- 05 6月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Steven Rostedt 提交于
As Peter Zijlstra told me, we have the following path: do_exit() exit_itimers() itimer_delete() spin_lock_irqsave(&timer->it_lock, &flags); timer_delete_hook(timer); kc->timer_del(timer) := posix_cpu_timer_del() put_task_struct() __put_task_struct() task_numa_free() spin_lock(&grp->lock); Which means that task_numa_free() can be called with interrupts disabled, which means that we should not be using spin_lock_irq() but spin_lock_irqsave() instead. Otherwise we are enabling interrupts while holding an interrupt unsafe lock! Signed-off-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner<tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140527182541.GH11096@twins.programming.kicks-ass.netSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 22 5月, 2014 7 次提交
-
-
由 Lai Jiangshan 提交于
Lai found that: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 13 at arch/x86/kernel/smp.c:124 native_smp_send_reschedule+0x2d/0x4b() ... migration_cpu_stop+0x1d/0x22 was caused by set_cpus_allowed_ptr() assuming that cpu_active_mask is always a sub-set of cpu_online_mask. This isn't true since 5fbd036b ("sched: Cleanup cpu_active madness"). So set active and online at the same time to avoid this particular problem. Fixes: 5fbd036b ("sched: Cleanup cpu_active madness") Signed-off-by: NLai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Gautham R. Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Michael wang <wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/53758B12.8060609@cn.fujitsu.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
Tejun reported that his resume was failing due to order-3 allocations from sched_domain building. Replace the NR_CPUS arrays in there with a dynamically allocated array. Reported-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-7cysnkw1gik45r864t1nkudh@git.kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
Tejun reported that his resume was failing due to order-3 allocations from sched_domain building. Replace the NR_CPUS arrays in there with a dynamically allocated array. Reported-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: NJuri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-kat4gl1m5a6dwy6nzuqox45e@git.kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Juri Lelli 提交于
Michael Kerrisk noticed that creating SCHED_DEADLINE reservations with certain parameters (e.g, a runtime of something near 2^64 ns) can cause a system freeze for some amount of time. The problem is that in the interface we have u64 sched_runtime; while internally we need to have a signed runtime (to cope with budget overruns) s64 runtime; At the time we setup a new dl_entity we copy the first value in the second. The cast turns out with negative values when sched_runtime is too big, and this causes the scheduler to go crazy right from the start. Moreover, considering how we deal with deadlines wraparound (s64)(a - b) < 0 we also have to restrict acceptable values for sched_{deadline,period}. This patch fixes the thing checking that user parameters are always below 2^63 ns (still large enough for everyone). It also rewrites other conditions that we check, since in __checkparam_dl we don't have to deal with deadline wraparounds and what we have now erroneously fails when the difference between values is too big. Reported-by: NMichael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Suggested-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NJuri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Dario Faggioli<raistlin@linux.it> Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140513141131.20d944f81633ee937f256385@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
The way we read POSIX one should only call sched_getparam() when sched_getscheduler() returns either SCHED_FIFO or SCHED_RR. Given that we currently return sched_param::sched_priority=0 for all others, extend the same behaviour to SCHED_DEADLINE. Requested-by: NMichael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: NMichael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it> Cc: linux-man <linux-man@vger.kernel.org> Cc: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140512205034.GH13467@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.netSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
The scheduler uses policy=-1 to preserve the current policy state to implement sys_sched_setparam(), this got exposed to userspace by accident through sys_sched_setattr(), cure this. Reported-by: NMichael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: NMichael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140509085311.GJ30445@twins.programming.kicks-ass.netSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Michael Kerrisk 提交于
