提交 51b6d717 编写于 作者: M Mauro Carvalho Chehab

[media] tm6000: remove a check for NO_PCM_LOCK

This was likely used by some test. There's no sense on keeping it
upstream.
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
上级 bca3ba79
...@@ -254,9 +254,7 @@ static int tm6000_fillbuf(struct tm6000_core *core, char *buf, int size) ...@@ -254,9 +254,7 @@ static int tm6000_fillbuf(struct tm6000_core *core, char *buf, int size)
memcpy(runtime->dma_area + buf_pos * stride, buf, memcpy(runtime->dma_area + buf_pos * stride, buf,
length * stride); length * stride);
#ifndef NO_PCM_LOCK
snd_pcm_stream_lock(substream); snd_pcm_stream_lock(substream);
#endif
chip->buf_pos += length; chip->buf_pos += length;
if (chip->buf_pos >= runtime->buffer_size) if (chip->buf_pos >= runtime->buffer_size)
...@@ -268,9 +266,7 @@ static int tm6000_fillbuf(struct tm6000_core *core, char *buf, int size) ...@@ -268,9 +266,7 @@ static int tm6000_fillbuf(struct tm6000_core *core, char *buf, int size)
period_elapsed = 1; period_elapsed = 1;
} }
#ifndef NO_PCM_LOCK
snd_pcm_stream_unlock(substream); snd_pcm_stream_unlock(substream);
#endif
if (period_elapsed) if (period_elapsed)
snd_pcm_period_elapsed(substream); snd_pcm_period_elapsed(substream);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册