Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 23 11月, 2013 4 次提交
    • R
      ACPI / hotplug: Move container-specific code out of the core · 46394fd0
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      Move container-specific uevents from the core hotplug code to the
container scan handler's .attach() and .detach() callbacks.

This way the core will not have to special-case containers and
the uevents will be guaranteed to happen every time a container
is either scanned or trimmed as appropriate.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
      46394fd0
    • R
      ACPI / hotplug: Make ACPI PCI root hotplug use common hotplug code · 3338db00
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      Rework the common ACPI device hotplug code so that it is suitable
for PCI host bridge hotplug and switch the PCI host bridge scan
handler to using the common hotplug code.

This allows quite a few lines of code that are not necessary any more
to be dropped from the PCI host bridge scan handler and removes
arbitrary differences in behavior between PCI host bridge hotplug
and ACPI-based hotplug of other components, like CPUs and memory.

Also acpi_device_hotplug() can be static now.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
      3338db00
    • R
      ACPI / scan: Add acpi_device objects for all device nodes in the namespace · 202317a5
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      Modify the ACPI namespace scanning code to register a struct
acpi_device object for every namespace node representing a device,
processor and so on, even if the device represented by that namespace
node is reported to be not present and not functional by _STA.

There are multiple reasons to do that.  First of all, it avoids
quite a lot of overhead when struct acpi_device objects are
deleted every time acpi_bus_trim() is run and then added again
by a subsequent acpi_bus_scan() for the same scope, although the
namespace objects they correspond to stay in memory all the time
(which always is the case on a vast majority of systems).

Second, it will allow user space to see that there are namespace
nodes representing devices that are not present at the moment and may
be added to the system.  It will also allow user space to evaluate
_SUN for those nodes to check what physical slots the "missing"
devices may be put into and it will make sense to add a sysfs
attribute for _STA evaluation after this change (that will be
useful for thermal management on some systems).

Next, it will help to consolidate the ACPI hotplug handling among
subsystems by making it possible to store hotplug-related information
in struct acpi_device objects in a standard common way.

Finally, it will help to avoid a race condition related to the
deletion of ACPI namespace nodes.  Namely, namespace nodes may be
deleted as a result of a table unload triggered by _EJ0 or _DCK.
If a hotplug notification for one of those nodes is triggered
right before the deletion and it executes a hotplug callback
via acpi_hotplug_execute(), the ACPI handle passed to that
callback may be stale when the callback actually runs.  One way
to work around that is to always pass struct acpi_device pointers
to hotplug callbacks after doing a get_device() on the objects in
question which eliminates the use-after-free possibility (the ACPI
handles in those objects are invalidated by acpi_scan_drop_device(),
so they will trigger ACPICA errors on attempts to use them).
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
      202317a5
    • R
      ACPI / scan: Define non-empty device removal handler · d783156e
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      If an ACPI namespace node is removed (usually, as a result of a
table unload), and there is a data object attached to that node,
acpi_ns_delete_node() executes the removal handler submitted to
acpi_attach_data() for that object.  That handler is currently empty
for struct acpi_device objects, so it is necessary to detach those
objects from the corresponding ACPI namespace nodes in advance every
time a table unload may happen.  That is cumbersome and inefficient
and leads to some design constraints that turn out to be quite
inconvenient (in particular, struct acpi_device objects cannot be
registered for namespace nodes representing devices that are not
reported as present or functional by _STA).

For this reason, introduce a non-empty removal handler for ACPI
device objects that will unregister them when their ACPI namespace
nodes go away.

This code modification alone should not change functionality except
for the ordering of the ACPI hotplug workqueue which should not
matter (without subsequent code changes).
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
      d783156e
  3. 21 11月, 2013 2 次提交
  5. 20 11月, 2013 1 次提交
    • T
      ACPI / hotplug: Fix conflicted PCI bridge notify handlers · ca499fc8
      由 Toshi Kani 提交于 
      The PCI host bridge scan handler installs its own notify handler,
handle_hotplug_event_root(), by itself.  Nevertheless, the ACPI
hotplug framework also installs the common notify handler,
acpi_hotplug_notify_cb(), for PCI root bridges.  This causes
acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() to call _OST method with unsupported
error as hotplug.enabled is not set.

