1. 13 1月, 2006 1 次提交
  2. 09 1月, 2006 1 次提交
  3. 30 9月, 2005 1 次提交
  4. 20 9月, 2005 1 次提交
  5. 11 7月, 2005 3 次提交
  6. 01 5月, 2005 1 次提交
  7. 18 4月, 2005 2 次提交
    • D
      [PATCH] sparc64: Reduce ptrace cache flushing · dadeafdf
      David S. Miller 提交于
      We were flushing the D-cache excessively for ptrace() processing
      and this makes debugging threads so slow as to be totally unusable.
      
      All process page accesses via ptrace() go via access_process_vm().
      This routine, for each process page, uses get_user_pages().  That
      in turn does a flush_dcache_page() on the child pages before we
      copy in/out the ptrace request data.
      
      Therefore, all we need to do after the data movement is:
      
      1) Flush the D-cache pages if the kernel maps the page to a different
         color than userspace does.
      2) If we wrote to the page, we need to flush the I-cache on older cpus.
      
      Previously we just flushed the entire cache at the end of a ptrace()
      request, and that was beyond stupid.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      dadeafdf
    • D
      [PATCH] sparc: Fix PTRACE_CONT bogosity · fb65b961
      David S. Miller 提交于
      SunOS aparently had this weird PTRACE_CONT semantic which
      we copied.  If the addr argument is something other than
      1, it sets the process program counter to whatever that
      value is.
      
      This is different from every other Linux architecture, which
      don't do anything with the addr and data args.
      
      This difference in particular breaks the Linux native GDB support
      for fork and vfork tracing on sparc and sparc64.
      
      There is no interest in running SunOS binaries using this weird
      PTRACE_CONT behavior, so just delete it so we behave like other
      platforms do.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      fb65b961
  8. 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
    • L
      Linux-2.6.12-rc2 · 1da177e4
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
      even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
      archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
      3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
      git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
      infrastructure for it.
      
      Let it rip!
      1da177e4