1. 31 10月, 2012 2 次提交
    • J
      MD RAID10: Fix oops when creating RAID10 arrays via dm-raid.c · ed30be07
      Jonathan Brassow 提交于
      Commit 2863b9eb didn't take into account the changes to add TRIM support to
      RAID10 (commit 532a2a3f).  That is, when using dm-raid.c to create the
      RAID10 arrays, there is no mddev->gendisk or mddev->queue.  The code added
      to support TRIM simply assumes that mddev->queue is available without
      checking.  The result is an oops any time dm-raid.c attempts to create a
      RAID10 device.
      Signed-off-by: NJonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
      ed30be07
    • N
      md/raid1: Fix assembling of arrays containing Replacements. · 02b898f2
      NeilBrown 提交于
      setup_conf in raid1.c uses conf->raid_disks before assigning
      a value.  It is used when including 'Replacement' devices.
      
      The consequence is that assembling an array which contains a
      replacement will misbehave and either not include the replacement, or
      not include the device being replaced.
      
      Though this doesn't lead directly to data corruption, it could lead to
      reduced data safety.
      
      So use mddev->raid_disks, which is initialised, instead.
      
      Bug was introduced by commit c19d5798
            md/raid1: recognise replacements when assembling arrays.
      
      in 3.3, so fix is suitable for 3.3.y thru 3.6.y.
      
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
      02b898f2
  2. 22 10月, 2012 1 次提交
    • E
      md faulty: use disk_stack_limits() · 0be1fecd
      Eric Sandeen 提交于
      in:
      fe86cdce block: do not artificially constrain max_sectors for stacking drivers
      
      max_sectors defaults to UINT_MAX.  md faulty wasn't using
      disk_stack_limits(), so inherited this large value as well.
      This triggered a bug in XFS when stressed over md_faulty, when
      a very large bio_alloc() failed.
      
      That was on an older kernel, and I can't reproduce exactly the
      same thing upstream, but I think the fix is appropriate in any
      case.
      
      Thanks to Mike Snitzer for pointing out the problem.
      Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
      0be1fecd
  3. 13 10月, 2012 4 次提交
  4. 12 10月, 2012 4 次提交
  5. 11 10月, 2012 28 次提交
  6. 27 9月, 2012 1 次提交
    • N
      md/raid10: fix "enough" function for detecting if array is failed. · 80b48124
      NeilBrown 提交于
      The 'enough' function is written to work with 'near' arrays only
      in that is implicitly assumes that the offset from one 'group' of
      devices to the next is the same as the number of copies.
      In reality it is the number of 'near' copies.
      
      So change it to make this number explicit.
      
      This bug makes it possible to run arrays without enough drives
      present, which is dangerous.
      It is appropriate for an -stable kernel, but will almost certainly
      need to be modified for some of them.
      
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      Reported-by: NJakub Husák <jakub@gooseman.cz>
      Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
      80b48124