- 18 2月, 2015 8 次提交
-
-
由 Davidlohr Bueso 提交于
37e95624 ("locking/rwsem: Allow conservative optimistic spinning when readers have lock") forced the default for optimistic spinning to be disabled if the lock owner was nil, which makes much sense for readers. However, while it is not our priority, we can make some optimizations for write-mostly workloads. We can bail the spinning step and still be conservative if there are any active tasks, otherwise there's really no reason not to spin, as the semaphore is most likely unlocked. This patch recovers most of a Unixbench 'execl' benchmark throughput by sleeping less and making better average system usage: before: CPU %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle all 0.60 0.00 8.02 0.00 0.00 91.38 after: CPU %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle all 1.22 0.00 70.18 0.00 0.00 28.60 Signed-off-by: NDavidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: NJason Low <jason.low2@hp.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1422609267-15102-6-git-send-email-dave@stgolabs.netSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Davidlohr Bueso 提交于
When readers hold the semaphore, the ->owner is nil. As such, and unlike mutexes, '!owner' does not necessarily imply that the lock is free. This will cause writers to potentially spin excessively as they've been mislead to thinking they have a chance of acquiring the lock, instead of blocking. This patch therefore enhances the counter check when the owner is not set by the time we've broken out of the loop. Otherwise we can return true as a new owner has the lock and thus we want to continue spinning. While at it, we can make rwsem_spin_on_owner() less ambiguos and return right away under need_resched conditions. Signed-off-by: NDavidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1422609267-15102-5-git-send-email-dave@stgolabs.netSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Davidlohr Bueso 提交于
In order to optimize the spinning step, we need to set the lock owner as soon as the lock is acquired; after a successful counter cmpxchg operation, that is. This is particularly useful as rwsems need to set the owner to nil for readers, so there is a greater chance of falling out of the spinning. Currently we only set the owner much later in the game, in the more generic level -- latency can be specially bad when waiting for a node->next pointer when releasing the osq in up_write calls. As such, update the owner inside rwsem_try_write_lock (when the lock is obtained after blocking) and rwsem_try_write_lock_unqueued (when the lock is obtained while spinning). This requires creating a new internal rwsem.h header to share the owner related calls. Also cleanup some headers for mutex and rwsem. Suggested-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NDavidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1422609267-15102-4-git-send-email-dave@stgolabs.netSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Davidlohr Bueso 提交于
The need for the smp_mb() in __rwsem_do_wake() should be properly documented. Applies to both xadd and spinlock variants. Signed-off-by: NDavidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1422609267-15102-3-git-send-email-dave@stgolabs.netSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于
attach_to_pi_owner() checks p->mm to prevent attaching to kthreads and this looks doubly wrong: 1. It should actually check PF_KTHREAD, kthread can do use_mm(). 2. If this task is not kthread and it is actually the lock owner we can wrongly return -EPERM instead of -ESRCH or retry-if-EAGAIN. And note that this wrong EPERM is the likely case unless the exiting task is (auto)reaped quickly, we check ->mm before PF_EXITING. Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Darren Hart <darren@dvhart.com> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com> Cc: Larry Woodman <lwoodman@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mateusz Guzik <mguzik@redhat.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150202140536.GA26406@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Jason Low 提交于
As suggested by Davidlohr, we could refactor mutex_spin_on_owner(). Currently, we split up owner_running() with mutex_spin_on_owner(). When the owner changes, we make duplicate owner checks which are not necessary. It also makes the code a bit obscure as we are using a second check to figure out why we broke out of the loop. This patch modifies it such that we remove the owner_running() function and the mutex_spin_on_owner() loop directly checks for if the owner changes, if the owner is not running, or if we need to reschedule. If the owner changes, we break out of the loop and return true. If the owner is not running or if we need to reschedule, then break out of the loop and return false. Suggested-by: NDavidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Signed-off-by: NJason Low <jason.low2@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@hp.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Cc: chegu_vinod@hp.com Cc: tglx@linutronix.de Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1422914367-5574-3-git-send-email-jason.low2@hp.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Jason Low 提交于
