- 11 3月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kumar Gala 提交于
Use device tree to determine if we actually have an MPIC and use CPU feature to decide if we should use doorbells for IPIs. Signed-off-by: NKumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
-
- 31 12月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Julia Lawall 提交于
There is a call to local_irq_restore in the normal exit case, so it would seem that there should be one on an error return as well. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: (http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/) // <smpl> @@ expression l; expression E,E1,E2; @@ local_irq_save(l); ... when != local_irq_restore(l) when != spin_unlock_irqrestore(E,l) when any when strict ( if (...) { ... when != local_irq_restore(l) when != spin_unlock_irqrestore(E1,l) + local_irq_restore(l); return ...; } | if (...) + {local_irq_restore(l); return ...; + } | spin_unlock_irqrestore(E2,l); | local_irq_restore(l); ) // </smpl> Signed-off-by: NJulia Lawall <julia@diku.dk> Signed-off-by: NKumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
-
- 03 12月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kumar Gala 提交于
Added 85xx specifc smp_ops structure. We use ePAPR style boot release and the MPIC for IPIs at this point. Additionally added routines for secondary cpu entry and initializtion. Signed-off-by: NAndy Fleming <afleming@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: NTrent Piepho <tpiepho@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: NKumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
-