1. 06 5月, 2010 1 次提交
    • J
      ocfs2: Make ocfs2_journal_dirty() void. · ec20cec7
      Joel Becker 提交于
      jbd[2]_journal_dirty_metadata() only returns 0.  It's been returning 0
      since before the kernel moved to git.  There is no point in checking
      this error.
      
      ocfs2_journal_dirty() has been faithfully returning the status since the
      beginning.  All over ocfs2, we have blocks of code checking this can't
      fail status.  In the past few years, we've tried to avoid adding these
      checks, because they are pointless.  But anyone who looks at our code
      assumes they are needed.
      
      Finally, ocfs2_journal_dirty() is made a void function.  All error
      checking is removed from other files.  We'll BUG_ON() the status of
      jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata() just in case they change it someday.  They
      won't.
      Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
      ec20cec7
  2. 24 3月, 2010 1 次提交
    • M
      ocfs2: Clear undo bits when local alloc is freed · b4414eea
      Mark Fasheh 提交于
      When the local alloc file changes windows, unused bits are freed back to the
      global bitmap. By defnition, those bits can not be in use by any file. Also,
      the local alloc will never have been able to allocate those bits if they
      were part of a previous truncate. Therefore it makes sense that we should
      clear unused local alloc bits in the undo buffer so that they can be used
      immediatly.
      
      [ Modified to call it ocfs2_release_clusters() -- Joel ]
      Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
      b4414eea
  3. 20 3月, 2010 2 次提交
    • T
      ocfs2: Init meta_ac properly in ocfs2_create_empty_xattr_block. · b2317968
      Tao Ma 提交于
      You can't store a pointer that you haven't filled in yet and expect it
      to work.
      Signed-off-by: NTao Ma <tao.ma@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
      b2317968
    • T
      ocfs2: Fix the update of name_offset when removing xattrs · dfe4d3d6
      Tao Ma 提交于
      When replacing a xattr's value, in some case we wipe its name/value
      first and then re-add it. The wipe is done by
      ocfs2_xa_block_wipe_namevalue() when the xattr is in the inode or
      block. We currently adjust name_offset for all the entries which have
      (offset < name_offset). This does not adjust the entrie we're replacing.
      Since we are replacing the entry, we don't adjust the total entry count.
      When we calculate a new namevalue location, we trust the entries
      now-wrong offset in ocfs2_xa_get_free_start().  The solution is to
      also adjust the name_offset for the replaced entry, allowing
      ocfs2_xa_get_free_start() to calculate the new namevalue location
      correctly.
      
      The following script can trigger a kernel panic easily.
      
      echo 'y'|mkfs.ocfs2 --fs-features=local,xattr -b 4K $DEVICE
      mount -t ocfs2 $DEVICE $MNT_DIR
      FILE=$MNT_DIR/$RANDOM
      for((i=0;i<76;i++))
      do
      string_76="a$string_76"
      done
      string_78="aa$string_76"
      string_82="aaaa$string_78"
      
      touch $FILE
      setfattr -n 'user.test1234567890' -v $string_76 $FILE
      setfattr -n 'user.test1234567890' -v $string_78 $FILE
      setfattr -n 'user.test1234567890' -v $string_82 $FILE
      Signed-off-by: NTao Ma <tao.ma@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
      dfe4d3d6
  4. 19 3月, 2010 1 次提交
    • M
      ocfs2: Always try for maximum bits with new local alloc windows · b22b63eb
      Mark Fasheh 提交于
      What we were doing before was to ask for the current window size as the
      maximum allocation. This had the effect of limiting the amount of allocation
      we could get for the local alloc during times when the window size was
      shrunk due to fragmentation. In some cases, that could actually *increase*
      fragmentation by artificially limiting the number of bits we can accept. So
      while we still want to ask for a minimum number of bits equal to window
      size, there is no reason why we should limit the number of bits the local
      alloc should accept. Hence always allow the maximum number of local alloc
      bits.
      Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
      b22b63eb
  5. 18 3月, 2010 4 次提交
  6. 15 3月, 2010 31 次提交