- 02 4月, 2014 9 次提交
-
-
由 Pavel Emelyanov 提交于
The problem is: 1. write cached data to a file 2. read directly from the same file (via another fd) The 2nd operation may read stale data, i.e. the one that was in a file before the 1st op. Problem is in how fuse manages writeback. When direct op occurs the core kernel code calls filemap_write_and_wait to flush all the cached ops in flight. But fuse acks the writeback right after the ->writepages callback exits w/o waiting for the real write to happen. Thus the subsequent direct op proceeds while the real writeback is still in flight. This is a problem for backends that reorder operation. Fix this by making the fuse direct IO callback explicitly wait on the in-flight writeback to finish. Signed-off-by: NMaxim Patlasov <MPatlasov@parallels.com> Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
-
由 Maxim Patlasov 提交于
The aim of .flush fop is to hint file-system that flushing its state or caches or any other important data to reliable storage would be desirable now. fuse_flush() passes this hint by sending FUSE_FLUSH request to userspace. However, dirty pages and pages under writeback may be not visible to userspace yet if we won't ensure it explicitly. Signed-off-by: NMaxim Patlasov <MPatlasov@parallels.com> Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
-
由 Pavel Emelyanov 提交于
The .write_begin and .write_end are requiered to use generic routines (generic_file_aio_write --> ... --> generic_perform_write) for buffered writes. Signed-off-by: NMaxim Patlasov <MPatlasov@parallels.com> Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
-
由 Maxim Patlasov 提交于
Move the code filling and sending read request to a separate function. Future patches will use it for .write_begin -- partial modification of a page requires reading the page from the storage very similarly to what fuse_readpage does. Signed-off-by: NMaxim Patlasov <MPatlasov@parallels.com> Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
-
由 Pavel Emelyanov 提交于
Any write request requires a file handle to report to the userspace. Thus when we close a file (and free the fuse_file with this info) we have to flush all the outstanding dirty pages. filemap_write_and_wait() is enough because every page under fuse writeback is accounted in ff->count. This delays actual close until all fuse wb is completed. In case of "write cache" turned off, the flush is ensured by fuse_vma_close(). Signed-off-by: NMaxim Patlasov <MPatlasov@parallels.com> Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
-
由 Maxim Patlasov 提交于
Let the kernel maintain i_mtime locally: - clear S_NOCMTIME - implement i_op->update_time() - flush mtime on fsync and last close - update i_mtime explicitly on truncate and fallocate Fuse inode flag FUSE_I_MTIME_DIRTY serves as indication that local i_mtime should be flushed to the server eventually. Signed-off-by: NMaxim Patlasov <MPatlasov@parallels.com> Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
-
由 Pavel Emelyanov 提交于
Make fuse think that when writeback is on the inode's i_size is always up-to-date and not update it with the value received from the userspace. This is done because the page cache code may update i_size without letting the FS know. This assumption implies fixing the previously introduced short-read helper -- when a short read occurs the 'hole' is filled with zeroes. fuse_file_fallocate() is also fixed because now we should keep i_size up to date, so it must be updated if FUSE_FALLOCATE request succeeded. Signed-off-by: NMaxim V. Patlasov <MPatlasov@parallels.com> Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
-
由 Pavel Emelyanov 提交于
A helper which gets called when read reports less bytes than was requested. See patch "trust kernel i_size only" for details. Signed-off-by: NMaxim Patlasov <MPatlasov@parallels.com> Signed-off-by: NPavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
-
由 Pavel Emelyanov 提交于
When writeback is ON every writeable file should be in per-inode write list, not only mmap-ed ones. Thus introduce a helper for this linkage. Signed-off-by: NMaxim Patlasov <MPatlasov@parallels.com> Signed-off-by: NPavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
-
- 26 1月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Steven Whitehouse 提交于
