- 13 4月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Anton Arapov 提交于
Enclose return probes implementation, introduce ->ret_handler() and update existing code to rely on ->handler() *and* ->ret_handler() for uprobe and uretprobe respectively. Signed-off-by: NAnton Arapov <anton@redhat.com> Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
-
- 04 4月, 2013 7 次提交
-
-
由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于
Change write_opcode() to use copy_highpage() + copy_to_page() and simplify the code. Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: NAnton Arapov <anton@redhat.com> Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于
Extract the kmap_atomic/memcpy/kunmap_atomic code from xol_get_insn_slot() into the new simple helper, copy_to_page(). It will have more users soon. Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: NAnton Arapov <anton@redhat.com> Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于
__copy_insn(filp) can only be called after valid_vma() returns T, vma->vm_file passed as "filp" can not be NULL. Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: NAnton Arapov <anton@redhat.com> Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于
Change __copy_insn() to use copy_from_page() and simplify the code. Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: NAnton Arapov <anton@redhat.com> Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于
No functional changes. Rename copy_opcode() into copy_from_page() and add the new "int len" argument to make it more more generic for the new users. Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: NAnton Arapov <anton@redhat.com> Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
Some architectures like powerpc have multiple variants of the trap instruction. Introduce an additional helper is_trap_insn() for run-time handling of non-uprobe traps on such architectures. While there, change is_swbp_at_addr() to is_trap_at_addr() for reading clarity. With this change, the uprobe registration path will supercede any trap instruction inserted at the requested location, while taking care of delivering the SIGTRAP for cases where the trap notification came in for an address without a uprobe. See [1] for a more detailed explanation. [1] https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2013-March/104771.html This change was suggested by Oleg Nesterov. Signed-off-by: NAnanth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com> Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
-
由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于
Cleanup. Now that we have f_inode/file_inode() we can use it instead of vm_file->f_mapping->host. This should not make any difference for uprobes, but in theory this change is more correct. We use this inode as a key, to compare it with uprobe->inode set by uprobe_register(inode), and the caller uses d_inode. Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
- 09 2月, 2013 26 次提交
-
-
由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于
Currently it is not possible to change the filtering constraints after uprobe_register(), so a consumer can not, say, start to trace a task/mm which was previously filtered out, or remove the no longer needed bp's. Introduce uprobe_apply() which simply does register_for_each_vma() again to consult uprobe_consumer->filter() and install/remove the breakpoints. The only complication is that register_for_each_vma() can no longer assume that uprobe->consumers should be consulter if is_register == T, so we change it to accept "struct uprobe_consumer *new" instead. Unlike uprobe_register(), uprobe_apply(true) doesn't do "unregister" if register_for_each_vma() fails, it is up to caller to handle the error. Note: we probably need to cleanup the current interface, it is strange that uprobe_apply/unregister need inode/offset. We should either change uprobe_register() to return "struct uprobe *", or add a private ->uprobe member in uprobe_consumer. And in the long term uprobe_apply() should take a single argument, uprobe or consumer, even "bool add" should go away. Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
-
由 Josh Stone 提交于
The original pull message for uprobes (commit 654443e2) noted: This tree includes uprobes support in 'perf probe' - but SystemTap (and other tools) can take advantage of user probe points as well. In order to actually be usable in module-based tools like SystemTap, the interface needs to be exported. This patch first adds the obvious exports for uprobe_register and uprobe_unregister. Then it also adds one for task_user_regset_view, which is necessary to get the correct state of userspace registers. Signed-off-by: NJosh Stone <jistone@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
-
由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于
utask->xol_vaddr is either zero or valid, remove the bogus IS_ERR_VALUE() check in xol_free_insn_slot(). Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: NAnton Arapov <anton@redhat.com> Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于
