- 04 8月, 2010 2 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
There is no need to delete the gss context separately from the rest of the security context information, and doing so gives rise to a an rcu_dereference_check() warning. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
This will allow us to save the original generic cred in rpc_message, so that if we migrate from one server to another, we can generate a new bound cred without having to punt back to the NFS layer. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 15 5月, 2010 5 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Now that the rpc.gssd daemon can explicitly tell us that the key expired, we should cache that information to avoid spamming gssd. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Again, we can deadlock if the memory reclaim triggers a writeback that requires a rpcsec_gss credential lookup. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
The text based upcall now indicates which Kerberos encryption types are supported by the kernel rpcsecgss code. This is used by gssd to determine which encryption types it should attempt to negotiate when creating a context with a server. The server principal's database and keytab encryption types are what limits what it should negotiate. Therefore, its keytab should be created with only the enctypes listed by this file. Currently we support des-cbc-crc, des-cbc-md4 and des-cbc-md5 Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Kevin Coffman 提交于
Signed-off-by: NSteve Dickson <steved@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Kevin Coffman 提交于
Make the client and server code consistent regarding the extra buffer space made available for the auth code when wrapping data. Add some comments/documentation about the available buffer space in the xdr_buf head and tail when gss_wrap is called. Add a compile-time check to make sure we are not exceeding the available buffer space. Add a central function to shift head data. Signed-off-by: NKevin Coffman <kwc@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NSteve Dickson <steved@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 22 3月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
The function alloc_enc_pages() currently fails to release the pointer rqstp->rq_enc_pages in the error path. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Acked-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Cc: stable@kernel.org
-
- 10 2月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
The kernel currently ignores any error code sent by gssd and always considers it to be -EACCES. In order to better handle the situation of an expired KRB5 TGT, the kernel needs to be able to parse and deal with the errors that gssd sends. Aside from -EACCES the only error we care about is -EKEYEXPIRED, which we're using to indicate that the upper layers should retry the call a little later. To maintain backward compatibility with older gssd's, any error other than -EKEYEXPIRED is interpreted as -EACCES. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 07 1月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Randy Dunlap 提交于
Fix auth_gss printk format warning: net/sunrpc/auth_gss/auth_gss.c:660: warning: format '%ld' expects type 'long int', but argument 3 has type 'ssize_t' Signed-off-by: NRandy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Acked-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 19 12月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
When handling the gssd downcall, the kernel should distinguish between a successful downcall that contains an error code and a failed downcall (i.e. where the parsing failed or some other sort of problem occurred). In the former case, gss_pipe_downcall should be returning the number of bytes written to the pipe instead of an error. In the event of other errors, we generally want the initiating task to retry the upcall so we set msg.errno to -EAGAIN. An unexpected error code here is a bug however, so BUG() in that case. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 10 12月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Suresh Jayaraman 提交于
The pointer to struct gss_auth parameter in gss_add_msg is not really needed after commit 5b7ddd4a. Zap it. Signed-off-by: NSuresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 09 12月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Roel Kluin 提交于
IS_ERR returns 1 or 0, PTR_ERR returns the error value. Signed-off-by: NRoel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com> Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 10 8月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 10 6月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jesper Dangaard Brouer 提交于
As the module uses rcu_call() we should make sure that all rcu callback has been completed before removing the code. Signed-off-by: NJesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@comx.dk> Acked-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 24 12月, 2008 11 次提交
-
-
由 Olga Kornievskaia 提交于
This patch extends the new upcall with a "service" field that currently can have 2 values: "*" or "nfs". These values specify matching rules for principals in the keytab file. The "*" means that gssd is allowed to use "root", "nfs", or "host" keytab entries while the other option requires "nfs". Restricting gssd to use the "nfs" principal is needed for when the server performs a callback to the client. The server in this case has to authenticate itself as an "nfs" principal. We also need "service" field to distiguish between two client-side cases both currently using a uid of 0: the case of regular file access by the root user, and the case of state-management calls (such as setclientid) which should use a keytab for authentication. (And the upcall should fail if an appropriate principal can't be found.) Signed-off: Olga Kornievskaia <aglo@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Olga Kornievskaia 提交于
This patch extends the new upcall by adding a "target" field communicating who we want to authenticate to (equivalently, the service principal that we want to acquire a ticket for). Signed-off: Olga Kornievskaia <aglo@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 \"J. Bruce Fields\ 提交于
Implement the new upcall. We decide which version of the upcall gssd will use (new or old), by creating both pipes (the new one named "gssd", the old one named after the mechanism (e.g., "krb5")), and then waiting to see which version gssd actually opens. We don't permit pipes of the two different types to be opened at once. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 \"J. Bruce Fields\ 提交于
Keep a pointer to the inode that the message is queued on in the struct gss_upcall_msg. This will be convenient, especially after we have a choice of two pipes that an upcall could be queued on. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 \"J. Bruce Fields\ 提交于
Introduce a global variable pipe_version which will eventually be used to keep track of which version of the upcall gssd is using. For now, though, it only keeps track of whether any pipe is open or not; it is negative if not, zero if one is opened. We use this to wait for the first gssd to open a pipe. (Minor digression: note this waits only for the very first open of any pipe, not for the first open of a pipe for a given auth; thus we still need the RPC_PIPE_WAIT_FOR_OPEN behavior to wait for gssd to open new pipes that pop up on subsequent mounts.) Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 \"J. Bruce Fields\ 提交于
Keep a count of the number of pipes open plus the number of messages on a pipe. This count isn't used yet. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 \"J. Bruce Fields\ 提交于
I want to add a little more code here, so it'll be convenient to have this flatter. Also, I'll want to add another error condition, so it'll be more convenient to return -ENOMEM than NULL in the error case. The only caller is already converting NULL to -ENOMEM anyway. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 \"J. Bruce Fields\ 提交于
We'll want to call this from elsewhere soon. And this is a bit nicer anyway. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 \"J. Bruce Fields\ 提交于
We're just about to kfree() gss_auth, so there's no point to setting any of its fields. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
There's a bit of a chicken and egg problem when it comes to destroying auth_gss credentials. When we destroy the last instance of a GSSAPI RPC credential, we should send a NULL RPC call with a GSS procedure of RPCSEC_GSS_DESTROY to hint to the server that it can destroy those creds. This isn't happening because we're setting clearing the uptodate bit on the credentials and then setting the operations to the gss_nullops. When we go to do the RPC call, we try to refresh the creds. That fails with -EACCES and the call fails. Fix this by not clearing the UPTODATE bit for the credentials and adding a new crdestroy op for gss_nullops that just tears down the cred without trying to destroy the context. The only difference between this patch and the first one is the removal of some minor formatting deltas. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Somehow, this escaped the previous purge. There should be no need to keep any extra locks in the XDR callbacks. The NFS client XDR code only writes into private objects, whereas all reads of shared objects are confined to fields that do not change, such as filehandles... Ditto for lockd, the NFSv2/v3 client mount code, and rpcbind. The nfsd XDR code may require the BKL, but since it does a synchronous RPC call from a thread that already holds the lock, that issue is moot. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 10 7月, 2008 3 次提交
-
-
由 \\\"J. Bruce Fields\\\ 提交于
There used to be a print_hexl() function that used isprint(), now gone. I don't know why NFS_NGROUPS and CA_RUN_AS_MACHINE were here. I also don't know why another #define that's actually used was marked "unused". Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 \\\"J. Bruce Fields\\\ 提交于
Also, a minor comment grammar fix in the same file. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Since the credentials may be allocated during the call to rpc_new_task(), which again may be called by a memory allocator... Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 12 6月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Adrian Bunk 提交于
This patch removes CVS keywords that weren't updated for a long time from comments. Signed-off-by: NAdrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 20 4月, 2008 5 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
When a server rejects our credential with an AUTH_REJECTEDCRED or similar, we need to refresh the credential and then retry the request. However, we do want to allow any requests that are in flight to finish executing, so that we can at least attempt to process the replies that depend on this instance of the credential. The solution is to ensure that gss_refresh() looks up an entirely new RPCSEC_GSS credential instead of attempting to create a context for the existing invalid credential. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If the downcall completes before we get the spin_lock then we currently fail to refresh the credential. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
We need to try to ensure that we always use the same credentials whenever we re-establish the clientid on the server. If not, the server won't recognise that we're the same client, and so may not allow us to recover state. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
With the recent change to generic creds, we can no longer use cred->cr_ops->cr_name to distinguish between RPCSEC_GSS principals and AUTH_SYS/AUTH_NULL identities. Replace it with the rpc_authops->au_name instead... Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
..and always destroy using a 'soft' RPC call. Destroying GSS credentials isn't mandatory; the server can always cope with a few credentials not getting destroyed in a timely fashion. This actually fixes a hang situation. Basically, some servers will decide that the client is crazy if it tries to destroy an RPC context for which they have sent an RPCSEC_GSS_CREDPROBLEM, and so will refuse to talk to it for a while. The regression therefor probably was introduced by commit 0df7fb74. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 15 3月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
We need the ability to treat 'generic' creds specially, since they want to bind instances of the auth cred instead of binding themselves. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 06 3月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Harvey Harrison 提交于
__FUNCTION__ is gcc-specific, use __func__ Signed-off-by: NHarvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 29 2月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 26 2月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
An audit of the current RPC timeout functions shows that they don't really ever need to run in the softirq context. As long as the softirq is able to signal that the wakeup is due to a timeout (which it can do by setting task->tk_status to -ETIMEDOUT) then the callback functions can just run as standard task->tk_callback functions (in the rpciod/process context). The only possible border-line case would be xprt_timer() for the case of UDP, when the callback is used to reduce the size of the transport congestion window. In testing, however, the effect of moving that update to a callback would appear to be minor. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-