Skip to content

K
kernel_linux

OpenHarmony / kernel_linux
上一次同步 4 年多

通知 15
Star 8
Fork 2
K
kernel_linux
切换分支/标签
  1. 01 8月, 2017 1 次提交
    • V
      sched: cpufreq: Allow remote cpufreq callbacks · 674e7541
      由 Viresh Kumar 提交于 
      With Android UI and benchmarks the latency of cpufreq response to
certain scheduling events can become very critical. Currently, callbacks
into cpufreq governors are only made from the scheduler if the target
CPU of the event is the same as the current CPU. This means there are
certain situations where a target CPU may not run the cpufreq governor
for some time.

One testcase to show this behavior is where a task starts running on
CPU0, then a new task is also spawned on CPU0 by a task on CPU1. If the
system is configured such that the new tasks should receive maximum
demand initially, this should result in CPU0 increasing frequency
immediately. But because of the above mentioned limitation though, this
does not occur.

This patch updates the scheduler core to call the cpufreq callbacks for
remote CPUs as well.

The schedutil, ondemand and conservative governors are updated to
process cpufreq utilization update hooks called for remote CPUs where
the remote CPU is managed by the cpufreq policy of the local CPU.

The intel_pstate driver is updated to always reject remote callbacks.

This is tested with couple of usecases (Android: hackbench, recentfling,
galleryfling, vellamo, Ubuntu: hackbench) on ARM hikey board (64 bit
octa-core, single policy). Only galleryfling showed minor improvements,
while others didn't had much deviation.

The reason being that this patch only targets a corner case, where
following are required to be true to improve performance and that
doesn't happen too often with these tests:

- Task is migrated to another CPU.
- The task has high demand, and should take the target CPU to higher
  OPPs.
- And the target CPU doesn't call into the cpufreq governor until the
  next tick.

Based on initial work from Steve Muckle.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: NSaravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      674e7541
  3. 23 6月, 2017 1 次提交
  5. 23 5月, 2017 2 次提交
  7. 16 3月, 2017 1 次提交
  9. 02 3月, 2017 2 次提交
  11. 01 2月, 2017 1 次提交
  13. 30 1月, 2017 1 次提交
    • S
      sched/rt: Add a missing rescheduling point · 619bd4a7
      由 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 提交于 
      Since the change in commit:

  fd7a4bed ("sched, rt: Convert switched_{from, to}_rt() / prio_changed_rt() to balance callbacks")

... we don't reschedule a task under certain circumstances:

Lets say task-A, SCHED_OTHER, is running on CPU0 (and it may run only on
CPU0) and holds a PI lock. This task is removed from the CPU because it
used up its time slice and another SCHED_OTHER task is running. Task-B on
CPU1 runs at RT priority and asks for the lock owned by task-A. This
results in a priority boost for task-A. Task-B goes to sleep until the
lock has been made available. Task-A is already runnable (but not active),
so it receives no wake up.

The reality now is that task-A gets on the CPU once the scheduler decides
to remove the current task despite the fact that a high priority task is
enqueued and waiting. This may take a long time.

The desired behaviour is that CPU0 immediately reschedules after the
priority boost which made task-A the task with the lowest priority.
Suggested-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: NSebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Fixes: fd7a4bed ("sched, rt: Convert switched_{from, to}_rt() prio_changed_rt() to balance callbacks")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170124144006.29821-1-bigeasy@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      619bd4a7
  15. 28 1月, 2017 1 次提交
  17. 14 1月, 2017 1 次提交
    • M
      sched/core: Add wrappers for lockdep_(un)pin_lock() · d8ac8971
      由 Matt Fleming 提交于 
      In preparation for adding diagnostic checks to catch missing calls to
update_rq_clock(), provide wrappers for (re)pinning and unpinning
rq->lock.

