- 12 7月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
由 Arne Jansen 提交于
Signed-off-by: NArne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
- 10 7月, 2012 8 次提交
-
-
由 Arne Jansen 提交于
Normally delayed refs get processed in ascending bytenr order. This correlates in most cases to the order added. To expose dependencies on this order, we start to process the tree in the middle instead of the beginning. This code is only effective when SCRAMBLE_DELAYED_REFS is defined. Signed-off-by: NArne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
-
由 Arne Jansen 提交于
Add state to fs_info. Signed-off-by: NArne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
-
由 Arne Jansen 提交于
This creates a brand new tree. Will be used to create the quota tree. Signed-off-by: NArne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
-
由 Arne Jansen 提交于
This patch only add a consistancy check to validate that the same root is passed to start_transaction and end_transaction. Subvolume quota depends on this. Signed-off-by: NArne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
-
由 Arne Jansen 提交于
Often no exact match is wanted but just the next lower or higher item. There's a lot of duplicated code throughout btrfs to deal with the corner cases. This patch adds a helper function that can facilitate searching. Signed-off-by: NArne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
-
由 Arne Jansen 提交于
Not all features are in use by the current version and thus may change in the future. Signed-off-by: NArne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
We've got two mechanisms both required for reliable backref resolving (tree mod log and holding back delayed refs). You cannot make use of one without the other. So instead of requiring the user of this mechanism to setup both correctly, we join them into a single interface. Additionally, we stop inserting non-blockers into fs_info->tree_mod_seq_list as we did before, which was of no value. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
When calling btrfs_next_old_leaf, we were leaking an extent buffer in the rare case of using the deadlock avoidance code needed for the tree mod log. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
- 03 7月, 2012 9 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
While we are resolving directory modifications in the tree log, we are triggering delayed metadata updates to the filesystem btrees. This commit forces the delayed updates to run so the replay code can find any modifications done. It stops us from crashing because the directory deleltion replay expects items to be removed immediately from the tree. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com> cc: stable@kernel.org
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We can race with unlink and not actually be able to do our igrab in btrfs_add_ordered_extent. This will result in all sorts of problems. Instead of doing the complicated work to try and handle returning an error properly from btrfs_add_ordered_extent, just hold a ref to the inode during writepages. If we cannot grab a ref we know we're freeing this inode anyway and can just drop the dirty pages on the floor, because screw them we're going to invalidate them anyway. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
The tree log stuff can have allocated space that we end up having split across a bitmap and a real extent. The free space code does not deal with this, it assumes that if it finds an extent or bitmap entry that the entire range must fall within the entry it finds. This isn't necessarily the case, so rework the remove function so it can handle this case properly. This fixed two panics the user hit, first in the case where the space was initially in a bitmap and then in an extent entry, and then the reverse case. Thanks, Reported-and-tested-by: NShaun Reich <sreich@kde.org> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
When we're evicting an inode during log recovery, we need to ensure that the inode is not in orphan state any more, which means inode's run_time flags has _no_ BTRFS_INODE_HAS_ORPHAN_ITEM. Thus, the BUG_ON was triggered because of a wrong check for the flags. Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Alexander Block 提交于
We used the wrong ioctl macro for the getflags ioctl before. As we don't have the set/getflags ioctls in the user space ioctl.h at the moment, it's safe to fix it now. Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NAlexander Block <ablock84@googlemail.com>
-
由 Ilya Dryomov 提交于
This introduces btrfs_resume_balance_async(), which, given that restriper state was recovered earlier by btrfs_recover_balance(), resumes balance in btrfs-balance kthread. Signed-off-by: NIlya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
-
由 Ilya Dryomov 提交于
Fix a bug that triggered asserts in btrfs_balance() in both normal and resume modes -- restriper state was not properly restored on read-only mounts. This factors out resuming code from btrfs_restore_balance(), which is now also called earlier in the mount sequence to avoid the problem of some early writes getting the old profile. Signed-off-by: NIlya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Miao pointed out there's a problem with mixing dio writes and buffered reads. If the read happens between us invalidating the page range and actually locking the extent we can bring in pages into page cache. Then once the write finishes if somebody tries to read again it will just find uptodate pages and we'll read stale data. So we need to lock the extent and check for uptodate bits in the range. If there are uptodate bits we need to unlock and invalidate again. This will keep this race from happening since we will hold the extent locked until we create the ordered extent, and then teh read side always waits for ordered extents. There was also a race in how we updated i_size, previously we were relying on the generic DIO stuff to adjust the i_size after the DIO had completed, but this happens outside of the extent lock which means reads could come in and not see the updated i_size. So instead move this work into where we create the extents, and then this way the update ordered i_size stuff works properly in the endio handlers. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Stefan Behrens 提交于
It is normal behaviour of the low level btrfs function btrfs_map_bio() to complete a bio with -EIO if the device is missing, instead of just preventing the bio creation in an earlier step. This used to cause I/O statistic read error increments and annoying printk_ratelimited messages. This commit fixes the issue. Signed-off-by: NStefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Reported-by: NCarey Underwood <cwillu@cwillu.com>
-
- 27 6月, 2012 7 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
