1. 12 2月, 2014 1 次提交
  2. 29 12月, 2013 1 次提交
    • R
      ACPI / hotplug / driver core: Handle containers in a special way · caa73ea1
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      ACPI container devices require special hotplug handling, at least
      on some systems, since generally user space needs to carry out
      system-specific cleanup before it makes sense to offline devices in
      the container.  However, the current ACPI hotplug code for containers
      first attempts to offline devices in the container and only then it
      notifies user space of the container offline.
      
      Moreover, after commit 202317a5 (ACPI / scan: Add acpi_device
      objects for all device nodes in the namespace), ACPI device objects
      representing containers are present as long as the ACPI namespace
      nodes corresponding to them are present, which may be forever, even
      if the container devices are physically detached from the system (the
      return values of the corresponding _STA methods change in those
      cases, but generally the namespace nodes themselves are still there).
      Thus it is useful to introduce entities representing containers that
      will go away during container hot-unplug.
      
      The goal of this change is to address both the above issues.
      
      The idea is to create a "companion" container system device for each
      of the ACPI container device objects during the initial namespace
      scan or on a hotplug event making the container present.  That system
      device will be unregistered on container removal.  A new bus type
      for container devices is added for this purpose, because device
      offline and online operations need to be defined for them.  The
      online operation is a trivial function that is always successful
      and the offline uses a callback pointed to by the container device's
      offline member.
      
      For ACPI containers that callback simply walks the list of ACPI
      device objects right below the container object (its children) and
      checks if all of their physical companion devices are offline.  If
      that's not the case, it returns -EBUSY and the container system
      devivce cannot be put offline.  Consequently, to put the container
      system device offline, it is necessary to put all of the physical
      devices depending on its ACPI companion object offline beforehand.
      
      Container system devices created for ACPI container objects are
      initially online.  They are created by the container ACPI scan
      handler whose hotplug.demand_offline flag is set.  That causes
      acpi_scan_hot_remove() to check if the companion container system
      device is offline before attempting to remove an ACPI container or
      any devices below it.  If the check fails, a KOBJ_CHANGE uevent is
      emitted for the container system device in question and user space
      is expected to offline all devices below the container and the
      container itself in response to it.  Then, user space can finalize
      the removal of the container with the help of its ACPI device
      object's eject attribute in sysfs.
      Tested-by: NYasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      Acked-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      caa73ea1
  3. 23 11月, 2013 1 次提交
  4. 25 3月, 2013 1 次提交
  5. 04 3月, 2013 2 次提交
  6. 13 2月, 2013 3 次提交
    • R
      ACPI / hotplug: Fix concurrency issues and memory leaks · 3757b948
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      This changeset is aimed at fixing a few different but related
      problems in the ACPI hotplug infrastructure.
      
      First of all, since notify handlers may be run in parallel with
      acpi_bus_scan(), acpi_bus_trim() and acpi_bus_hot_remove_device()
      and some of them are installed for ACPI handles that have no struct
      acpi_device objects attached (i.e. before those objects are created),
      those notify handlers have to take acpi_scan_lock to prevent races
      from taking place (e.g. a struct acpi_device is found to be present
      for the given ACPI handle, but right after that it is removed by
      acpi_bus_trim() running in parallel to the given notify handler).
      Moreover, since some of them call acpi_bus_scan() and
      acpi_bus_trim(), this leads to the conclusion that acpi_scan_lock
      should be acquired by the callers of these two funtions rather by
      these functions themselves.
      
      For these reasons, make all notify handlers that can handle device
      addition and eject events take acpi_scan_lock and remove the
      acpi_scan_lock locking from acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_trim().
      Accordingly, update all of their users to make sure that they
      are always called under acpi_scan_lock.
      
      Furthermore, since eject operations are carried out asynchronously
      with respect to the notify events that trigger them, with the help
      of acpi_bus_hot_remove_device(), even if notify handlers take the
      ACPI scan lock, it still is possible that, for example,
      acpi_bus_trim() will run between acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() and
      the notify handler that scheduled its execution and that
      acpi_bus_trim() will remove the device node passed to
      acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() for ejection.  In that case, the struct
      acpi_device object obtained by acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() will be
      invalid and not-so-funny things will ensue.  To protect agaist that,
      make the users of acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() run get_device() on
      ACPI device node objects that are about to be passed to it and make
      acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() run put_device() on them and check if
      their ACPI handles are not NULL (make acpi_device_unregister() clear
      the device nodes' ACPI handles for that check to work).
      
