Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>

Sysbench thinks SD_BALANCE_WAKE is too agressive and kbuild doesn't
really mind too much, SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE picks up most of the
slack.

On a dual socket, quad core, dual thread nehalem system:

sysbench (--num_threads=16):

 SD_BALANCE_WAKE-: 13982 tx/s
 SD_BALANCE_WAKE+: 15688 tx/s

kbuild (-j16):

 SD_BALANCE_WAKE-: 47.648295846  seconds time elapsed   ( +-   0.312% )
 SD_BALANCE_WAKE+: 47.608607360  seconds time elapsed   ( +-   0.026% )

(same within noise)
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

If we're looking to place a new task, we might as well find the
idlest position _now_, not 1 tick ago.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

Make the idle balancer more agressive, to improve a
x264 encoding workload provided by Jason Garrett-Glaser:

 NEXT_BUDDY NO_LB_BIAS
 encoded 600 frames, 252.82 fps, 22096.60 kb/s
 encoded 600 frames, 250.69 fps, 22096.60 kb/s
 encoded 600 frames, 245.76 fps, 22096.60 kb/s

 NO_NEXT_BUDDY LB_BIAS
 encoded 600 frames, 344.44 fps, 22096.60 kb/s
 encoded 600 frames, 346.66 fps, 22096.60 kb/s
 encoded 600 frames, 352.59 fps, 22096.60 kb/s

 NO_NEXT_BUDDY NO_LB_BIAS
 encoded 600 frames, 425.75 fps, 22096.60 kb/s
 encoded 600 frames, 425.45 fps, 22096.60 kb/s
 encoded 600 frames, 422.49 fps, 22096.60 kb/s

Peter pointed out that this is better done via newidle_idx,
not via LB_BIAS, newidle balancing should look for where
there is load _now_, not where there was load 2 ticks ago.

Worst-case latencies are improved as well as no buddies
means less vruntime spread. (as per prior lkml discussions)

This change improves kbuild-peak parallelism as well.
Reported-by: NJason Garrett-Glaser <darkshikari@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <1253011667.9128.16.camel@marge.simson.net>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

When merging select_task_rq_fair() and sched_balance_self() we lost
the use of wake_idx, restore that and set them to 0 to make wake
balancing more aggressive.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

The problem with wake_idle() is that is doesn't respect things like
cpu_power, which means it doesn't deal well with SMT nor the recent
RT interaction.

To cure this, it needs to do what sched_balance_self() does, which
leads to the possibility of merging select_task_rq_fair() and
sched_balance_self().

Modify sched_balance_self() to:

  - update_shares() when walking up the domain tree,
    (it only called it for the top domain, but it should
     have done this anyway), which allows us to remove
    this ugly bit from try_to_wake_up().

  - do wake_affine() on the smallest domain that contains
    both this (the waking) and the prev (the wakee) cpu for
    WAKE invocations.

Then use the top-down balance steps it had to replace wake_idle().

This leads to the dissapearance of SD_WAKE_BALANCE and
SD_WAKE_IDLE_FAR, with SD_WAKE_IDLE replaced with SD_BALANCE_WAKE.

SD_WAKE_AFFINE needs SD_BALANCE_WAKE to be effective.

Touch all topology bits to replace the old with new SD flags --
platforms might need re-tuning, enabling SD_BALANCE_WAKE
conditionally on a NUMA distance seems like a good additional
feature, magny-core and small nehalem systems would want this
enabled, systems with slow interconnects would not.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

cpumask_of_pcibus() is the new version.
Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>

Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>

Everyone defines it, and only one person uses it
(arch/mips/sgi-ip27/ip27-nmi.c).  So just open code it there.
Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org

Impact: New APIs

The old node_to_cpumask/node_to_pcibus returned a cpumask_t: these
return a pointer to a struct cpumask.  Part of removing cpumasks from
the stack.
Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>

Mathieu Desnoyers reported this build failure on powerpc:

 kernel/sched.c: In function 'sd_init_NODE':
 kernel/sched.c:7319: error: non-static initialization of a flexible array member
 kernel/sched.c:7319: error: (near initialization for '(anonymous)')

this happens because .span changed to cpumask_var_t, hence
the static CPU_MASK_NONE initializers in the SD_*_INIT
templates are not type-correct anymore.

Remove them, as they default to empty anyway.

Also remove them from IA64, MIPS and SH.
Reported-by: NMathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

This follows the sparc changes a439fe51.

Most of the moving about was done with Sam's directions at:

http://marc.info/?l=linux-sh&m=121724823706062&w=2

with subsequent hacking and fixups entirely my fault.
Signed-off-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>

Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>

[rebased for sched-devel/latest]

 - Add a new cpuset file, having levels:
     sched_relax_domain_level

 - Modify partition_sched_domains() and build_sched_domains()
   to take attributes parameter passed from cpuset.

 - Fill newidle_idx for node domains which currently unused but
   might be required if sched_relax_domain_level become higher.

 - We can change the default level by boot option 'relax_domain_level='.
Signed-off-by: NHidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

This adds basic support for multiple nodes on SH machines.
This is primarily useful for boards with many different
memory blocks that are otherwise unused (SH7722/SH7785 URAM
and so forth).
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>

Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.

Let it rip!