- 04 1月, 2012 4 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
new helper (wrapper around mnt_drop_write()) to be used in pair with mnt_want_write_file(). Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
A bunch of places in nfsd does mnt_{want,drop}_write on vfsmount of export of given fhandle. Switched to obvious inlined helpers... Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
it's both faster (in case when file has been opened for write) and cleaner. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 02 11月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Benny Halevy 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBenny Halevy <bhalevy@tonian.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 01 11月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Paul Gortmaker 提交于
Some files were using the complete module.h infrastructure without actually including the header at all. Fix them up in advance so once the implicit presence is removed, we won't get failures like this: CC [M] fs/nfsd/nfssvc.o fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c: In function 'nfsd_create_serv': fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c:335: error: 'THIS_MODULE' undeclared (first use in this function) fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c:335: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c:335: error: for each function it appears in.) fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c: In function 'nfsd': fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c:555: error: implicit declaration of function 'module_put_and_exit' make[3]: *** [fs/nfsd/nfssvc.o] Error 1 Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
-
由 Paul Gortmaker 提交于
These files were getting <linux/module.h> via an implicit include path, but we want to crush those out of existence since they cost time during compiles of processing thousands of lines of headers for no reason. Give them the lightweight header that just contains the EXPORT_SYMBOL infrastructure. Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
-
- 25 10月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Stanislav Kinsbursky 提交于
We have to call svc_rpcb_cleanup() explicitly from nfsd_last_thread() since this function is registered as service shutdown callback and thus nobody else will done it for us. Signed-off-by: NStanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 24 10月, 2011 5 次提交
-
-
由 Mi Jinlong 提交于
According to rfc5661 18.50, implement DESTROY_CLIENTID operation. Signed-off-by: NMi Jinlong <mijinlong@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 Benny Halevy 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBenny Halevy <bhalevy@tonian.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 Benny Halevy 提交于
RFC5661 says: The client may set one or both of OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WANT_SIGNAL_DELEG_WHEN_RESRC_AVAIL and OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WANT_PUSH_DELEG_WHEN_UNCONTENDED. Signed-off-by: NBenny Halevy <bhalevy@tonian.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 Benny Halevy 提交于
Reported-by: NGopala Suryanarayana <gsuryanarayana@vmware.com> Signed-off-by: NBenny Halevy <bhalevy@tonian.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 Benny Halevy 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBenny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 19 10月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
0c12eaff "nfsd: don't break lease on CLAIM_DELEGATE_CUR" was a temporary workaround for a problem fixed properly in the vfs layer by 778fc546 "locks: fix tracking of inprogress lease breaks", so we can revert that change (but keeping some minor cleanup from that commit). Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 18 10月, 2011 8 次提交
-
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
If we create the object and then return failure to the client, we're left with an unexpected file in the filesystem. I'm trying to eliminate such cases but not 100% sure I have so an assertion might be helpful for now. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
As with the nfs4_file, we'd prefer to find out about any failure before creating a new file rather than after. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Move idr preallocation out of stateid initialization, into stateid allocation, so that we no longer have to handle any errors from the former. This is a little subtle due to the way the idr code manages these preallocated items--document that in comments. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Creating a new file is an irrevocable step--once it's visible in the filesystem, other processes may have seen it and done something with it, and unlinking it wouldn't simply undo the effects of the create. Therefore, in the case where OPEN creates a new file, we shouldn't do the create until we know that the rest of the OPEN processing will succeed. For example, we should preallocate a struct file in case we need it until waiting to allocate it till process_open2(), which is already too late. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
If process_open1() creates a new open owner, but the open later fails, the current code will leave the open owner around. It won't be on the close_lru list, and the client isn't expected to send a CLOSE, so it will hang around as long as the client does. Similarly, if process_open1() removes an existing open owner from the close lru, anticipating that an open owner that previously had no associated stateid's now will, but the open subsequently fails, then we'll again be left with the same leak. Fix both problems. Reported-by: NBryan Schumaker <bjschuma@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
No change in behavior. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
There doesn't seem to be any harm to renewing the client a bit earlier, when it is looked up. That saves us from having to sprinkle renew_client calls over quite so many places. Also remove a redundant comment and do a little cleanup. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 17 10月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dan Carpenter 提交于
