Skip to content

K
kernel_linux

OpenHarmony / kernel_linux
上一次同步 大约 4 年

通知 14
Star 8
Fork 2
K
kernel_linux
提交 3086d391 编写于 作者: S Suzuki K. Poulose 提交者： Catalin Marinas
浏览文件
操作

arm64: Consolidate CPU Sanity check to CPU Feature infrastructure 

This patch consolidates the CPU Sanity check to the new infrastructure.

Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NSuzuki K. Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Tested-by: NDave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
上级 3c739b57
隐藏空白更改
内联 并排
Showing with 134 addition and 146 deletion
arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu.h
浏览文件 @ 3086d391
......@@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ void cpuinfo_store_cpu(void);
void __init cpuinfo_store_boot_cpu(void);
void __init init_cpu_features(struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info);
void update_cpu_features(struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info);
void update_cpu_features(int cpu, struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info,
struct cpuinfo_arm64 *boot);
#endif /* __ASM_CPU_H */
arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
浏览文件 @ 3086d391
......@@ -438,12 +438,9 @@ void __init init_cpu_features(struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info)
update_mixed_endian_el0_support(info);
}
static void update_cpu_ftr_reg(u32 sys_reg, u64 new)
static void update_cpu_ftr_reg(struct arm64_ftr_reg *reg, u64 new)
{
struct arm64_ftr_bits *ftrp;
struct arm64_ftr_reg *reg = get_arm64_ftr_reg(sys_reg);
BUG_ON(!reg);
for (ftrp = reg->ftr_bits; ftrp->width; ftrp++) {
s64 ftr_cur = arm64_ftr_value(ftrp, reg->sys_val);
......@@ -458,36 +455,137 @@ static void update_cpu_ftr_reg(u32 sys_reg, u64 new)
}
/* Update CPU feature register from non-boot CPU */
void update_cpu_features(struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info)
static int check_update_ftr_reg(u32 sys_id, int cpu, u64 val, u64 boot)
{
update_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_CTR_EL0, info->reg_ctr);
update_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_DCZID_EL0, info->reg_dczid);
update_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_CNTFRQ_EL0, info->reg_cntfrq);
update_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1, info->reg_id_aa64dfr0);
update_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64DFR1_EL1, info->reg_id_aa64dfr1);
update_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64ISAR0_EL1, info->reg_id_aa64isar0);
update_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1, info->reg_id_aa64isar1);
update_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1, info->reg_id_aa64mmfr0);
update_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1, info->reg_id_aa64mmfr1);
update_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, info->reg_id_aa64pfr0);
update_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1, info->reg_id_aa64pfr1);
update_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_DFR0_EL1, info->reg_id_dfr0);
update_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_ISAR0_EL1, info->reg_id_isar0);
update_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_ISAR1_EL1, info->reg_id_isar1);
update_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_ISAR2_EL1, info->reg_id_isar2);
update_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_ISAR3_EL1, info->reg_id_isar3);
update_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_ISAR4_EL1, info->reg_id_isar4);
update_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_ISAR5_EL1, info->reg_id_isar5);
update_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_MMFR0_EL1, info->reg_id_mmfr0);
update_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_MMFR1_EL1, info->reg_id_mmfr1);
update_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_MMFR2_EL1, info->reg_id_mmfr2);
update_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_MMFR3_EL1, info->reg_id_mmfr3);
update_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_PFR0_EL1, info->reg_id_pfr0);
update_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_PFR1_EL1, info->reg_id_pfr1);
update_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_MVFR0_EL1, info->reg_mvfr0);
update_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_MVFR1_EL1, info->reg_mvfr1);
update_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_MVFR2_EL1, info->reg_mvfr2);
struct arm64_ftr_reg *regp = get_arm64_ftr_reg(sys_id);
BUG_ON(!regp);
update_cpu_ftr_reg(regp, val);
if ((boot & regp->strict_mask) == (val & regp->strict_mask))
return 0;
pr_warn("SANITY CHECK: Unexpected variation in %s. Boot CPU: %#016llx, CPU%d: %#016llx\n",