Because the pending diagnostic checks allow state to be maintained in
rq_flags across pin contexts, swap the 'struct pin_cookie' arguments
for 'struct rq_flags *'.
Signed-off-by: NMatt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
Cc: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160921133813.31976-5-matt@codeblueprint.co.ukSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      d8ac8971
  19. 17 8月, 2016 2 次提交
  21. 12 5月, 2016 1 次提交
  23. 10 5月, 2016 1 次提交
    • X
      sched/rt, sched/dl: Don't push if task's scheduling class was changed · 13b5ab02
      由 Xunlei Pang 提交于 
      We got this warning:

    WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 2468 at kernel/sched/core.c:1161 set_task_cpu+0x1af/0x1c0
    [...]
    Call Trace:

    dump_stack+0x63/0x87
    __warn+0xd1/0xf0
    warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x20
    set_task_cpu+0x1af/0x1c0
    push_dl_task.part.34+0xea/0x180
    push_dl_tasks+0x17/0x30
    __balance_callback+0x45/0x5c
    __sched_setscheduler+0x906/0xb90
    SyS_sched_setattr+0x150/0x190
    do_syscall_64+0x62/0x110
    entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25

This corresponds to:

    WARN_ON_ONCE(p->state == TASK_RUNNING &&
             p->sched_class == &fair_sched_class &&
             (p->on_rq && !task_on_rq_migrating(p)))

It happens because in find_lock_later_rq(), the task whose scheduling
class was changed to fair class is still pushed away as if it were
a deadline task ...

So, check in find_lock_later_rq() after double_lock_balance(), if the
scheduling class of the deadline task was changed, break and retry.

Apply the same logic to RT tasks.
Signed-off-by: NXunlei Pang <xlpang@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1462767091-1215-1-git-send-email-xlpang@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      13b5ab02
  25. 05 5月, 2016 1 次提交
    • P
      locking/lockdep, sched/core: Implement a better lock pinning scheme · e7904a28
      由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于 
      The problem with the existing lock pinning is that each pin is of
value 1; this mean you can simply unpin if you know its pinned,
without having any extra information.

This scheme generates a random (16 bit) cookie for each pin and
requires this same cookie to unpin. This means you have to keep the
cookie in context.

No objsize difference for !LOCKDEP kernels.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      e7904a28
  27. 28 4月, 2016 1 次提交
  29. 09 3月, 2016 1 次提交
  31. 02 3月, 2016 1 次提交
    • F
      sched: Account rr tasks · 01d36d0a
      由 Frederic Weisbecker 提交于 
      In order to evaluate the scheduler tick dependency without probing
context switches, we need to know how much SCHED_RR and SCHED_FIFO tasks
are enqueued as those policies don't have the same preemption
requirements.

To prepare for that, let's account SCHED_RR tasks, we'll be able to
deduce SCHED_FIFO tasks as well from it and the total RT tasks in the
runqueue.
Reviewed-by: NChris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
      01d36d0a
  33. 29 2月, 2016 2 次提交
    • S
      sched/rt: Kick RT bandwidth timer immediately on start up · c3a990dc
      由 Steven Rostedt 提交于 
      I've been debugging why deadline tasks can cause the RT scheduler to
throttle, even when the deadline tasks are only taking up 50% of the
CPU and RT tasks are not even using 1% of the CPU. Here's what I found.

In order to keep a CPU from being hogged by RT tasks, the deadline
scheduler adds its run time (delta_exec) to the rt_time of the RT
bandwidth. That way, if the two use more than 95% of the CPU within one
second (default settings), the RT tasks are throttled to allow non RT
tasks to run.

Although the deadline tasks add their run time to the RT bandwidth, it
lets the RT tasks do the accounting. This is where the problem lies. If
a deadline task runs for a bit, and no RT tasks are running, then it
will continually add to the RT rt_time that is used to calculate how
much CPU the RT tasks use. But no RT period is in play, and this
accumulation of the runtime never gets reset.

When an RT task finally gets to run, and the watchdog goes off, it can
see that the RT task has used more than it should of, because the
deadline task added all this runtime to its rt_time. Then the RT task
that just woke up gets throttled for no good reason.

I also noticed that when an RT task is queued, it starts the timer to
account for overload and such. But that timer goes off one period
later, which may be too late and the extra rt_time will trigger a
throttle.

