A user reported a problem where he was getting early ENOSPC with hundreds of
gigs of free data space and 6 gigs of free metadata space.  This is because the
global block reserve was taking up the entire free metadata space.  This is
ridiculous, we have infrastructure in place to throttle if we start using too
much of the global reserve, so instead of letting it get this huge just limit it
to 512mb so that users can still get work done.  This allowed the user to
complete his rsync without issues.  Thanks

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-and-tested-by: NStefan Priebe <s.priebe@profihost.ag>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

We need to hold the ordered_operations mutex while waiting on ordered extents
since we splice and run the ordered extents list.  We need to make sure anybody
else who wants to wait on ordered extents does actually wait for them to be
completed.  This will keep us from bailing out of flushing in case somebody is
already waiting on ordered extents to complete.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

We are way over-reserving for unlink and rename.  Rename is just some random
huge number and unlink accounts for tree log operations that don't actually
happen during unlink, not to mention the tree log doesn't take from the trans
block rsv anyway so it's completely useless.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

Dave reported a warning when running xfstest 275.  We have been leaking delalloc
metadata space when our reservations fail.  This is because we were improperly
calculating how much space to free for our checksum reservations.  The problem
is we would sometimes free up space that had already been freed in another
thread and we would end up with negative usage for the delalloc space.  This
patch fixes the problem by calculating how much space the other threads would
have already freed, and then calculate how much space we need to free had we not
done the reservation at all, and then freeing any excess space.  This makes
xfstests 275 no longer have leaked space.  Thanks

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

When you take a snapshot, punch a hole where there has been data, then take
another snapshot and try to send an incremental stream, btrfs send would
give you EIO. That is because is_extent_unchanged had no support for holes
being punched. With this patch, instead of returning EIO we just return
0 (== the extent is not unchanged) and we're good.
Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
Cc: Alexander Block <ablock84@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

Btrfs uses page_mkwrite to ensure stable pages during
crc calculations and mmap workloads.  We call clear_page_dirty_for_io
before we do any crcs, and this forces any application with the file
mapped to wait for the crc to finish before it is allowed to change
the file.

With compression on, the clear_page_dirty_for_io step is happening after
we've compressed the pages.  This means the applications might be
changing the pages while we are compressing them, and some of those
modifications might not hit the disk.

This commit adds the clear_page_dirty_for_io before compression starts
and makes sure to redirty the page if we have to fallback to
uncompressed IO as well.
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Reported-by: NAlexandre Oliva <oliva@gnu.org>
cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

We should free leaf and root before returning from the error
handling code.
Signed-off-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

To resolve backrefs, ROOT_REPLACE operations in the tree mod log are
required to be tied to at least one KEY_REMOVE_WHILE_FREEING operation.
Therefore, those operations must be enclosed by tree_mod_log_write_lock()
and tree_mod_log_write_unlock() calls.

Those calls are private to the tree_mod_log_* functions, which means that
removal of the elements of an old root node must be logged from
tree_mod_log_insert_root. This partly reverts and corrects commit ba1bfbd5
(Btrfs: fix a tree mod logging issue for root replacement operations).

This fixes the brand-new version of xfstest 276 as of commit cfe73f71.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Steps to reproduce:
	mkfs.btrfs <disk>
	mount <disk> <mnt>
	btrfs quota enable <mnt>
	btrfs sub create <mnt>/subv
	btrfs qgroup limit 10M <mnt>/subv
	fallocate --length 20M <mnt>/subv/data

For the above example, fallocating will return successfully which
is not expected, we try to fix it by doing qgroup reservation before
fallocating.
Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

If you restore a btrfs-image file system and try to mount that file system we'll
panic.  That's because btrfs-image restores and just makes one big chunk to
envelope the whole disk, since they are really only meant to be messed with by
our btrfs-progs.  So fix up btrfs_rmap_block and the callers of it for mount so
that we no longer panic but instead just return an error and fail to mount.
Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Now that we use bit operation to check fs_state, update
btrfs_free_fs_root()'s checker, otherwise we get back to
memory leak case.
Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Users report that an extent map's list is still linked when it's actually
going to be freed from cache.

The story is that

a) when we're going to drop an extent map and may split this large one into
smaller ems, and if this large one is flagged as EXTENT_FLAG_LOGGING which means
that it's on the list to be logged, then the smaller ems split from it will also
be flagged as EXTENT_FLAG_LOGGING, and this is _not_ expected.

b) we'll keep ems from unlinking the list and freeing when they are flagged with
EXTENT_FLAG_LOGGING, because the log code holds one reference.