regp->name, boot, cpu, val);
return 1;
}
/*
* Update system wide CPU feature registers with the values from a
* non-boot CPU. Also performs SANITY checks to make sure that there
* aren't any insane variations from that of the boot CPU.
*/
void update_cpu_features(int cpu,
struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info,
struct cpuinfo_arm64 *boot)
{
int taint = 0;
/*
* The kernel can handle differing I-cache policies, but otherwise
* caches should look identical. Userspace JITs will make use of
* *minLine.
*/
taint |= check_update_ftr_reg(SYS_CTR_EL0, cpu,
info->reg_ctr, boot->reg_ctr);
/*
* Userspace may perform DC ZVA instructions. Mismatched block sizes
* could result in too much or too little memory being zeroed if a
* process is preempted and migrated between CPUs.
*/
taint |= check_update_ftr_reg(SYS_DCZID_EL0, cpu,
info->reg_dczid, boot->reg_dczid);
/* If different, timekeeping will be broken (especially with KVM) */
taint |= check_update_ftr_reg(SYS_CNTFRQ_EL0, cpu,
info->reg_cntfrq, boot->reg_cntfrq);
/*
* The kernel uses self-hosted debug features and expects CPUs to
* support identical debug features. We presently need CTX_CMPs, WRPs,
* and BRPs to be identical.
* ID_AA64DFR1 is currently RES0.
*/
taint |= check_update_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1, cpu,
info->reg_id_aa64dfr0, boot->reg_id_aa64dfr0);
taint |= check_update_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64DFR1_EL1, cpu,
info->reg_id_aa64dfr1, boot->reg_id_aa64dfr1);
/*
* Even in big.LITTLE, processors should be identical instruction-set
* wise.
*/
taint |= check_update_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64ISAR0_EL1, cpu,
info->reg_id_aa64isar0, boot->reg_id_aa64isar0);
taint |= check_update_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1, cpu,
info->reg_id_aa64isar1, boot->reg_id_aa64isar1);
/*
* Differing PARange support is fine as long as all peripherals and
* memory are mapped within the minimum PARange of all CPUs.
* Linux should not care about secure memory.
*/
taint |= check_update_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1, cpu,
info->reg_id_aa64mmfr0, boot->reg_id_aa64mmfr0);
taint |= check_update_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1, cpu,
info->reg_id_aa64mmfr1, boot->reg_id_aa64mmfr1);
/*
* EL3 is not our concern.
* ID_AA64PFR1 is currently RES0.
*/
taint |= check_update_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, cpu,
info->reg_id_aa64pfr0, boot->reg_id_aa64pfr0);
taint |= check_update_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1, cpu,
info->reg_id_aa64pfr1, boot->reg_id_aa64pfr1);
/*
* If we have AArch32, we care about 32-bit features for compat. These
* registers should be RES0 otherwise.
*/
taint |= check_update_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_DFR0_EL1, cpu,
info->reg_id_dfr0, boot->reg_id_dfr0);
taint |= check_update_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_ISAR0_EL1, cpu,
info->reg_id_isar0, boot->reg_id_isar0);
taint |= check_update_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_ISAR1_EL1, cpu,
info->reg_id_isar1, boot->reg_id_isar1);
taint |= check_update_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_ISAR2_EL1, cpu,
info->reg_id_isar2, boot->reg_id_isar2);
taint |= check_update_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_ISAR3_EL1, cpu,
info->reg_id_isar3, boot->reg_id_isar3);
taint |= check_update_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_ISAR4_EL1, cpu,
info->reg_id_isar4, boot->reg_id_isar4);
taint |= check_update_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_ISAR5_EL1, cpu,
info->reg_id_isar5, boot->reg_id_isar5);
/*
* Regardless of the value of the AuxReg field, the AIFSR, ADFSR, and
* ACTLR formats could differ across CPUs and therefore would have to
* be trapped for virtualization anyway.
*/
taint |= check_update_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_MMFR0_EL1, cpu,
info->reg_id_mmfr0, boot->reg_id_mmfr0);
taint |= check_update_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_MMFR1_EL1, cpu,
info->reg_id_mmfr1, boot->reg_id_mmfr1);
taint |= check_update_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_MMFR2_EL1, cpu,
info->reg_id_mmfr2, boot->reg_id_mmfr2);
taint |= check_update_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_MMFR3_EL1, cpu,
info->reg_id_mmfr3, boot->reg_id_mmfr3);
taint |= check_update_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_PFR0_EL1, cpu,
info->reg_id_pfr0, boot->reg_id_pfr0);
taint |= check_update_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_PFR1_EL1, cpu,
info->reg_id_pfr1, boot->reg_id_pfr1);
taint |= check_update_ftr_reg(SYS_MVFR0_EL1, cpu,