So far I've had one ACK for this, and no other comments. So I think it is probably time to send this via some suitable tree. I'm guessing that the vfs tree would be the most appropriate route, but not sure that there is one at the moment (don't see anything recent at kernel.org) so in that case I think -mm is the "back up plan". Al, please let me know if you will take this? Steve. --------------------- Following on from the "Re: [PATCH v3] vfs: fix a bug when we do some dio reads with append dio writes" thread on linux-fsdevel, this patch is my current version of the fix proposed as option (b) in that thread. Removing the i_size test from the direct i/o read path at vfs level means that filesystems now have to deal with requests which are beyond i_size themselves. These I've divided into three sets: a) Those with "no op" ->direct_IO (9p, cifs, ceph) These are obviously not going to be an issue b) Those with "home brew" ->direct_IO (nfs, fuse) I've been told that NFS should not have any problem with the larger i_size, however I've added an extra test to FUSE to duplicate the original behaviour just to be on the safe side. c) Those using __blockdev_direct_IO() These call through to ->get_block() which should deal with the EOF condition correctly. I've verified that with GFS2 and I believe that Zheng has verified it for ext4. I've also run the test on XFS and it passes both before and after this change. The part of the patch in filemap.c looks a lot larger than it really is - there are only two lines of real change. The rest is just indentation of the contained code. There remains a test of i_size though, which was added for btrfs. It doesn't cause the other filesystems a problem as the test is performed after ->direct_IO has been called. It is possible that there is a race that does matter to btrfs, however this patch doesn't change that, so its still an overall improvement. Signed-off-by: NSteven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Reported-by: NZheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Acked-by: NMiklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 23 1月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Andrew Gallagher 提交于
open/release operations require userspace transitions to keep track of the open count and to perform any FS-specific setup. However, for some purely read-only FSs which don't need to perform any setup at open/release time, we can avoid the performance overhead of calling into userspace for open/release calls. This patch adds the necessary support to the fuse kernel modules to prevent open/release operations from hitting in userspace. When the client returns ENOSYS, we avoid sending the subsequent release to userspace, and also remember this so that future opens also don't trigger a userspace operation. Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
-
由 Andrew Gallagher 提交于
Various read operations (e.g. readlink, readdir) invalidate the cached attrs for atime changes. This patch adds a new function 'fuse_invalidate_atime', which checks for a read-only super block and avoids the attr invalidation in that case. Signed-off-by: NAndrew Gallagher <andrewjcg@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
-
- 05 11月, 2013 4 次提交
-
-
由 Maxim Patlasov 提交于
All async fuse requests must be supplied with extra reference to a fuse file. This is necessary to ensure that the fuse file is not released until all in-flight requests are completed. Fuse secondary writeback requests must obey this rule as well. Signed-off-by: NMaxim Patlasov <MPatlasov@parallels.com> Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
-
由 Maxim Patlasov 提交于
BDI_WRITTEN counter is used to estimate bdi bandwidth. It must be incremented every time as bdi ends page writeback. No matter whether it was fulfilled by actual write or by discarding the request (e.g. due to shrunk i_size). Note that even before writepages patches, the case "Got truncated off completely" was handled in fuse_send_writepage() by calling fuse_writepage_finish() which updated BDI_WRITTEN unconditionally. Signed-off-by: NMaxim Patlasov <MPatlasov@parallels.com> Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
-
由 Maxim Patlasov 提交于
If writeback happens while fuse is in FUSE_NOWRITE condition, the request will be queued but not processed immediately (see fuse_flush_writepages()). Until FUSE_NOWRITE becomes relaxed, more writebacks can happen. They will be queued as "secondary" requests to that first ("primary") request. Existing implementation crops only primary request. This is not correct because a subsequent extending write(2) may increase i_size and then secondary requests won't be cropped properly. The result would be stale data written to the server to a file offset where zeros must be. Similar problem may happen if secondary requests are attached to an in-flight request that was already cropped. The patch solves the issue by cropping all secondary requests in fuse_writepage_end(). Thanks to Miklos for idea. Signed-off-by: NMaxim Patlasov <MPatlasov@parallels.com> Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