To address this issue, introduce hotplug.ignore flag, which
indicates that the scan handler installs its own notify handler by
itself.  The ACPI hotplug framework does not install the common
notify handler when this flag is set.
Signed-off-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
[rjw: Changed the name of the new flag]
Cc: 3.9+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.9+
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      ca499fc8
  7. 15 11月, 2013 1 次提交
    • R
      ACPI / driver core: Store an ACPI device pointer in struct acpi_dev_node · 7b199811
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      Modify struct acpi_dev_node to contain a pointer to struct acpi_device
associated with the given device object (that is, its ACPI companion
device) instead of an ACPI handle corresponding to it.  Introduce two
new macros for manipulating that pointer in a CONFIG_ACPI-safe way,
ACPI_COMPANION() and ACPI_COMPANION_SET(), and rework the
ACPI_HANDLE() macro to take the above changes into account.
Drop the ACPI_HANDLE_SET() macro entirely and rework its users to
use ACPI_COMPANION_SET() instead.  For some of them who used to
pass the result of acpi_get_child() directly to ACPI_HANDLE_SET()
introduce a helper routine acpi_preset_companion() doing an
equivalent thing.

The main motivation for doing this is that there are things
represented by struct acpi_device objects that don't have valid
ACPI handles (so called fixed ACPI hardware features, such as
power and sleep buttons) and we would like to create platform
device objects for them and "glue" them to their ACPI companions
in the usual way (which currently is impossible due to the
lack of valid ACPI handles).  However, there are more reasons
why it may be useful.

First, struct acpi_device pointers allow of much better type checking
than void pointers which are ACPI handles, so it should be more
difficult to write buggy code using modified struct acpi_dev_node
and the new macros.  Second, the change should help to reduce (over
time) the number of places in which the result of ACPI_HANDLE() is
passed to acpi_bus_get_device() in order to obtain a pointer to the
struct acpi_device associated with the given "physical" device,
because now that pointer is returned by ACPI_COMPANION() directly.
Finally, the change should make it easier to write generic code that
will build both for CONFIG_ACPI set and unset without adding explicit
compiler directives to it.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> # on Haswell
Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> # for ATA and SDIO part
      7b199811
  9. 08 11月, 2013 1 次提交
    • R
      ACPI / hotplug: Consolidate deferred execution of ACPI hotplug routines · 7b98118a
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      There are two different interfaces for queuing up work items on the
ACPI hotplug workqueue, alloc_acpi_hp_work() used by PCI and PCI host
bridge hotplug code and acpi_os_hotplug_execute() used by the common
ACPI hotplug code and docking stations.  They both are somewhat
cumbersome to use and work slightly differently.

The users of alloc_acpi_hp_work() have to submit a work function that
will extract the necessary data items from a struct acpi_hp_work
object allocated by alloc_acpi_hp_work() and then will free that
object, while it would be more straightforward to simply use a work
function with one more argument and let the interface take care of
the execution details.

The users of acpi_os_hotplug_execute() also have to deal with the
fact that it takes only one argument in addition to the work function
pointer, although acpi_os_execute_deferred() actually takes care of
the allocation and freeing of memory, so it would have been able to
pass more arguments to the work function if it hadn't been
constrained by the connection with acpi_os_execute().

Moreover, while alloc_acpi_hp_work() makes GFP_KERNEL memory
allocations, which is correct, because hotplug work items are
always queued up from process context, acpi_os_hotplug_execute()
uses GFP_ATOMIC, as that is needed by acpi_os_execute().  Also,
acpi_os_execute_deferred() queued up by it waits for the ACPI event
workqueues to flush before executing the work function, whereas
alloc_acpi_hp_work() can't do anything similar.  That leads to
somewhat arbitrary differences in behavior between various ACPI
hotplug code paths and has to be straightened up.

For this reason, replace both alloc_acpi_hp_work() and
acpi_os_hotplug_execute() with a single interface,
acpi_hotplug_execute(), combining their behavior and being more
friendly to its users than any of the two.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
      7b98118a
  11. 07 11月, 2013 2 次提交
  13. 31 10月, 2013 16 次提交
  15. 30 10月, 2013 5 次提交
  17. 22 10月, 2013 1 次提交
  19. 17 10月, 2013 1 次提交
  21. 11 10月, 2013 1 次提交
    • M
      ACPI / PM: allow child devices to ignore parent power state · 644f17ad
      由 Mika Westerberg 提交于 
      Some serial buses like I2C and SPI don't require that the parent device is
in D0 before any of its children transitions to D0, but instead the parent
device can control its own power independently from the children.

This does not follow the ACPI specification as it requires the parent to be
powered on before its children. However, Windows seems to ignore this
requirement so I think we can do the same in Linux.

Implement this by adding a new power flag 'ignore_parent' to struct
acpi_device.  If this flag is set the ACPI core ignores checking of the
parent device power state when the device is powered on/off.
Signed-off-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      644f17ad
  23. 24 9月, 2013 5 次提交