1. 08 10月, 2008 2 次提交
  2. 07 10月, 2008 2 次提交
    • T
      NFS: Clean up nfs_sb_active/nfs_sb_deactive · 1daef0a8
      Trond Myklebust 提交于
      Instead of causing umount requests to block on server->active_wq while the
      asynchronous sillyrename deletes are executing, we can use the sb->s_active
      counter to obtain a reference to the super_block, and then release that
      reference in nfs_async_unlink_release().
      Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
      1daef0a8
    • T
      NFS: Fix nfs_file_llseek() · d5e66348
      Trond Myklebust 提交于
      After the BKL removal patches were applied to the rest of the NFS code, the
      BKL protection in nfs_file_llseek() is no longer sufficient to ensure that
      inode->i_size is read safely in generic_file_llseek_unlocked().
      
      In order to fix the situation, we either have to replace the naked read of
      inode->i_size in generic_file_llseek_unlocked() with i_size_read(), or the
      whole thing needs to be executed under the inode->i_lock;
      In order to avoid disrupting other filesystems, avoid touching
      generic_file_llseek_unlocked() for now...
      Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
      d5e66348
  3. 03 10月, 2008 2 次提交
  4. 29 9月, 2008 2 次提交
    • B
      mm owner: fix race between swapoff and exit · 31a78f23
      Balbir Singh 提交于
      There's a race between mm->owner assignment and swapoff, more easily
      seen when task slab poisoning is turned on.  The condition occurs when
      try_to_unuse() runs in parallel with an exiting task.  A similar race
      can occur with callers of get_task_mm(), such as /proc/<pid>/<mmstats>
      or ptrace or page migration.
      
      CPU0                                    CPU1
                                              try_to_unuse
                                              looks at mm = task0->mm
                                              increments mm->mm_users
      task 0 exits
      mm->owner needs to be updated, but no
      new owner is found (mm_users > 1, but
      no other task has task->mm = task0->mm)
      mm_update_next_owner() leaves
                                              mmput(mm) decrements mm->mm_users
      task0 freed
                                              dereferencing mm->owner fails
      
      The fix is to notify the subsystem via mm_owner_changed callback(),
      if no new owner is found, by specifying the new task as NULL.
      
      Jiri Slaby:
      mm->owner was set to NULL prior to calling cgroup_mm_owner_callbacks(), but
      must be set after that, so as not to pass NULL as old owner causing oops.
      
      Daisuke Nishimura:
      mm_update_next_owner() may set mm->owner to NULL, but mem_cgroup_from_task()
      and its callers need to take account of this situation to avoid oops.
      
      Hugh Dickins:
      Lockdep warning and hang below exec_mmap() when testing these patches.
      exit_mm() up_reads mmap_sem before calling mm_update_next_owner(),
      so exec_mmap() now needs to do the same.  And with that repositioning,
      there's now no point in mm_need_new_owner() allowing for NULL mm.
      Reported-by: NHugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
      Signed-off-by: NBalbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDaisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
      Signed-off-by: NHugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
      Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
      Cc: Paul Menage <menage@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      31a78f23
    • L
      Fix NULL pointer dereference in proc_sys_compare · d0185c08
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      The VFS interface for the 'd_compare()' is a bit special (read: 'odd'),
      because it really just essentially replaces a memcmp().  The filesystem
      is supposed to just compare the two names with whatever case-independent
      or other function.
      
      And when I say 'is supposed to', I obviously mean that 'procfs does odd
      things, and actually looks at the dentry that we don't even pass down,
      rather than just the name'.  Which results in problems, because we
      actually call d_compare before we have even verified that the dentry is
      still hashed at all.
      
      And that causes a problm since the inode that procfs looks at may have
      been free'd and the d_inode pointer is NULL.  procfs just assumes that
      all dentries are positive, since procfs itself never generates a
      negative one.  But memory pressure will still result in the dentry
      getting torn down, and as it is removed by RCU, it still remains visible
      on some lists - and to d_compare.
      
      If the filesystem just did a name comparison, we wouldn't care.  And we
      could just fix procfs to know about negative dentries too.  But rather
      than have the low-level filesystems know about internal VFS details,
      just move the check for a unhashed dentry up a bit, so that we will only
      call d_compare on dentries that are still active.
      