info->reg_mvfr0, boot->reg_mvfr0);
taint |= check_update_ftr_reg(SYS_MVFR1_EL1, cpu,
info->reg_mvfr1, boot->reg_mvfr1);
taint |= check_update_ftr_reg(SYS_MVFR2_EL1, cpu,
info->reg_mvfr2, boot->reg_mvfr2);
/*
* Mismatched CPU features are a recipe for disaster. Don't even
* pretend to support them.
*/
WARN_TAINT_ONCE(taint, TAINT_CPU_OUT_OF_SPEC,
"Unsupported CPU feature variation.\n");
update_mixed_endian_el0_support(info);
}
......
arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
浏览文件 @ 3086d391
......@@ -192,116 +192,6 @@ static void cpuinfo_detect_icache_policy(struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info)
pr_info("Detected %s I-cache on CPU%d\n", icache_policy_str[l1ip], cpu);
}
static int check_reg_mask(char *name, u64 mask, u64 boot, u64 cur, int cpu)
{
if ((boot & mask) == (cur & mask))
return 0;
pr_warn("SANITY CHECK: Unexpected variation in %s. Boot CPU: %#016lx, CPU%d: %#016lx\n",
name, (unsigned long)boot, cpu, (unsigned long)cur);
return 1;
}
#define CHECK_MASK(field, mask, boot, cur, cpu) \
check_reg_mask(#field, mask, (boot)->reg_ ## field, (cur)->reg_ ## field, cpu)
#define CHECK(field, boot, cur, cpu) \
CHECK_MASK(field, ~0ULL, boot, cur, cpu)
/*
* Verify that CPUs don't have unexpected differences that will cause problems.
*/
static void cpuinfo_sanity_check(struct cpuinfo_arm64 *cur)
{
unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();
struct cpuinfo_arm64 *boot = &boot_cpu_data;
unsigned int diff = 0;
/*
* The kernel can handle differing I-cache policies, but otherwise
* caches should look identical. Userspace JITs will make use of
* *minLine.
*/
diff |= CHECK_MASK(ctr, 0xffff3fff, boot, cur, cpu);
/*
* Userspace may perform DC ZVA instructions. Mismatched block sizes
* could result in too much or too little memory being zeroed if a
* process is preempted and migrated between CPUs.
*/
diff |= CHECK(dczid, boot, cur, cpu);
/* If different, timekeeping will be broken (especially with KVM) */
diff |= CHECK(cntfrq, boot, cur, cpu);
/*
* The kernel uses self-hosted debug features and expects CPUs to
* support identical debug features. We presently need CTX_CMPs, WRPs,
* and BRPs to be identical.
* ID_AA64DFR1 is currently RES0.
*/
diff |= CHECK(id_aa64dfr0, boot, cur, cpu);
diff |= CHECK(id_aa64dfr1, boot, cur, cpu);
/*
* Even in big.LITTLE, processors should be identical instruction-set
* wise.
*/
diff |= CHECK(id_aa64isar0, boot, cur, cpu);
diff |= CHECK(id_aa64isar1, boot, cur, cpu);
/*
* Differing PARange support is fine as long as all peripherals and
* memory are mapped within the minimum PARange of all CPUs.
* Linux should not care about secure memory.
* ID_AA64MMFR1 is currently RES0.
*/
diff |= CHECK_MASK(id_aa64mmfr0, 0xffffffffffff0ff0, boot, cur, cpu);
diff |= CHECK(id_aa64mmfr1, boot, cur, cpu);
/*
* EL3 is not our concern.
* ID_AA64PFR1 is currently RES0.
*/
diff |= CHECK_MASK(id_aa64pfr0, 0xffffffffffff0fff, boot, cur, cpu);
diff |= CHECK(id_aa64pfr1, boot, cur, cpu);
/*
* If we have AArch32, we care about 32-bit features for compat. These
* registers should be RES0 otherwise.
*/
diff |= CHECK(id_dfr0, boot, cur, cpu);
diff |= CHECK(id_isar0, boot, cur, cpu);
diff |= CHECK(id_isar1, boot, cur, cpu);
diff |= CHECK(id_isar2, boot, cur, cpu);
diff |= CHECK(id_isar3, boot, cur, cpu);
diff |= CHECK(id_isar4, boot, cur, cpu);
diff |= CHECK(id_isar5, boot, cur, cpu);
/*
* Regardless of the value of the AuxReg field, the AIFSR, ADFSR, and
* ACTLR formats could differ across CPUs and therefore would have to
* be trapped for virtualization anyway.
*/
diff |= CHECK_MASK(id_mmfr0, 0xff0fffff, boot, cur, cpu);
diff |= CHECK(id_mmfr1, boot, cur, cpu);
diff |= CHECK(id_mmfr2, boot, cur, cpu);
diff |= CHECK(id_mmfr3, boot, cur, cpu);
diff |= CHECK(id_pfr0, boot, cur, cpu);
diff |= CHECK(id_pfr1, boot, cur, cpu);
diff |= CHECK(mvfr0, boot, cur, cpu);
diff |= CHECK(mvfr1, boot, cur, cpu);
diff |= CHECK(mvfr2, boot, cur, cpu);
/*
* Mismatched CPU features are a recipe for disaster. Don't even
* pretend to support them.
*/
WARN_TAINT_ONCE(diff, TAINT_CPU_OUT_OF_SPEC,
"Unsupported CPU feature variation.\n");
}
static void __cpuinfo_store_cpu(struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info)
{
info->reg_cntfrq = arch_timer_get_cntfrq();
......@@ -346,8 +236,7 @@ void cpuinfo_store_cpu(void)
{
struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_data);
__cpuinfo_store_cpu(info);
cpuinfo_sanity_check(info);
update_cpu_features(info);
update_cpu_features(smp_processor_id(), info, &boot_cpu_data);
}
void __init cpuinfo_store_boot_cpu(void)
......
Markdown is supported
0% 或 .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑！
想要评论请 注册 或