In the mutex_spin_on_owner(), we return true only if lock->owner == NULL. This was beneficial in situations where there were multiple threads simultaneously spinning for the mutex. If another thread got the lock while other spinner(s) were also doing mutex_spin_on_owner(), then the other spinners would stop spinning. This workaround helped reduce the chance that many spinners were simultaneously spinning for the mutex which can help reduce contention in highly contended cases. However, recent changes were made to the optimistic spinning code such that instead of having all spinners simultaneously spin for the mutex, we queue the spinners with an MCS lock such that only one thread spins for the mutex at a time. Furthermore, the OSQ optimizations ensure that spinners in the queue will stop waiting if it needs to reschedule. Now, we don't have to worry about multiple threads spinning on owner at the same time, and if lock->owner is not NULL at this point, it likely means another thread happens to obtain the lock in the fastpath. In this case, it would make sense for the spinner to continue spinning as long as the spinner doesn't need to schedule and the mutex owner is running. This patch changes this so that mutex_spin_on_owner() returns true when the lock owner changes, which means a thread will only stop spinning if it either needs to reschedule or if the lock owner is not running. We saw up to a 5% performance improvement in the fserver workload with this patch. Signed-off-by: NJason Low <jason.low2@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: NDavidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@hp.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Cc: chegu_vinod@hp.com Cc: tglx@linutronix.de Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1422914367-5574-2-git-send-email-jason.low2@hp.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
With task_blocks_on_rt_mutex() returning early -EDEADLK we never add the waiter to the waitqueue. Later, we try to remove it via remove_waiter() and go boom in rt_mutex_top_waiter() because rb_entry() gives a NULL pointer. ( Tested on v3.18-RT where rtmutex is used for regular mutex and I tried to get one twice in a row. ) Not sure when this started but I guess 397335f0 ("rtmutex: Fix deadlock detector for real") or commit 3d5c9340 ("rtmutex: Handle deadlock detection smarter"). Signed-off-by: NSebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # for v3.16 and later kernels Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1424187823-19600-1-git-send-email-bigeasy@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 05 2月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 John Stultz 提交于
I noticed some CLOCK_TAI timer test failures on one of my less-frequently used configurations. And after digging in I found in 76f41088 (Cleanup hrtimer accessors to the timekepeing state), the hrtimer_get_softirq_time tai offset calucation was incorrectly rewritten, as the tai offset we return shold be from CLOCK_MONOTONIC, and not CLOCK_REALTIME. This results in CLOCK_TAI timers expiring early on non-highres capable machines. This patch fixes the issue, calculating the tai time properly from the monotonic base. Signed-off-by: NJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.17+ Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1423097126-10236-1-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 04 2月, 2015 20 次提交
-
-
由 Mark Rutland 提交于
Currently the adjusments made as part of perf_event_task_tick() use the percpu rotation lists to iterate over any active PMU contexts, but these are not used by the context rotation code, having been replaced by separate (per-context) hrtimer callbacks. However, some manipulation of the rotation lists (i.e. removal of contexts) has remained in perf_rotate_context(). This leads to the following issues: * Contexts are not always removed from the rotation lists. Removal of PMUs which have been placed in rotation lists, but have not been removed by a hrtimer callback can result in corruption of the rotation lists (when memory backing the context is freed). This has been observed to result in hangs when PMU drivers built as modules are inserted and removed around the creation of events for said PMUs. * Contexts which do not require rotation may be removed from the rotation lists as a result of a hrtimer, and will not be considered by the unthrottling code in perf_event_task_tick. This patch fixes the issue by updating the rotation ist when events are scheduled in/out, ensuring that each rotation list stays in sync with the HW state. As each event holds a refcount on the module of its PMU, this ensures that when a PMU module is unloaded none of its CPU contexts can be in a rotation list. By maintaining a list of perf_event_contexts rather than perf_event_cpu_contexts, we don't need separate paths to handle the cpu and task contexts, which also makes the code a little simpler. As the rotation_list variables are not used for rotation, these are renamed to active_ctx_list, which better matches their current function. perf_pmu_rotate_{start,stop} are renamed to perf_pmu_ctx_{activate,deactivate}. Reported-by: NJohannes Jensen <johannes.jensen@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> Cc: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150129134511.GR17721@leverpostejSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> -
