-
由 Colin Ian King 提交于
Checking for ret < 0 is redundant because a previous check on ret being non-zero already handles the ret < 0 case. Remove the redundant code. Found by CoverityScan, CID#1398863, CID#1398864 Signed-off-by: NColin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Reviewed-by: NRichard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Acked-by: NMarek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NCyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@atmel.com>
7fa2c703