handle_swbp() does get_utask() before can_skip_sstep() for no reason, we do not need ->utask if can_skip_sstep() succeeds. Move get_utask() to pre_ssout() who actually starts to use it. Move the initialization of utask->active_uprobe/state as well. This way the whole initialization is consolidated in pre_ssout(). Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: NAnton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>
-
由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于
pre_ssout() should do xol_free_insn_slot() if arch_uprobe_pre_xol() fails, otherwise nobody will free the allocated slot. Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: NAnton Arapov <anton@redhat.com> Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于
pre_ssout()->xol_get_insn_slot() path is confusing and buggy. This patch cleanups the code, the next one fixes the bug. Change xol_get_insn_slot() to only allocate the slot and do nothing more, move the initialization of utask->xol_vaddr/vaddr into pre_ssout(). Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: NAnton Arapov <anton@redhat.com> Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于
Rename add_utask() into get_utask() and change it to allocate on demand to simplify the caller. Like get_xol_area() it will have more users. Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: NAnton Arapov <anton@redhat.com> Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于
Currently only xol_get_insn_slot() does get_xol_area() + xol_alloc_area(), but this will have more users and we do not want to copy-and-paste this code. This patch simply moves xol_alloc_area() into get_xol_area() to simplify the current and future code. Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: NAnton Arapov <anton@redhat.com> Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于
Move alloc_page() from xol_add_vma() to xol_alloc_area() to cleanup the code. This separates the memory allocations and consolidates the -EALREADY cleanups and the error handling. Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: NAnton Arapov <anton@redhat.com> Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于
Change handle_swbp() to set regs->ip = bp_vaddr in advance, this is what consumer->handler() needs but uprobe_get_swbp_addr() is not exported. This also simplifies the code and makes it more consistent across the supported architectures. handle_swbp() becomes the only caller of uprobe_get_swbp_addr(). Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: NAnanth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
-
由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于
Currrently the are 2 problems with pre-filtering: 1. It is not possible to add/remove a task (mm) after uprobe_register() 2. A forked child inherits all breakpoints and uprobe_consumer can not control this. This patch does the first step to improve the filtering. handler_chain() removes the breakpoints installed by this uprobe from current->mm if all handlers return UPROBE_HANDLER_REMOVE. Note that handler_chain() relies on ->register_rwsem to avoid the race with uprobe_register/unregister which can add/del a consumer, or even remove and then insert the new uprobe at the same address. Perhaps we will add uprobe_apply_mm(uprobe, mm, is_register) and teach copy_mm() to do filter(UPROBE_FILTER_FORK), but I think this change makes sense anyway. Note: instead of checking the retcode from uc->handler, we could add uc->filter(UPROBE_FILTER_BPHIT). But I think this is not optimal to call 2 hooks in a row. This buys nothing, and if handler/filter do something nontrivial they will probably do the same work twice. Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于
Finally add uprobe_consumer->filter() and change consumer_filter() to actually call this method. Note that ->filter() accepts mm_struct, not task_struct. Because: 1. We do not have for_each_mm_user(mm, task). 2. Even if we implement for_each_mm_user(), ->filter() can use it itself. 3. It is not clear who will actually need this interface to do the "nontrivial" filtering. Another argument is "enum uprobe_filter_ctx", consumer->filter() can use it to figure out why/where it was called. For example, perhaps we can add UPROBE_FILTER_PRE_REGISTER used by build_map_info() to quickly "nack" the unwanted mm's. In this case consumer should know that it is called under ->i_mmap_mutex. See the previous discussion at http://marc.info/?t=135214229700002 Perhaps we should pass more arguments, vma/vaddr? Note: this patch obviously can't help to filter out the child created by fork(), this will be addressed later. Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于
filter_chain() was added into install_breakpoint/remove_breakpoint to simplify the initial changes but this is sub-optimal. This patch shifts the callsite to the callers, register_for_each_vma() and uprobe_mmap(). This way: - It will be easier to add the new arguments. This is the main reason, we can do more optimizations later. - register_for_each_vma(is_register => true) can be optimized, we only need to consult the new consumer. The previous consumers were already asked when they called uprobe_register(). This patch also moves the MMF_HAS_UPROBES check from remove_breakpoint(), this allows to avoid the potentionally costly filter_chain(). Note that register_for_each_vma(is_register => false) doesn't really need to take ->consumer_rwsem, but I don't think it makes sense to optimize this and introduce filter_chain_lockless(). Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于
