Skip to content

K
kernel_linux

OpenHarmony / kernel_linux
上一次同步 3 年多

通知 13
Star 8
Fork 2
K
kernel_linux
切换分支/标签
  1. 19 6月, 2008 2 次提交
    • P
      sched: rt-group: fix hierarchy · 7ea56616
      由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于 
      Don't re-set the entity's runqueue to the wrong rq after we've set it
to the right one.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Tested-by: NDaniel K. <dk@uw.no>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      7ea56616
    • D
      sched: NULL pointer dereference while setting sched_rt_period_us · 49307fd6
      由 Dario Faggioli 提交于 
      When CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED and CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED are enabled, with:

 echo 10000 > /proc/sys/kernel/sched_rt_period_us

We get this:

 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000008c
 [  947.682233] IP: [<c0216b72>] __rt_schedulable+0x12/0x160
 [  947.683123] *pde = 00000000=20
 [  947.683782] Oops: 0000 [#1]
 [  947.684307] Modules linked in:
 [  947.684308]
 [  947.684308] Pid: 2359, comm: bash Not tainted (2.6.26-rc6 #8)
 [  947.684308] EIP: 0060:[<c0216b72>] EFLAGS: 00000246 CPU: 0
 [  947.684308] EIP is at __rt_schedulable+0x12/0x160
 [  947.684308] EAX: 00000000 EBX: 00000000 ECX: 00000000 EDX: 00000001
 [  947.684308] ESI: c0521db4 EDI: 00000001 EBP: c6cc9f00 ESP: c6cc9ed0
 [  947.684308]  DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 0068
 [  947.684308] Process bash (pid: 2359, tiÆcc8000 taskÇa54f00=20 task.tiÆcc8000)
 [  947.684308] Stack: c0222790 00000000 080f8c08 c0521db4 c6cc9f00 00000001 00000000 00000000
 [  947.684308]        c6cc9f9c 00000000 c0521db4 00000001 c6cc9f28 c0216d40 00000000 00000000
 [  947.684308]        c6cc9f9c 000f4240 000e7ef0 ffffffff c0521db4 c79dfb60 c6cc9f58 c02af2cc
 [  947.684308] Call Trace:
 [  947.684308]  [<c0222790>] ? do_proc_dointvec_conv+0x0/0x50
 [  947.684308]  [<c0216d40>] ? sched_rt_handler+0x80/0x110
 [  947.684308]  [<c02af2cc>] ? proc_sys_call_handler+0x9c/0xb0
 [  947.684308]  [<c02af2fa>] ? proc_sys_write+0x1a/0x20
 [  947.684308]  [<c0273c36>] ? vfs_write+0x96/0x160
 [  947.684308]  [<c02af2e0>] ? proc_sys_write+0x0/0x20
 [  947.684308]  [<c027423d>] ? sys_write+0x3d/0x70
 [  947.684308]  [<c0202ef5>] ? sysenter_past_esp+0x6a/0x91
 [  947.684308]  =======================
 [  947.684308] Code: 24 04 e8 62 b1 0e 00 89 c7 89 f8 8b 5d f4 8b 75
 f8 8b 7d fc 89 ec 5d c3 90 55 89 e5 57 56 53 83 ec 24 89 45 ec 89 55 e4
 89 4d e8 <8b> b8 8c 00 00 00 85 ff 0f 84 c9 00 00 00 8b 57 24 39 55 e8
 8b
 [  947.684308] EIP: [<c0216b72>] __rt_schedulable+0x12/0x160 SS:ESP  0068:c6cc9ed0

We think the following patch solves the issue.
Signed-off-by: NDario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it>
Signed-off-by: NMichael Trimarchi <trimarchimichael@yahoo.it>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      49307fd6
  3. 18 6月, 2008 1 次提交
    • D
      sched: rework of "prioritize non-migratable tasks over migratable ones" · 20b6331b
      由 Dmitry Adamushko 提交于 
      regarding this commit: 45c01e82

I think we can do it simpler. Please take a look at the patch below.

Instead of having 2 separate arrays (which is + ~800 bytes on x86_32 and
twice so on x86_64), let's add "exclusive" (the ones that are bound to
this CPU) tasks to the head of the queue and "shared" ones -- to the
end.

In case of a few newly woken up "exclusive" tasks, they are 'stacked'
(not queued as now), meaning that a task {i+1} is being placed in front
of the previously woken up task {i}. But I don't think that this
behavior may cause any realistic problems.

