Having moved the priotree struct into i915_scheduler.h, identify it as
the scheduling element and rebrand into i915_sched. This becomes more
useful as we start attaching more information we require to propagate
through the scheduler.

v2: Use i915_sched_node for future distinctiveness
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180418184052.7129-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Include fence context and seqno in low level tracing so it is easier to
follow flows of individual requests when things go bad.

Also added tracing on the reset side of things.

v2:
 Chris Wilson:
 * Standardize global_seqno and seqno as global.
 * Include current hws seqno in execlists_cancel_port_requests.

v3:
 * Fix port printk format for all builds.
Signed-off-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> # v2
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180406123514.5809-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com

Currently, we rely on inspecting the hangcheck state from within the
i915_reset() routines to determine which engines were guilty of the
hang. This is problematic for cases where we want to run
i915_handle_error() and call i915_reset() independently of hangcheck.
Instead of relying on the indirect parameter passing, turn it into an
explicit parameter providing the set of stalled engines which then are
treated as guilty until proven innocent.

While we are removing the implicit stalled parameter, also make the
reason into an explicit parameter to i915_reset(). We still need a
back-channel for i915_handle_error() to hand over the task to the locked
waiter, but let's keep that its own channel rather than incriminate
another.

This leaves stalled/seqno as being private to hangcheck, with no more
nefarious snooping by reset, be it whole-device or per-engine. \o/

The only real issue now is that this makes it crystal clear that we
don't actually do any testing of hangcheck per se in
drv_selftest/live_hangcheck, merely of resets!
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Cc: Jeff McGee <jeff.mcgee@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMichel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180406220354.18911-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

We will want to park GEM before disengaging the drive^W^W^W unwedging.
Since we already do the work for idling, expose the guts as a new
function that we can then reuse.

v2: Just skip if already parked; makes it more forgiving to use by
future callers.
v3: Extract mark_busy, rename it to i915_gem_unpark and place it next to
i915_gem_park so that we can evaluate it for symmetry more easily.
Calling GEM from inside i915_request looks to be a bit of a layering
violation, for the moment I am imaging them as being notify_cb.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> #v1
Reviewed-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180406155144.27791-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

When we include a request's global_seqno in a GEM_TRACE it often helps
to know how that relates to the current breadcrumb as seen by the
hardware.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180327210157.16896-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>

Both request_submit and request_unsubmit deal with transferring the
request from the client's timeline onto the execution timeline and back
again. As both functions deal with a pair of timeline's, using a
shorthand for just one of them is slightly confusing, especially as the
different functions use the shorthand for the alternate timeline.
Instead, use the full version of each timeline so it should be easier to
keep track of the transfer between the request/client and the engine.

v2: Refactor the common lock+list_move
v3: Be clear we require the other timeline list to be locked as well.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180322131034.6036-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

We pre-increment the timeline->seqno when handing it to the request,
make sure the GEM_TRACE takes this into account. Otherwise, it appears
that we go backwards over a preemption point:

1d..1 157681077us : __i915_request_unsubmit: vcs0 fence 75e:3 <- global_seqno 17
0d.s1 157681113us : __i915_request_submit: vcs0 fence 75e:3 -> global_seqno 16

Fixes: d9b13c4d ("drm/i915: Trace GEM steps between submit and wedging")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180322110059.4467-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Not all callers want the GPU error to handled in the same way, so expose
a control parameter. In the first instance, some callers do not want the
heavyweight error capture so add a bit to request the state to be
captured and saved.

v2: Pass msg down to i915_reset/i915_reset_engine so that we include the
reason for the reset in the dev_notice(), superseding the earlier option
to not print that notice.
v3: Stash the reason inside the i915->gpu_error to handover to the direct
reset from the blocking waiter.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Jeff McGee <jeff.mcgee@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMichel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180320100449.1360-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Similar to the staging around handling of engine->submit_request, we
need to stop adding to the execlists->queue prior to calling
engine->cancel_requests. cancel_requests will move requests from the
queue onto the timeline, so if we add a request onto the queue after that
point, it will be lost.

