提交 72d4d3e3 编写于 作者: J Jozsef Kadlecsik 提交者: Pablo Neira Ayuso

netfilter: Fix handling simultaneous open in TCP conntrack

Dominique Martinet reported a TCP hang problem when simultaneous open was used.
The problem is that the tcp_conntracks state table is not smart enough
to handle the case. The state table could be fixed by introducing a new state,
but that would require more lines of code compared to this patch, due to the
required backward compatibility with ctnetlink.
Signed-off-by: NJozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu>
Reported-by: NDominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>
Tested-by: NDominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>
Signed-off-by: NPablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
上级 25eb0ea7
......@@ -46,6 +46,9 @@ enum tcp_conntrack {
/* Marks possibility for expected RFC5961 challenge ACK */
#define IP_CT_EXP_CHALLENGE_ACK 0x40
/* Simultaneous open initialized */
#define IP_CT_TCP_SIMULTANEOUS_OPEN 0x80
struct nf_ct_tcp_flags {
__u8 flags;
__u8 mask;
......
......@@ -981,6 +981,17 @@ static int tcp_packet(struct nf_conn *ct,
return NF_ACCEPT; /* Don't change state */
}
break;
case TCP_CONNTRACK_SYN_SENT2:
/* tcp_conntracks table is not smart enough to handle
* simultaneous open.
*/
ct->proto.tcp.last_flags |= IP_CT_TCP_SIMULTANEOUS_OPEN;
break;
case TCP_CONNTRACK_SYN_RECV:
if (dir == IP_CT_DIR_REPLY && index == TCP_ACK_SET &&
ct->proto.tcp.last_flags & IP_CT_TCP_SIMULTANEOUS_OPEN)
new_state = TCP_CONNTRACK_ESTABLISHED;
break;
case TCP_CONNTRACK_CLOSE:
if (index == TCP_RST_SET
&& (ct->proto.tcp.seen[!dir].flags & IP_CT_TCP_FLAG_MAXACK_SET)
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册