1. 27 9月, 2013 7 次提交
    • J
      [networking]device.h: Remove extern from function prototypes · f629d208
      Joe Perches 提交于
      There are a mix of function prototypes with and without extern
      in the kernel sources.  Standardize on not using extern for
      function prototypes.
      
      Function prototypes don't need to be written with extern.
      extern is assumed by the compiler.  Its use is as unnecessary as
      using auto to declare automatic/local variables in a block.
      Signed-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
      f629d208
    • J
      net.h/skbuff.h: Remove extern from function prototypes · 7965bd4d
      Joe Perches 提交于
      There are a mix of function prototypes with and without extern
      in the kernel sources.  Standardize on not using extern for
      function prototypes.
      
      Function prototypes don't need to be written with extern.
      extern is assumed by the compiler.  Its use is as unnecessary as
      using auto to declare automatic/local variables in a block.
      Signed-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
      7965bd4d
    • J
      netfilter: Remove extern from function prototypes · a0f4ecf3
      Joe Perches 提交于
      There are a mix of function prototypes with and without extern
      in the kernel sources.  Standardize on not using extern for
      function prototypes.
      
      Function prototypes don't need to be written with extern.
      extern is assumed by the compiler.  Its use is as unnecessary as
      using auto to declare automatic/local variables in a block.
      Signed-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
      a0f4ecf3
    • V
      net: add a possibility to get private from netdev_adjacent->list · b6ccba4c
      Veaceslav Falico 提交于
      It will be useful to get first/last element.
      
      CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
      CC: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
      CC: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
      CC: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      b6ccba4c
    • V
      net: add for_each iterators through neighbour lower link's private · 31088a11
      Veaceslav Falico 提交于
      Add a possibility to iterate through netdev_adjacent's private, currently
      only for lower neighbours.
      
      Add both RCU and RTNL/other locking variants of iterators, and make the
      non-rcu variant to be safe from removal.
      
      CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
      CC: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
      CC: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
      CC: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      31088a11
    • V
      net: add netdev_adjacent->private and allow to use it · 402dae96
      Veaceslav Falico 提交于
      Currently, even though we can access any linked device, we can't attach
      anything to it, which is vital to properly manage them.
      
      To fix this, add a new void *private to netdev_adjacent and functions
      setting/getting it (per link), so that we can save, per example, bonding's
      slave structures there, per slave device.
      
      netdev_master_upper_dev_link_private(dev, upper_dev, private) links dev to
      upper dev and populates the neighbour link only with private.
      
      netdev_lower_dev_get_private{,_rcu}() returns the private, if found.
      
      CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
      CC: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
      CC: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
      CC: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      402dae96
    • V
      net: add adj_list to save only neighbours · 2f268f12
      Veaceslav Falico 提交于
      Currently, we distinguish neighbours (first-level linked devices) from
      non-neighbours by the neighbour bool in the netdev_adjacent. This could be
      quite time-consuming in case we would like to traverse *only* through
      neighbours - cause we'd have to traverse through all devices and check for
      this flag, and in a (quite common) scenario where we have lots of vlans on
      top of bridge, which is on top of a bond - the bonding would have to go
      through all those vlans to get its upper neighbour linked devices.
      
      This situation is really unpleasant, cause there are already a lot of cases
      when a device with slaves needs to go through them in hot path.
      
      To fix this, introduce a new upper/lower device lists structure -
      adj_list, which contains only the neighbours. It works always in
      pair with the all_adj_list structure (renamed from upper/lower_dev_list),
      i.e. both of them contain the same links, only that all_adj_list contains
      also non-neighbour device links. It's really a small change visible,
      currently, only for __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert/remove(), and doesn't
      change the main linked logic at all.
      
      Also, add some comments a fix a name collision in
      netdev_for_each_upper_dev_rcu() and rework the naming by the following
      rules:
      
      netdev_(all_)(upper|lower)_*
      
      If "all_" is present, then we work with the whole list of upper/lower
      devices, otherwise - only with direct neighbours. Uninline functions - to
      get better stack traces.
      
      CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
      CC: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
      CC: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
      CC: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
      CC: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      2f268f12
  2. 24 9月, 2013 13 次提交
  3. 23 9月, 2013 12 次提交
  4. 22 9月, 2013 8 次提交