-
由 Al Viro 提交于
In fill_super() we hadn't MS_ACTIVE set yet, so there won't be any inodes with zero i_count sitting around. In put_super() we already have MS_ACTIVE removed *and* we had called invalidate_inodes() since then. So again there won't be any inodes with zero i_count... Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
9dcefee5