With the tree mod log, we may end up with two roots (the current root and a rewinded version of it) both pointing to two leaves, l1 and l2, of which l2 had already been cow-ed in the current transaction. If we don't rewind any tree blocks, we cannot have two roots both pointing to an already cowed tree block. Now there is btrfs_next_leaf, which has a leaf locked and wants a lock on the next (right) leaf. And there is push_leaf_left, which has a (cowed!) leaf locked and wants a lock on the previous (left) leaf. In order to solve this dead lock situation, we use try_lock in btrfs_next_leaf (only in case it's called with a tree mod log time_seq paramter) and if we fail to get a lock on the next leaf, we give up our lock on the current leaf and retry from the very beginning. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
When a MOD_LOG_KEY_ADD operation is rewinded, we remove the key from the tree block. If its not the last key, removal involves a move operation. This move operation was explicitly done before this commit. However, at insertion time, there's a move operation before the actual addition to make room for the new key, which is recorded in the tree mod log as well. This means, we must drop the move operation when rewinding the add operation, because the next operation we'll be rewinding will be the corresponding MOD_LOG_MOVE_KEYS operation. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
When delayed refs exist, btrfs_find_all_roots used to hold the delayed ref mutex way longer than actually required. We ought to drop it immediately after we're done collecting all the delayed refs. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
Several callers of insert_ptr set the tree_mod_log parameter to 0 to avoid addition to the tree mod log. In fact, we need all of those operations. This commit simply removes the additional parameter and makes addition to the tree mod log unconditional. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
For the tree mod log, we don't log any operations at leaf level. If the root is at the leaf level (i.e. the tree consists only of the root), then __tree_mod_log_oldest_root will find a ROOT_REPLACE operation in the log (because we always log that one no matter which level), but no other operations. With this patch __tree_mod_log_oldest_root exits cleanly instead of BUGging in this situation. get_old_root checks if its really a root at leaf level in case we don't have any operations and WARNs if this assumption breaks. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
With the tree mod log, we can have a tree that's two levels high, but btrfs_search_old_slot may still return a path with the tree root at level one instead. __resolve_indirect_ref must care for this and accept parents in a lower level than expected. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
We track two conditions to decide if we should sleep while waiting for more delayed refs, the number of delayed refs (num_refs) and the first entry in the list of blockers (first_seq). When we suspect staleness, we save num_refs and do one more cycle. If nothing changes, we then save first_seq for later comparison and do wait_event. We ought to save first_seq the very same moment we're saving num_refs. Otherwise we cannot be sure that nothing has changed and we might start waiting when we shouldn't, which could lead to starvation. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
- 21 6月, 2012 4 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
There is some concern that these iput()'s could be the final iputs and could induce lockups on people waiting on writeback. This would happen in the rare case that we don't create ordered extents because of an error, but it is theoretically possible and we already have a mechanism to deal with this so just make them delayed iputs to negate any worry. Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
When fixing up the locking in the delayed ref destruction work I accidently broke the locking myself ;(. Add back a spin_lock that should be there and we are now all set. Thanks, Btrfs: add a missing spin_lock When fixing up the locking in the delayed ref destruction work I accidently broke the locking myself ;(. Add back a spin_lock that should be there and we are now all set. Thanks, Reported-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Alexander Block 提交于
add_all_parents did assume that path is already at a correct extent data item, which may not be true in case of data extents that were partly rewritten and splitted. We need to check if we're on a matching extent for every item and only for the ones after the first. The loop is changed to do this now. This patch also fixes a bug introduced with commit 3b127fd8 "Btrfs: remove obsolete btrfs_next_leaf call from __resolve_indirect_ref". The removal of next_leaf did sometimes result in slot==nritems when the above described case happens, and thus resulting in invalid values (e.g. wanted_obejctid) in add_all_parents (leading to missed backrefs or even crashes). Signed-off-by: NAlexander Block <ablock84@googlemail.com> Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Alexander Block 提交于
We introduce btrfs_next_old_item that uses btrfs_next_old_leaf instead of btrfs_next_leaf. btrfs_next_item is also changed to simply call btrfs_next_old_item with time_seq being 0. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Block <ablock84@googlemail.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
- 16 6月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
Avoid warning in 32 bit machines Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
gcc was giving an uninit variable warning here. Strictly speaking we don't need to init it, but this will make things much less error prone. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
- 15 6月, 2012 8 次提交
-
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
Update to the latest btrfs's maintainer mail and git repo. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
the items of the delayed inodes were forgotten to be freed, this patch fixes it. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
Since we have two trees for recording pinned extents, we need to go through both of them to make sure that we've done everything clean. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
We've forgotten to clear extent states in pinned tree, which will results in space counter mismatch and memory leak: WARNING: at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:7537 btrfs_free_block_groups+0x1f3/0x2e0 [btrfs]() ... space_info 2 has 8380416 free, is not full space_info total=12582912, used=4096, pinned=4096, reserved=0, may_use=0, readonly=4194304 btrfs state leak: start 29364224 end 29376511 state 1 in tree ffff880075f20090 refs 1 ... Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
Seeding devices are not supposed to change any more. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
When we move a file into a directory with compression flag, we need to inherite BTRFS_INODE_COMPRESS and clear BTRFS_INODE_NOCOMPRESS as well. But if we move a file into a directory without compression flag, we need to clear both of them. It is the way how our setflags deals with compression flag, so keep the same behaviour here. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
-
由 Li Zefan 提交于
It's a bug, but it happens to work, as BTRFS_COMPRESS_LZO == 2, which has only one bit set. Signed-off-by: NLi Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
-