This is a quick work around to the problem. When a new RT task is
queued, the bandwidth timer is set to go off immediately. Then the
timer can clear out the extra time added to the rt_time while there was
no RT task running. This stops my tests from triggering the throttle,
and it will still throttle if an RT task runs too much, even while a
deadline task is running.

A better solution may be to subtract the bandwidth that the deadline
task uses from the rt_runtime, and add it back when its finished. Then
there wont be a need for runtime tracking of the time used by deadline
tasks.

I may play with that solution tomorrow.
Signed-off-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
Cc: <williams@redhat.com>
Cc: Clark Williams
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Cc: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160216183746.349ec98b@gandalf.local.homeSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      c3a990dc
    • P
      sched/rt: Fix PI handling vs. sched_setscheduler() · ff77e468
      由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于 
      Andrea Parri reported:

> I found that the following scenario (with CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED=y) is not
> handled correctly:
>
>     T1 (prio = 20)
>        lock(rtmutex);
>
>     T2 (prio = 20)
>        blocks on rtmutex  (rt_nr_boosted = 0 on T1's rq)
>
>     T1 (prio = 20)
>        sys_set_scheduler(prio = 0)
>           [new_effective_prio == oldprio]
>           T1 prio = 20    (rt_nr_boosted = 0 on T1's rq)
>
> The last step is incorrect as T1 is now boosted (c.f., rt_se_boosted());
> in particular, if we continue with
>
>    T1 (prio = 20)
>       unlock(rtmutex)
>          wakeup(T2)
>          adjust_prio(T1)
>             [prio != rt_mutex_getprio(T1)]
>	    dequeue(T1)
>	       rt_nr_boosted = (unsigned long)(-1)
>	       ...
>             T1 prio = 0
>
> then we end up leaving rt_nr_boosted in an "inconsistent" state.
>
> The simple program attached could reproduce the previous scenario; note
> that, as a consequence of the presence of this state, the "assertion"
>
>     WARN_ON(!rt_nr_running && rt_nr_boosted)
>
> from dec_rt_group() may trigger.

So normally we dequeue/enqueue tasks in sched_setscheduler(), which
would ensure the accounting stays correct. However in the early PI path
we fail to do so.

So this was introduced at around v3.14, by:

  c365c292 ("sched: Consider pi boosting in setscheduler()")

which fixed another problem exactly because that dequeue/enqueue, joy.

Fix this by teaching rt about DEQUEUE_SAVE/ENQUEUE_RESTORE and have it
preserve runqueue location with that option. This requires decoupling
the on_rt_rq() state from being on the list.

In order to allow for explicit movement during the SAVE/RESTORE,
introduce {DE,EN}QUEUE_MOVE. We still must use SAVE/RESTORE in these
cases to preserve other invariants.

Respecting the SAVE/RESTORE flags also has the (nice) side-effect that
things like sys_nice()/sys_sched_setaffinity() also do not reorder
FIFO tasks (whereas they used to before this patch).
Reported-by: NAndrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
Tested-by: NAndrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      ff77e468
  35. 23 11月, 2015 1 次提交
  37. 23 9月, 2015 1 次提交
  39. 12 8月, 2015 2 次提交
  41. 03 8月, 2015 1 次提交
  43. 19 6月, 2015 4 次提交
  45. 18 5月, 2015 1 次提交
    • P
      sched,perf: Fix periodic timers · 4cfafd30
      由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于 
      In the below two commits (see Fixes) we have periodic timers that can
stop themselves when they're no longer required, but need to be
(re)-started when their idle condition changes.

Further complications is that we want the timer handler to always do
the forward such that it will always correctly deal with the overruns,
and we do not want to race such that the handler has already decided
to stop, but the (external) restart sees the timer still active and we
end up with a 'lost' timer.

The problem with the current code is that the re-start can come before
the callback does the forward, at which point the forward from the
callback will WARN about forwarding an enqueued timer.