      Finally, observe that acpi_os_hotplug_execute() actually can fail,
      in which case its caller ought to free memory allocated for the
      context object to prevent leaks from happening.  It also needs to
      run put_device() on the device node that it ran get_device() on
      previously in that case.  Modify the code accordingly.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
      3757b948
    • R
      ACPI: Drop the container.h header file · 87d4a4da
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      The include/acpi/container.h only contains a definition of a
      structure that is not used any more, so drop it entirely.
      
      Similar change was proposed earlier by Toshi Kani.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
      87d4a4da
    • R
      ACPI / scan: Make container driver use struct acpi_scan_handler · 737f1a9f
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      Make the ACPI container driver use struct acpi_scan_handler for
      representing the object used to initialize ACPI containers and remove
      the ACPI driver structure used previously and the data structures
      created by it, since in fact they were not used for any purpose.
      
      This simplifies the code and reduces the kernel's memory footprint by
      avoiding the registration of a struct device_driver object with the
      driver core and creation of its sysfs directory which is unnecessary.
      
      In addition to that, make the namespace walk callback used for
      installing the notify handlers for ACPI containers more
      straightforward.
      
      This change includes fixes from Toshi Kani.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
      Acked-by: NYasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
      Tested-by: NYasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
      Reviewed-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
      Tested-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
      737f1a9f
  7. 26 1月, 2013 1 次提交
  8. 19 1月, 2013 1 次提交
    • R
      ACPI / scan: Drop acpi_bus_add() and use acpi_bus_scan() instead · b8bd759a
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      The only difference between acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_add() is the
      invocation of acpi_update_all_gpes() in the latter which in fact is
      unnecessary, because acpi_update_all_gpes() has already been called
      by acpi_scan_init() and the way it is implemented guarantees the next
      invocations of it to do nothing.
      
      For this reason, drop acpi_bus_add() and make all its callers use
      acpi_bus_scan() directly instead of it.  Additionally, rearrange the
      code in acpi_scan_init() slightly to improve the visibility of the
      acpi_update_all_gpes() call in there.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
      b8bd759a
  9. 03 1月, 2013 3 次提交
    • R
      ACPI: Make acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_add() take only one argument · 0cd6ac52
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      The callers of acpi_bus_add() usually assume that if it has
      succeeded, then a struct acpi_device object has been attached to
      the handle passed as the first argument.  Unfortunately, however,
      this assumption is wrong, because acpi_bus_scan(), and acpi_bus_add()
      too as a result, may return a pointer to a different struct
      acpi_device object on success (it may be an object corresponding to
      one of the descendant ACPI nodes in the namespace scope below that
      handle).
      
      For this reason, the callers of acpi_bus_add() who care about
      whether or not a struct acpi_device object has been created for
      its first argument need to check that using acpi_bus_get_device()
      anyway, so the second argument of acpi_bus_add() is not really
      useful for them.  The same observation applies to acpi_bus_scan()
      executed directly from acpi_scan_init().
      
      Therefore modify the relevant callers of acpi_bus_add() to check the
      existence of the struct acpi_device in question with the help of
      acpi_bus_get_device() and drop the no longer necessary second
      argument of acpi_bus_add().  Accordingly, modify acpi_scan_init() to
      use acpi_bus_get_device() to get acpi_root and drop the no longer
      needed second argument of acpi_bus_scan().
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
      Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
      0cd6ac52
    • R
      ACPI: Remove the arguments of acpi_bus_add() that are not used · 636458de
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      Notice that acpi_bus_add() uses only 2 of its 4 arguments and
      redefine its header to match the body.  Update all of its callers as
      necessary and observe that this leads to quite a number of removed
      lines of code (Linus will like that).
      
      Add a kerneldoc comment documenting acpi_bus_add() and wonder how
      its callers make wrong assumptions about the second argument (make
      note to self to take care of that later).
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
      Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
      636458de
    • R
      ACPI: Remove acpi_start_single_object() and acpi_bus_start() · 02f57c67
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      The ACPI PCI root bridge driver was the only ACPI driver implementing
      the .start() callback, which isn't used by any ACPI drivers any more
      now.
      