      The actual oops this caused didn't look like a NULL pointer dereference
      because procfs did a 'container_of(inode, struct proc_inode, vfs_inode)'
      to get at its internal proc_inode information from the inode pointer,
      and accessed a field below the inode. So the oops would look something
      like
      
      	BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at fffffffffffffff0
      	IP: [<ffffffff802bc6c6>] proc_sys_compare+0x36/0x50
      
      and was seen on both x86-64 (Alexey Dobriyan and Hugh Dickins) and
      ppc64 (Hugh Dickins).
      Reported-by: NAlexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
      Acked-by: NHugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
      Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
      Reviewed-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
      Signed-of-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      d0185c08
  5. 26 9月, 2008 2 次提交
    • L
      [XFS] Remove xfs_iext_irec_compact_full() · 71a8c87f
      Lachlan McIlroy 提交于
      Yet another bug was found in xfs_iext_irec_compact_full() and while the
      source of the bug was found it wasn't an easy task to track it down
      because the conditions are very difficult to reproduce.
      
      A HUGE thank-you goes to Russell Cattelan and Eric Sandeen for their
      significant effort in tracking down the source of this corruption.
      
      xfs_iext_irec_compact_full() and xfs_iext_irec_compact_pages() are almost
      identical - they both compact indirect extent lists by moving extents from
      subsequent buffers into earlier ones. xfs_iext_irec_compact_pages() only
      moves extents if all of the extents in the next buffer will fit into the
      empty space in the buffer before it. xfs_iext_irec_compact_full() will go
      a step further and move part of the next buffer if all the extents wont
      fit. It will then shift the remaining extents in the next buffer up to the
      start of the buffer. The bug here was that we did not update er_extoff and
      this caused extent list corruption.
      
      It does not appear that this extra functionality gains us much. Calling
      xfs_iext_irec_compact_pages() instead will do a good enough job at
      compacting the indirect list and will be quicker too.
      
      For the case in xfs_iext_indirect_to_direct() the total number of extents
      in the indirect list will fit into one buffer so we will never need the
      extra functionality of xfs_iext_irec_compact_full() there.
      
      Also xfs_iext_irec_compact_pages() doesn't need to do a memmove() (the
      buffers will never overlap) so we don't want the performance hit that can
      incur.
      
      SGI-PV: 987159
      
      SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:32166a
      Signed-off-by: NLachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com>
      Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
      71a8c87f
    • L
      [XFS] Fix extent list corruption in xfs_iext_irec_compact_full(). · f1ccd295
      Lachlan McIlroy 提交于
      If we don't move all the records from the next buffer into the current
      buffer then we need to update the er_extoff field of the next buffer as we
      shift the remaining records to the start of the buffer.
      
      SGI-PV: 987159
      
      SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:32165a
      Signed-off-by: NLachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com>
      Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
      Signed-off-by: NRussell Cattelan <cattelan@thebarn.com>
      f1ccd295
  6. 25 9月, 2008 1 次提交
  7. 18 9月, 2008 1 次提交
  8. 17 9月, 2008 10 次提交
  9. 14 9月, 2008 4 次提交
    • A
      rescan_partitions(): make device capacity errors non-fatal · 8d99f83b
      Andrew Morton 提交于
      Herton Krzesinski reports that the error-checking changes in
      04ebd4ae ("block/ioctl.c and
      fs/partition/check.c: check value returned by add_partition") cause his
      buggy USB camera to no longer mount.  "The camera is an Olympus X-840.
      The original issue comes from the camera itself: its format program
      creates a partition with an off by one error".
      
      Buggy devices happen.  It is better for the kernel to warn and to proceed
      with the mount.
      Reported-by: NHerton Ronaldo Krzesinski <herton@mandriva.com.br>
      Cc: Abdel Benamrouche <draconux@gmail.com>
      Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
      Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
      Cc: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      8d99f83b
    • H
      mm: ifdef Quicklists in /proc/meminfo · d7a3e495
      Hugh Dickins 提交于
      A "Quicklists:          0 kB" line has just started appearing in
      /proc/meminfo, but most architectures (including x86) don't have
      them configured, so #ifdef it, like the highmem lines.
      