The end result is the warning, but the truth is that we set the flag
EXTENT_FLAG_LOGGING only during fsync.

So clear flag EXTENT_FLAG_LOGGING for extent maps split from a large one.
Reported-by: NJohannes Hirte <johannes.hirte@fem.tu-ilmenau.de>
Reported-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Creating snapshot passes extent_root to commit its transaction,
but it can lead to the warning of checking root for quota in
the __btrfs_end_transaction() when someone else is committing
the current transaction.  Since we've recorded the needed root
in trans_handle, just use it to get rid of the warning.
Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

If one of qgroup fails to reserve firstly, we should return immediately,
it is unnecessary to continue check.
Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

The callers of lookup_inline_extent_info all handle getting an error back
properly, so return an error if we have corruption instead of being a jerk and
panicing.  Still WARN_ON() since this is kind of crucial and I've been seeing it
a bit too much recently for my taste, I think we're doing something wrong
somewhere.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Doing this would reliably fail with -EBUSY for me:

# mount /dev/sdb2 /mnt/scratch; umount /mnt/scratch; mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb2
...
unable to open /dev/sdb2: Device or resource busy

because mkfs.btrfs tries to open the device O_EXCL, and somebody still has it.

Using systemtap to track bdev gets & puts shows a kworker thread doing a
blkdev put after mkfs attempts a get; this is left over from the unmount
path:

btrfs_close_devices
	__btrfs_close_devices
		call_rcu(&device->rcu, free_device);
			free_device
				INIT_WORK(&device->rcu_work, __free_device);
				schedule_work(&device->rcu_work);

so unmount might complete before __free_device fires & does its blkdev_put.

Adding an rcu_barrier() to btrfs_close_devices() causes unmount to wait
until all blkdev_put()s are done, and the device is truly free once
unmount completes.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Remove a useless function declaration
Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Using spinning case instead of blocking will result in better concurrency
overall.
Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

The delayed inode code batches up changes to the btree in hopes of doing
them in bulk.  As the changes build up, processes kick off worker
threads and wait for them to make progress.

The current code kicks off an async work queue item for each delayed
node, which creates a lot of churn.  It also uses a fixed 1 HZ waiting
period for the throttle, which allows us to build a lot of pending
work and can slow down the commit.

This changes us to watch a sequence counter as it is bumped during the
operations.  We kick off fewer work items and have each work item do
more work.
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Raid56 merge (merge commit e942f883) had mistakenly removed a call to
__cancel_balance(), which resulted in balance not cleaning up after itself
after a successful finish.  (Cleanup includes switching the state, removing
the balance item and releasing mut_ex_op testnset lock.)  Bring it back.
Reported-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NIlya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Merge branch 'master' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/josef/btrfs-next into for-linus-3.9

Commit 24542bf7 changed preallocation of
extents to cap the max size we try to allocate.  It's a valid change,
but the extent reservation code is also used by balance, and that
can't tolerate a smaller extent being allocated.

__btrfs_prealloc_file_range already has a min_size parameter, which is
used by relocation to request a specific extent size.  This commit
adds an extra check to enforce that minimum extent size.
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Reported-by: NStefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>

Commit 5ac00add added a testnset mutex and code that disallows
running administrative tasks in parallel. It is prevented that
the device add/delete/balance/replace/resize operations are
started in parallel. By mistake, the defragmentation operation
was included in the check for mutually exclusiveness as well.
This is fixed with this commit.
Signed-off-by: NStefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

Only let one trans handle to wait for other handles, otherwise we
will get ABBA issues.
Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

Btrfs balance can easily hit BUG_ON in these places, but we want
to it bail out gracefully after we force the whole filesystem to
readonly.  So we use btrfs_std_error hook in place of BUG_ON.
Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

We can bail out from here gracefully instead of a cold BUG_ON.
Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

We've missed the 'free blocks' part on ENOMEM error.
Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

We first use btrfs_std_error hook to replace with BUG_ON, and we
also need to cleanup what is left, including reloc roots rbtree
and reloc roots list.
Here we use a helper function to cleanup both rbtree and list, and
since this function can also be used in the balance recover path,
we also make the change as well to keep code simple.
Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

Add a check for NULL pointer to avoid invalid reference.
Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

If the async transaction commitment failed, we need close the
current transaction handler, or the current transaction will be
blocked to commit because of this orphan handler.