Now, conceptually its easy to detect if you're before or after the fwd
by comparing the expiration time against the current time. Of course,
that's expensive (and racy) because we don't have the current time.

Alternatively one could cache this state inside the timer, but then
everybody pays the overhead of maintaining this extra state, and that
is undesired.

The only other option that I could see is the external timer_active
variable, which I tried to kill before. I would love a nicer interface
for this seemingly simple 'problem' but alas.

Fixes: 272325c4 ("perf: Fix mux_interval hrtimer wreckage")
Fixes: 77a4d1a1 ("sched: Cleanup bandwidth timers")
Cc: pjt@google.com
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de
Cc: klamm@yandex-team.ru
Cc: mingo@kernel.org
Cc: bsegall@google.com
Cc: hpa@zytor.com
Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150514102311.GX21418@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net
      4cfafd30
  47. 08 5月, 2015 1 次提交
  49. 22 4月, 2015 1 次提交
    • P
      sched: Cleanup bandwidth timers · 77a4d1a1
      由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于 
      Roman reported a 3 cpu lockup scenario involving __start_cfs_bandwidth().

The more I look at that code the more I'm convinced its crack, that
entire __start_cfs_bandwidth() thing is brain melting, we don't need to
cancel a timer before starting it, *hrtimer_start*() will happily remove
the timer for you if its still enqueued.

Removing that, removes a big part of the problem, no more ugly cancel
loop to get stuck in.

So now, if I understand things right, the entire reason you have this
cfs_b->lock guarded ->timer_active nonsense is to make sure we don't
accidentally lose the timer.

It appears to me that it should be possible to guarantee that same by
unconditionally (re)starting the timer when !queued. Because regardless
what hrtimer::function will return, if we beat it to (re)enqueue the
timer, it doesn't matter.

Now, because hrtimers don't come with any serialization guarantees we
must ensure both handler and (re)start loop serialize their access to
the hrtimer to avoid both trying to forward the timer at the same
time.

Update the rt bandwidth timer to match.

This effectively reverts: 09dc4ab0 ("sched/fair: Fix
tg_set_cfs_bandwidth() deadlock on rq->lock").
Reported-by: NRoman Gushchin <klamm@yandex-team.ru>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: NBen Segall <bsegall@google.com>
Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150415095011.804589208@infradead.orgSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      77a4d1a1
  51. 02 4月, 2015 1 次提交
  53. 23 3月, 2015 1 次提交
    • S
      sched/rt: Use IPI to trigger RT task push migration instead of pulling · b6366f04
      由 Steven Rostedt 提交于 
      When debugging the latencies on a 40 core box, where we hit 300 to
500 microsecond latencies, I found there was a huge contention on the
runqueue locks.

Investigating it further, running ftrace, I found that it was due to
the pulling of RT tasks.

The test that was run was the following:

 cyclictest --numa -p95 -m -d0 -i100

This created a thread on each CPU, that would set its wakeup in iterations
of 100 microseconds. The -d0 means that all the threads had the same
interval (100us). Each thread sleeps for 100us and wakes up and measures
its latencies.

cyclictest is maintained at:
 git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/clrkwllms/rt-tests.git

What happened was another RT task would be scheduled on one of the CPUs
that was running our test, when the other CPU tests went to sleep and
scheduled idle. This caused the "pull" operation to execute on all
these CPUs. Each one of these saw the RT task that was overloaded on
the CPU of the test that was still running, and each one tried
to grab that task in a thundering herd way.

To grab the task, each thread would do a double rq lock grab, grabbing
its own lock as well as the rq of the overloaded CPU. As the sched
domains on this box was rather flat for its size, I saw up to 12 CPUs
block on this lock at once. This caused a ripple affect with the
rq locks especially since the taking was done via a double rq lock, which
means that several of the CPUs had their own rq locks held while trying
to take this rq lock. As these locks were blocked, any wakeups or load
balanceing on these CPUs would also block on these locks, and the wait
time escalated.

I've tried various methods to lessen the load, but things like an
atomic counter to only let one CPU grab the task wont work, because
the task may have a limited affinity, and we may pick the wrong
CPU to take that lock and do the pull, to only find out that the
CPU we picked isn't in the task's affinity.