      And those architectures which do have quicklists configured are
      using them for page tables: so let's place it next to PageTables.
      Signed-off-by: NHugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
      Acked-by: NChristoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
      Acked-by: NKOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      d7a3e495
    • E
      bfs: fix Lockdep warning · 1558182f
      Eric Sesterhenn 提交于
      This fixes:
      
        =============================================
        [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
        2.6.27-rc5-00283-g70bb0896 #68
        ---------------------------------------------
        touch/6855 is trying to acquire lock:
         (&info->bfs_lock){--..}, at: [<c02262f5>] bfs_delete_inode+0x9e/0x18c
      
        but task is already holding lock:
         (&info->bfs_lock){--..}, at: [<c0226c00>] bfs_create+0x45/0x187
      
        other info that might help us debug this:
        2 locks held by touch/6855:
         #0:  (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#5){--..}, at: [<c018ad13>] do_filp_open+0x10b/0x62f
         #1:  (&info->bfs_lock){--..}, at: [<c0226c00>] bfs_create+0x45/0x187
      
        stack backtrace:
        Pid: 6855, comm: touch Not tainted 2.6.27-rc5-00283-g70bb0896 #68
         [<c013e769>] validate_chain+0x458/0x9f4
         [<c013bece>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0xd
         [<c013f36b>] __lock_acquire+0x666/0x6e0
         [<c013f440>] lock_acquire+0x5b/0x77
         [<c02262f5>] ? bfs_delete_inode+0x9e/0x18c
         [<c06aab74>] mutex_lock_nested+0xbc/0x234
         [<c02262f5>] ? bfs_delete_inode+0x9e/0x18c
         [<c02262f5>] ? bfs_delete_inode+0x9e/0x18c
         [<c02262f5>] bfs_delete_inode+0x9e/0x18c
         [<c0226257>] ? bfs_delete_inode+0x0/0x18c
         [<c01925e1>] generic_delete_inode+0x94/0xfe
         [<c019265d>] generic_drop_inode+0x12/0x12f
         [<c0191b7e>] iput+0x4b/0x4e
         [<c0226d1e>] bfs_create+0x163/0x187
         [<c0188b42>] vfs_create+0xa6/0x114
         [<c018adb5>] do_filp_open+0x1ad/0x62f
         [<c0107cdc>] ? native_sched_clock+0x82/0x96
         [<c06ac309>] ? _spin_unlock+0x27/0x3c
         [<c019379e>] ? alloc_fd+0xbf/0xc9
         [<c06ae2f4>] ? sub_preempt_count+0x9d/0xab
         [<c019379e>] ? alloc_fd+0xbf/0xc9
         [<c0180391>] do_sys_open+0x42/0xb8
         [<c041d564>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0xc/0x10
         [<c0180449>] sys_open+0x1e/0x26
         [<c01038bd>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x31
         =======================
      
      The problem is that we don't unlock the bfs->lock mutex before calling
      iput (we do in the other cases).
      Signed-off-by: NEric Sesterhenn <snakebyte@gmx.de>
      Cc: Tigran Aivazian <tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      1558182f
    • A
      proc: more debugging for "already registered" case · 665020c3
      Alexey Dobriyan 提交于
      Print parent directory name as well.
      
      The aim is to catch non-creation of parent directory when proc_mkdir will
      return NULL and all subsequent registrations go directly in /proc instead
      of intended directory.
      Signed-off-by: NAlexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      [ Fixed insane printk string while at it.  - Linus ]
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      665020c3
  10. 10 9月, 2008 1 次提交
    • T
      ocfs2: Fix a bug in direct IO read. · 0e116227
      Tao Ma 提交于
      ocfs2 will become read-only if we try to read the bytes which pass
      the end of i_size. This can be easily reproduced by following steps:
      1. mkfs a ocfs2 volume with bs=4k cs=4k and nosparse.
      2. create a small file(say less than 100 bytes) and we will create the file
         which is allocated 1 cluster.
      3. read 8196 bytes from the kernel using O_DIRECT which exceeds the limit.
      4. The ocfs2 volume becomes read-only and dmesg shows:
      OCFS2: ERROR (device sda13): ocfs2_direct_IO_get_blocks:
      Inode 66010 has a hole at block 1
      File system is now read-only due to the potential of on-disk corruption.
      Please run fsck.ocfs2 once the file system is unmounted.
      