由 Mark Rutland 提交于
When initialising an event, perf_init_event will call try_module_get() to ensure that the PMU's module cannot be removed for the lifetime of the event, with __free_event() dropping the reference when the event is finally destroyed. If something fails after the event has been initialised, but before the event is installed, perf_event_alloc will drop the reference on the module. However, if we fail to initialise an event for some reason (e.g. we ask an uncore PMU to perform sampling, and it refuses to initialise the event), we do not drop the refcount. If we try to open such a bogus event without a precise IDR type, we will loop over each PMU in the pmus list, incrementing each of their refcounts without decrementing them. This patch adds a module_put when pmu->event_init(event) fails, ensuring that the refcounts are balanced in failure cases. As the innards of the precise and search based initialisation look very similar, this logic is hoisted out into a new helper function. While the early return for the failed try_module_get is removed from the search case, this is handled by the remaining return when ret is not -ENOENT. Signed-off-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1420642611-22667-1-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Jiri Olsa 提交于
Currently we flag available data (via poll syscall) on perf fd with POLL_IN macro, which is normally used for SIGIO interface. We've been lucky, because POLLIN (0x1) is subset of POLL_IN (0x20001) and sys_poll (do_pollfd function) cut the extra bit out (0x20000). Signed-off-by: NJiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1422467678-22341-1-git-send-email-jolsa@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
So what I suspect; but I'm in zombie mode today it seems; is that while I initially thought that it was impossible for ctx to change when refcount dropped to 0, I now suspect its possible. Note that until perf_remove_from_context() the event is still active and visible on the lists. So a concurrent sys_perf_event_open() from another task into this task can race. Reported-by: NVince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@gmail.com> Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150129134434.GB26304@twins.programming.kicks-ass.netSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Peter Zijlstra (Intel) 提交于
Jiri reported triggering the new WARN_ON_ONCE in event_sched_out over the weekend: event_sched_out.isra.79+0x2b9/0x2d0 group_sched_out+0x69/0xc0 ctx_sched_out+0x106/0x130 task_ctx_sched_out+0x37/0x70 __perf_install_in_context+0x70/0x1a0 remote_function+0x48/0x60 generic_exec_single+0x15b/0x1d0 smp_call_function_single+0x67/0xa0 task_function_call+0x53/0x80 perf_install_in_context+0x8b/0x110 I think the below should cure this; if we install a group leader it will iterate the (still intact) group list and find its siblings and try and install those too -- even though those still have the old event->ctx -- in the new ctx. Upon installing the first group sibling we'd try and schedule out the group and trigger the above warn. Fix this by installing the group leader last, installing siblings would have no effect, they're not reachable through the group lists and therefore we don't schedule them. Also delay resetting the state until we're absolutely sure the events are quiescent. Reported-by: NJiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Reported-by: vincent.weaver@maine.edu Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150126162639.GA21418@twins.programming.kicks-ass.netSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
There have been a few reported issues wrt. the lack of locking around changing event->ctx. This patch tries to address those. It avoids the whole rwsem thing; and while it appears to work, please give it some thought in review. What I did fail at is sensible runtime checks on the use of event->ctx, the RCU use makes it very hard. Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150123125834.209535886@infradead.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
Add a few WARN()s to catch things that should never happen. Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150123125834.150481799@infradead.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Davidlohr Bueso 提交于