Fixes: af7a8ffa ("drm/i915: Use rcu instead of stop_machine in set_wedged")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180307134226.25492-5-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit 47650db0)
Signed-off-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

We still have an odd race with wedging/unwedging as shown by igt/gem_eio
that defies expectations. Add some more trace_printks to try and
visualize the flow over the precipice.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180315131451.4060-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

There is some redundancy between dma_fence->ops->enable_signaling (via
i915_fence_enable_signaling) and our backend,
intel_engine_enable_signaling() in that both levels recheck the fence
status multiple times. If we convert intel_engine_enable_signaling() to
return the information desired by dma_fence->ops->enable_signaling, we
can reduce i915_fence_enable_signaling to a simple stub and avoid
trying to reinterpret the same information.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180308140732.25090-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Similar to the staging around handling of engine->submit_request, we
need to stop adding to the execlists->queue prior to calling
engine->cancel_requests. cancel_requests will move requests from the
queue onto the timeline, so if we add a request onto the queue after that
point, it will be lost.

Fixes: af7a8ffa ("drm/i915: Use rcu instead of stop_machine in set_wedged")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180307134226.25492-5-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

When wedged, we do not update the ring->tail as we submit the requests
causing us to leak the ring->space upon cleaning up the wedged driver.
We can just use the value stored in rq->tail, and keep the submission
backend details away from set-wedge.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180307134226.25492-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Previously, we would spin waiting for all waiters to wake up and notice
their request had completed before we would reset the seqno upon
wraparound.  However, we can mark their waits as complete and wake them
up directly using the existing machinery for handling the flushing of
missed wakeups when idling.
Suggested-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180306130143.13312-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Since commit fd10e2ce ("drm/i915/breadcrumbs: Ignore unsubmitted
signalers"), we cancel the signaler when retiring the request and so
upon wraparound, where we wait for all requests to be retired, we no
longer need to spin waiting for the signaling thread to release its
references to the in-flight requests, and so we can assert that the
signaler is idle.

References: fd10e2ce ("drm/i915/breadcrumbs: Ignore unsubmitted signalers")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180306130143.13312-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Mostly doc/print messages that were not updated after commit e61e0f51
("drm/i915: Rename drm_i915_gem_request to i915_request").
Signed-off-by: NMichel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180222172405.11386-1-michel.thierry@intel.com

We want to de-emphasize the link between the request (dependency,
execution and fence tracking) from GEM and so rename the struct from
drm_i915_gem_request to i915_request. That is we may implement the GEM
user interface on top of requests, but they are an abstraction for
tracking execution rather than an implementation detail of GEM. (Since
they are not tied to HW, we keep the i915 prefix as opposed to intel.)

In short, the spatch:
@@

@@
- struct drm_i915_gem_request
+ struct i915_request

A corollary to contracting the type name, we also harmonise on using
'rq' shorthand for local variables where space if of the essence and
repetition makes 'request' unwieldy. For globals and struct members,
'request' is still much preferred for its clarity.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180221095636.6649-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMichał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Acked-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

Commit fe49789f ("drm/i915: Deconstruct execute fence") re-arranged
the code and moved the i915_gem_request_execute tracepoint to before the
global seqno is assigned to the request.

We need to move the tracepoint a bit later so this information is once
again available.
Signed-off-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Fixes: fe49789f ("drm/i915: Deconstruct execute fence")
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180220104742.565-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c:941: warning: No description found for parameter 'write'
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NLionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180208111453.32567-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

We only need to wake up the RPS worker once when initially enabling the
client boost, it remains in effect then until the last client no longer
requires the boost.

References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102250
References: 7b92c1bd ("drm/i915: Avoid keeping waitboost active for signaling threads")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMichał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180206143137.15509-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

If we submit a request and see that the previous request on this
timeline was already signaled, we first do not need to add the
dependency tracker for that completed request and secondly we know that
we there is then a large backlog in retiring requests affecting this
timeline. Given that we just submitted more work to the HW, now would be
a good time to catch up on those retirements.

v2: Try to sum up the compromises involved in flushing the retirement
queue after submission.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180207084350.3929-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

If the last request on the timeline is already complete, we do not need
to emit the serialisation barriers.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180207084350.3929-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

If we remember to cancel the signaler on a request when retiring it
(after we know that the request has been signaled), we do not need to
carry an additional request in the signaler itself. This prevents an
issue whereby the signaler threads may be delayed and hold on to
thousands of request references, causing severe memory fragmentation and
premature oom (most noticeable on 32b snb due to the limited GFP_KERNEL
and frequent use of inter-engine fences).

v2: Rename first_signal(), document reads outside of locks.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180203101914.24880-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>

Previously, we relied on only running the hangcheck while somebody was
waiting on the GPU, in order to minimise the amount of time hangcheck
had to run. (If nobody was watching the GPU, nobody would notice if the
GPU wasn't responding -- eventually somebody would care and so kick
hangcheck into action.) However, this falls apart from around commit
4680816b ("drm/i915: Wait first for submission, before waiting for
request completion"), as not all waiters declare themselves to hangcheck
and so we could switch off hangcheck and miss GPU hangs even when
waiting under the struct_mutex.