-
由 Maxim Patlasov 提交于
fuse_writepage_in_flight() returns false if it fails to find request with given index in fi->writepages. Then the caller proceeds with populating data->orig_pages[] and incrementing req->num_pages. Hence, fuse_writepage_in_flight() must revert changes it made in request before returning false. Signed-off-by: NMaxim Patlasov <MPatlasov@parallels.com> Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
-
- 01 10月, 2013 9 次提交
-
-
由 Miklos Szeredi 提交于
If ->writepage() tries to write back a page whose copy is still in flight, then just skip by calling redirty_page_for_writepage(). This is OK, since now ->writepage() should never be called for data integrity sync. Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
-
由 Miklos Szeredi 提交于
As Maxim Patlasov pointed out, it's possible to get a dirty page while it's copy is still under writeback, despite fuse_page_mkwrite() doing its thing (direct IO). This could result in two concurrent write request for the same offset, with data corruption if they get mixed up. To prevent this, fuse needs to check and delay such writes. This implementation does this by: 1. check if page is still under writeout, if so create a new, single page secondary request for it 2. chain this secondary request onto the in-flight request 2/a. if a seconday request for the same offset was already chained to the in-flight request, then just copy the contents of the page and discard the new secondary request. This makes sure that for each page will have at most two requests associated with it 3. when the in-flight request finished, send off all secondary requests chained onto it Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
-
由 Miklos Szeredi 提交于
Checking against tmp-page indexes is not very useful, and results in one (or rarely two) page requests. Which is not much of an improvement... Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
-
由 Maxim Patlasov 提交于
The patch fixes a race between ftruncate(2), mmap-ed write and write(2): 1) An user makes a page dirty via mmap-ed write. 2) The user performs shrinking truncate(2) intended to purge the page. 3) Before fuse_do_setattr calls truncate_pagecache, the page goes to writeback. fuse_writepages_fill attaches a new page to FUSE_WRITE request, then releases the original page by end_page_writeback and unlock it. 4) fuse_do_setattr completes and successfully returns. Since now, i_mutex is free. 5) Ordinary write(2) extends i_size back to cover the page. Note that fuse_send_write_pages do wait for fuse writeback, but for another page->index. 6) fuse_writepages_fill attaches more pages to the request (if any), then fuse_writepages_send is eventually called. It is supposed to crop inarg->size of the request, but it doesn't because i_size has already been extended back. Moving end_page_writeback behind fuse_writepages_send guarantees that __fuse_release_nowrite (called from fuse_do_setattr) will crop inarg->size of the request before write(2) gets the chance to extend i_size. Signed-off-by: NMaxim Patlasov <mpatlasov@parallels.com> Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
-
由 Pavel Emelyanov 提交于
The .writepages one is required to make each writeback request carry more than one page on it. The patch enables optimized behaviour unconditionally, i.e. mmap-ed writes will benefit from the patch even if fc->writeback_cache=0. [SzM: simplify, add comments] Signed-off-by: NMaxim Patlasov <MPatlasov@parallels.com> Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
-
由 Miklos Szeredi 提交于
Don't bug if there's no writable files found for page writeback. If ever this is triggered, a WARN_ON helps debugging it much better then a BUG_ON. Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
-
由 Miklos Szeredi 提交于
Lock the page in fuse_page_mkwrite() to protect against a race with fuse_writepage() where the page is redirtied before the actual writeback begins. Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
-
由 Pavel Emelyanov 提交于
The .writepages callback will issue writeback requests with more than one page aboard. Make existing end/check code be aware of this. Signed-off-by: NMaxim Patlasov <MPatlasov@parallels.com> Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
-
由 Pavel Emelyanov 提交于
There will be a .writepageS callback implementation which will need to get a fuse_file out of a fuse_inode, thus make a helper for this. Signed-off-by: NMaxim Patlasov <MPatlasov@parallels.com> Signed-off-by: NPavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