uprobe_register() and uprobe_unregister() are the only users of mutex_lock(uprobes_hash(inode)), and the only reason why we can't simply remove it is that we need to ensure that delete_uprobe() is not possible after alloc_uprobe() and before consumer_add(). IOW, we need to ensure that when we take uprobe->register_rwsem this uprobe is still valid and we didn't race with _unregister() which called delete_uprobe() in between. With this patch uprobe_register() simply checks uprobe_is_active() and retries if it hits this very unlikely race. uprobes_mutex[] is no longer needed and can be removed. There is another reason for this change, prepare_uprobe() should be folded into alloc_uprobe() and we do not want to hold the extra locks around read_mapping_page/etc. Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: NAnton Arapov <anton@redhat.com> Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于
The lifetime of uprobe->rb_node and uprobe->inode is not refcounted, delete_uprobe() is called when we detect that uprobe has no consumers, and it would be deadly wrong to do this twice. Change delete_uprobe() to WARN() if it was already called. We use RB_CLEAR_NODE() to mark uprobe "inactive", then RB_EMPTY_NODE() can be used to detect this case. RB_EMPTY_NODE() is not used directly, we add the trivial helper for the next change. Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: NAnton Arapov <anton@redhat.com> Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于
uprobe_events counts the number of uprobes in uprobes_tree but it is used as a boolean. We can use RB_EMPTY_ROOT() instead. Probably no_uprobe_events() added by this patch can have more callers, say, mmf_recalc_uprobes(). Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: NAnton Arapov <anton@redhat.com> Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于
Now that ->register_rwsem is safe under ->mmap_sem we can kill ->copy_mutex and abuse down_write(&uprobe->consumer_rwsem). This makes prepare_uprobe() even more ugly, but we should kill it anyway. Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于
Simply remove UPROBE_RUN_HANDLER and the corresponding code. It can only help if uprobe has a single consumer, and in fact it is no longer needed after handler_chain() was changed to use ->register_rwsem, we simply can not race with uprobe_register(). Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于
Now that it safe to use ->consumer_rwsem under ->mmap_sem we can almost finish the implementation of filter_chain(). It still lacks the actual uc->filter(...) call but othewrwise it is ready, just it pretends that ->filter() always returns true. Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于
Introduce uprobe->register_rwsem. It is taken for writing around __uprobe_register/unregister. Change handler_chain() to use this sem rather than consumer_rwsem. The main reason for this change is that we have the nasty problem with mmap_sem/consumer_rwsem dependency. filter_chain() needs to protect uprobe->consumers like handler_chain(), but they can not use the same lock. filter_chain() can be called under ->mmap_sem (currently this is always true), but we want to allow ->handler() to play with the probed task's memory, and this needs ->mmap_sem. Alternatively we could use srcu, but synchronize_srcu() is very slow and ->register_rwsem allows us to do more. In particular, we can teach handler_chain() to do remove_breakpoint() if this bp is "nacked" by all consumers, we know that we can't race with the new consumer which does uprobe_register(). See also the next patches. uprobes_mutex[] is almost ready to die. Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于
To support the filtering uprobe_register() should do register_for_each_vma(true) every time the new consumer comes, we need to install the previously nacked breakpoints. Note: - uprobes_mutex[] should die, what it actually protects is alloc_uprobe(). - UPROBE_RUN_HANDLER should die too, obviously it can't work unless uprobe has a single consumer. The consumer should serialize with _register/_unregister itself. Or this flag should live in uprobe_consumer->state. - Perhaps we can do some optimizations later. For example, if filter_chain() never returns false uprobe can record this fact and avoid the unnecessary register_for_each_vma(). Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于
uprobe_unregister() removes the breakpoints only if the last consumer goes away. To support the filtering it should do this every time, we want to remove the breakpoints which nobody else want to keep. Note: given that filter_chain() is not actually implemented, this patch itself doesn't change the behaviour yet, register_for_each_vma(false) is a heavy "nop" unless there are no more consumers. Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于