      So suppress the ERROR message.
      Signed-off-by: NTao Ma <tao.ma@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
      0e116227
  11. 09 9月, 2008 2 次提交
    • C
      NFS: Restore missing hunk in NFS mount option parser · af904dea
      Chuck Lever 提交于
      Automounter maps can contain mount options valid for other NFS
      implementations but not for Linux.  The Linux automounter uses the
      mount command's "-s" command line option ("s" for "sloppy") so that
      mount requests containing such options are not rejected.
      
      Commit f45663ce attempted to address a
      known regression with text-based NFS mount option parsing.  Unrecognized
      mount options would cause mount requests to fail, even if the "-s"
      option was used on the mount command line.
      
      Unfortunately, this commit was not complete as submitted.  It adds a
      new mount option, "sloppy".  But it is missing a hunk, so it now allows
      NFS mounts with unrecognized mount options, even if the "sloppy" option
      is not present.  This could be a problem if a required critical mount
      option such as "sync" is misspelled, for example, and is considered a
      regression from 2.6.26.
      
      This patch restores the missing hunk.  Now, the default behavior of
      text-based NFS mount options is as before: any unrecognized mount option
      will cause the mount to fail.
      
      Please include this in 2.6.27-rc.
      
      Thanks to Neil Brown for reporting this.
      Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
      Acked-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      af904dea
    • C
      udf: add llseek method · 5c89468c
      Christoph Hellwig 提交于
      UDF currently doesn't set a llseek method for regular files, which
      means it will fall back to default_llseek.  This means no one can seek
      beyond 2 Gigabytes on udf, and that there's not protection vs
      the i_size updates from writers.
      Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
      Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
      5c89468c
  12. 06 9月, 2008 3 次提交
    • A
      UBIFS: make minimum fanout 3 · a5cb562d
      Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
      UBIFS does not really work correctly when fanout is 2,
      because of the way we manage the indexing tree. It may
      just become a list and UBIFS screws up.
      Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
      a5cb562d
    • A
      UBIFS: fix division by zero · f171d4d7
      Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
      If fanout is 3, we have division by zero in
      'ubifs_read_superblock()':
      
      divide error: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
      
      Pid: 28744, comm: mount Not tainted (2.6.27-rc4-ubifs-2.6 #23)
      EIP: 0060:[<f8f9e3ef>] EFLAGS: 00010202 CPU: 0
      EIP is at ubifs_reported_space+0x2d/0x69 [ubifs]
      EAX: 00000000 EBX: 00000000 ECX: 00000000 EDX: 00000000
      ESI: 00000000 EDI: f0ae64b0 EBP: f1f9fcf4 ESP: f1f9fce0
       DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0033 SS: 0068
      Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
      f171d4d7
    • B
      sched: fix process time monotonicity · 49048622
      Balbir Singh 提交于
      Spencer reported a problem where utime and stime were going negative despite
      the fixes in commit b27f03d4. The suspected
      reason for the problem is that signal_struct maintains it's own utime and
      stime (of exited tasks), these are not updated using the new task_utime()
      routine, hence sig->utime can go backwards and cause the same problem
      to occur (sig->utime, adds tsk->utime and not task_utime()). This patch
      fixes the problem
      
      TODO: using max(task->prev_utime, derived utime) works for now, but a more
      generic solution is to implement cputime_max() and use the cputime_gt()
      function for comparison.
      
      Reported-by: spencer@bluehost.com
      Signed-off-by: NBalbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      49048622
  13. 03 9月, 2008 3 次提交
  14. 02 9月, 2008 2 次提交
  15. 31 8月, 2008 3 次提交
    • A
      UBIFS: fill f_fsid · b3385c27
      Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
      UBIFS stores 16-bit UUID in the superblock, and it is a good
      idea to return part of it in 'f_fsid' filed of kstatfs structure.
      Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
      b3385c27
    • A
      UBIFS: improve statfs reporting even more · 7dad181b
      Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
      Since free space we report in statfs is file size which should
      fit to the FS - change the way we calculate free space and use
      leb_overhead instead of dark_wm in calculations.
      