The documented[1] behavior of sched_attr() in the proposed man page text is: sched_attr::size must be set to the size of the structure, as in sizeof(struct sched_attr), if the provided structure is smaller than the kernel structure, any additional fields are assumed '0'. If the provided structure is larger than the kernel structure, the kernel verifies all additional fields are '0' if not the syscall will fail with -E2BIG. As currently implemented, sched_copy_attr() returns -EFBIG for for this case, but the logic in sys_sched_setattr() converts that error to -EFAULT. This patch fixes the behavior. [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1615615/focus=1697760Signed-off-by: NMichael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/536CEC17.9070903@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 07 5月, 2014 7 次提交
-
-
由 Jason Low 提交于
Also initialize the per-sd variables for newidle load balancing in sd_numa_init(). Signed-off-by: NJason Low <jason.low2@hp.com> Acked-by: morten.rasmussen@arm.com Cc: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org Cc: alex.shi@linaro.org Cc: preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: efault@gmx.de Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org Cc: aswin@hp.com Cc: chegu_vinod@hp.com Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1398303035-18255-3-git-send-email-jason.low2@hp.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Jason Low 提交于
The following commit: e5fc6611 ("sched: Fix race in idle_balance()") can potentially cause rq->max_idle_balance_cost to not be updated, even when load_balance(NEWLY_IDLE) is attempted and the per-sd max cost value is updated. Preeti noticed a similar issue with updating rq->next_balance. In this patch, we fix this by making sure we still check/update those values even if a task gets enqueued while browsing the domains. Signed-off-by: NJason Low <jason.low2@hp.com> Reviewed-by: NPreeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: morten.rasmussen@arm.com Cc: aswin@hp.com Cc: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org Cc: alex.shi@linaro.org Cc: efault@gmx.de Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1398725155-7591-2-git-send-email-jason.low2@hp.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
Tim wrote: "The current code will call pick_next_task_fair a second time in the slow path if we did not pull any task in our first try. This is really unnecessary as we already know no task can be pulled and it doubles the delay for the cpu to enter idle. We instrumented some network workloads and that saw that pick_next_task_fair is frequently called twice before a cpu enters idle. The call to pick_next_task_fair can add non trivial latency as it calls load_balance which runs find_busiest_group on an hierarchy of sched domains spanning the cpus for a large system. For some 4 socket systems, we saw almost 0.25 msec spent per call of pick_next_task_fair before a cpu can be idled." Optimize the second call away for the common case and document the dependency. Reported-by: NTim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140424100047.GP11096@twins.programming.kicks-ass.netSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Steven Rostedt (Red Hat) 提交于
The check at the beginning of cpupri_find() makes sure that the task_pri variable does not exceed the cp->pri_to_cpu array length. But that length is CPUPRI_NR_PRIORITIES not MAX_RT_PRIO, where it will miss the last two priorities in that array. As task_pri is computed from convert_prio() which should never be bigger than CPUPRI_NR_PRIORITIES, if the check should cause a panic if it is hit. Reported-by: NMike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1397015410.5212.13.camel@marge.simpson.netSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Li Zefan 提交于
Free cpudl->free_cpus allocated in cpudl_init(). Signed-off-by: NLi Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com> Acked-by: NJuri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.14+ Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/534F36CE.2000409@huawei.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Juri Lelli 提交于
yield_task_dl() is broken: o it forces current to be throttled setting its runtime to zero; o it sets current's dl_se->dl_new to one, expecting that dl_task_timer() will queue it back with proper parameters at replenish time. Unfortunately, dl_task_timer() has this check at the very beginning: if (!dl_task(p) || dl_se->dl_new) goto unlock; So, it just bails out and the task is never replenished. It actually yielded forever. To fix this, introduce a new flag indicating that the task properly yielded the CPU before its current runtime expired. While this is a little overdoing at the moment, the flag would be useful in the future to discriminate between "good" jobs (of which remaining runtime could be reclaimed, i.e. recycled) and "bad" jobs (for which dl_throttled task has been set) that needed to be stopped. Reported-by: Nyjay.kim <yjay.kim@lge.com> Signed-off-by: NJuri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140429103953.e68eba1b2ac3309214e3dc5a@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