We explicitly mark the task running after returning from a __rt_mutex_slowlock() call, which does the actual sleeping via wait-wake-trylocking. As such, this patch does two things: (1) refactors the code so that setting current to TASK_RUNNING is done by __rt_mutex_slowlock(), and not by the callers. The downside to this is that it becomes a bit unclear when at what point we block. As such I've added a comment that the task blocks when calling __rt_mutex_slowlock() so readers can figure out when it is running again. (2) relaxes setting current's state through __set_current_state(), instead of it's more expensive barrier alternative. There was no need for the implied barrier as we're obviously not planning on blocking. Signed-off-by: NDavidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1422857784.18096.1.camel@stgolabs.netSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> -
由 Davidlohr Bueso 提交于
Call __set_task_state() instead of assigning the new state directly. These interfaces also aid CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP environments, keeping track of who last changed the state. Signed-off-by: NDavidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1422257769-14083-2-git-send-email-dave@stgolabs.netSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Nicholas Mc Guire 提交于
The "thread would block" case can be checked without grabbing ->wait.lock. [ If the check does not return early then grab the lock and recheck. A memory barrier is not needed as complete() and complete_all() imply a barrier. The ACCESS_ONCE() is needed for calls in a loop that, if inlined, could optimize out the re-fetching of x->done. ] Signed-off-by: NNicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@hofr.at> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1422013307-13200-1-git-send-email-der.herr@hofr.atSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Nicholas Mc Guire 提交于
Signed-off-by: NNicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@hofr.at> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1421467534-22834-1-git-send-email-der.herr@hofr.atSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Davidlohr Bueso 提交于
By the time we wake up and get the lock after being asleep in the slowpath, we better be running. As good practice, be explicit about this and avoid any mischief. Signed-off-by: NDavidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1421717961.4903.11.camel@stgolabs.netSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Sharon Dvir 提交于
The second 'mutex' shouldn't be there, it can't be about the mutex, as the mutex can't be freed, but unlocked, the memory where the mutex resides however, can be freed. Signed-off-by: NSharon Dvir <sharon.dvir1@mail.huji.ac.il> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1422827252-31363-1-git-send-email-sharon.dvir1@mail.huji.ac.ilSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Frederic Weisbecker 提交于
__schedule() disables preemption during its job and re-enables it afterward without doing a preemption check to avoid recursion. But if an event happens after the context switch which requires rescheduling, we need to check again if a task of a higher priority needs the CPU. A preempt irq can raise such a situation. To handle that, __schedule() loops on need_resched(). But preempt_schedule_*() functions, which call __schedule(), also loop on need_resched() to handle missed preempt irqs. Hence we end up with the same loop happening twice. Lets simplify that by attributing the need_resched() loop responsibility to all __schedule() callers. There is a risk that the outer loop now handles reschedules that used to be handled by the inner loop with the added overhead of caller details (inc/dec of PREEMPT_ACTIVE, irq save/restore) but assuming those inner rescheduling loop weren't too frequent, this shouldn't matter. Especially since the whole preemption path is now losing one loop in any case. Suggested-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1422404652-29067-2-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Xunlei Pang 提交于
cpu_active_mask is rarely changed (only on hotplug), so remove this operation to gain a little performance. If there is a change in cpu_active_mask, rq_online_dl() and rq_offline_dl() should take care of it normally, so cpudl::free_cpus carries enough information for us. For the rare case when a task is put onto a dying cpu (which rq_offline_dl() can't handle in a timely fashion), it will be handled through _cpu_down()->...->multi_cpu_stop()->migration_call() ->migrate_tasks(), preventing the task from hanging on the dead cpu. Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NXunlei Pang <pang.xunlei@linaro.org> [peterz: changelog] Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1421642980-10045-2-git-send-email-pang.xunlei@linaro.org Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Wanpeng Li 提交于