Instead of doing the PULL, I now have the CPUs that want the pull to
send over an IPI to the overloaded CPU, and let that CPU pick what
CPU to push the task to. No more need to grab the rq lock, and the
push/pull algorithm still works fine.

With this patch, the latency dropped to just 150us over a 20 hour run.
Without the patch, the huge latencies would trigger in seconds.

I've created a new sched feature called RT_PUSH_IPI, which is enabled
by default.

When RT_PUSH_IPI is not enabled, the old method of grabbing the rq locks
and having the pulling CPU do the work is implemented. When RT_PUSH_IPI
is enabled, the IPI is sent to the overloaded CPU to do a push.

To enabled or disable this at run time:

 # mount -t debugfs nodev /sys/kernel/debug
 # echo RT_PUSH_IPI > /sys/kernel/debug/sched_features
or
 # echo NO_RT_PUSH_IPI > /sys/kernel/debug/sched_features

Update: This original patch would send an IPI to all CPUs in the RT overload
list. But that could theoretically cause the reverse issue. That is, there
could be lots of overloaded RT queues and one CPU lowers its priority. It would
then send an IPI to all the overloaded RT queues and they could then all try
to grab the rq lock of the CPU lowering its priority, and then we have the
same problem.

The latest design sends out only one IPI to the first overloaded CPU. It tries to
push any tasks that it can, and then looks for the next overloaded CPU that can
push to the source CPU. The IPIs stop when all overloaded CPUs that have pushable
tasks that have priorities greater than the source CPU are covered. In case the
source CPU lowers its priority again, a flag is set to tell the IPI traversal to
restart with the first RT overloaded CPU after the source CPU.
Parts-suggested-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Joern Engel <joern@purestorage.com>
Cc: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150318144946.2f3cc982@gandalf.local.homeSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      b6366f04
  55. 31 1月, 2015 1 次提交
  57. 14 1月, 2015 1 次提交
  59. 16 11月, 2014 2 次提交
    • W
      sched: Move p->nr_cpus_allowed check to select_task_rq() · 6c1d9410
      由 Wanpeng Li 提交于 
      Move the p->nr_cpus_allowed check into kernel/sched/core.c: select_task_rq().
This change will make fair.c, rt.c, and deadline.c all start with the
same logic.
Suggested-and-Acked-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: NWanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: "pang.xunlei" <pang.xunlei@linaro.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1415150077-59053-1-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      6c1d9410
    • S
      sched/cputime: Fix clock_nanosleep()/clock_gettime() inconsistency · 6e998916
      由 Stanislaw Gruszka 提交于 
      Commit d670ec13 "posix-cpu-timers: Cure SMP wobbles" fixes one glibc
test case in cost of breaking another one. After that commit, calling
clock_nanosleep(TIMER_ABSTIME, X) and then clock_gettime(&Y) can result
of Y time being smaller than X time.

Reproducer/tester can be found further below, it can be compiled and ran by:

	gcc -o tst-cpuclock2 tst-cpuclock2.c -pthread
	while ./tst-cpuclock2 ; do : ; done

This reproducer, when running on a buggy kernel, will complain
about "clock_gettime difference too small".

Issue happens because on start in thread_group_cputimer() we initialize
sum_exec_runtime of cputimer with threads runtime not yet accounted and
then add the threads runtime to running cputimer again on scheduler
tick, making it's sum_exec_runtime bigger than actual threads runtime.

KOSAKI Motohiro posted a fix for this problem, but that patch was never
applied: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/26/191 .

This patch takes different approach to cure the problem. It calls
update_curr() when cputimer starts, that assure we will have updated
stats of running threads and on the next schedule tick we will account
only the runtime that elapsed from cputimer start. That also assure we
have consistent state between cpu times of individual threads and cpu
time of the process consisted by those threads.