-
- 18 9月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Maxim Patlasov 提交于
A former patch introducing FUSE_I_SIZE_UNSTABLE flag provided detailed description of races between ftruncate and anyone who can extend i_size: > 1. As in the previous scenario fuse_dentry_revalidate() discovered that i_size > changed (due to our own fuse_do_setattr()) and is going to call > truncate_pagecache() for some 'new_size' it believes valid right now. But by > the time that particular truncate_pagecache() is called ... > 2. fuse_do_setattr() returns (either having called truncate_pagecache() or > not -- it doesn't matter). > 3. The file is extended either by write(2) or ftruncate(2) or fallocate(2). > 4. mmap-ed write makes a page in the extended region dirty. This patch adds necessary bits to fuse_file_fallocate() to protect from that race. Signed-off-by: NMaxim Patlasov <mpatlasov@parallels.com> Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
由 Maxim Patlasov 提交于
The patch fixes a race between mmap-ed write and fallocate(PUNCH_HOLE): 1) An user makes a page dirty via mmap-ed write. 2) The user performs fallocate(2) with mode == PUNCH_HOLE|KEEP_SIZE and <offset, size> covering the page. 3) Before truncate_pagecache_range call from fuse_file_fallocate, the page goes to write-back. The page is fully processed by fuse_writepage (including end_page_writeback on the page), but fuse_flush_writepages did nothing because fi->writectr < 0. 4) truncate_pagecache_range is called and fuse_file_fallocate is finishing by calling fuse_release_nowrite. The latter triggers processing queued write-back request which will write stale data to the hole soon. Changed in v2 (thanks to Brian for suggestion): - Do not truncate page cache until FUSE_FALLOCATE succeeded. Otherwise, we can end up in returning -ENOTSUPP while user data is already punched from page cache. Use filemap_write_and_wait_range() instead. Changed in v3 (thanks to Miklos for suggestion): - fuse_wait_on_writeback() is prone to livelocks; use fuse_set_nowrite() instead. So far as we need a dirty-page barrier only, fuse_sync_writes() should be enough. - rebased to for-linus branch of fuse.git Signed-off-by: NMaxim Patlasov <mpatlasov@parallels.com> Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
- 03 9月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Maxim Patlasov 提交于
The way how fuse calls truncate_pagecache() from fuse_change_attributes() is completely wrong. Because, w/o i_mutex held, we never sure whether 'oldsize' and 'attr->size' are valid by the time of execution of truncate_pagecache(inode, oldsize, attr->size). In fact, as soon as we released fc->lock in the middle of fuse_change_attributes(), we completely loose control of actions which may happen with given inode until we reach truncate_pagecache. The list of potentially dangerous actions includes mmap-ed reads and writes, ftruncate(2) and write(2) extending file size. The typical outcome of doing truncate_pagecache() with outdated arguments is data corruption from user point of view. This is (in some sense) acceptable in cases when the issue is triggered by a change of the file on the server (i.e. externally wrt fuse operation), but it is absolutely intolerable in scenarios when a single fuse client modifies a file without any external intervention. A real life case I discovered by fsx-linux looked like this: 1. Shrinking ftruncate(2) comes to fuse_do_setattr(). The latter sends FUSE_SETATTR to the server synchronously, but before getting fc->lock ... 2. fuse_dentry_revalidate() is asynchronously called. It sends FUSE_LOOKUP to the server synchronously, then calls fuse_change_attributes(). The latter updates i_size, releases fc->lock, but before comparing oldsize vs attr->size.. 3. fuse_do_setattr() from the first step proceeds by acquiring fc->lock and updating attributes and i_size, but now oldsize is equal to outarg.attr.size because i_size has just been updated (step 2). Hence, fuse_do_setattr() returns w/o calling truncate_pagecache(). 4. As soon as ftruncate(2) completes, the user extends file size by write(2) making a hole in the middle of file, then reads data from the hole either by read(2) or mmap-ed read. The user expects to get zero data from the hole, but gets stale data because truncate_pagecache() is not executed yet. The scenario above illustrates one side of the problem: not truncating the page cache even though we should. Another side corresponds to truncating page cache too late, when the state of inode changed significantly. Theoretically, the following is possible: 1. As in the previous scenario fuse_dentry_revalidate() discovered that i_size changed (due to our own fuse_do_setattr()) and is going to call truncate_pagecache() for some 'new_size' it believes valid right now. But by the time that particular truncate_pagecache() is called ... 