      For this reason, acpi_start_single_object() has no purpose any more,
      so remove it and all references to it.  Also remove
      acpi_bus_start_device(), whose only purpose was to call
      acpi_start_single_object().
      
      Moreover, since after the removal of acpi_bus_start_device() the
      only purpose of acpi_bus_start() remains to call
      acpi_update_all_gpes(), move that into acpi_bus_add() and drop
      acpi_bus_start() too, remove its header from acpi_bus.h and
      update all of its former users accordingly.
      
      This change was previously proposed in a different from by
      Yinghai Lu.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
      Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
      02f57c67
  10. 22 11月, 2012 1 次提交
  11. 15 11月, 2012 1 次提交
  12. 04 6月, 2012 1 次提交
    • T
      ACPI: Add _OST support for ACPI container hotplug · 0c67dc24
      Toshi Kani 提交于
      Changed container_notify_cb() to call ACPI _OST method when ACPI
      container hotplug operation has completed. Slightly restructured
      the code with the same logic. The function sets eject_pending bit
      for an eject request since it does not initiate hot-remove operation.
      This bit is checked by the sysfs eject handler to determine if the
      request is originated from an ACPI eject notification.
      Signed-off-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
      0c67dc24
  13. 30 3月, 2010 1 次提交
    • T
      include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking... · 5a0e3ad6
      Tejun Heo 提交于
      include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h
      
      percpu.h is included by sched.h and module.h and thus ends up being
      included when building most .c files.  percpu.h includes slab.h which
      in turn includes gfp.h making everything defined by the two files
      universally available and complicating inclusion dependencies.
      
      percpu.h -> slab.h dependency is about to be removed.  Prepare for
      this change by updating users of gfp and slab facilities include those
      headers directly instead of assuming availability.  As this conversion
      needs to touch large number of source files, the following script is
      used as the basis of conversion.
      
        http://userweb.kernel.org/~tj/misc/slabh-sweep.py
      
      The script does the followings.
      
      * Scan files for gfp and slab usages and update includes such that
        only the necessary includes are there.  ie. if only gfp is used,
        gfp.h, if slab is used, slab.h.
      
      * When the script inserts a new include, it looks at the include
        blocks and try to put the new include such that its order conforms
        to its surrounding.  It's put in the include block which contains
        core kernel includes, in the same order that the rest are ordered -
        alphabetical, Christmas tree, rev-Xmas-tree or at the end if there
        doesn't seem to be any matching order.
      
      * If the script can't find a place to put a new include (mostly
        because the file doesn't have fitting include block), it prints out
        an error message indicating which .h file needs to be added to the
        file.
      
      The conversion was done in the following steps.
      
      1. The initial automatic conversion of all .c files updated slightly
         over 4000 files, deleting around 700 includes and adding ~480 gfp.h
         and ~3000 slab.h inclusions.  The script emitted errors for ~400
         files.
      
      2. Each error was manually checked.  Some didn't need the inclusion,
         some needed manual addition while adding it to implementation .h or
         embedding .c file was more appropriate for others.  This step added
         inclusions to around 150 files.
      
      3. The script was run again and the output was compared to the edits
         from #2 to make sure no file was left behind.
      
      4. Several build tests were done and a couple of problems were fixed.
         e.g. lib/decompress_*.c used malloc/free() wrappers around slab
         APIs requiring slab.h to be added manually.
      
      5. The script was run on all .h files but without automatically
         editing them as sprinkling gfp.h and slab.h inclusions around .h
         files could easily lead to inclusion dependency hell.  Most gfp.h
         inclusion directives were ignored as stuff from gfp.h was usually
         wildly available and often used in preprocessor macros.  Each
         slab.h inclusion directive was examined and added manually as
         necessary.
      
      6. percpu.h was updated not to include slab.h.
      
      7. Build test were done on the following configurations and failures
         were fixed.  CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL was turned off for all tests (as my
         distributed build env didn't work with gcov compiles) and a few
         more options had to be turned off depending on archs to make things
         build (like ipr on powerpc/64 which failed due to missing writeq).
      
