1. 23 12月, 2006 34 次提交
  2. 22 12月, 2006 6 次提交
    • J
      [PATCH] elevator: fixup typo in merge logic · bb4067e3
      Jens Axboe 提交于
      The recent io scheduler allow_merge commit left the block layer with
      no merging, oops. This patch fixes that up.
      
      That means the CFQ change needs to be verified again, it might not fix
      the original bug now.  But that's a seperate thing, I'll double check
      that tomorrow.
      Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      bb4067e3
    • A
      [PATCH] truncate: clear page dirtiness before running try_to_free_buffers() · 3e67c098
      Andrew Morton 提交于
      truncate presently invalidates the dirty page's buffer_heads then shoots down
      the page.  But try_to_free_buffers() will now bale out because the page is
      dirty.
      
      Net effect: the LRU gets filled with dirty pages which have invalidated
      buffer_heads attached.  They have no ->mapping and hence cannot be cleaned.
      The machine leaks memory at an enormous rate.
      
      Fix this by cleaning the page before running try_to_free_buffers(), so
      try_to_free_buffers() can do its work.
      
      Also, remember to do dirty-page-acoounting in cancel_dirty_page() so the
      machine won't wedge up trying to write non-existent dirty pages.
      
      Probably still wrong, but now less so.
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      3e67c098
    • D
      [PATCH] Fix XFS after clear_page_dirty() removal · 92132021
      David Chinner 提交于
      XFS appears to call clear_page_dirty to get the mapping tree dirty tag
      set correctly at the same time the page dirty flag is cleared.  I note
      that this can be done by set_page_writeback() if we clear the dirty flag
      on the page first when we are writing back the entire page.
      
      Hence it seems to me that the XFS call to clear_page_dirty() could
      easily be substituted by clear_page_dirty_for_io() followed by a call to
      set_page_writeback() to get the mapping tree tags set correctly after
      the page has been marked clean.
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      92132021
    • M
      [PATCH] fuse: remove clear_page_dirty() call · 9280f682
      Miklos Szeredi 提交于
      The use by FUSE was just a remnant of an optimization from the time
      when writable mappings were supported.
      
      Now FUSE never actually allows the creation of dirty pages, so this
      invocation of clear_page_dirty() is effectively a no-op.
      Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      9280f682
    • D
      [PATCH] Fix JFS after clear_page_dirty() removal · d0e671a9
      Dave Kleikamp 提交于
      This patch removes some questionable code that attempted to make a
      no-longer-used page easier to reclaim.
      
      Calling metapage_writepage against such a page will not result in any
      I/O being performed, so removing this code shouldn't be a big deal.
      
      [ It's likely that we could have just replaced the "clear_page_dirty()"
        call with a call to "cancel_dirty_page()" instead, but in the
        meantime this is cleaner and simpler anyway, so unless there is some
        overriding reason (and Dave implies there isn't) I'll just use this
        patch as-is.			- Linus ]
      Signed-off-by: NDave Kleikamp <shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      d0e671a9
    • L
      VM: Remove "clear_page_dirty()" and "test_clear_page_dirty()" functions · fba2591b
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      They were horribly easy to mis-use because of their tempting naming, and
      they also did way more than any users of them generally wanted them to
      do.
      
      A dirty page can become clean under two circumstances:
      
       (a) when we write it out.  We have "clear_page_dirty_for_io()" for
           this, and that function remains unchanged.
      
           In the "for IO" case it is not sufficient to just clear the dirty
           bit, you also have to mark the page as being under writeback etc.
      
       (b) when we actually remove a page due to it becoming inaccessible to
           users, notably because it was truncate()'d away or the file (or
           metadata) no longer exists, and we thus want to cancel any
           outstanding dirty state.
      
      For the (b) case, we now introduce "cancel_dirty_page()", which only
      touches the page state itself, and verifies that the page is not mapped
      (since cancelling writes on a mapped page would be actively wrong as it
      is still accessible to users).
      
      Some filesystems need to be fixed up for this: CIFS, FUSE, JFS,
      ReiserFS, XFS all use the old confusing functions, and will be fixed
      separately in subsequent commits (with some of them just removing the
      offending logic, and others using clear_page_dirty_for_io()).
      
      This was confirmed by Martin Michlmayr to fix the apt database
      corruption on ARM.
      
      Cc: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
      Cc: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
      Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
      Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
      Cc: Andrei Popa <andrei.popa@i-neo.ro>
      Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Cc: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Cc: Gordon Farquharson <gordonfarquharson@gmail.com>
      Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
      Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      fba2591b