We fix the problem by doing sync transaction commitment, that is
to invoke btrfs_commit_transaction().
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

There are several bugs at error path of create_snapshot() when the
transaction commitment failed.
- access the freed transaction handler. At the end of the
  transaction commitment, the transaction handler was freed, so we
  should not access it after the transaction commitment.
- we were not aware of the error which happened during the snapshot
  creation if we submitted a async transaction commitment.
- pending snapshot access vs pending snapshot free. when something
  wrong happened after we submitted a async transaction commitment,
  the transaction committer would cleanup the pending snapshots and
  free them. But the snapshot creators were not aware of it, they
  would access the freed pending snapshots.

This patch fixes the above problems by:
- remove the dangerous code that accessed the freed handler
- assign ->error if the error happens during the snapshot creation
- the transaction committer doesn't free the pending snapshots,
  just assigns the error number and evicts them before we unblock
  the transaction.
Reported-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

We need to inc the nlink of deleted entries when running replay so we can do the
unlink on the fs_root and get everything cleaned up and then have the orphan
cleanup do the right thing.  The problem is inc_nlink complains about this, even
thought it still does the right thing.  So use set_nlink() if our i_nlink is 0
to keep users from seeing the warnings during log replay.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

tilegx_defconfig:

fs/btrfs/raid56.c: In function 'btrfs_alloc_stripe_hash_table':
fs/btrfs/raid56.c:206:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'vzalloc' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
fs/btrfs/raid56.c:206:9: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast [enabled by default]
fs/btrfs/raid56.c:226:4: error: implicit declaration of function 'vfree' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Signed-off-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

We want to avoid module.h where posible, since it in turn includes
nearly all of header space.  This means removing it where it is not
required, and using export.h where we are only exporting symbols via
EXPORT_SYMBOL and friends.
Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Apparently when we do inline extents we allow the data to overlap the last chunk
of the btrfs_file_extent_item, which means that we can possibly have a
btrfs_file_extent_item that isn't actually as large as a btrfs_file_extent_item.
This messes with us when we try to overwrite the extent when logging new extents
since we expect for it to be the right size.  To fix this just delete the item
and try to do the insert again which will give us the proper sized
btrfs_file_extent_item.  This fixes a panic where map_private_extent_buffer
would blow up because we're trying to write past the end of the leaf.  Thanks,

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

The stripe hash table is large, starting with allocation order 4 and can go as
high as order 7 in case lock debugging is turned on and structure padding
happens.

Observed mount failure:

mount: page allocation failure: order:7, mode:0x200050
Pid: 8234, comm: mount Tainted: G        W    3.8.0-default+ #267
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff81114353>] warn_alloc_failed+0xf3/0x140
 [<ffffffff811171d2>] ? __alloc_pages_direct_compact+0x92/0x250
 [<ffffffff81117ac3>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x733/0x9d0
 [<ffffffff81152878>] ? cache_alloc_refill+0x3f8/0x840
 [<ffffffff811528bc>] cache_alloc_refill+0x43c/0x840
 [<ffffffff811302eb>] ? is_kernel_percpu_address+0x4b/0x90
 [<ffffffffa00a00ac>] ? btrfs_alloc_stripe_hash_table+0x5c/0x130 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffff811531d7>] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x247/0x270
 [<ffffffffa00a00ac>] btrfs_alloc_stripe_hash_table+0x5c/0x130 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa003133f>] open_ctree+0xb2f/0x1f90 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffff81397289>] ? string+0x49/0xe0
 [<ffffffff813987b3>] ? vsnprintf+0x443/0x5d0
 [<ffffffffa0007cb6>] btrfs_mount+0x526/0x600 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffff8115127c>] ? cache_alloc_debugcheck_after+0x4c/0x200
 [<ffffffff81162b90>] mount_fs+0x20/0xe0
 [<ffffffff8117db26>] vfs_kern_mount+0x76/0x120
 [<ffffffff811801b6>] do_mount+0x386/0x980
 [<ffffffff8112a5cb>] ? strndup_user+0x5b/0x80
 [<ffffffff81180840>] sys_mount+0x90/0xe0
 [<ffffffff81962e99>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

The original code is a little confusing and not clear, The right
way to deal with the kernel code like this:
		[...]
		if (ret)
			goto out;
		[...]

So i move the common clean_up code to the place labeled with
out_fail, this will be easier to maintain.
Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

commit eb6b88d9 leads into another bug.
If it is just because qgroup_reserve fails, the function btrfs_qgroup_free
should not be called, otherwise, it will cause the wrong quota accounting.
Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

The check work has been done just before the function btrfs_clean_quota_tree
is called, it is not necessary to check it again, remove it.
Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

Return ENOMEM rather trigger BUG_ON, fix it.
Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: NZach Brown <zab@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>