The commit 177ef2a6 ("sched/deadline: Fix a precision problem in the microseconds range") forgot to change the UP version of hrtick_start(), do so now. Signed-off-by: NWanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com> Fixes: 177ef2a6 ("sched/deadline: Fix a precision problem in the microseconds range") [ Fixed the changelog. ] Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> Cc: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1416962647-76792-7-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Wanpeng Li 提交于
There is no need to dequeue/enqueue and push/pull if there are no scheduling parameters changed for the DL class. Both fair and RT classes already check if parameters changed for them to avoid unnecessary overhead. This patch add the parameters changed test for the DL class in order to reduce overhead. Signed-off-by: NWanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com> [ Fixed up the changelog. ] Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> Cc: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1416962647-76792-5-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
When we fail to start the deadline timer in update_curr_dl(), we forget to clear ->dl_yielded, resulting in wrecked time keeping. Since the natural place to clear both ->dl_yielded and ->dl_throttled is in replenish_dl_entity(); both are after all waiting for that event; make it so. Luckily since 67dfa1b7 ("sched/deadline: Implement cancel_dl_timer() to use in switched_from_dl()") the task_on_rq_queued() condition in dl_task_timer() must be true, and can therefore call enqueue_task_dl() unconditionally. Reported-by: NWanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1416962647-76792-4-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Wanpeng Li 提交于
After update_curr_dl() the current task might not be the leftmost task anymore. In that case do not start a new hrtick for it. In this case NEED_RESCHED will be set and the next schedule will start the hrtick for the new task if and when appropriate. Signed-off-by: NWanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NJuri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> [ Rewrote the changelog and comment. ] Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1416962647-76792-2-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
Commit 67dfa1b7 ("sched/deadline: Implement cancel_dl_timer() to use in switched_from_dl()") removed the hrtimer_try_cancel() function call out from init_dl_task_timer(), which gets called from __setparam_dl(). The result is that we can now re-init the timer while its active -- this is bad and corrupts timer state. Furthermore; changing the parameters of an active deadline task is tricky in that you want to maintain guarantees, while immediately effective change would allow one to circumvent the CBS guarantees -- this too is bad, as one (bad) task should not be able to affect the others. Rework things to avoid both problems. We only need to initialize the timer once, so move that to __sched_fork() for new tasks. Then make sure __setparam_dl() doesn't affect the current running state but only updates the parameters used to calculate the next scheduling period -- this guarantees the CBS functions as expected (albeit slightly pessimistic). This however means we need to make sure __dl_clear_params() needs to reset the active state otherwise new (and tasks flipping between classes) will not properly (re)compute their first instance. Todo: close class flipping CBS hole. Todo: implement delayed BW release. Reported-by: NLuca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it> Acked-by: NJuri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> Tested-by: NLuca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it> Fixes: 67dfa1b7 ("sched/deadline: Implement cancel_dl_timer() to use in switched_from_dl()") Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@yandex.ru> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150128140803.GF23038@twins.programming.kicks-ass.netSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 02 2月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Commit 8eb23b9f ("sched: Debug nested sleeps") added code to report on nested sleep conditions, which we generally want to avoid because the inner sleeping operation can re-set the thread state to TASK_RUNNING, but that will then cause the outer sleep loop not actually sleep when it calls schedule. However, that's actually valid traditional behavior, with the inner sleep being some fairly rare case (like taking a sleeping lock that normally doesn't actually need to sleep). And the debug code would actually change the state of the task to TASK_RUNNING internally, which makes that kind of traditional and working code not work at all, because now the nested sleep doesn't just sometimes cause the outer one to not block, but will cause it to happen every time. In particular, it will cause the