There are a couple of changes on top of this one.

(1) in check_preempt_curr_rt()

I don't think there is a need for the "pick_next_rt_entity(rq, &rq->rt)
!= &rq->curr->rt" check.

enqueue_task_rt(p) and check_preempt_curr_rt() are always called one
after another with rq->lock being held so the following check
"p->rt.nr_cpus_allowed == 1 && rq->curr->rt.nr_cpus_allowed != 1" should
be enough (well, just its left part) to guarantee that 'p' has been
queued in front of the 'curr'.

(2) in set_cpus_allowed_rt()

I don't thinks there is a need for requeue_task_rt() here.

Perhaps, the only case when 'requeue' (+ reschedule) might be useful is
as follows:

i) weight == 1 && cpu_isset(task_cpu(p), *new_mask)

i.e. a task is being bound to this CPU);

ii) 'p' != rq->curr

but here, 'p' has already been on this CPU for a while and was not
migrated. i.e. it's possible that 'rq->curr' would not have high chances
to be migrated right at this particular moment (although, has chance in
a bit longer term), should we allow it to be preempted.

Anyway, I think we should not perhaps make it more complex trying to
address some rare corner cases. For instance, that's why a single queue
approach would be preferable. Unless I'm missing something obvious, this
approach gives us similar functionality at lower cost.

Verified only compilation-wise.

(Almost)-Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      20b6331b
  5. 17 6月, 2008 1 次提交
  7. 12 6月, 2008 2 次提交
    • L
      sched: 64-bit: fix arithmetics overflow · 7a232e03
      由 Lai Jiangshan 提交于 
      (overflow means weight >= 2^32 here, because inv_weigh = 2^32/weight)

A weight of a cfs_rq is the sum of weights of which entities
are queued on this cfs_rq, so it will overflow when there are
too many entities.

Although, overflow occurs very rarely, but it break fairness when
it occurs. 64-bits systems have more memory than 32-bit systems
and 64-bit systems can create more process usually, so overflow may
occur more frequently.

This patch guarantees fairness when overflow happens on 64-bit systems.
Thanks to the optimization of compiler, it changes nothing on 32-bit.
Signed-off-by: NLai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      7a232e03
    • L
      sched: fair group: fix overflow(was: fix divide by zero) · 2e084786
      由 Lai Jiangshan 提交于 
      I found a bug which can be reproduced by this way:(linux-2.6.26-rc5, x86-64)
(use 2^32, 2^33, ...., 2^63 as shares value)

# mkdir /dev/cpuctl
# mount -t cgroup -o cpu cpuctl /dev/cpuctl
# cd /dev/cpuctl
# mkdir sub
# echo 0x8000000000000000 > sub/cpu.shares
# echo $$ > sub/tasks
oops here! divide by zero.

This is because do_div() expects the 2th parameter to be 32 bits,
but unsigned long is 64 bits in x86_64.

Peter Zijstra pointed it out that the sane thing to do is limit the
shares value to something smaller instead of using an even more
expensive divide.

Also, I found another bug about "the shares value is too large":

pid1 and pid2 are set affinity to cpu#0
pid1 is attached to cg1 and pid2 is attached to cg2

if cg1/cpu.shares = 1024 cg2/cpu.shares = 2000000000
then pid2 got 100% usage of cpu, and pid1 0%

if cg1/cpu.shares = 1024 cg2/cpu.shares = 20000000000
then pid2 got 0% usage of cpu, and pid1 100%

And a weight of a cfs_rq is the sum of weights of which entities
are queued on this cfs_rq, so the shares value should be limited
to a smaller value.

I think that (1UL << 18) is a good limited value:

1) it's not too large, we can create a lot of group before overflow
2) it's several times the weight value for nice=-19 (not too small)
Signed-off-by: NLai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      2e084786
  9. 10 6月, 2008 4 次提交
    • P
      sched: kill off dead cfs_rq_set_shares() · e9886ca3
      由 Paul Mundt 提交于 
      Building with CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED=y on UP results in an unused
cfs_rq_set_shares() reference. As nothing is using this dummy function
in the first place, just kill it off.
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      e9886ca3
    • D
      sched: prevent bound kthreads from changing cpus_allowed · 9985b0ba
      由 David Rientjes 提交于 
      Kthreads that have called kthread_bind() are bound to specific cpus, so
other tasks should not be able to change their cpus_allowed from under
them.  Otherwise, it is possible to move kthreads, such as the migration
or software watchdog threads, so they are not allowed access to the cpu
they work on.

Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Paul Menage <menage@google.com>
Cc: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      9985b0ba
    • P
      sched: fix hotplug cpus on ia64 · 7def2be1
      由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于 
      Cliff Wickman wrote:

> I built an ia64 kernel from Andrew's tree (2.6.26-rc2-mm1)
> and get a very predictable hotplug cpu problem.
> billberry1:/tmp/cpw # ./dis
> disabled cpu 17
> enabled cpu 17
> billberry1:/tmp/cpw # ./dis
> disabled cpu 17
> enabled cpu 17
> billberry1:/tmp/cpw # ./dis
>
> The script that disables the cpu always hangs (unkillable)
> on the 3rd attempt.
>
> And a bit further:
> The kstopmachine thread always sits on the run queue (real time) for about
> 30 minutes before running.

this fix solves some (but not all) issues between CPU hotplug and
RT bandwidth throttling.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      7def2be1
    • O
      sched: fix TASK_WAKEKILL vs SIGKILL race · 16882c1e
      由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于 
      schedule() has the special "TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE && signal_pending()" case,
this allows us to do

	current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
	schedule();

without fear to sleep with pending signal.

However, the code like

	current->state = TASK_KILLABLE;
	schedule();

is not right, schedule() doesn't take TASK_WAKEKILL into account. This means
that mutex_lock_killable(), wait_for_completion_killable(), down_killable(),
schedule_timeout_killable() can miss SIGKILL (and btw the second SIGKILL has
no effect).

Introduce the new helper, signal_pending_state(), and change schedule() to
use it. Hopefully it will have more users, that is why the task's state is
passed separately.

Note this "__TASK_STOPPED | __TASK_TRACED" check in signal_pending_state().
This is needed to preserve the current behaviour (ptrace_notify). I hope
this check will be removed soon, but this (afaics good) change needs the
separate discussion.

The fast path is "(state & (INTERRUPTIBLE | WAKEKILL)) + signal_pending(p)",
basically the same that schedule() does now. However, this patch of course
bloats schedule().
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      16882c1e
  11. 06 6月, 2008 13 次提交
  13. 29 5月, 2008 4 次提交
  15. 15 5月, 2008 1 次提交
  17. 12 5月, 2008 1 次提交
    • L
      Add new 'cond_resched_bkl()' helper function · c3921ab7
      由 Linus Torvalds 提交于 
      It acts exactly like a regular 'cond_resched()', but will not get
optimized away when CONFIG_PREEMPT is set.

Normal kernel code is already preemptable in the presense of
CONFIG_PREEMPT, so cond_resched() is optimized away (see commit
02b67cc3 "sched: do not do
cond_resched() when CONFIG_PREEMPT").

But when wanting to conditionally reschedule while holding a lock, you
need to use "cond_sched_lock(lock)", and the new function is the BKL
equivalent of that.

Also make fs/locks.c use it.
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      c3921ab7
  19. 11 5月, 2008 1 次提交
    • L
      BKL: revert back to the old spinlock implementation · 8e3e076c
      由 Linus Torvalds 提交于 
      The generic semaphore rewrite had a huge performance regression on AIM7
(and potentially other BKL-heavy benchmarks) because the generic
semaphores had been rewritten to be simple to understand and fair.  The
latter, in particular, turns a semaphore-based BKL implementation into a
mess of scheduling.

The attempt to fix the performance regression failed miserably (see the
previous commit 00b41ec2 'Revert
"semaphore: fix"'), and so for now the simple and sane approach is to
instead just go back to the old spinlock-based BKL implementation that
never had any issues like this.

This patch also has the advantage of being reported to fix the
regression completely according to Yanmin Zhang, unlike the semaphore
hack which still left a couple percentage point regression.

As a spinlock, the BKL obviously has the potential to be a latency
issue, but it's not really any different from any other spinlock in that
respect.  We do want to get rid of the BKL asap, but that has been the
plan for several years.

These days, the biggest users are in the tty layer (open/release in
particular) and Alan holds out some hope:

  "tty release is probably a few months away from getting cured - I'm
   afraid it will almost certainly be the very last user of the BKL in
   tty to get fixed as it depends on everything else being sanely locked."

so while we're not there yet, we do have a plan of action.
Tested-by: NYanmin Zhang <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      8e3e076c
  21. 06 5月, 2008 10 次提交