Skip to content

K
kernel_linux

OpenHarmony / kernel_linux
上一次同步 4 年多

通知 15
Star 8
Fork 2
K
kernel_linux
切换分支/标签
  1. 24 3月, 2018 1 次提交
    • A
      perf annotate: Add "_local" to jump/offset validation routines · 2eff0611
      由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于 
      Because they all really check if we can access data structures/visual
constructs where a "jump" instruction targets code in the same function,
i.e. things like:

  __pthread_mutex_lock  /usr/lib64/libpthread-2.26.so
  1.95 │       mov    __pthread_force_elision,%ecx
       │    ┌──test   %ecx,%ecx
  0.07 │    ├──je     60
       │    │  test   $0x300,%esi
       │    │↓ jne    60
       │    │  or     $0x100,%esi
       │    │  mov    %esi,0x10(%rdi)
       │ 42:│  mov    %esi,%edx
       │    │  lea    0x16(%r8),%rsi
       │    │  mov    %r8,%rdi
       │    │  and    $0x80,%edx
       │    │  add    $0x8,%rsp
       │    │→ jmpq   __lll_lock_elision
       │    │  nop
  0.29 │ 60:└─→and    $0x80,%esi
  0.07 │       mov    $0x1,%edi
  0.29 │       xor    %eax,%eax
  2.53 │       lock   cmpxchg %edi,(%r8)

And not things like that "jmpq __lll_lock_elision", that instead should behave
like a "call" instruction and "jump" to the disassembly of "___lll_lock_elision".

Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-3cwx39u3h66dfw9xjrlt7ca2@git.kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
      2eff0611
  3. 21 3月, 2018 29 次提交
  5. 05 3月, 2018 3 次提交
  7. 17 2月, 2018 1 次提交
    • J
      perf report: Fix wrong jump arrow · b40982e8
      由 Jin Yao 提交于 
      When we use perf report interactive annotate view, we can see
the position of jump arrow is not correct. For example,

1. perf record -b ...
2. perf report
3. In interactive mode, select Annotate 'function'

Percent│ IPC Cycle
       │                                if (flag)
  1.37 │0.4┌──   1      ↓ je     82
       │   │                                    x += x / y + y / x;
  0.00 │0.4│  1310        movsd  (%rsp),%xmm0
  0.00 │0.4│   565        movsd  0x8(%rsp),%xmm4
       │0.4│              movsd  0x8(%rsp),%xmm1
       │0.4│              movsd  (%rsp),%xmm3
       │0.4│              divsd  %xmm4,%xmm0
  0.00 │0.4│   579        divsd  %xmm3,%xmm1
       │0.4│              movsd  (%rsp),%xmm2
       │0.4│              addsd  %xmm1,%xmm0
       │0.4│              addsd  %xmm2,%xmm0
  0.00 │0.4│              movsd  %xmm0,(%rsp)
       │   │                    volatile double x = 1212121212, y = 121212;
       │   │
       │   │                    s_randseed = time(0);
       │   │                    srand(s_randseed);
       │   │
       │   │                    for (i = 0; i < 2000000000; i++) {
  1.37 │0.4└─→      82:   sub    $0x1,%ebx
 28.21 │0.48    17      ↑ jne    38

The jump arrow in above example is not correct. It should add the
width of IPC and Cycle.

With this patch, the result is:

Percent│ IPC Cycle
       │                                if (flag)
  1.37 │0.48     1     ┌──je     82
       │               │                        x += x / y + y / x;
  0.00 │0.48  1310     │  movsd  (%rsp),%xmm0
  0.00 │0.48   565     │  movsd  0x8(%rsp),%xmm4
       │0.48           │  movsd  0x8(%rsp),%xmm1
       │0.48           │  movsd  (%rsp),%xmm3
       │0.48           │  divsd  %xmm4,%xmm0
  0.00 │0.48   579     │  divsd  %xmm3,%xmm1
       │0.48           │  movsd  (%rsp),%xmm2
       │0.48           │  addsd  %xmm1,%xmm0
       │0.48           │  addsd  %xmm2,%xmm0
  0.00 │0.48           │  movsd  %xmm0,(%rsp)
       │               │        volatile double x = 1212121212, y = 121212;
       │               │
       │               │        s_randseed = time(0);
       │               │        srand(s_randseed);
       │               │
       │               │        for (i = 0; i < 2000000000; i++) {
  1.37 │0.48        82:└─→sub    $0x1,%ebx
 28.21 │0.48    17      ↑ jne    38

Committer notes:

Please note that only from LBRv5 (according to Jiri) onwards, i.e. >=
Skylake is that we'll have the cycles counts in each branch record
entry, so to see the Cycles and IPC columns, and be able to test this
patch, one need a capable hardware.

While applying this I first tested it on a Broadwell class machine and
couldn't get those columns, will add code to the annotate browser to
warn the user about that, i.e. you have branch records, but no cycles,
use a more recent hardware to get the cycles and IPC columns.
Signed-off-by: NJin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jin Yao <yao.jin@intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1517223473-14750-1-git-send-email-yao.jin@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
      b40982e8
  9. 27 12月, 2017 1 次提交
  11. 17 11月, 2017 5 次提交