2. fuse_do_setattr() returns (either having called truncate_pagecache() or not -- it doesn't matter). 3. The file is extended either by write(2) or ftruncate(2) or fallocate(2). 4. mmap-ed write makes a page in the extended region dirty. The result will be the lost of data user wrote on the fourth step. The patch is a hotfix resolving the issue in a simplistic way: let's skip dangerous i_size update and truncate_pagecache if an operation changing file size is in progress. This simplistic approach looks correct for the cases w/o external changes. And to handle them properly, more sophisticated and intrusive techniques (e.g. NFS-like one) would be required. I'd like to postpone it until the issue is well discussed on the mailing list(s). Changed in v2: - improved patch description to cover both sides of the issue. Signed-off-by: NMaxim Patlasov <mpatlasov@parallels.com> Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
由 Maxim Patlasov 提交于
The patch fixes a race between ftruncate(2), mmap-ed write and write(2): 1) An user makes a page dirty via mmap-ed write. 2) The user performs shrinking truncate(2) intended to purge the page. 3) Before fuse_do_setattr calls truncate_pagecache, the page goes to writeback. fuse_writepage_locked fills FUSE_WRITE request and releases the original page by end_page_writeback. 4) fuse_do_setattr() completes and successfully returns. Since now, i_mutex is free. 5) Ordinary write(2) extends i_size back to cover the page. Note that fuse_send_write_pages do wait for fuse writeback, but for another page->index. 6) fuse_writepage_locked proceeds by queueing FUSE_WRITE request. fuse_send_writepage is supposed to crop inarg->size of the request, but it doesn't because i_size has already been extended back. Moving end_page_writeback to the end of fuse_writepage_locked fixes the race because now the fact that truncate_pagecache is successfully returned infers that fuse_writepage_locked has already called end_page_writeback. And this, in turn, infers that fuse_flush_writepages has already called fuse_send_writepage, and the latter used valid (shrunk) i_size. write(2) could not extend it because of i_mutex held by ftruncate(2). Signed-off-by: NMaxim Patlasov <mpatlasov@parallels.com> Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
- 29 6月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 18 6月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Maxim Patlasov 提交于
Changing size of a file on server and local update (fuse_write_update_size) should be always protected by inode->i_mutex. Otherwise a race like this is possible: 1. Process 'A' calls fallocate(2) to extend file (~FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE). fuse_file_fallocate() sends FUSE_FALLOCATE request to the server. 2. Process 'B' calls ftruncate(2) shrinking the file. fuse_do_setattr() sends shrinking FUSE_SETATTR request to the server and updates local i_size by i_size_write(inode, outarg.attr.size). 3. Process 'A' resumes execution of fuse_file_fallocate() and calls fuse_write_update_size(inode, offset + length). But 'offset + length' was obsoleted by ftruncate from previous step. Changed in v2 (thanks Brian and Anand for suggestions): - made relation between mutex_lock() and fuse_set_nowrite(inode) more explicit and clear. - updated patch description to use ftruncate(2) in example Signed-off-by: NMaxim V. Patlasov <MPatlasov@parallels.com> Reviewed-by: NBrian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
-
- 03 6月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Maxim Patlasov 提交于
The bug was introduced with async_dio feature: trying to optimize short reads, we cut number-of-bytes-to-read to i_size boundary. Hence the following example: truncate --size=300 /mnt/file dd if=/mnt/file of=/dev/null iflag=direct led to FUSE_READ request of 300 bytes size. This turned out to be problem for userspace fuse implementations who rely on assumption that kernel fuse does not change alignment of request from client FS. The patch turns off the optimization if async_dio is disabled. And, if it's enabled, the patch fixes adjustment of number-of-bytes-to-read to preserve alignment. Note, that we cannot throw out short read optimization entirely because otherwise a direct read of a huge size issued on a tiny file would generate a huge amount of fuse requests and most of them would be ACKed by userspace with zero bytes read. Signed-off-by: NMaxim Patlasov <MPatlasov@parallels.com> Reviewed-by: NBrian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
