-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
This implements more accurately what is stated in sacktag's overall comment: "Both of these heuristics are not used in Loss state, when we cannot account for retransmits accurately." When CA_Loss state is entered, the state changer ensures that undo_marker is only set if no TCPCB_RETRANS skbs were found, thus having non-zero undo_marker in CA_Loss basically tells that the R-bits still accurately reflect the current state of TCP. Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
f5771113