1. 20 3月, 2010 1 次提交
    • R
      iwlwifi: implement new mac80211 station add/remove calls · fe6b23dd
      Reinette Chatre 提交于
      mac80211 recently implemented two new callbacks that are used to request
      station add/remove from the driver. The benefot from these new callbacks
      are that they enable the driver to sleep while performing this work.
      
      This is a big patch since a few things need to be coordinated in this move.
      First we need to decouple station management from rate scaling, which
      caused a lot of code to be moved and/or deleted. Next we needed to tie in
      with mac80211's station management callback and let it direct our station
      management as well as trigger the rate scaling initialization.
      Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
      fe6b23dd
  2. 10 3月, 2010 2 次提交
  3. 12 2月, 2010 1 次提交
  4. 20 1月, 2010 1 次提交
  5. 29 12月, 2009 1 次提交
  6. 24 11月, 2009 1 次提交
  7. 19 11月, 2009 1 次提交
  8. 11 11月, 2009 1 次提交
    • W
      iwlwifi: Use RTS/CTS as the preferred protection mechanism for 6000 series · 73871f71
      Wey-Yi Guy 提交于
      When 802.11g was introduced, we had RTS/CTS and CTS-to-Self protection
      mechanisms. In an HT Beacon, HT stations use the "Operating Mode" field
      in the HT Information Element to determine whether or not to use
      protection.
      
      The Operating Mode field has 4 possible settings: 0-3:
      Mode 0: If all stations in the BSS are 20/40 MHz HT capable, or if the
      BSS is 20/40 MHz capable, or if all stations in the BSS are 20 MHz HT
      stations in a 20 MHz BSS
      Mode 1: used if there are non-HT stations or APs using the primary or
      secondary channels
      Mode 2: if only HT stations are associated in the BSS and at least one
      20 MHz HT station is associated.
      Mode 3: used if one or more non-HT stations are associated in the BSS.
      
      When in operating modes 1 or 3, and the Use_Protection field is 1 in the
      Beacon's ERP IE, all HT transmissions must be protected using RTS/CTS or
      CTS-to-Self.
      
      By default, CTS-to-self is the preferred protection mechanism for less
      overhead and higher throughput; but using the full RTS/CTS will better
      protect the inner exchange from interference, especially in
      highly-congested environment.
      
      For 6000 series WIFI NIC, RTS/CTS protection mechanism is the
      recommended choice for HT traffic based on the HW design.
      Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
      Cc: stable@kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
      73871f71
  9. 03 11月, 2009 1 次提交
  10. 28 10月, 2009 2 次提交
  11. 08 10月, 2009 5 次提交
  12. 23 9月, 2009 2 次提交
  13. 15 9月, 2009 2 次提交
  14. 01 9月, 2009 2 次提交
  15. 29 8月, 2009 1 次提交
  16. 20 8月, 2009 4 次提交
  17. 14 8月, 2009 2 次提交
  18. 28 7月, 2009 2 次提交
  19. 25 7月, 2009 2 次提交
  20. 04 6月, 2009 2 次提交
  21. 23 5月, 2009 2 次提交
  22. 12 5月, 2009 2 次提交