Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 13 5月, 2013 1 次提交
  3. 10 5月, 2013 3 次提交
  5. 02 5月, 2013 2 次提交
  7. 01 5月, 2013 1 次提交
    • D
      drm/prime: keep a reference from the handle to exported dma-buf (v6) · 219b4733
      由 Dave Airlie 提交于 
      Currently we have a problem with this:
1. i915: create gem object
2. i915: export gem object to prime
3. radeon: import gem object
4. close prime fd
5. radeon: unref object
6. i915: unref object

i915 has an imported object reference in its file priv, that isn't
cleaned up properly until fd close. The reference gets added at step 2,
but at step 6 we don't have enough info to clean it up.

The solution is to take a reference on the dma-buf when we export it,
and drop the reference when the gem handle goes away.

So when we export a dma_buf from a gem object, we keep track of it
with the handle, we take a reference to the dma_buf. When we close
the handle (i.e. userspace is finished with the buffer), we drop
the reference to the dma_buf, and it gets collected.

This patch isn't meant to fix any other problem or bikesheds, and it doesn't
fix any races with other scenarios.

v1.1: move export symbol line back up.

v2: okay I had to do a bit more, as the first patch showed a leak
on one of my tests, that I found using the dma-buf debugfs support,
the problem case is exporting a buffer twice with the same handle,
we'd add another export handle for it unnecessarily, however
we now fail if we try to export the same object with a different gem handle,
however I'm not sure if that is a case I want to support, and I've
gotten the code to WARN_ON if we hit something like that.

v2.1: rebase this patch, write better commit msg.
v3: cleanup error handling, track import vs export in linked list,
these two patches were separate previously, but seem to work better
like this.
v4: danvet is correct, this code is no longer useful, since the buffer
better exist, so remove it.
v5: always take a reference to the dma buf object, import or export.
(Imre Deak contributed this originally)
v6: square the circle, remove import vs export tracking now
that there is no difference
Reviewed-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
      219b4733
  9. 30 4月, 2013 2 次提交
    • V
      drm: Kill user_modes list and the associated ioctls · c55b6b3d
      由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于 
      There is no way to use modes added to the user_modes list. We never
look at the contents of said list in the kernel, and the only operations
userspace can do are attach and detach. So the only "benefit" of this
interface is wasting kernel memory.

Fortunately it seems no real user space application ever used these
ioctls. So just kill them.

Also remove the prototypes for the non-existing drm_mode_addmode_ioctl()
and drm_mode_rmmode_ioctl() functions.

v2: Use drm_noop instead of completely removing the ioctls
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
      c55b6b3d
    • V
      drm: Silence some sparse warnings · ea9cbb06
      由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于 
      drivers/gpu/drm/drm_pci.c:155:5: warning: symbol 'drm_pci_set_busid' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_pci.c:197:5: warning: symbol 'drm_pci_set_unique' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_pci.c:269:5: warning: symbol 'drm_pci_agp_init' was not declared. Should it be static?

drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c:181:1: warning: symbol 'drm_get_dirty_info_name' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c:1123:5: warning: symbol 'drm_mode_group_init' was not declared. Should it be static?

drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c:918:6: warning: symbol 'drm_mode_validate_clocks' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
      ea9cbb06
  11. 26 4月, 2013 2 次提交
  13. 24 4月, 2013 1 次提交
  15. 22 4月, 2013 3 次提交
  17. 16 4月, 2013 1 次提交
  19. 12 4月, 2013 4 次提交
  21. 11 4月, 2013 2 次提交
  23. 09 4月, 2013 2 次提交
  25. 03 4月, 2013 11 次提交
  27. 01 4月, 2013 1 次提交
    • P
      Revert "lockdep: check that no locks held at freeze time" · dbf520a9
      由 Paul Walmsley 提交于 
      This reverts commit 6aa97070.

Commit 6aa97070 ("lockdep: check that no locks held at freeze time")
causes problems with NFS root filesystems.  The failures were noticed on
OMAP2 and 3 boards during kernel init:

  [ BUG: swapper/0/1 still has locks held! ]
  3.9.0-rc3-00344-ga937536b #1 Not tainted
  -------------------------------------
  1 lock held by swapper/0/1:
   #0:  (&type->s_umount_key#13/1){+.+.+.}, at: [<c011e84c>] sget+0x248/0x574

  stack backtrace:
    rpc_wait_bit_killable
    __wait_on_bit
    out_of_line_wait_on_bit
    __rpc_execute
    rpc_run_task
    rpc_call_sync
    nfs_proc_get_root
    nfs_get_root
    nfs_fs_mount_common
    nfs_try_mount
    nfs_fs_mount
    mount_fs
    vfs_kern_mount
    do_mount
    sys_mount
    do_mount_root
    mount_root
    prepare_namespace
    kernel_init_freeable
    kernel_init

Although the rootfs mounts, the system is unstable.  Here's a transcript
from a PM test:

  http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v3.9-rc3/20130317194234/pm/37xxevm/37xxevm_log.txt

Here's what the test log should look like:

  http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v3.8/20130218214403/pm/37xxevm/37xxevm_log.txt

Mailing list discussion is here:

  http://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/4/221

Deal with this for v3.9 by reverting the problem commit, until folks can
figure out the right long-term course of action.
Signed-off-by: NPaul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@chromium.org>
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Cc: <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>
Cc: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Ben Chan <benchan@chromium.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      dbf520a9
  29. 29 3月, 2013 1 次提交
  31. 28 3月, 2013 2 次提交
  33. 27 3月, 2013 1 次提交
    • E
      userns: Restrict when proc and sysfs can be mounted · 87a8ebd6
      由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于 
      Only allow unprivileged mounts of proc and sysfs if they are already
mounted when the user namespace is created.

proc and sysfs are interesting because they have content that is
per namespace, and so fresh mounts are needed when new namespaces
are created while at the same time proc and sysfs have content that
is shared between every instance.

Respect the policy of who may see the shared content of proc and sysfs
by only allowing new mounts if there was an existing mount at the time
the user namespace was created.

In practice there are only two interesting cases: proc and sysfs are
mounted at their usual places, proc and sysfs are not mounted at all
(some form of mount namespace jail).

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: NSerge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
      87a8ebd6