Full reproducer (tst-cpuclock2.c):

	#define _GNU_SOURCE
	#include <unistd.h>
	#include <sys/syscall.h>
	#include <stdio.h>
	#include <time.h>
	#include <pthread.h>
	#include <stdint.h>
	#include <inttypes.h>

	/* Parameters for the Linux kernel ABI for CPU clocks.  */
	#define CPUCLOCK_SCHED          2
	#define MAKE_PROCESS_CPUCLOCK(pid, clock) \
		((~(clockid_t) (pid) << 3) | (clockid_t) (clock))

	static pthread_barrier_t barrier;

	/* Help advance the clock.  */
	static void *chew_cpu(void *arg)
	{
		pthread_barrier_wait(&barrier);
		while (1) ;

		return NULL;
	}

	/* Don't use the glibc wrapper.  */
	static int do_nanosleep(int flags, const struct timespec *req)
	{
		clockid_t clock_id = MAKE_PROCESS_CPUCLOCK(0, CPUCLOCK_SCHED);

		return syscall(SYS_clock_nanosleep, clock_id, flags, req, NULL);
	}

	static int64_t tsdiff(const struct timespec *before, const struct timespec *after)
	{
		int64_t before_i = before->tv_sec * 1000000000ULL + before->tv_nsec;
		int64_t after_i = after->tv_sec * 1000000000ULL + after->tv_nsec;

		return after_i - before_i;
	}

	int main(void)
	{
		int result = 0;
		pthread_t th;

		pthread_barrier_init(&barrier, NULL, 2);

		if (pthread_create(&th, NULL, chew_cpu, NULL) != 0) {
			perror("pthread_create");
			return 1;
		}

		pthread_barrier_wait(&barrier);

		/* The test.  */
		struct timespec before, after, sleeptimeabs;
		int64_t sleepdiff, diffabs;
		const struct timespec sleeptime = {.tv_sec = 0,.tv_nsec = 100000000 };

		/* The relative nanosleep.  Not sure why this is needed, but its presence
		   seems to make it easier to reproduce the problem.  */
		if (do_nanosleep(0, &sleeptime) != 0) {
			perror("clock_nanosleep");
			return 1;
		}

		/* Get the current time.  */
		if (clock_gettime(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, &before) < 0) {
			perror("clock_gettime[2]");
			return 1;
		}

		/* Compute the absolute sleep time based on the current time.  */
		uint64_t nsec = before.tv_nsec + sleeptime.tv_nsec;
		sleeptimeabs.tv_sec = before.tv_sec + nsec / 1000000000;
		sleeptimeabs.tv_nsec = nsec % 1000000000;

		/* Sleep for the computed time.  */
		if (do_nanosleep(TIMER_ABSTIME, &sleeptimeabs) != 0) {
			perror("absolute clock_nanosleep");
			return 1;
		}

		/* Get the time after the sleep.  */
		if (clock_gettime(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, &after) < 0) {
			perror("clock_gettime[3]");
			return 1;
		}

		/* The time after sleep should always be equal to or after the absolute sleep
		   time passed to clock_nanosleep.  */
		sleepdiff = tsdiff(&sleeptimeabs, &after);
		if (sleepdiff < 0) {
			printf("absolute clock_nanosleep woke too early: %" PRId64 "\n", sleepdiff);
			result = 1;

			printf("Before %llu.%09llu\n", before.tv_sec, before.tv_nsec);
			printf("After  %llu.%09llu\n", after.tv_sec, after.tv_nsec);
			printf("Sleep  %llu.%09llu\n", sleeptimeabs.tv_sec, sleeptimeabs.tv_nsec);
		}

		/* The difference between the timestamps taken before and after the
		   clock_nanosleep call should be equal to or more than the duration of the
		   sleep.  */
		diffabs = tsdiff(&before, &after);
		if (diffabs < sleeptime.tv_nsec) {
			printf("clock_gettime difference too small: %" PRId64 "\n", diffabs);
			result = 1;
		}

		pthread_cancel(th);

		return result;
	}
Signed-off-by: NStanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20141112155843.GA24803@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      6e998916
  61. 04 11月, 2014 1 次提交