      Results of "freespace" test (120MiB volume, 16KiB LEB size,
      512 bytes page size). Before the change:
      
      freespace: Test 1: fill the space we have 3 times
      freespace: was free: 85204992 bytes 81.3 MiB, wrote: 96489472 bytes 92.0 MiB, delta: 11284480 bytes 10.8 MiB, wrote 13.2% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 83554304 bytes 79.7 MiB, wrote: 96489472 bytes 92.0 MiB, delta: 12935168 bytes 12.3 MiB, wrote 15.5% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 83554304 bytes 79.7 MiB, wrote: 96493568 bytes 92.0 MiB, delta: 12939264 bytes 12.3 MiB, wrote 15.5% more than predicted
      freespace: Test 1 finished
      
      freespace: Test 2: gradually lessen amount of free space and fill the FS
      freespace: do 10 steps, lessen free space by 7596218 bytes 7.2 MiB each time
      freespace: was free: 78675968 bytes 75.0 MiB, wrote: 88903680 bytes 84.8 MiB, delta: 10227712 bytes 9.8 MiB, wrote 13.0% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 72015872 bytes 68.7 MiB, wrote: 81514496 bytes 77.7 MiB, delta: 9498624 bytes 9.1 MiB, wrote 13.2% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 63938560 bytes 61.0 MiB, wrote: 72589312 bytes 69.2 MiB, delta: 8650752 bytes 8.2 MiB, wrote 13.5% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 56127488 bytes 53.5 MiB, wrote: 63762432 bytes 60.8 MiB, delta: 7634944 bytes 7.3 MiB, wrote 13.6% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 48336896 bytes 46.1 MiB, wrote: 54935552 bytes 52.4 MiB, delta: 6598656 bytes 6.3 MiB, wrote 13.7% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 40587264 bytes 38.7 MiB, wrote: 46157824 bytes 44.0 MiB, delta: 5570560 bytes 5.3 MiB, wrote 13.7% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 32841728 bytes 31.3 MiB, wrote: 37384192 bytes 35.7 MiB, delta: 4542464 bytes 4.3 MiB, wrote 13.8% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 25100288 bytes 23.9 MiB, wrote: 28618752 bytes 27.3 MiB, delta: 3518464 bytes 3.4 MiB, wrote 14.0% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 17342464 bytes 16.5 MiB, wrote: 19841024 bytes 18.9 MiB, delta: 2498560 bytes 2.4 MiB, wrote 14.4% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 9605120 bytes 9.2 MiB, wrote: 11063296 bytes 10.6 MiB, delta: 1458176 bytes 1.4 MiB, wrote 15.2% more than predicted
      freespace: Test 2 finished
      
      freespace: Test 3: gradually lessen amount of free space by trashing and fill the FS
      freespace: do 10 steps, lessen free space by 7606272 bytes 7.3 MiB each time
      freespace: trashing: was free: 83668992 bytes 79.8 MiB, need free: 7606272 bytes 7.3 MiB, files created: 248297, delete 225724 (90.9% of them)
      freespace: was free: 70803456 bytes 67.5 MiB, wrote: 82485248 bytes 78.7 MiB, delta: 11681792 bytes 11.1 MiB, wrote 16.5% more than predicted
      freespace: trashing: was free: 81080320 bytes 77.3 MiB, need free: 15212544 bytes 14.5 MiB, files created: 248711, delete 202047 (81.2% of them)
      freespace: was free: 59867136 bytes 57.1 MiB, wrote: 71897088 bytes 68.6 MiB, delta: 12029952 bytes 11.5 MiB, wrote 20.1% more than predicted
      freespace: trashing: was free: 82243584 bytes 78.4 MiB, need free: 22818816 bytes 21.8 MiB, files created: 248866, delete 179817 (72.3% of them)
      freespace: was free: 50905088 bytes 48.5 MiB, wrote: 63168512 bytes 60.2 MiB, delta: 12263424 bytes 11.7 MiB, wrote 24.1% more than predicted
      freespace: trashing: was free: 83402752 bytes 79.5 MiB, need free: 30425088 bytes 29.0 MiB, files created: 248920, delete 158114 (63.5% of them)
      freespace: was free: 42651648 bytes 40.7 MiB, wrote: 55406592 bytes 52.8 MiB, delta: 12754944 bytes 12.2 MiB, wrote 29.9% more than predicted
      freespace: trashing: was free: 84402176 bytes 80.5 MiB, need free: 38031360 bytes 36.3 MiB, files created: 248709, delete 136641 (54.9% of them)
      freespace: was free: 35233792 bytes 33.6 MiB, wrote: 48250880 bytes 46.0 MiB, delta: 13017088 bytes 12.4 MiB, wrote 36.9% more than predicted
      freespace: trashing: was free: 82530304 bytes 78.7 MiB, need free: 45637632 bytes 43.5 MiB, files created: 248778, delete 111208 (44.7% of them)
      freespace: was free: 27287552 bytes 26.0 MiB, wrote: 40267776 bytes 38.4 MiB, delta: 12980224 bytes 12.4 MiB, wrote 47.6% more than predicted
      freespace: trashing: was free: 85114880 bytes 81.2 MiB, need free: 53243904 bytes 50.8 MiB, files created: 248508, delete 93052 (37.4% of them)
      freespace: was free: 22437888 bytes 21.4 MiB, wrote: 35328000 bytes 33.7 MiB, delta: 12890112 bytes 12.3 MiB, wrote 57.4% more than predicted
      freespace: trashing: was free: 84103168 bytes 80.2 MiB, need free: 60850176 bytes 58.0 MiB, files created: 248637, delete 68743 (27.6% of them)
      freespace: was free: 15536128 bytes 14.8 MiB, wrote: 28319744 bytes 27.0 MiB, delta: 12783616 bytes 12.2 MiB, wrote 82.3% more than predicted
      freespace: trashing: was free: 84357120 bytes 80.4 MiB, need free: 68456448 bytes 65.3 MiB, files created: 248567, delete 46852 (18.8% of them)
      freespace: was free: 9015296 bytes 8.6 MiB, wrote: 22044672 bytes 21.0 MiB, delta: 13029376 bytes 12.4 MiB, wrote 144.5% more than predicted
      freespace: trashing: was free: 84942848 bytes 81.0 MiB, need free: 76062720 bytes 72.5 MiB, files created: 248636, delete 25993 (10.5% of them)
      freespace: was free: 6086656 bytes 5.8 MiB, wrote: 8331264 bytes 7.9 MiB, delta: 2244608 bytes 2.1 MiB, wrote 36.9% more than predicted
      freespace: Test 3 finished
      