If we enable hangcheck from the first request submission, and let it run
until the GPU is idle again, we forgo all the complexity involved with
only enabling around waiters. We just have to remember to be careful that
we do not declare a GPU hang when idly waiting for the next request to
be come ready, as we will run hangcheck continuously even when the
engines are stalled waiting for external events. This should be true
already as we should only be tracking requests submitted to hardware for
execution as an indicator that the engine is busy.

Fixes: 4680816b ("drm/i915: Wait first for submission, before waiting for request completion"
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104840Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180129144104.3921-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit 88923048)
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

Previously, we relied on only running the hangcheck while somebody was
waiting on the GPU, in order to minimise the amount of time hangcheck
had to run. (If nobody was watching the GPU, nobody would notice if the
GPU wasn't responding -- eventually somebody would care and so kick
hangcheck into action.) However, this falls apart from around commit
4680816b ("drm/i915: Wait first for submission, before waiting for
request completion"), as not all waiters declare themselves to hangcheck
and so we could switch off hangcheck and miss GPU hangs even when
waiting under the struct_mutex.

If we enable hangcheck from the first request submission, and let it run
until the GPU is idle again, we forgo all the complexity involved with
only enabling around waiters. We just have to remember to be careful that
we do not declare a GPU hang when idly waiting for the next request to
be come ready, as we will run hangcheck continuously even when the
engines are stalled waiting for external events. This should be true
already as we should only be tracking requests submitted to hardware for
execution as an indicator that the engine is busy.

Fixes: 4680816b ("drm/i915: Wait first for submission, before waiting for request completion"
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104840Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180129144104.3921-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>

Assert that we do not try to unsubmit a completed request, as should we
try to resubmit it later, the ring is already past the request's
breadcrumb and the breadcrumb will not be updated.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180129094912.14428-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NMichał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>

By counting the number of times we have woken up, we have a very simple
means of defining an epoch, which will come in handy if we want to
perform deferred tasks at the end of an epoch (i.e. while we are going
to sleep) without imposing on the next activity cycle.

v2: No reason to specify precise number of bits here.
v3: Take Tvrtko's advice and reserve 0 as an invalid epoch.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180124113608.14909-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

If we fail to allocate a new request, make sure we recover the pages
that are in the process of being freed by inserting an RCU barrier.

v2: Comment before the shrink and barrier in the error path.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180119144657.22606-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Back up our comment that all signalers should have been signaled before
we ourselves were retired with an assert to that effect.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMichał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180102151235.3949-9-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

We should only attempt to remove requests from the execution queue that
are on the execution queue. These are the requests that have been
assigned a global_seqno, so we can assert that we only attempt to remove
requests with a nonzero global_seqno. Afterwards we assert that we
remove them in order, i.e. the global_seqno matches the engine's seqno,
but that leaves a small loophole for an unattached request on an unused
engine.

We can then make the same assertion on queuing the request to the
execution engine, it must have a zero global_seqno or else we are queuing
the same request twice.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171222141959.3006-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>

If we fail to allocate a request, we can reap the outstanding requests
and push them to the request's slab's freelist before trying again. This
forces us to ratelimit malicious clients that tie up all of the system
resources in requests, instead of causing a system-wide oom.

Testcase: igt/gem_shrink/execbuf1
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171212180652.22061-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

If a fence allocation fails in a blocking context, we will sleep on the
fence as a last resort. We can therefore allow ourselves to fail and
sleep on the fence instead of triggering a system-wide oom. This allows
us to throttle malicious clients that are consuming lots of system
resources by capping the amount of memory used by fences.

Testcase: igt/gem_shrink/execbufX
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171212180652.22061-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

It seems that the DMC likes to transition between the DC states a lot when
there are no connected displays (no active power domains) during command
submission.

This activity on DC states has a negative impact on the performance of the
chip with huge latencies observed in the interrupt handlers and elsewhere.
Simple tests like igt/gem_latency -n 0 are slowed down by a factor of
eight.

Work around it by introducing a new power domain named,
POWER_DOMAIN_GT_IRQ, associtated with the "DC off" power well, which is
held for the duration of command submission activity.