Russell reported, that irqtime_account_idle_ticks() takes ages due to: for (i = 0; i < ticks; i++) irqtime_account_process_tick(current, 0, rq); It's sad, that this code was written way _AFTER_ the NOHZ idle functionality was available. I charge myself guitly for not paying attention when that crap got merged with commit abb74cef ("sched: Export ns irqtimes through /proc/stat") So instead of looping nr_ticks times just apply the whole thing at once. As a side note: The whole cputime_t vs. u64 business in that context wants to be cleaned up as well. There is no point in having all these back and forth conversions. Lets standardise on u64 nsec for all kernel internal accounting and be done with it. Everything else does not make sense at all for fine grained accounting. Frederic, can you please take care of that? Reported-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com> Cc: Shaun Ruffell <sruffell@digium.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.02.1405022307000.6261@ionos.tec.linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 24 4月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Masanari Iida 提交于
When 'flags' argument to sched_{set,get}attr() syscalls were added in: 6d35ab48 ("sched: Add 'flags' argument to sched_{set,get}attr() syscalls") no description for 'flags' was added. It causes the following warnings on "make htmldocs": Warning(/kernel/sched/core.c:3645): No description found for parameter 'flags' Warning(/kernel/sched/core.c:3789): No description found for parameter 'flags' Signed-off-by: NMasanari Iida <standby24x7@gmail.com> Cc: peterz@infradead.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1397753955-2914-1-git-send-email-standby24x7@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 17 4月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kirill Tkhai 提交于
We need to do it like we do for the other higher priority classes.. Signed-off-by: NKirill Tkhai <tkhai@yandex.ru> Cc: Michael wang <wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/336561397137116@web27h.yandex.ruSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 11 4月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mike Galbraith 提交于
Sasha reported that lockdep claims that the following commit: made numa_group.lock interrupt unsafe: 156654f4 ("sched/numa: Move task_numa_free() to __put_task_struct()") While I don't see how that could be, given the commit in question moved task_numa_free() from one irq enabled region to another, the below does make both gripes and lockups upon gripe with numa=fake=4 go away. Reported-by: NSasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> Fixes: 156654f4 ("sched/numa: Move task_numa_free() to __put_task_struct()") Signed-off-by: NMike Galbraith <bitbucket@online.de> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org Cc: mgorman@suse.com Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1396860915.5170.5.camel@marge.simpson.netSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 08 4月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Gideon Israel Dsouza 提交于
To increase compiler portability there is <linux/compiler.h> which provides convenience macros for various gcc constructs. Eg: __weak for __attribute__((weak)). I've replaced all instances of gcc attributes with the right macro in the kernel subsystem. Signed-off-by: NGideon Israel Dsouza <gidisrael@gmail.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Arnd Bergmann 提交于
This is the final piece in the puzzle, as all patches to remove the last users of \(interruptible_\|\)sleep_on\(_timeout\|\) have made it into the 3.15 merge window. The work was long overdue, and this interface in particular should not have survived the BKL removal that was done a couple of years ago. Citing Jon Corbet from http://lwn.net/2001/0201/kernel.php3": "[...] it was suggested that the janitors look for and fix all code that calls sleep_on() [...] since (1) almost all such code is incorrect, and (2) Linus has agreed that those functions should be removed in the 2.5 development series". We haven't quite made it for 2.5, but maybe we can merge this for 3.15. Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 04 4月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Paul Gortmaker 提交于