      freespace: finished successfully
      
      After the change:
      
      freespace: Test 1: fill the space we have 3 times
      freespace: was free: 94048256 bytes 89.7 MiB, wrote: 96489472 bytes 92.0 MiB, delta: 2441216 bytes 2.3 MiB, wrote 2.6% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 92246016 bytes 88.0 MiB, wrote: 96493568 bytes 92.0 MiB, delta: 4247552 bytes 4.1 MiB, wrote 4.6% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 92254208 bytes 88.0 MiB, wrote: 96489472 bytes 92.0 MiB, delta: 4235264 bytes 4.0 MiB, wrote 4.6% more than predicted
      freespace: Test 1 finished
      
      freespace: Test 2: gradually lessen amount of free space and fill the FS
      freespace: do 10 steps, lessen free space by 8386001 bytes 8.0 MiB each time
      freespace: was free: 86605824 bytes 82.6 MiB, wrote: 88252416 bytes 84.2 MiB, delta: 1646592 bytes 1.6 MiB, wrote 1.9% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 78667776 bytes 75.0 MiB, wrote: 80715776 bytes 77.0 MiB, delta: 2048000 bytes 2.0 MiB, wrote 2.6% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 69615616 bytes 66.4 MiB, wrote: 71630848 bytes 68.3 MiB, delta: 2015232 bytes 1.9 MiB, wrote 2.9% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 61018112 bytes 58.2 MiB, wrote: 62783488 bytes 59.9 MiB, delta: 1765376 bytes 1.7 MiB, wrote 2.9% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 52424704 bytes 50.0 MiB, wrote: 53968896 bytes 51.5 MiB, delta: 1544192 bytes 1.5 MiB, wrote 2.9% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 43880448 bytes 41.8 MiB, wrote: 45199360 bytes 43.1 MiB, delta: 1318912 bytes 1.3 MiB, wrote 3.0% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 35332096 bytes 33.7 MiB, wrote: 36425728 bytes 34.7 MiB, delta: 1093632 bytes 1.0 MiB, wrote 3.1% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 26771456 bytes 25.5 MiB, wrote: 27643904 bytes 26.4 MiB, delta: 872448 bytes 852.0 KiB, wrote 3.3% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 18231296 bytes 17.4 MiB, wrote: 18878464 bytes 18.0 MiB, delta: 647168 bytes 632.0 KiB, wrote 3.5% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 9674752 bytes 9.2 MiB, wrote: 10088448 bytes 9.6 MiB, delta: 413696 bytes 404.0 KiB, wrote 4.3% more than predicted
      freespace: Test 2 finished
      