         * x86 and x86_64 UP and SMP allmodconfig and a custom test config.
         * powerpc and powerpc64 SMP allmodconfig
         * sparc and sparc64 SMP allmodconfig
         * ia64 SMP allmodconfig
         * s390 SMP allmodconfig
         * alpha SMP allmodconfig
         * um on x86_64 SMP allmodconfig
      
      8. percpu.h modifications were reverted so that it could be applied as
         a separate patch and serve as bisection point.
      
      Given the fact that I had only a couple of failures from tests on step
      6, I'm fairly confident about the coverage of this conversion patch.
      If there is a breakage, it's likely to be something in one of the arch
      headers which should be easily discoverable easily on most builds of
      the specific arch.
      Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
      Guess-its-ok-by: NChristoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
      Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
      5a0e3ad6
  14. 25 11月, 2009 1 次提交
  15. 29 8月, 2009 1 次提交
  16. 27 8月, 2009 1 次提交
    • B
      ACPICA: Major update for acpi_get_object_info external interface · 15b8dd53
      Bob Moore 提交于
      Completed a major update for the acpi_get_object_info external interface.
      Changes include:
       - Support for variable, unlimited length HID, UID, and CID strings
       - Support Processor objects the same as Devices (HID,UID,CID,ADR,STA, etc.)
       - Call the _SxW power methods on behalf of a device object
       - Determine if a device is a PCI root bridge
       - Change the ACPI_BUFFER parameter to ACPI_DEVICE_INFO.
      These changes will require an update to all callers of this interface.
      See the ACPICA Programmer Reference for details.
      
      Also, update all invocations of acpi_get_object_info interface
      Signed-off-by: NBob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
      15b8dd53
  17. 07 2月, 2009 1 次提交
  18. 08 11月, 2008 1 次提交
  19. 11 10月, 2008 2 次提交
  20. 24 7月, 2007 1 次提交
  21. 26 4月, 2007 1 次提交
  22. 13 2月, 2007 3 次提交
    • L
      ACPI: delete extra #defines in /drivers/acpi/ drivers · 7cda93e0
      Len Brown 提交于
      Cosmetic only.
      
      Except in a single case, #define ACPI_*_DRIVER_NAME
      were invoked 0 or 1 times.
      Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
      7cda93e0
    • L
      ACPI: fix acpi_driver.name usage · c2b6705b
      Len Brown 提交于
      It was erroneously used as a description rather than a name.
      
      ie. turn this:
      
      lenb@se7525gp2:/sys> ls bus/acpi/drivers
      ACPI AC Adapter Driver  ACPI Embedded Controller Driver  ACPI Power Resource Driver
      ACPI Battery Driver     ACPI Fan Driver                  ACPI Processor Driver
      ACPI Button Driver      ACPI PCI Interrupt Link Driver   ACPI Thermal Zone Driver
      ACPI container driver   ACPI PCI Root Bridge Driver      hpet
      
      into this:
      
      lenb@se7525gp2:~> ls /sys/bus/acpi/drivers
      ac  battery  button  container  ec  fan  hpet  pci_link  pci_root  power  processor  thermal
      Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
      c2b6705b
    • L
      ACPI: clean up ACPI_MODULE_NAME() use · f52fd66d
      Len Brown 提交于
      cosmetic only
      
      Make "module name" actually match the file name.
      Invoke with ';' as leaving it off confuses Lindent and gcc doesn't care.
      Fix indentation where Lindent did get confused.
      Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
      f52fd66d
  23. 21 12月, 2006 1 次提交
  24. 16 12月, 2006 1 次提交
    • P
      ACPI: convert to sysfs framework · f883d9db
      Patrick Mochel 提交于
      Setup new sysfs framework
      
      1.	Remove /sys/firmware/acpi
      2.	Add ACPI device in device tree.
      
      File "eject" for every device that has _EJ0 method is moved from
      /sys/firmware to /sys/devices.
      Operation on this file is exactly the same as before.
      i.e. echo 1 to "eject" will cause hot removal of this device.
      Corresponding changes should be made in userspace for hot removal.
      Signed-off-by: NLi Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui<rui.zhang@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
      f883d9db
  25. 14 10月, 2006 1 次提交
  26. 30 6月, 2006 1 次提交
  27. 27 6月, 2006 3 次提交
  28. 05 1月, 2006 1 次提交
  29. 07 11月, 2005 1 次提交
  30. 05 8月, 2005 1 次提交