Code that is obj-y (always built-in) or dependent on a bool Kconfig (built-in or absent) can never be modular. So using module_init as an alias for __initcall can be somewhat misleading. Fix these up now, so that we can relocate module_init from init.h into module.h in the future. If we don't do this, we'd have to add module.h to obviously non-modular code, and that would be a worse thing. The audit targets the following module_init users for change: kernel/user.c obj-y kernel/kexec.c bool KEXEC (one instance per arch) kernel/profile.c bool PROFILING kernel/hung_task.c bool DETECT_HUNG_TASK kernel/sched/stats.c bool SCHEDSTATS kernel/user_namespace.c bool USER_NS Note that direct use of __initcall is discouraged, vs. one of the priority categorized subgroups. As __initcall gets mapped onto device_initcall, our use of subsys_initcall (which makes sense for these files) will thus change this registration from level 6-device to level 4-subsys (i.e. slightly earlier). However no observable impact of that difference has been observed during testing. Also, two instances of missing ";" at EOL are fixed in kexec. Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 20 3月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
There are only two users of get_nohz_timer_target(): timer and hrtimer. Both call it under same circumstances, i.e. #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON if (!pinned && get_sysctl_timer_migration() && idle_cpu(this_cpu)) return get_nohz_timer_target(); #endif So, it makes more sense to get all this as part of get_nohz_timer_target() instead of duplicating code at two places. For this another parameter is required to be passed to this routine, pinned. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org Cc: fweisbec@gmail.com Cc: peterz@infradead.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1e1b53537217d58d48c2d7a222a9c3ac47d5b64c.1395140107.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 13 3月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Frederic Weisbecker 提交于
When update_rq_clock_task() accounts the pending steal time for a task, it converts the steal delta from nsecs to tick then from tick to nsecs. There is no apparent good reason for doing that though because both the task clock and the prev steal delta are u64 and store values in nsecs. So lets remove the needless conversion. Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
-
由 Frederic Weisbecker 提交于
The steal guest time accounting code assumes that cputime_t is based on jiffies. So when CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL=y, which implies that cputime_t is based on nsecs, steal_account_process_tick() passes the delta in jiffies to account_steal_time() which then accounts it as if it's a value in nsecs. As a result, accounting 1 second of steal time (with HZ=100 that would be 100 jiffies) is spuriously accounted as 100 nsecs. As such /proc/stat may report 0 values of steal time even when two guests have run concurrently for a few seconds on the same host and same CPU. In order to fix this, lets convert the nsecs based steal delta to cputime instead of jiffies by using the right conversion API. Given that the steal time is stored in cputime_t and this type can have a smaller granularity than nsecs, we only account the rounded converted value and leave the remaining nsecs for the next deltas. Reported-by: NHuiqingding <huding@redhat.com> Reported-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
-
- 12 3月, 2014 3 次提交
-
-
由 Alex Shi 提交于
task_hot() doesn't need the 'sched_domain' parameter, so remove it. Signed-off-by: NAlex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1394607111-1904-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Vincent Guittot 提交于
The tmp value has been already calculated in: scaled_busy_load_per_task = (busiest->load_per_task * SCHED_POWER_SCALE) / busiest->group_power; Signed-off-by: NVincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1394555166-22894-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Steven Rostedt 提交于
I decided to run my tests on linux-next, and my wakeup_rt tracer was broken. After running a bisect, I found that the problem commit was: linux-next commit c365c292 "sched: Consider pi boosting in setscheduler()" And the reason the wake_rt tracer test was failing, was because it had no RT task to trace. I first noticed this when running with sched_switch event and saw that my RT task still had normal SCHED_OTHER priority. Looking at the problem commit, I found: - p->normal_prio = normal_prio(p); - p->prio = rt_mutex_getprio(p); With no + p->normal_prio = normal_prio(p); + p->prio = rt_mutex_getprio(p); Reading what the commit is suppose to do, I realize that the p->prio can't be set if the task is boosted with a higher prio, but the p->normal_prio still needs to be set regardless, otherwise, when the task is deboosted, it wont get the new priority. The p->prio has to be set before "check_class_changed()" is called, otherwise the class wont be changed. Also added fix to newprio to include a check for deadline policy that was missing. This change was suggested by Juri Lelli. Signed-off-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: SebastianAndrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140306120438.638bfe94@gandalf.local.homeSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 11 3月, 2014 11 次提交
-
-
由 Mike Galbraith 提交于