-
由 Brian Foster 提交于
If request submission fails for an async request (i.e., get_user_pages() returns -ERESTARTSYS), we currently skip the -EIOCBQUEUED return and drop into wait_for_sync_kiocb() forever. Avoid this by always returning -EIOCBQUEUED for async requests. If an error occurs, the error is passed into fuse_aio_complete(), returned via aio_complete() and thus propagated to userspace via io_getevents(). Signed-off-by: NBrian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NMaxim Patlasov <MPatlasov@parallels.com> Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
-
- 20 5月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Brian Foster 提交于
An fallocate request without FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE set can extend the size of a file. Update the inode size after a successful fallocate. Also invalidate the inode attributes after a successful fallocate to ensure we pick up the latest attribute values (i.e., i_blocks). Signed-off-by: NBrian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
-
由 Brian Foster 提交于
fuse supports hole punch via the fallocate() FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE interface. When a hole punch is passed through, the page cache is not cleared and thus allows reading stale data from the cache. This is easily demonstrable (using FOPEN_KEEP_CACHE) by reading a smallish random data file into cache, punching a hole and creating a copy of the file. Drop caches or remount and observe that the original file no longer matches the file copied after the hole punch. The original file contains a zeroed range and the latter file contains stale data. Protect against writepage requests in progress and punch out the associated page cache range after a successful client fs hole punch. Signed-off-by: NBrian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
-
- 15 5月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Brian Foster 提交于
Commit 8b41e671 introduced explicit background checking for fuse_req structures with BUG_ON() checks for the appropriate type of request in in the associated send functions. Commit bcba24cc introduced the ability to send dio requests as background requests but does not update the request allocation based on the type of I/O request. As a result, a BUG_ON() triggers in the fuse_request_send_background() background path if an async I/O is sent. Allocate a request based on the async state of the fuse_io_priv to avoid the BUG. Signed-off-by: NBrian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
-
- 08 5月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kent Overstreet 提交于
Faster kernel compiles by way of fewer unnecessary includes. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix fallout] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix build] Signed-off-by: NKent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com> Cc: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com> Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Asai Thambi S P <asamymuthupa@micron.com> Cc: Selvan Mani <smani@micron.com> Cc: Sam Bradshaw <sbradshaw@micron.com> Cc: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org> Reviewed-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 01 5月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Miklos Szeredi 提交于
Without async DIO write requests to a single file were always serialized. With async DIO that's no longer the case. So don't turn on async DIO by default for fear of breaking backward compatibility. Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
-
- 18 4月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Maxim Patlasov 提交于
The patch improves error handling in fuse_direct_IO(): if we successfully submitted several fuse requests on behalf of synchronous direct write extending file and some of them failed, let's try to do our best to clean-up. Changed in v2: reuse fuse_do_setattr(). Thanks to Brian for suggestion. Signed-off-by: NMaxim Patlasov <mpatlasov@parallels.com> Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
-
由 Maxim Patlasov 提交于
If user requested direct read beyond EOF, we can skip sending fuse requests for positions beyond EOF because userspace would ACK them with zero bytes read anyway. We can trust to i_size in fuse_direct_IO for such cases because it's called from fuse_file_aio_read() and the latter updates fuse attributes including i_size. Signed-off-by: NMaxim Patlasov <mpatlasov@parallels.com> Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
-