cardbus kernel daemon (pccardd) to basically busy-loop doing scheduling, converting a laptop into a heater, as reported by Bruno Prémont. But there may be other legacy uses of that nested sleep model in other drivers that are also likely to never get converted to the new model. This fixes both cases: - don't set TASK_RUNNING when the nested condition happens (note: even if WARN_ONCE() only _warns_ once, the return value isn't whether the warning happened, but whether the condition for the warning was true. So despite the warning only happening once, the "if (WARN_ON(..))" would trigger for every nested sleep. - in the cases where we knowingly disable the warning by using "sched_annotate_sleep()", don't change the task state (that is used for all core scheduling decisions), instead use '->task_state_change' that is used for the debugging decision itself. (Credit for the second part of the fix goes to Oleg Nesterov: "Can't we avoid this subtle change in behaviour DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP adds?" with the suggested change to use 'task_state_change' as part of the test) Reported-and-bisected-by: NBruno Prémont <bonbons@linux-vserver.org> Tested-by: NRafael J Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Acked-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Cc: Ilya Dryomov <ilya.dryomov@inktank.com>, Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>, Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>, Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 31 1月, 2015 4 次提交
-
-
由 Xunlei Pang 提交于
Currently, cpudl::free_cpus contains all CPUs during init, see cpudl_init(). When calling cpudl_find(), we have to add rd->span to avoid selecting the cpu outside the current root domain, because cpus_allowed cannot be depended on when performing clustered scheduling using the cpuset, see find_later_rq(). This patch adds cpudl_set_freecpu() and cpudl_clear_freecpu() for changing cpudl::free_cpus when doing rq_online_dl()/rq_offline_dl(), so we can avoid the rd->span operation when calling cpudl_find() in find_later_rq(). Signed-off-by: NXunlei Pang <pang.xunlei@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1421642980-10045-1-git-send-email-pang.xunlei@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Preeti U Murthy 提交于
cpu_idle_poll() is entered into when either the cpu_idle_force_poll is set or tick_check_broadcast_expired() returns true. The exit condition from cpu_idle_poll() is tif_need_resched(). However this does not take into account scenarios where cpu_idle_force_poll changes or tick_check_broadcast_expired() returns false, without setting the resched flag. So a cpu will be caught in cpu_idle_poll() needlessly, thereby wasting power. Add an explicit check on cpu_idle_force_poll and tick_check_broadcast_expired() to the exit condition of cpu_idle_poll() to avoid this. Signed-off-by: NPreeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150121105655.15279.59626.stgit@preeti.in.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Frederic Weisbecker 提交于
If an interrupt fires in cond_resched(), between the call to __schedule() and the PREEMPT_ACTIVE count decrementation, and that interrupt sets TIF_NEED_RESCHED, the call to preempt_schedule_irq() will be ignored due to the PREEMPT_ACTIVE count. This kind of scenario, with irq preemption being delayed because it's interrupting a preempt-disabled area, is usually fixed up after preemption is re-enabled back with an explicit call to preempt_schedule(). This is what preempt_enable() does but a raw preempt count decrement as performed by __preempt_count_sub(PREEMPT_ACTIVE) doesn't handle delayed preemption check. Therefore when such a race happens, the rescheduling is going to be delayed until the next scheduler or preemption entrypoint. This can be a problem for scheduler latency sensitive workloads. Lets fix that by consolidating cond_resched() with preempt_schedule() internals. Reported-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Reported-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Original-patch-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1421946484-9298-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Tim Chen 提交于
This patch adds checks that prevens futile attempts to move rt tasks to a CPU with active tasks of equal or higher priority. This reduces run queue lock contention and improves the performance of a well known OLTP benchmark by 0.7%. Signed-off-by: NTim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Shawn Bohrer <sbohrer@rgmadvisors.com> Cc: Suruchi Kadu <suruchi.a.kadu@intel.com> Cc: Doug Nelson<doug.nelson@intel.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1421430374.2399.27.camel@schen9-desk2.jf.intel.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 28 1月, 2015 3 次提交
-
-
由 Mike Galbraith 提交于