CNL has the same problem which will be addressed as a follow-up. Doing
that requires a fix for a DC6 context corruption problem in the CNL DMC
firmware which is yet to be released.

v2:
 * Add commit text as comment in i915_gem_mark_busy. (Chris Wilson)
 * Protect macro body with braces. (Jani Nikula)

v3:
 * Add dedicated power domain for clarity. (Chris, Imre)
 * Commit message and comment text updates.
 * Apply to all big-core GEN9 parts apart for Skylake which is pending DMC
   firmware release.

v4:
 * Power domain should be inner to device runtime pm. (Chris)
 * Simplify NEEDS_CSR_GT_PERF_WA macro. (Chris)
 * Handle async DMC loading by moving the GT_IRQ power domain logic into
   intel_runtime_pm. (Daniel, Chris)
 * Include small core GEN9 as well. (Imre)

v5
 * Special handling for async DMC load is not needed since on failure the
   power domain reference is kept permanently taken. (Imre)

v6:
 * Drop the NEEDS_CSR_GT_PERF_WA macro since all firmwares have now been
   deployed. (Imre, Chris)
Signed-off-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100572
Testcase: igt/gem_exec_nop/headless
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (v2)
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Dmitry Rogozhkin <dmitry.v.rogozhkin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> (v5)
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
[Imre: Add note about applying the WA on CNL as a follow-up]
Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171205132854.26380-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com

The legacy context switch for ringbuffer submission is multistaged,
where each of those stages may fail. However, we were updating global
state after some stages, and so we had to force the incomplete request
to be submitted because we could not unwind. Save the global state
before performing the switches, and so enable us to unwind back to the
previous global state should any phase fail. We then must cancel the
request instead of submitting it should the construction fail.

v2: s/saved_ctx/from_ctx/; s/ctx/to_ctx/ etc.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171123152631.31385-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

If only a subset of events is enabled we can afford to suspend
the sampling timer when the GPU is idle and so save some cycles
and power.

v2: Rebase and limit timer even more.
v3: Rebase.
v4: Rebase.
v5: Skip action if perf PMU failed to register.
v6: Checkpatch cleanup.
v7:
 * Add a common helper to start the timer if needed. (Chris Wilson)
 * Add comment explaining bitwise logic in pmu_needs_timer.
v8: Fix some comments styles. (Chris Wilson)
v9: Rebase.
v10: Move function declarations to i915_pmu.h.
v11: Rename functions to i915_pmu_gt_(un)parked. (Chris Wilson)
Signed-off-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171121181852.16128-3-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com

During request construction, after pinning the context we know whether
or not we have to emit a context switch. So move this common operation
from every caller into i915_gem_request_alloc() itself.

v2: Always submit the request if we emitted some commands during request
construction, as typically it also involves changes in global state.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171120102002.22254-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

As the request will, in the following patch, implicitly invoke a
context-switch on construction, we should precede that with a GPU TLB
invalidation. Also, even before using GGTT, we always want to invalidate
the TLBs for any updates (as well as the ppgtt invalidates that are
unconditionally applied by execbuf). Since we almost always require the
TLB invalidate, do it unconditionally on request allocation and so we can
remove it from all other paths.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171120102002.22254-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>

In the next patch, we will want to install a callback when the engines
(GT as a whole) become idle and similarly when they first become busy.
To enable that callback, first rename intel_engines_mark_idle() to
intel_engines_park() and provide the companion intel_engines_unpark().
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171025143943.7661-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

stop_machine is not really a locking primitive we should use, except
when the hw folks tell us the hw is broken and that's the only way to
work around it.

This patch tries to address the locking abuse of stop_machine() from

commit 20e4933c
Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date:   Tue Nov 22 14:41:21 2016 +0000

    drm/i915: Stop the machine as we install the wedged submit_request handler

Chris said parts of the reasons for going with stop_machine() was that
it's no overhead for the fast-path. But these callbacks use irqsave
spinlocks and do a bunch of MMIO, and rcu_read_lock is _real_ fast.

To stay as close as possible to the stop_machine semantics we first
update all the submit function pointers to the nop handler, then call
synchronize_rcu() to make sure no new requests can be submitted. This
should give us exactly the huge barrier we want.

I pondered whether we should annotate engine->submit_request as __rcu
and use rcu_assign_pointer and rcu_dereference on it. But the reason
behind those is to make sure the compiler/cpu barriers are there for
when you have an actual data structure you point at, to make sure all
the writes are seen correctly on the read side. But we just have a
function pointer, and .text isn't changed, so no need for these
barriers and hence no need for annotations.

