- 02 11月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eryu Guan 提交于
Some jbd2 code prints out kernel messages with "JBD2: " prefix, at the same time other jbd2 code prints with "JBD: " prefix. Unify the prefix to "JBD2: ". Signed-off-by: NEryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 27 10月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Randy Dunlap 提交于
Fix build error when CONFIG_BUG is not enabled: fs/jbd2/transaction.c:1175:3: error: implicit declaration of function '__WARN' by changing __WARN() to WARN_ON(), as suggested by Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com>. Signed-off-by: NRandy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com>
-
- 04 9月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Dan Carpenter 提交于
This silences some Sparse warnings: fs/jbd2/transaction.c:135:69: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) fs/jbd2/transaction.c:135:69: expected restricted gfp_t [usertype] flags fs/jbd2/transaction.c:135:69: got int [signed] gfp_mask Signed-off-by: NDan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Add debugging information in case jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata() is called with a buffer_head which didn't have jbd2_journal_get_write_access() called on it, or if the journal_head has the wrong transaction in it. In addition, return an error code. This won't change anything for ocfs2, which will BUG_ON() the non-zero exit code. For ext4, the caller of this function is ext4_handle_dirty_metadata(), and on seeing a non-zero return code, will call __ext4_journal_stop(), which will print the function and line number of the (buggy) calling function and abort the journal. This will allow us to recover instead of bug halting, which is better from a robustness and reliability point of view. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 14 6月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
jbd2_journal_remove_journal_head() can oops when trying to access journal_head returned by bh2jh(). This is caused for example by the following race: TASK1 TASK2 jbd2_journal_commit_transaction() ... processing t_forget list __jbd2_journal_refile_buffer(jh); if (!jh->b_transaction) { jbd_unlock_bh_state(bh); jbd2_journal_try_to_free_buffers() jbd2_journal_grab_journal_head(bh) jbd_lock_bh_state(bh) __journal_try_to_free_buffer() jbd2_journal_put_journal_head(jh) jbd2_journal_remove_journal_head(bh); jbd2_journal_put_journal_head() in TASK2 sees that b_jcount == 0 and buffer is not part of any transaction and thus frees journal_head before TASK1 gets to doing so. Note that even buffer_head can be released by try_to_free_buffers() after jbd2_journal_put_journal_head() which adds even larger opportunity for oops (but I didn't see this happen in reality). Fix the problem by making transactions hold their own journal_head reference (in b_jcount). That way we don't have to remove journal_head explicitely via jbd2_journal_remove_journal_head() and instead just remove journal_head when b_jcount drops to zero. The result of this is that [__]jbd2_journal_refile_buffer(), [__]jbd2_journal_unfile_buffer(), and __jdb2_journal_remove_checkpoint() can free journal_head which needs modification of a few callers. Also we have to be careful because once journal_head is removed, buffer_head might be freed as well. So we have to get our own buffer_head reference where it matters. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 13 6月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tao Ma 提交于
credits isn't a parameter for jbd2_journal_get_write_access and jbd2_journal_get_undo_access. So remove the corresponding comments. Acked-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net> Signed-off-by: NTao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 26 5月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ding Dinghua 提交于
drop jh->b_jcount in error path Signed-off-by: NDing Dinghua <dingdinghua@nrchpc.ac.cn> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 25 5月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eryu Guan 提交于
jbd2__journal_start() returns an ERR_PTR() value rather than NULL on failure. Signed-off-by: NEryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 24 5月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
In data=ordered mode, it's theoretically possible (however rare) that an inode is filed to transaction's t_inode_list and a flusher thread writes all the data and inode is reclaimed before the transaction starts to commit. In such a case, we could erroneously omit sending a flush to file system device when it is different from the journal device (because data can still be in disk cache only). Fix the problem by setting a flag in a transaction when some inode is added to it and then send disk flush in the commit code when the flag is set. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 23 5月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tao Ma 提交于
t_max_wait is added in commit 8e85fb3f to indicate how long we were waiting for new transaction to start. In commit 6d0bf005, it is moved to another function named update_t_max_wait to avoid a build warning. But the wrong thing is that the original 'ts' is initialized in the start of function start_this_handle and we can calculate t_max_wait in the right way. while with this change, ts is initialized within the function and t_max_wait can never be calculated right. This patch moves the initialization of ts to the original beginning of start_this_handle and pass it to function update_t_max_wait so that it can be calculated right and the build warning is avoided also. Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
-
- 31 3月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lucas De Marchi 提交于
Fixes generated by 'codespell' and manually reviewed. Signed-off-by: NLucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@profusion.mobi>
-
- 12 2月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
On an SMP ARM system running ext4, I've received a report that the first J_ASSERT in jbd2_journal_commit_transaction has been triggering: J_ASSERT(journal->j_running_transaction != NULL); While investigating possible causes for this problem, I noticed that __jbd2_log_start_commit() is getting called with j_state_lock only read-locked, in spite of the fact that it's possible for it might j_commit_request. Fix this by grabbing the necessary information so we can test to see if we need to start a new transaction before dropping the read lock, and then calling jbd2_log_start_commit() which will grab the write lock. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 19 12月, 2010 3 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
This is a port to jbd2 of a patch which Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com> originally made to fs/jbd. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
This is a port to jbd2 of a patch which Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com> originally made to fs/jbd. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
'buffer_head' should be 'journal_head' This is a port of a patch which Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com> made to fs/jbd to jbd2. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 10 12月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Uwe Kleine-König 提交于
Signed-off-by: NUwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
-
- 28 10月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
An attempt to modify the file system during the call to jbd2_destroy_journal() can lead to a system lockup. So add some checking to make it much more obvious when this happens to and to determine where the offending code is located. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 10 8月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Fix the compiler warning: fs/jbd2/transaction.c: In function ‘start_this_handle’: fs/jbd2/transaction.c:98: warning: unused variable ‘ts’ Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 04 8月, 2010 2 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
This should remove the last exclusive lock from start_this_handle(), so that we should now be able to start multiple transactions at the same time on large SMP systems. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Lockstat reports have shown that j_state_lock is a major source of lock contention, especially on systems with more than 4 CPU cores. So change it to be a read/write spinlock. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 02 8月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
By using an atomic_t for t_updates and t_outstanding credits, this should allow us to not need to take transaction t_handle_lock in jbd2_journal_stop(). Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 27 7月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
__GFP_NOFAIL is going away, so add our own retry loop. Also add jbd2__journal_start() and jbd2__journal_restart() which take a gfp mask, so that file systems can optionally (re)start transaction handles using GFP_KERNEL. If they do this, then they need to be prepared to handle receiving an PTR_ERR(-ENOMEM) error, and be ready to reflect that error up to userspace. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 16 7月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
OCFS2 uses t_commit trigger to compute and store checksum of the just committed blocks. When a buffer has b_frozen_data, checksum is computed for it instead of b_data but this can result in an old checksum being written to the filesystem in the following scenario: 1) transaction1 is opened 2) handle1 is opened 3) journal_access(handle1, bh) - This sets jh->b_transaction to transaction1 4) modify(bh) 5) journal_dirty(handle1, bh) 6) handle1 is closed 7) start committing transaction1, opening transaction2 8) handle2 is opened 9) journal_access(handle2, bh) - This copies off b_frozen_data to make it safe for transaction1 to commit. jh->b_next_transaction is set to transaction2. 10) jbd2_journal_write_metadata() checksums b_frozen_data 11) the journal correctly writes b_frozen_data to the disk journal 12) handle2 is closed - There was no dirty call for the bh on handle2, so it is never queued for any more journal operation 13) Checkpointing finally happens, and it just spools the bh via normal buffer writeback. This will write b_data, which was never triggered on and thus contains a wrong (old) checksum. This patch fixes the problem by calling the trigger at the moment data is frozen for journal commit - i.e., either when b_frozen_data is created by do_get_write_access or just before we write a buffer to the log if b_frozen_data does not exist. We also rename the trigger to t_frozen as that better describes when it is called. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
- 16 5月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
One of the most contended locks in the jbd2 layer is j_state_lock when running dbench. This is especially true if using the real-time kernel with its "sleeping spinlocks" patch that replaces spinlocks with priority inheriting mutexes --- but it also shows up on large SMP benchmarks. Thanks to John Stultz for pointing this out. Reviewed by Mingming Cao and Jan Kara. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 16 2月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 dingdinghua 提交于
Delay discarding buffers in journal_unmap_buffer until we know that "add to orphan" operation has definitely been committed, otherwise the log space of committing transation may be freed and reused before truncate get committed, updates may get lost if crash happens. Signed-off-by: Ndingdinghua <dingdinghua@nrchpc.ac.cn> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 18 8月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
lockdep annotation for a transaction start has been at the end of jbd2_journal_start(). But a transaction is also started from jbd2_journal_restart(). Move the lockdep annotation to start_this_handle() which covers both cases. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 11 8月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andreas Dilger 提交于
fix jiffie rounding in jbd commit timer setup code. Rounding down could cause the timer to be fired before the corresponding transaction has expired. That transaction can stay not committed forever if no new transaction is created or expicit sync/umount happens. Signed-off-by: NAlex Zhuravlev (Tomas) <alex.zhuravlev@sun.com> Signed-off-by: NAndreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 18 6月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Hisashi Hifumi 提交于
This patch reverts 3f31fddf, which is no longer needed because if a race between freeing buffer and committing transaction functionality occurs and dio gets error, currently dio falls back to buffered IO due to the commit 6ccfa806. Signed-off-by: NHisashi Hifumi <hifumi.hisashi@oss.ntt.co.jp> Cc: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Acked-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 14 7月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
The following race can happen: CPU1 CPU2 checkpointing code checks the buffer, adds it to an array for writeback do_get_write_access() ... lock_buffer() unlock_buffer() flush_batch() submits the buffer for IO __jbd2_journal_file_buffer() So a buffer under writeout is returned from do_get_write_access(). Since the filesystem code relies on the fact that journaled buffers cannot be written out, it does not take the buffer lock and so it can modify buffer while it is under writeout. That can lead to a filesystem corruption if we crash at the right moment. We fix the problem by clearing the buffer dirty bit under buffer_lock even if the buffer is on BJ_None list. Actually, we clear the dirty bit regardless the list the buffer is in and warn about the fact if the buffer is already journalled. Thanks for spotting the problem goes to dingdinghua <dingdinghua85@gmail.com>. Reported-by: Ndingdinghua <dingdinghua85@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 26 3月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
If a commit is triggered by fsync(), set a flag indicating the journal blocks associated with the transaction should be flushed out using WRITE_SYNC. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 11 2月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
If we race with commit code setting i_transaction to NULL, we could possibly dereference it. Proper locking requires the journal pointer (to access journal->j_list_lock), which we don't have. So we have to change the prototype of the function so that filesystem passes us the journal pointer. Also add a more detailed comment about why the function jbd2_journal_begin_ordered_truncate() does what it does and how it should be used. Thanks to Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com> for pointing to the suspitious code. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Acked-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com> CC: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org CC: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com CC: mfasheh@suse.de CC: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
-
- 06 1月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
Filesystems often to do compute intensive operation on some metadata. If this operation is repeated many times, it can be very expensive. It would be much nicer if the operation could be performed once before a buffer goes to disk. This adds triggers to jbd2 buffer heads. Just before writing a metadata buffer to the journal, jbd2 will optionally call a commit trigger associated with the buffer. If the journal is aborted, an abort trigger will be called on any dirty buffers as they are dropped from pending transactions. ocfs2 will use this feature. Initially I tried to come up with a more generic trigger that could be used for non-buffer-related events like transaction completion. It doesn't tie nicely, because the information a buffer trigger needs (specific to a journal_head) isn't the same as what a transaction trigger needs (specific to a tranaction_t or perhaps journal_t). So I implemented a buffer set, with the understanding that journal/transaction wide triggers should be implemented separately. There is only one trigger set allowed per buffer. I can't think of any reason to attach more than one set. Contrast this with a journal or transaction in which multiple places may want to watch the entire transaction separately. The trigger sets are considered static allocation from the jbd2 perspective. ocfs2 will just have one trigger set per block type, setting the same set on every bh of the same type. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
-
- 04 1月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Add new mount options, min_batch_time and max_batch_time, which controls how long the jbd2 layer should wait for additional filesystem operations to get batched with a synchronous write transaction. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 26 11月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
This patch removes the static sleep time in favor of a more self optimizing approach where we measure the average amount of time it takes to commit a transaction to disk and the ammount of time a transaction has been running. If somebody does a sync write or an fsync() traditionally we would sleep for 1 jiffies, which depending on the value of HZ could be a significant amount of time compared to how long it takes to commit a transaction to the underlying storage. With this patch instead of sleeping for a jiffie, we check to see if the amount of time this transaction has been running is less than the average commit time, and if it is we sleep for the delta using schedule_hrtimeout to give us a higher precision sleep time. This greatly benefits high end storage where you could end up sleeping for longer than it takes to commit the transaction and therefore sitting idle instead of allowing the transaction to be committed by keeping the sleep time to a minimum so you are sure to always be doing something. Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 17 10月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
The multiblock allocator needs to be able to release blocks (and issue a blkdev discard request) when the transaction which freed those blocks is committed. Previously this was done via a polling mechanism when blocks are allocated or freed. A much better way of doing things is to create a jbd2 callback function and attaching the list of blocks to be freed directly to the transaction structure. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 11 8月, 2008 2 次提交
-
-
由 Ingo Molnar 提交于
the names were too generic: drivers/uio/uio.c:87: error: expected identifier or '(' before 'do' drivers/uio/uio.c:87: error: expected identifier or '(' before 'while' drivers/uio/uio.c:113: error: 'map_release' undeclared here (not in a function) Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
Most the free-standing lock_acquire() usages look remarkably similar, sweep them into a new helper. Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 12 7月, 2008 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
This patch adds necessary framework into JBD2 to be able to track inodes with each transaction and write-out their dirty data during transaction commit time. This new ordered mode brings all sorts of advantages such as possibility to get rid of journal heads and buffer heads for data buffers in ordered mode, better ordering of writes on transaction commit, simplification of some JBD code, no more anonymous pages when truncate of data being committed happens. Also with this new ordered mode, delayed allocation on ordered mode is much simpler. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
- 14 7月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mingming Cao 提交于
journal_try_to_free_buffers() could race with jbd commit transaction when the later is holding the buffer reference while waiting for the data buffer to flush to disk. If the caller of journal_try_to_free_buffers() request tries hard to release the buffers, it will treat the failure as error and return back to the caller. We have seen the directo IO failed due to this race. Some of the caller of releasepage() also expecting the buffer to be dropped when passed with GFP_KERNEL mask to the releasepage()->journal_try_to_free_buffers(). With this patch, if the caller is passing the GFP_KERNEL to indicating this call could wait, in case of try_to_free_buffers() failed, let's waiting for journal_commit_transaction() to finish commit the current committing transaction , then try to free those buffers again with journal locked. Signed-off-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-