Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 02 1月, 2009 2 次提交
  3. 11 12月, 2008 2 次提交
  5. 09 12月, 2008 1 次提交
  7. 08 12月, 2008 1 次提交
  9. 28 11月, 2008 1 次提交
    • N
      [ARM] rationalize memory configuration code some more · 4b5f32ce
      由 Nicolas Pitre 提交于 
      Currently there are two instances of struct meminfo: one in
kernel/setup.c marked __initdata, and another in mm/init.c with
permanent storage.  Let's keep only the later to directly populate
the permanent version from arm_add_memory().

Also move common validation tests between the MMU and non-MMU cases
into arm_add_memory() to remove some duplication.  Protection against
overflowing the membank array is also moved in there in order to cover
the kernel cmdline parsing path as well.
Signed-off-by: NNicolas Pitre <nico@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
      4b5f32ce
  11. 10 11月, 2008 1 次提交
  13. 07 11月, 2008 1 次提交
    • R
      [ARM] fix naming of MODULE_START / MODULE_END · ab4f2ee1
      由 Russell King 提交于 
      As of 73bdf0a6, the kernel needs
to know where modules are located in the virtual address space.
On ARM, we located this region between MODULE_START and MODULE_END.
Unfortunately, everyone else calls it MODULES_VADDR and MODULES_END.
Update ARM to use the same naming, so is_vmalloc_or_module_addr()
can work properly.  Also update the comment on mm/vmalloc.c to
reflect that ARM also places modules in a separate region from the
vmalloc space.
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
      ab4f2ee1
  15. 06 11月, 2008 2 次提交
  17. 04 11月, 2008 1 次提交
  19. 23 10月, 2008 1 次提交
  21. 21 10月, 2008 1 次提交
  23. 10 10月, 2008 1 次提交
  25. 09 10月, 2008 1 次提交
  27. 03 10月, 2008 1 次提交
  29. 01 10月, 2008 2 次提交
  31. 26 9月, 2008 1 次提交
    • J
      kgdb, x86, arm, mips, powerpc: ignore user space single stepping · d7161a65
      由 Jason Wessel 提交于 
      On the x86 arch, user space single step exceptions should be ignored
if they occur in the kernel space, such as ptrace stepping through a
system call.

First check if it is kgdb that is executing a single step, then ensure
it is not an accidental traversal into the user space, while in kgdb,
any other time the TIF_SINGLESTEP is set, kgdb should ignore the
exception.

On x86, arm, mips and powerpc, the kgdb_contthread usage was
inconsistent with the way single stepping is implemented in the kgdb
core.  The arch specific stub should always set the
kgdb_cpu_doing_single_step correctly if it is single stepping.  This
allows kgdb to correctly process an instruction steps if ptrace
happens to be requesting an instruction step over a system call.
Signed-off-by: NJason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>
      d7161a65
  33. 25 9月, 2008 3 次提交
    • R
      [ARM] Print details relevant to how we handle the cache · 2b4ae1f1
      由 Russell King 提交于 
      This replaces the original cache type decoding printks.  We now
indicate how we're treating the cache which we found, rather
than what we found.
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
      2b4ae1f1
    • R
      [ARM] Introduce new bitmask based cache type macros · c0e95878
      由 Russell King 提交于 
      Rather than trying to (inaccurately) decode the cache type from the
registers each time we need to decide what type of cache we have,
use a bitmask initialized early during boot.

Since the setup is a one-off initialization, we can be a little more
clever and take account of the CPU architecture as well.

Note that we continue to achieve the compactness on optimised kernels
by forcing tests to always-false or always-true as appropriate, thereby
allowing the compiler to do build-time code elimination.
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
      c0e95878
    • R
      [ARM] Remove cache type printks · 90f1e084
      由 Russell King 提交于 
      The cache type register found in ARMv5 and later CPUs changes format
and meaning depending on the CPU architecture version.  Currently,
this code:
a) doesn't work for everything - Xscale's are identified as
   'unknown 5'.
b) is not able to tell whether the caches are VIVT or VIPT from the
   cache type.
c) prints rubbish on some ARMv6 and ARMv7+ CPUs.

