1. 02 12月, 2005 1 次提交
  2. 30 11月, 2005 19 次提交
  3. 29 11月, 2005 13 次提交
  4. 28 11月, 2005 3 次提交
  5. 25 11月, 2005 1 次提交
  6. 24 11月, 2005 3 次提交
    • D
      drm: fix quiescent locking · cf65f162
      Dave Airlie 提交于
      A fix for a locking bug which is triggered when a client tries to lock with
      flag DMA_QUIESCENT (typically the X server), but gets interrupted by a signal.
      The locking IOCTL should then return an error, but if DMA_QUIESCENT succeeds
      it returns 0, and the client falsely thinks it has the lock. In addition
      The client waits for DMA_QUISCENT and possibly DMA_READY without having the lock.
      
      From: Thomas Hellstrom
      Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
      cf65f162
    • N
      [PATCH] usb serial: remove redundant include · 569cfaad
      Nicolas Kaiser 提交于
      remove redundant include
      Signed-off-by: NNicolas Kaiser <nikai@nikai.net>
      Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      569cfaad
    • D
      [PATCH] USB: fix USB key generates ioctl_internal_command errors issue · 63dc3ff3
      David Hrdeman 提交于
      On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 06:34:24PM -0800, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
      >On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 23:52:32 +0100, David Hrdeman <david@2gen.com> wrote:
      >> usb-storage: waiting for device to settle before scanning
      >>   Vendor: I0MEGA    Model: UMni1GB*IOM2K4    Rev: 1.01
      >>   Type:   Direct-Access                      ANSI SCSI revision: 02
      >> SCSI device sda: 2048000 512-byte hdwr sectors (1049 MB)
      >> sda: Write Protect is off
      >> sda: Mode Sense: 00 00 00 00
      >> sda: assuming drive cache: write through
      >> ioctl_internal_command: <8 0 0 0> return code = 8000002
      >>    : Current: sense key=0x0
      >>     ASC=0x0 ASCQ=0x0
      >> SCSI device sda: 2048000 512-byte hdwr sectors (1049 MB)
      >
      >I think it's harmless. I saw things like that, and initially I plugged
      >them with workarounds like this:
      
      Thanks for the pointer, and yes, it is harmless, but it floods the
      console with the messages which hides other (potentially important)
      messages...following your example I've made a patch which fixes the
      problem.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Hrdeman <david@2gen.com>
      Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      63dc3ff3