Unfortunately there's a complication with the call to
intel_engine_init_global_seqno:

- Without stop_machine we must hold the corresponding spinlock.

- Without stop_machine we must ensure that all requests are marked as
  having failed with dma_fence_set_error() before we call it. That
  means we need to split the nop request submission into two phases,
  both synchronized with rcu:

  1. Only stop submitting the requests to hw and mark them as failed.

  2. After all pending requests in the scheduler/ring are suitably
  marked up as failed and we can force complete them all, also force
  complete by calling intel_engine_init_global_seqno().

This should fix the followwing lockdep splat:

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
4.14.0-rc3-CI-CI_DRM_3179+ #1 Tainted: G     U
------------------------------------------------------
kworker/3:4/562 is trying to acquire lock:
 (cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem){++++}, at: [<ffffffff8113d4bc>] stop_machine+0x1c/0x40

but task is already holding lock:
 (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa0136588>] i915_reset_device+0x1e8/0x260 [i915]

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #6 (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.}:
       __lock_acquire+0x1420/0x15e0
       lock_acquire+0xb0/0x200
       __mutex_lock+0x86/0x9b0
       mutex_lock_interruptible_nested+0x1b/0x20
       i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x51/0x130 [i915]
       i915_gem_fault+0x209/0x650 [i915]
       __do_fault+0x1e/0x80
       __handle_mm_fault+0xa08/0xed0
       handle_mm_fault+0x156/0x300
       __do_page_fault+0x2c5/0x570
       do_page_fault+0x28/0x250
       page_fault+0x22/0x30

-> #5 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}:
       __lock_acquire+0x1420/0x15e0
       lock_acquire+0xb0/0x200
       __might_fault+0x68/0x90
       _copy_to_user+0x23/0x70
       filldir+0xa5/0x120
       dcache_readdir+0xf9/0x170
       iterate_dir+0x69/0x1a0
       SyS_getdents+0xa5/0x140
       entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1c/0xb1

-> #4 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#5){++++}:
       down_write+0x3b/0x70
       handle_create+0xcb/0x1e0
       devtmpfsd+0x139/0x180
       kthread+0x152/0x190
       ret_from_fork+0x27/0x40

-> #3 ((complete)&req.done){+.+.}:
       __lock_acquire+0x1420/0x15e0
       lock_acquire+0xb0/0x200
       wait_for_common+0x58/0x210
       wait_for_completion+0x1d/0x20
       devtmpfs_create_node+0x13d/0x160
       device_add+0x5eb/0x620
       device_create_groups_vargs+0xe0/0xf0
       device_create+0x3a/0x40
       msr_device_create+0x2b/0x40
       cpuhp_invoke_callback+0xc9/0xbf0
       cpuhp_thread_fun+0x17b/0x240
       smpboot_thread_fn+0x18a/0x280
       kthread+0x152/0x190
       ret_from_fork+0x27/0x40

-> #2 (cpuhp_state-up){+.+.}:
       __lock_acquire+0x1420/0x15e0
       lock_acquire+0xb0/0x200
       cpuhp_issue_call+0x133/0x1c0
       __cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked+0x139/0x2a0
       __cpuhp_setup_state+0x46/0x60
       page_writeback_init+0x43/0x67
       pagecache_init+0x3d/0x42
       start_kernel+0x3a8/0x3fc
       x86_64_start_reservations+0x2a/0x2c
       x86_64_start_kernel+0x6d/0x70
       verify_cpu+0x0/0xfb

-> #1 (cpuhp_state_mutex){+.+.}:
       __lock_acquire+0x1420/0x15e0
       lock_acquire+0xb0/0x200
       __mutex_lock+0x86/0x9b0
       mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20
       __cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked+0x53/0x2a0
       __cpuhp_setup_state+0x46/0x60
       page_alloc_init+0x28/0x30
       start_kernel+0x145/0x3fc
       x86_64_start_reservations+0x2a/0x2c
       x86_64_start_kernel+0x6d/0x70
       verify_cpu+0x0/0xfb

-> #0 (cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem){++++}:
       check_prev_add+0x430/0x840
       __lock_acquire+0x1420/0x15e0
       lock_acquire+0xb0/0x200
       cpus_read_lock+0x3d/0xb0
       stop_machine+0x1c/0x40
       i915_gem_set_wedged+0x1a/0x20 [i915]
       i915_reset+0xb9/0x230 [i915]
       i915_reset_device+0x1f6/0x260 [i915]
       i915_handle_error+0x2d8/0x430 [i915]
       hangcheck_declare_hang+0xd3/0xf0 [i915]
       i915_hangcheck_elapsed+0x262/0x2d0 [i915]
       process_one_work+0x233/0x660
       worker_thread+0x4e/0x3b0
       kthread+0x152/0x190
       ret_from_fork+0x27/0x40

other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:
  cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem --> &mm->mmap_sem --> &dev->struct_mutex

