nilfs2: delete mark_inode_dirty in nilfs_new_inode
It is redundant to call mark_inode_dirty() in nilfs_new_inode() because all caller of nilfs_new_inode() will call mark_inode_dirty() after calling nilfs_new_inode() directly or indirectly in transaction. Signed-off-by: NJiro SEKIBA <jir@unicus.jp> Signed-off-by: NRyusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Showing
想要评论请 注册 或 登录