svcrpc: don't set then immediately clear XPT_DEFERRED
There's no harm to doing this, since the only caller will immediately
call svc_enqueue() afterwards, ensuring we don't miss the remaining
deferred requests just because XPT_DEFERRED was briefly cleared.
But why not just do this the simple way?
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Showing
想要评论请 注册 或 登录