The two solutions to this are:
1. Add yet more code to decode and print the various different register
   formats.
2. Remove the code altogther.

The code only exists to decode and print the cache parameters.
Increasing the complexity of it just for the sake of a few prinks
isn't worth it.
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
      90f1e084
  35. 09 9月, 2008 1 次提交
    • M
      kernel/cpu.c: create a CPU_STARTING cpu_chain notifier · e545a614
      由 Manfred Spraul 提交于 
      Right now, there is no notifier that is called on a new cpu, before the new
cpu begins processing interrupts/softirqs.
Various kernel function would need that notification, e.g. kvm works around
by calling smp_call_function_single(), rcu polls cpu_online_map.

The patch adds a CPU_STARTING notification. It also adds a helper function
that sends the message to all cpu_chain handlers.

Tested on x86-64.
All other archs are untested. Especially on sparc, I'm not sure if I got
it right.
Signed-off-by: NManfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      e545a614
  37. 06 9月, 2008 5 次提交
  39. 05 9月, 2008 1 次提交
    • R
      [ARM] sparse: fix several warnings · 09d9bae0
      由 Russell King 提交于 
      arch/arm/kernel/process.c:270:6: warning: symbol 'show_fpregs' was not declared. Should it be static?

This function isn't used, so can be removed.

arch/arm/kernel/setup.c:532:9: warning: symbol 'len' shadows an earlier one
arch/arm/kernel/setup.c:524:6: originally declared here

A function containing two 'len's.

arch/arm/mm/fault-armv.c:188:13: warning: symbol 'check_writebuffer_bugs' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mm/mmap.c:122:5: warning: symbol 'valid_phys_addr_range' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mm/mmap.c:137:5: warning: symbol 'valid_mmap_phys_addr_range' was not declared. Should it be static?

Missing includes.

arch/arm/kernel/traps.c:71:77: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
arch/arm/mm/ioremap.c:355:46: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces)

Sillies.
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
      09d9bae0
  41. 01 9月, 2008 5 次提交
  43. 15 8月, 2008 1 次提交
  45. 13 8月, 2008 3 次提交
  47. 09 8月, 2008 1 次提交
    • L
      [ARM] prevent crashing when too much RAM installed · 60296c71
      由 Lennert Buytenhek 提交于 
      This patch will truncate and/or ignore memory banks if their kernel
direct mappings would (partially) overlap with the vmalloc area or
the mappings between the vmalloc area and the address space top, to
prevent crashing during early boot if there happens to be more RAM
installed than we are expecting.

Since the start of the vmalloc area is not at a fixed address (but
the vmalloc end address is, via the per-platform VMALLOC_END define),
a default area of 128M is reserved for vmalloc mappings, which can
be shrunk or enlarged by passing an appropriate vmalloc= command line
option as it is done on x86.

On a board with a 3:1 user:kernel split, VMALLOC_END at 0xfe000000,
two 512M RAM banks and vmalloc=128M (the default), this patch gives:

	Truncating RAM at 20000000-3fffffff to -35ffffff (vmalloc region overlap).
	Memory: 512MB 352MB = 864MB total

On a board with a 3:1 user:kernel split, VMALLOC_END at 0xfe800000,
two 256M RAM banks and vmalloc=768M, this patch gives:

	Truncating RAM at 00000000-0fffffff to -0e7fffff (vmalloc region overlap).
	Ignoring RAM at 10000000-1fffffff (vmalloc region overlap).
Signed-off-by: NLennert Buytenhek <buytenh@marvell.com>
Tested-by: NRiku Voipio <riku.voipio@iki.fi>
      60296c71