Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 04 8月, 2008 1 次提交
    • H
      sctp: Drop ipfargok in sctp_xmit function · f880374c
      由 Herbert Xu 提交于 
      The ipfragok flag controls whether the packet may be fragmented
either on the local host on beyond.  The latter is only valid on
IPv4.

In fact, we never want to do the latter even on IPv4 when PMTU is
enabled.  This is because even though we can't fragment packets
within SCTP due to the prtocol's inherent faults, we can still
fragment it at IP layer.  By setting the DF bit we will improve
the PMTU process.

RFC 2960 only says that we SHOULD clear the DF bit in this case,
so we're compliant even if we set the DF bit.  In fact RFC 4960
no longer has this statement.

Once we make this change, we only need to control the local
fragmentation.  There is already a bit in the skb which controls
that, local_df.  So this patch sets that instead of using the
ipfragok argument.

The only complication is that there isn't a struct sock object
per transport, so for IPv4 we have to resort to changing the
pmtudisc field for every packet.  This should be safe though
as the protocol is single-threaded.

Note that after this patch we can remove ipfragok from the rest
of the stack too.
Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      f880374c
  3. 23 7月, 2008 1 次提交
  5. 19 7月, 2008 1 次提交
  7. 20 6月, 2008 1 次提交
    • V
      sctp: Follow security requirement of responding with 1 packet · 2e3216cd
      由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于 
      RFC 4960, Section 11.4. Protection of Non-SCTP-Capable Hosts

When an SCTP stack receives a packet containing multiple control or
DATA chunks and the processing of the packet requires the sending of
multiple chunks in response, the sender of the response chunk(s) MUST
NOT send more than one packet.  If bundling is supported, multiple
response chunks that fit into a single packet MAY be bundled together
into one single response packet.  If bundling is not supported, then
the sender MUST NOT send more than one response chunk and MUST
discard all other responses.  Note that this rule does NOT apply to a
SACK chunk, since a SACK chunk is, in itself, a response to DATA and
a SACK does not require a response of more DATA.

We implement this by not servicing our outqueue until we reach the end
of the packet.  This enables maximum bundling.  We also identify
'response' chunks and make sure that we only send 1 packet when sending
such chunks.
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      2e3216cd
  9. 05 6月, 2008 4 次提交
  11. 10 5月, 2008 1 次提交
  13. 24 3月, 2008 1 次提交
  15. 01 3月, 2008 1 次提交
  17. 05 2月, 2008 1 次提交
  19. 29 1月, 2008 5 次提交
  21. 21 12月, 2007 1 次提交
  23. 07 12月, 2007 1 次提交
  25. 10 11月, 2007 1 次提交
  27. 08 11月, 2007 4 次提交
  29. 11 10月, 2007 7 次提交
  31. 27 9月, 2007 1 次提交
  33. 26 9月, 2007 1 次提交
  35. 17 9月, 2007 2 次提交
  37. 31 8月, 2007 1 次提交
    • W
      SCTP: Fix to encode PROTOCOL VIOLATION error cause correctly · 00f1c2df
      由 Wei Yongjun 提交于 
      PROTOCOL VIOLATION error cause in ABORT is bad encode when make abort
chunk. When SCTP encode ABORT chunk with PROTOCOL VIOLATION error cause,
it just add the error messages to PROTOCOL VIOLATION error cause, the
rest four bytes(struct sctp_paramhdr) is just add to the chunk, not
change the length of error cause. This cause the ABORT chunk to be a bad
format. The chunk is like this:

ABORT chunk
  Chunk type: ABORT (6)
  Chunk flags: 0x00
  Chunk length: 72 (*1)
  Protocol violation cause
    Cause code: Protocol violation (0x000d)
    Cause length: 62 (*2)
    Cause information: 5468652063756D756C61746976652074736E2061636B2062...
    Cause padding: 0000
[Needless] 00030010
Chunk Length(*1) = 72 but Cause length(*2) only 62, not include the
extend 4 bytes.
((72 - sizeof(chunk_hdr)) = 68) != (62 +3) / 4 * 4
Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
      00f1c2df
  39. 14 6月, 2007 2 次提交
  41. 05 5月, 2007 1 次提交
    • V
      [SCTP]: Set assoc_id correctly during INIT collision. · 07d93967
      由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于 
      During the INIT/COOKIE-ACK collision cases, it's possible to get
into a situation where the association id is not yet set at the time
of the user event generation.  As a result, user events have an
association id set to 0 which will confuse applications.

This happens if we hit case B of duplicate cookie processing.
In the particular example found and provided by Oscar Isaula
<Oscar.Isaula@motorola.com>, flow looks like this:
A				B
---- INIT------->  (lost)
	    <---------INIT------
---- INIT-ACK--->
	    <------ Cookie ECHO

When the Cookie Echo is received, we end up trying to update the
association that was created on A as a result of the (lost) INIT,
but that association doesn't have the ID set yet.
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      07d93967
  43. 26 4月, 2007 1 次提交