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
                               lock(&mm->mmap_sem);
                               lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
  lock(cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

3 locks held by kworker/3:4/562:
 #0:  ("events_long"){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8109c64a>] process_one_work+0x1aa/0x660
 #1:  ((&(&i915->gpu_error.hangcheck_work)->work)){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8109c64a>] process_one_work+0x1aa/0x660
 #2:  (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa0136588>] i915_reset_device+0x1e8/0x260 [i915]

stack backtrace:
CPU: 3 PID: 562 Comm: kworker/3:4 Tainted: G     U          4.14.0-rc3-CI-CI_DRM_3179+ #1
Hardware name:                  /NUC7i5BNB, BIOS BNKBL357.86A.0048.2017.0704.1415 07/04/2017
Workqueue: events_long i915_hangcheck_elapsed [i915]
Call Trace:
 dump_stack+0x68/0x9f
 print_circular_bug+0x235/0x3c0
 ? lockdep_init_map_crosslock+0x20/0x20
 check_prev_add+0x430/0x840
 ? irq_work_queue+0x86/0xe0
 ? wake_up_klogd+0x53/0x70
 __lock_acquire+0x1420/0x15e0
 ? __lock_acquire+0x1420/0x15e0
 ? lockdep_init_map_crosslock+0x20/0x20
 lock_acquire+0xb0/0x200
 ? stop_machine+0x1c/0x40
 ? i915_gem_object_truncate+0x50/0x50 [i915]
 cpus_read_lock+0x3d/0xb0
 ? stop_machine+0x1c/0x40
 stop_machine+0x1c/0x40
 i915_gem_set_wedged+0x1a/0x20 [i915]
 i915_reset+0xb9/0x230 [i915]
 i915_reset_device+0x1f6/0x260 [i915]
 ? gen8_gt_irq_ack+0x170/0x170 [i915]
 ? work_on_cpu_safe+0x60/0x60
 i915_handle_error+0x2d8/0x430 [i915]
 ? vsnprintf+0xd1/0x4b0
 ? scnprintf+0x3a/0x70
 hangcheck_declare_hang+0xd3/0xf0 [i915]
 ? intel_runtime_pm_put+0x56/0xa0 [i915]
 i915_hangcheck_elapsed+0x262/0x2d0 [i915]
 process_one_work+0x233/0x660
 worker_thread+0x4e/0x3b0
 kthread+0x152/0x190
 ? process_one_work+0x660/0x660
 ? kthread_create_on_node+0x40/0x40
 ret_from_fork+0x27/0x40
Setting dangerous option reset - tainting kernel
i915 0000:00:02.0: Resetting chip after gpu hang
Setting dangerous option reset - tainting kernel
i915 0000:00:02.0: Resetting chip after gpu hang

v2: Have 1 global synchronize_rcu() barrier across all engines, and
improve commit message.

v3: We need to protect the seqno update with the timeline spinlock (in
set_wedged) to avoid racing with other updates of the seqno, like we
already do in nop_submit_request (Chris).

v4: Use two-phase sequence to plug the race Chris spotted where we can
complete requests before they're marked up with -EIO.

v5: Review from Chris:
- simplify nop_submit_request.
- Add comment to rcu_read_lock section.
- Align comments with the new style.

v6: Remove unused variable to appease CI.
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102886
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103096
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Marta Lofstedt <marta.lofstedt@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171011091019.1425-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch

Prepared substructure rps for RPS related state. autoenable_work is
used for RC6 too hence it is defined outside rps structure. As we do
this lot many functions are refactored to use intel_rps *rps to access
rps related members. Hence renamed intel_rps_client pointer variables
to rps_client in various functions.

v2: Rebase.

v3: s/pm/gt_pm (Chris)
Refactored access to rps structure by declaring struct intel_rps * in
many functions.
Signed-off-by: NSagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Radoslaw Szwichtenberg <radoslaw.szwichtenberg@intel.com> #1Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1507360055-19948-9-git-send-email-sagar.a.kamble@intel.comAcked-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171010213010.7415-8-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk