Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 19 2月, 2011 20 次提交
  3. 18 2月, 2011 2 次提交
  5. 17 2月, 2011 1 次提交
  7. 16 2月, 2011 1 次提交
  9. 14 2月, 2011 1 次提交
  11. 13 2月, 2011 2 次提交
  13. 11 2月, 2011 2 次提交
  15. 09 2月, 2011 2 次提交
  17. 08 2月, 2011 1 次提交
  19. 05 2月, 2011 2 次提交
    • T
      genirq: Add missing status flags to modification mask · 872434d6
      由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于 
      The mask which filters out the valid bits which can be set via
irq_modify_status() is missing IRQ_NO_BALANCING, which breaks UV.

Add IRQ_PER_CPU as well to avoid another one line patch for 39.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      872434d6
    • P
      USB: Fix trout build failure with ci13xxx_msm gadget · 8cf28f1f
      由 Pavankumar Kondeti 提交于 
      This patch fixes the below compilation errors.

  CC      drivers/usb/gadget/ci13xxx_msm.o
  CC      net/mac80211/led.o
  drivers/usb/gadget/ci13xxx_msm.c: In function 'ci13xxx_msm_notify_event':
  drivers/usb/gadget/ci13xxx_msm.c:42: error: 'USB_AHBBURST' undeclared (first use in this function)
  drivers/usb/gadget/ci13xxx_msm.c:42: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
  drivers/usb/gadget/ci13xxx_msm.c:42: error: for each function it appears in.)
  drivers/usb/gadget/ci13xxx_msm.c:43: error: 'USB_AHBMODE' undeclared (first use in this function)
make[4]: *** [drivers/usb/gadget/ci13xxx_msm.o] Error 1
make[3]: *** [drivers/usb/gadget] Error 2

MSM USB driver is not supported on boards like trout (MSM7201) which
has an external PHY.
Signed-off-by: NPavankumar Kondeti <pkondeti@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
      8cf28f1f
  21. 04 2月, 2011 2 次提交
  23. 03 2月, 2011 4 次提交
    • S
      tracing: Replace syscall_meta_data struct array with pointer array · 3d56e331
      由 Steven Rostedt 提交于 
      Currently the syscall_meta structures for the syscall tracepoints are
placed in the __syscall_metadata section, and at link time, the linker
makes one large array of all these syscall metadata structures. On boot
up, this array is read (much like the initcall sections) and the syscall
data is processed.

The problem is that there is no guarantee that gcc will place complex
structures nicely together in an array format. Two structures in the
same file may be placed awkwardly, because gcc has no clue that they
are suppose to be in an array.

A hack was used previous to force the alignment to 4, to pack the
structures together. But this caused alignment issues with other
architectures (sparc).

Instead of packing the structures into an array, the structures' addresses
are now put into the __syscall_metadata section. As pointers are always the
natural alignment, gcc should always pack them tightly together
(otherwise initcall, extable, etc would also fail).

By having the pointers to the structures in the section, we can still
iterate the trace_events without causing unnecessary alignment problems
with other architectures, or depending on the current behaviour of
gcc that will likely change in the future just to tick us kernel developers
off a little more.

The __syscall_metadata section is also moved into the .init.data section
as it is now only needed at boot up.
Suggested-by: NDavid Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Acked-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Signed-off-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
      3d56e331
    • M
      tracepoints: Fix section alignment using pointer array · 65498646
      由 Mathieu Desnoyers 提交于 
      Make the tracepoints more robust, making them solid enough to handle compiler
changes by not relying on anything based on compiler-specific behavior with
respect to structure alignment. Implement an approach proposed by David Miller:
use an array of const pointers to refer to the individual structures, and export
this pointer array through the linker script rather than the structures per se.
It will consume 32 extra bytes per tracepoint (24 for structure padding and 8
for the pointers), but are less likely to break due to compiler changes.

History:

commit 7e066fb8 tracepoints: add DECLARE_TRACE() and DEFINE_TRACE()
added the aligned(32) type and variable attribute to the tracepoint structures
to deal with gcc happily aligning statically defined structures on 32-byte
multiples.

One attempt was to use a 8-byte alignment for tracepoint structures by applying
both the variable and type attribute to tracepoint structures definitions and
declarations. It worked fine with gcc 4.5.1, but broke with gcc 4.4.4 and 4.4.5.

The reason is that the "aligned" attribute only specify the _minimum_ alignment
for a structure, leaving both the compiler and the linker free to align on
larger multiples. Because tracepoint.c expects the structures to be placed as an
array within each section, up-alignment cause NULL-pointer exceptions due to the
extra unexpected padding.

(this patch applies on top of -tip)
Signed-off-by: NMathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Acked-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
LKML-Reference: <20110126222622.GA10794@Krystal>
CC: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
CC: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
      65498646
    • S
      tracing: Replace trace_event struct array with pointer array · e4a9ea5e
      由 Steven Rostedt 提交于 
      Currently the trace_event structures are placed in the _ftrace_events
section, and at link time, the linker makes one large array of all
the trace_event structures. On boot up, this array is read (much like
the initcall sections) and the events are processed.

The problem is that there is no guarantee that gcc will place complex
structures nicely together in an array format. Two structures in the
same file may be placed awkwardly, because gcc has no clue that they
are suppose to be in an array.

A hack was used previous to force the alignment to 4, to pack the
structures together. But this caused alignment issues with other
architectures (sparc).

Instead of packing the structures into an array, the structures' addresses
are now put into the _ftrace_event section. As pointers are always the
natural alignment, gcc should always pack them tightly together
(otherwise initcall, extable, etc would also fail).

By having the pointers to the structures in the section, we can still
iterate the trace_events without causing unnecessary alignment problems
with other architectures, or depending on the current behaviour of
gcc that will likely change in the future just to tick us kernel developers
off a little more.

The _ftrace_event section is also moved into the .init.data section
as it is now only needed at boot up.
Suggested-by: NDavid Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Acked-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
      e4a9ea5e
    • N
      vfs: sparse: add __FMODE_EXEC · 3cd90ea4
      由 Namhyung Kim 提交于 
      FMODE_EXEC is a constant type of fmode_t but was used with normal integer
constants.  This results in following warnings from sparse.  Fix it using
new macro __FMODE_EXEC.

 fs/exec.c:116:58: warning: restricted fmode_t degrades to integer
 fs/exec.c:689:58: warning: restricted fmode_t degrades to integer
 fs/fcntl.c:777:9: warning: restricted fmode_t degrades to integer
Signed-off-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      3cd90ea4