Add the new helper filter_chain(). Currently it is only placeholder, the comment explains what is should do. We will change it later to consult every consumer to decide whether we need to install the swbp. Until then it works as if any consumer returns true, this matches the current behavior. Change install_breakpoint() to call filter_chain() instead of checking uprobe->consumers != NULL. We obviously need this, and this equally closes the race with _unregister(). Change remove_breakpoint() to call this helper too. Currently this is pointless because remove_breakpoint() is only called when the last consumer goes away, but we will change this. Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于
uprobe_consumer->filter() is pointless in its current form, kill it. We will add it back, but with the different signature/semantics. Perhaps we will even re-introduce the callsite in handler_chain(), but not to just skip uc->handler(). Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于
register/unregister verifies that inode/uc != NULL. For what? This really looks like "hide the potential problem", the caller should pass the valid data. register() also checks uc->next == NULL, probably to prevent the double-register but the caller can do other stupid/wrong things. If we do this check, then we should document that uc->next should be cleared before register() and add BUG_ON(). Also add the small comment about the i_size_read() check. Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于
Cosmetic. __set_bit(UPROBE_SKIP_SSTEP) is the part of initialization, it is not clear why it is set in insert_uprobe(). Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
- 25 1月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Sasha Levin 提交于
We checked for uprobe==NULL earlier, no need to redo that. Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1356030701-16284-22-git-send-email-sasha.levin@oracle.comSigned-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
-
- 16 11月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于
This was always racy, but 26872090 "uprobes: Rework register_for_each_vma() to make it O(n)" should be blamed anyway, it made everything worse and I didn't notice. register/unregister call build_map_info() and then do install/remove breakpoint for every mm which mmaps inode/offset. This can obviously race with fork()->dup_mmap() in between and we can miss the child. uprobe_register() could be easily fixed but unregister is much worse, the new mm inherits "int3" from parent and there is no way to detect this if uprobe goes away. So this patch simply adds percpu_down_read/up_read around dup_mmap(), and percpu_down_write/up_write into register_for_each_vma(). This adds 2 new hooks into dup_mmap() but we can kill uprobe_dup_mmap() and fold it into uprobe_end_dup_mmap(). Reported-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
-
- 15 11月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rabin Vincent 提交于
Flush the cache so that the instructions written to the XOL area are visible. Signed-off-by: NRabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in> Acked-by: NAnanth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
-
- 04 11月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于
Kill arch_uprobe_enable/disable_step() hooks, they do nothing and nobody needs them. Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于
No functional changes. powerpc is the only user of arch_uprobe_enable/disable_step() helpers, but they should die. They can not be used correctly, every arch needs its own implementation (like x86 does). And they do not really help even as initial-and-almost-working code, arch_uprobe_*_xol() hooks can easily use user_enable/disable_single_step() directly. Change arch_uprobe_*_step() to do nothing, and convert powerpc to use ptrace helpers. This is equally wrong, powerpc needs the arch-specific fixes. Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: NAnanth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com> Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
- 09 10月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Haggai Eran 提交于
In order to allow sleeping during invalidate_page mmu notifier calls, we need to avoid calling when holding the PT lock. In addition to its direct calls, invalidate_page can also be called as a substitute for a change_pte call, in case the notifier client hasn't implemented change_pte. This patch drops the invalidate_page call from change_pte, and instead wraps all calls to change_pte with invalidate_range_start and invalidate_range_end calls. Note that change_pte still cannot sleep after this patch, and that clients implementing change_pte should not take action on it in case the number of outstanding invalidate_range_start calls is larger than one, otherwise they might miss a later invalidation. Signed-off-by: NHaggai Eran <haggaie@mellanox.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@qumranet.com> Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@mellanox.com> Cc: Haggai Eran <haggaie@mellanox.com> Cc: Shachar Raindel <raindel@mellanox.com> Cc: Liran Liss <liranl@mellanox.com> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-