While creating an exclusive cpuset, we passed cpuset_cpumask_can_shrink() an empty cpumask (cur), and dl_bw_of(cpumask_any(cur)) made boom with it: CPU: 0 PID: 6942 Comm: shield.sh Not tainted 3.19.0-master #19 Hardware name: MEDIONPC MS-7502/MS-7502, BIOS 6.00 PG 12/26/2007 task: ffff880224552450 ti: ffff8800caab8000 task.ti: ffff8800caab8000 RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81073846>] [<ffffffff81073846>] cpuset_cpumask_can_shrink+0x56/0xb0 [...] Call Trace: [<ffffffff810cb82a>] validate_change+0x18a/0x200 [<ffffffff810cc877>] cpuset_write_resmask+0x3b7/0x720 [<ffffffff810c4d58>] cgroup_file_write+0x38/0x100 [<ffffffff811d953a>] kernfs_fop_write+0x12a/0x180 [<ffffffff8116e1a3>] vfs_write+0xb3/0x1d0 [<ffffffff8116ed06>] SyS_write+0x46/0xb0 [<ffffffff8159ced6>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Signed-off-by: NMike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> Acked-by: NZefan Li <lizefan@huawei.com> Fixes: f82f8042 ("sched/deadline: Ensure that updates to exclusive cpusets don't break AC") Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1422417235.5716.5.camel@marge.simpson.netSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
The fix from 9fc81d87 ("perf: Fix events installation during moving group") was incomplete in that it failed to recognise that creating a group with events for different CPUs is semantically broken -- they cannot be co-scheduled. Furthermore, it leads to real breakage where, when we create an event for CPU Y and then migrate it to form a group on CPU X, the code gets confused where the counter is programmed -- triggered in practice as well by me via the perf fuzzer. Fix this by tightening the rules for creating groups. Only allow grouping of counters that can be co-scheduled in the same context. This means for the same task and/or the same cpu. Fixes: 9fc81d87 ("perf: Fix events installation during moving group") Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150123125834.090683288@infradead.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Jan Beulich 提交于
At least some gcc versions - validly afaict - warn about potentially using max_group uninitialized: There's no way the compiler can prove that the body of the conditional where it and max_faults get set/ updated gets executed; in fact, without knowing all the details of other scheduler code, I can't prove this either. Generally the necessary change would appear to be to clear max_group prior to entering the inner loop, and break out of the outer loop when it ends up being all clear after the inner one. This, however, seems inefficient, and afaict the same effect can be achieved by exiting the outer loop when max_faults is still zero after the inner loop. [ mingo: changed the solution to zero initialization: uninitialized_var() needs to die, as it's an actively dangerous construct: if in the future a known-proven-good piece of code is changed to have a true, buggy uninitialized variable, the compiler warning is then supressed... The better long term solution is to clean up the code flow, so that even simple minded compilers (and humans!) are able to read it without getting a headache. ] Signed-off-by: NJan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/54C2139202000078000588F7@mail.emea.novell.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 27 1月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/memory.c:3732 in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 671, name: test_maps 1 lock held by test_maps/671: #0: (rcu_read_lock){......}, at: [<0000000000264190>] map_lookup_elem+0xe8/0x260 Call Trace: ([<0000000000115b7e>] show_trace+0x12e/0x150) [<0000000000115c40>] show_stack+0xa0/0x100 [<00000000009b163c>] dump_stack+0x74/0xc8 [<000000000017424a>] ___might_sleep+0x23a/0x248 [<00000000002b58e8>] might_fault+0x70/0xe8 [<0000000000264230>] map_lookup_elem+0x188/0x260 [<0000000000264716>] SyS_bpf+0x20e/0x840 Fix it by allocating temporary buffer to store map element value. Fixes: db20fd2b ("bpf: add lookup/update/delete/iterate methods to BPF maps") Reported-by: NMichael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 24 1月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 kbuild test robot 提交于
kernel/time/hrtimer.c:444:9: sparse: symbol '__hrtimer_get_next_event' was not declared. Should it be static? Fixes: 9bc74919 hrtimer: Prevent stale expiry time in hrtimer_interrupt() Signed-off-by: NFengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Cc: kbuild-all@01.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150123121206.GA4766@snbSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Xunlei Pang 提交于
rtc_set_ntp_time() uses timespec which is y2038-unsafe, so modify to use timespec64 which is y2038-safe, then replace rtc_time_to_tm() with rtc_time64_to_tm(). Also adjust all its call sites(only NTP uses it) accordingly. Cc: pang.xunlei <pang.xunlei@linaro.org> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@linaro.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NXunlei Pang <pang.xunlei@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
-