This should be a bitwise negate here. It silences a Sparse warning: fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c:693:16: warning: dubious: x & !y Signed-off-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 12 10月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Mask out the WANT bits right at the start instead of on each use. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Again, these checks are better in the xdr code. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 11 10月, 2011 5 次提交
-
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
I'd rather put more of these sorts of checks into standardized xdr decoders for the various types rather than have them cluttering up the core logic in nfs4proc.c and nfs4state.c. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
We don't use WANT bits yet--and sending them can probably trigger a BUG() further down. Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
These comments are mostly out of date. Reported-by: NBryan Schumaker <bjschuma@netapp.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
In response to some review comments, get rid of the somewhat obscure for-loop with bitops, and improve a comment. Reported-by: NSteve Dickson <steved@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
In commit 5ec094c1 "nfsd4: extend state lock over seqid replay logic" I modified the exit logic of all the seqid-based procedures except nfsd4_locku(). Fix the oversight. The result of the bug was a double-unlock while handling the LOCKU procedure, and a warning like: [ 142.150014] WARNING: at kernel/mutex-debug.c:78 debug_mutex_unlock+0xda/0xe0() ... [ 142.152927] Pid: 742, comm: nfsd Not tainted 3.1.0-rc1-SLIM+ #9 [ 142.152927] Call Trace: [ 142.152927] [<ffffffff8105fa4f>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7f/0xc0 [ 142.152927] [<ffffffff8105faaa>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 142.152927] [<ffffffff810960ca>] debug_mutex_unlock+0xda/0xe0 [ 142.152927] [<ffffffff813e4200>] __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x80/0x140 [ 142.152927] [<ffffffff813e42ce>] mutex_unlock+0xe/0x10 [ 142.152927] [<ffffffffa03bd3f5>] nfs4_lock_state+0x35/0x40 [nfsd] [ 142.152927] [<ffffffffa03b0b71>] nfsd4_proc_compound+0x2a1/0x690 [nfsd] [ 142.152927] [<ffffffffa039f9fb>] nfsd_dispatch+0xeb/0x230 [nfsd] [ 142.152927] [<ffffffffa02b1055>] svc_process_common+0x345/0x690 [sunrpc] [ 142.152927] [<ffffffff81058d10>] ? try_to_wake_up+0x280/0x280 [ 142.152927] [<ffffffffa02b16e2>] svc_process+0x102/0x150 [sunrpc] [ 142.152927] [<ffffffffa039f0bd>] nfsd+0xbd/0x160 [nfsd] [ 142.152927] [<ffffffffa039f000>] ? 0xffffffffa039efff [ 142.152927] [<ffffffff8108230c>] kthread+0x8c/0xa0 [ 142.152927] [<ffffffff813e8694>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10 [ 142.152927] [<ffffffff81082280>] ? kthread_worker_fn+0x190/0x190 [ 142.152927] [<ffffffff813e8690>] ? gs_change+0x13/0x13 Reported-by: NBryan Schumaker <bjschuma@netapp.com> Tested-by: NBryan Schumaker <bjschuma@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 27 9月, 2011 4 次提交
-
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Use a separate stateid idr per client, and lookup a stateid by first finding the client, then looking up the stateid relative to that client. Also some minor refactoring. This allows us to improve error returns: we can return expired when the clientid is not found and bad_stateid when the clientid is found but not the stateid, as opposed to returning expired for both cases. I hope this will also help to replace the state lock mostly by a per-client lock, but that hasn't been done yet. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Test_stateid is 4.1-only and only allowed after a sequence operation, so this check is unnecessary. Cc: Bryan Schumaker <bjschuma@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
The idr system is designed exactly for generating id and looking up integer id's. Thanks to Trond for pointing it out. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
This will be convenient. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 21 9月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
I'm not sure why I used a new field for this originally. Also, the differences between some of these flags are a little subtle; add some comments to explain. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Yet another open-management regression: - nfs4_file_downgrade() doesn't remove the BOTH access bit on downgrade, so the server's idea of the stateid's access gets out of sync with the client's. If we want to keep an O_RDWR open in this case, we should do that in the file_put_access logic rather than here. - We forgot to convert v4 access to an open mode here. This logic has proven too hard to get right. In the future we may consider: - reexamining the lock/openowner relationship (locks probably don't really need to take their own references here). - adding open upgrade/downgrade support to the vfs. - removing the atomic operations. They're redundant as long as this is all under some other lock. Also, maybe some kind of additional static checking would help catch O_/NFS4_SHARE_ACCESS confusion. Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 19 9月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Look up closed stateid's in the stateid hash like any other stateid rather than searching the close lru. This is simpler, and fixes a bug: currently we handle only the case of a close that is the last close for a given stateowner, but not the case of a close for a stateowner that still has active opens on other files. Thus in a case like: open(owner, file1) open(owner, file2) close(owner, file2) close(owner, file2) the final close won't be recognized as a retransmission. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Including the full clientid in the on-the-wire stateid allows more reliable detection of bad vs. expired stateid's, simplifies code, and ensures we won't reuse the opaque part of the stateid (as we currently do when the same openowner closes and reopens the same file). Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 17 9月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
We no longer need is_deleg_stateid, for example. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-