提交 2d3475c0 编写于 作者: B Bryan Schumaker 提交者: J. Bruce Fields

NFSD: forget_delegations should use list_for_each_entry_safe

Otherwise the for loop could try to use a file recently removed from the
file_hashtbl list and oops.
Signed-off-by: NBryan Schumaker <bjschuma@netapp.com>
Tested-by: NCasey Bodley <cbodley@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
上级 39c4cc0f
......@@ -4505,18 +4505,19 @@ void nfsd_forget_openowners(u64 num)
int nfsd_process_n_delegations(u64 num, void (*deleg_func)(struct nfs4_delegation *))
{
int i, count = 0;
struct nfs4_file *fp;
struct nfs4_delegation *dp, *next;
struct nfs4_file *fp, *fnext;
struct nfs4_delegation *dp, *dnext;
for (i = 0; i < FILE_HASH_SIZE; i++) {
list_for_each_entry(fp, &file_hashtbl[i], fi_hash) {
list_for_each_entry_safe(dp, next, &fp->fi_delegations, dl_perfile) {
list_for_each_entry_safe(fp, fnext, &file_hashtbl[i], fi_hash) {
list_for_each_entry_safe(dp, dnext, &fp->fi_delegations, dl_perfile) {
deleg_func(dp);
if (++count == num)
return count;
}
}
}
return count;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册