      freespace: Test 3: gradually lessen amount of free space by trashing and fill the FS
      freespace: do 10 steps, lessen free space by 8397544 bytes 8.0 MiB each time
      freespace: trashing: was free: 92372992 bytes 88.1 MiB, need free: 8397552 bytes 8.0 MiB, files created: 248296, delete 225723 (90.9% of them)
      freespace: was free: 71909376 bytes 68.6 MiB, wrote: 82472960 bytes 78.7 MiB, delta: 10563584 bytes 10.1 MiB, wrote 14.7% more than predicted
      freespace: trashing: was free: 88989696 bytes 84.9 MiB, need free: 16795096 bytes 16.0 MiB, files created: 248794, delete 201838 (81.1% of them)
      freespace: was free: 60354560 bytes 57.6 MiB, wrote: 71782400 bytes 68.5 MiB, delta: 11427840 bytes 10.9 MiB, wrote 18.9% more than predicted
      freespace: trashing: was free: 90304512 bytes 86.1 MiB, need free: 25192640 bytes 24.0 MiB, files created: 248733, delete 179342 (72.1% of them)
      freespace: was free: 51187712 bytes 48.8 MiB, wrote: 62943232 bytes 60.0 MiB, delta: 11755520 bytes 11.2 MiB, wrote 23.0% more than predicted
      freespace: trashing: was free: 91209728 bytes 87.0 MiB, need free: 33590184 bytes 32.0 MiB, files created: 248779, delete 157160 (63.2% of them)
      freespace: was free: 42704896 bytes 40.7 MiB, wrote: 55050240 bytes 52.5 MiB, delta: 12345344 bytes 11.8 MiB, wrote 28.9% more than predicted
      freespace: trashing: was free: 92700672 bytes 88.4 MiB, need free: 41987728 bytes 40.0 MiB, files created: 248848, delete 136135 (54.7% of them)
      freespace: was free: 35250176 bytes 33.6 MiB, wrote: 48115712 bytes 45.9 MiB, delta: 12865536 bytes 12.3 MiB, wrote 36.5% more than predicted
      freespace: trashing: was free: 93986816 bytes 89.6 MiB, need free: 50385272 bytes 48.1 MiB, files created: 248723, delete 115385 (46.4% of them)
      freespace: was free: 29995008 bytes 28.6 MiB, wrote: 41582592 bytes 39.7 MiB, delta: 11587584 bytes 11.1 MiB, wrote 38.6% more than predicted
      freespace: trashing: was free: 91881472 bytes 87.6 MiB, need free: 58782816 bytes 56.1 MiB, files created: 248645, delete 89569 (36.0% of them)
      freespace: was free: 22511616 bytes 21.5 MiB, wrote: 34705408 bytes 33.1 MiB, delta: 12193792 bytes 11.6 MiB, wrote 54.2% more than predicted
      freespace: trashing: was free: 91774976 bytes 87.5 MiB, need free: 67180360 bytes 64.1 MiB, files created: 248580, delete 66616 (26.8% of them)
      freespace: was free: 16908288 bytes 16.1 MiB, wrote: 26898432 bytes 25.7 MiB, delta: 9990144 bytes 9.5 MiB, wrote 59.1% more than predicted
      freespace: trashing: was free: 92450816 bytes 88.2 MiB, need free: 75577904 bytes 72.1 MiB, files created: 248654, delete 45381 (18.3% of them)
      freespace: was free: 10170368 bytes 9.7 MiB, wrote: 19111936 bytes 18.2 MiB, delta: 8941568 bytes 8.5 MiB, wrote 87.9% more than predicted
      freespace: trashing: was free: 93282304 bytes 89.0 MiB, need free: 83975448 bytes 80.1 MiB, files created: 248513, delete 24794 (10.0% of them)
      freespace: was free: 3911680 bytes 3.7 MiB, wrote: 7872512 bytes 7.5 MiB, delta: 3960832 bytes 3.8 MiB, wrote 101.3% more than predicted
      freespace: Test 3 finished
      
      freespace: finished successfully
      Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
      7dad181b
    • A
      UBIFS: introduce LEB overhead · 9bbb5726
      Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
      This is a preparational patch for the following statfs()
      report fix.
      Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
      9bbb5726