- 20 4月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ingo Molnar 提交于
this function doesnt just 'find' the max_pfn - it also has other side-effects such as registering sparse memory maps. Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 17 4月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Joe Perches 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 22 3月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Yinghai Lu 提交于
fix the bug reported here: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10232 use update_memory_range() instead of add_memory_range() directly to avoid closing the gap. ( the new code only affects and runs on systems where the MTRR workaround triggers. ) Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 30 1月, 2008 3 次提交
-
-
由 Yinghai Lu 提交于
when MTRRs are not covering the whole e820 table, we need to trim the RAM and need to update e820. reuse some code on 64-bit as well. here need to add early_get_cap and use it in early_cpu_detect, and move mtrr_bp_init early. The code successfully trimmed the memory map on Justin's system: from: [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: 0000000100000000 - 000000022c000000 (usable) to: [ 0.000000] modified: 0000000100000000 - 0000000228000000 (usable) [ 0.000000] modified: 0000000228000000 - 000000022c000000 (reserved) According to Justin it makes quite a difference: | When I boot the box without any trimming it acts like a 286 or 386, | takes about 10 minutes to boot (using raptor disks). Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai.lu@sun.com> Tested-by: NJustin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Huang, Ying 提交于
Because the EFI memory map are converted to e820 memory map in bootloader, the EFI memory map handling code is removed to clean up. Signed-off-by: NHuang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Bernhard Walle 提交于
This patch removes the extern struct resource declarations for data_resource, code_resource and bss_resource on x86 and declares that three structures as static as done on other architectures like IA64. On i386, these structures are moved to setup_32.c (from e820_32.c) because that's code that is not specific to e820 and also required on EFI systems. That makes the "extern" reference superfluous. On x86_64, data_resource, code_resource and bss_resource are passed to e820_reserve_resources() as arguments just as done on i386 and IA64. That also avoids the "extern" reference and it's possible to make it static. Signed-off-by: NBernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de> Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 23 10月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rusty Russell 提交于
To actually write a bootloader (or, say, the lguest launcher) currently requires duplication of these structures. Making them includable from userspace is much nicer. We merge the common userspace-required definitions of e820_32/64.h into e820.h for export. Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
-
- 11 10月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
Move the headers to include/asm-x86 and fixup the header install make rules Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 30 7月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Replace CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND with CONFIG_HIBERNATION to avoid confusion (among other things, with CONFIG_SUSPEND introduced in the next patch). Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 22 7月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
On some systems the ACPI NVS area is located in the first 1 MB of RAM and it is overwritten by the i386 code during the restore after hibernation. This confuses the ACPI platform firmware that doesn't update the AC adapter status appropriately as a result (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7995). The solution is to register the reserved memory in the first 1 MB as 'nosave', so that swsusp doesn't touch it during the restore. Also, this has been done on x86_64 for a long time now, so this patch makes the i386 restore code behave like the x86_64 one. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: build fix] Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 13 7月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 H. Peter Anvin 提交于
Make definitions for struct e820entry and struct e820map consistent between i386 and x86-64. Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 03 5月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Beulich 提交于
Under CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM, assuming that a !pfn_valid() implies all subsequent pfn-s are also invalid is wrong. Thus replace this by explicitly checking against the E820 map. AK: make e820 on x86-64 not initdata Signed-off-by: NJan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@suse.de> Acked-by: NMark Langsdorf <mark.langsdorf@amd.com>
-
- 23 12月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Yasunori Goto 提交于
register_memory() becomes double definition in 2.6.20-rc1. It is defined in arch/i386/kernel/setup.c as static definition in 2.6.19. But it is moved to arch/i386/kernel/e820.c in 2.6.20-rc1. And same name function is defined in driver/base/memory.c too. So, it becomes cause of compile error of duplicate definition if memory hotplug option is on. Signed-off-by: NYasunori Goto <y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 07 12月, 2006 3 次提交
-
-
由 bibo,mao 提交于
This patch moves e820 memory map print and memmap boot param parsing function from setup.c to e820.c, also adds limit_regions and print_memory_map declaration in header file. Signed-off-by: Nbibo,mao <bibo.mao@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@suse.de> arch/i386/kernel/e820.c | 152 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/i386/kernel/setup.c | 158 --------------------------------- include/asm-i386/e820.h | 2 arch/i386/kernel/e820.c | 152 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/i386/kernel/setup.c | 153 ----------------------------------------------- include/asm-i386/e820.h | 2 3 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 152 deletions(-)
-
由 bibo,mao 提交于
This patch moves e820/efi memmap table walking function from setup.c to e820.c, also this patch adds extern declaration in header file. Signed-off-by: Nbibo,mao <bibo.mao@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@suse.de> arch/i386/kernel/e820.c | 115 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/i386/kernel/setup.c | 118 ----------------------------------- include/asm-i386/e820.h | 2 arch/i386/kernel/e820.c | 115 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/i386/kernel/setup.c | 118 ----------------------------------------------- include/asm-i386/e820.h | 2 3 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 118 deletions(-)
-
由 bibo,mao 提交于
Move more code from setup.c into e820.c Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
-
- 26 9月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andi Kleen 提交于
They cannot be actually freed because the FACS table has a shared-with-the-BIOS lock. Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
-
- 10 4月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Arjan van de Ven 提交于
Introduce a e820_all_mapped() function which checks if the entire range <start,end> is mapped with type. This is done by moving the local start variable to the end of each known-good region; if at the end of the function the start address is still before end, there must be a part that's not of the correct type; otherwise it's a good region. Signed-off-by: NArjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 01 5月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Venkatesh Pallipadi 提交于
The specifications that talk about E820 map doesn't have an upper limit on the number of e820 entries. But, today's kernel has a hard limit of 32. With increase in memory size, we are seeing the number of E820 entries reaching close to 32. Patch below bumps the number upto 128. The patch changes the location of EDDBUF in zero-page (as it comes after E820). As, EDDBUF is not used by boot loaders, this patch should not have any effect on bootloader-setup code interface. Patch covers both i386 and x86-64. Tested on: * grub booting bzImage * lilo booting bzImage with EDID info enabled * pxeboot of bzImage Side-effect: bss increases by ~ 2K and init.data increases by ~7.5K on all systems, due to increase in size of static arrays. Signed-off-by: NVenkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
-