Bad idea on -rt: [ 908.026136] [<ffffffff8150ad6a>] rt_spin_lock_slowlock+0xaa/0x2c0 [ 908.026145] [<ffffffff8108f701>] task_numa_free+0x31/0x130 [ 908.026151] [<ffffffff8108121e>] finish_task_switch+0xce/0x100 [ 908.026156] [<ffffffff81509c0a>] thread_return+0x48/0x4ae [ 908.026160] [<ffffffff8150a095>] schedule+0x25/0xa0 [ 908.026163] [<ffffffff8150ad95>] rt_spin_lock_slowlock+0xd5/0x2c0 [ 908.026170] [<ffffffff810658cf>] get_signal_to_deliver+0xaf/0x680 [ 908.026175] [<ffffffff8100242d>] do_signal+0x3d/0x5b0 [ 908.026179] [<ffffffff81002a30>] do_notify_resume+0x90/0xe0 [ 908.026186] [<ffffffff81513176>] int_signal+0x12/0x17 [ 908.026193] [<00007ff2a388b1d0>] 0x7ff2a388b1cf and since upstream does not mind where we do this, be a bit nicer ... Signed-off-by: NMike Galbraith <bitbucket@online.de> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1393568591.6018.27.camel@marge.simpson.netSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Kirill Tkhai 提交于
Check for fair tasks number to decide, that we've pulled a task. rq's nr_running may contain throttled RT tasks. Signed-off-by: NKirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1394118975.19290.104.camel@tkhaiSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Kirill Tkhai 提交于
1) Single cpu machine case. When rq has only RT tasks, but no one of them can be picked because of throttling, we enter in endless loop. pick_next_task_{dl,rt} return NULL. In pick_next_task_fair() we permanently go to retry if (rq->nr_running != rq->cfs.h_nr_running) return RETRY_TASK; (rq->nr_running is not being decremented when rt_rq becomes throttled). No chances to unthrottle any rt_rq or to wake fair here, because of rq is locked permanently and interrupts are disabled. 2) In case of SMP this can cause a hang too. Although we unlock rq in idle_balance(), interrupts are still disabled. The solution is to check for available tasks in DL and RT classes instead of checking for sum. Signed-off-by: NKirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1394098321.19290.11.camel@tkhaiSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Kirill Tkhai 提交于
We close idle_exit_fair() bracket in case of we've pulled something or we've received task of high priority class. Signed-off-by: NKirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1394098315.19290.10.camel@tkhaiSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Kirill Tkhai 提交于
The problems: 1) We check for rt_nr_running before call of put_prev_task(). If previous task is RT, its rt_rq may become throttled and dequeued after this call. In case of p is from rt->rq this just causes picking a task from throttled queue, but in case of its rt_rq is child we are guaranteed catch BUG_ON. 2) The same with deadline class. The only difference we operate on only dl_rq. This patch fixes all the above problems and it adds a small skip in the DL update like we've already done for RT class: if (unlikely((s64)delta_exec <= 0)) return; This will optimize sequential update_curr_dl() calls a little. Signed-off-by: NKirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1393946746.3643.3.camel@tkhaiSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Daniel Lezcano 提交于
The idle main function is a complex and a critical function. Added more comments to the code. Signed-off-by: NDaniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Acked-by: NNicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: tglx@linutronix.de Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net Cc: preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1393832934-11625-5-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Daniel Lezcano 提交于
This patch moves the condition before entering idle into the cpuidle main function located in idle.c. That simplify the idle mainloop functions and increase the readibility of the conditions to enter truly idle. This patch is code reorganization and does not change the behavior of the function. Signed-off-by: NDaniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: tglx@linutronix.de Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net Cc: nicolas.pitre@linaro.org Cc: preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1393832934-11625-4-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Daniel Lezcano 提交于
Now that we have the main cpuidle function in idle.c, move some code from the idle mainloop to this function for the sake of clarity. That removes if then else indentation difficult to follow when looking at the code. This patch does not change the current behavior. Signed-off-by: NDaniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Acked-by: NNicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: tglx@linutronix.de Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net Cc: preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1393832934-11625-3-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Daniel Lezcano 提交于
The cpuidle_idle_call does nothing more than calling the three individuals function and is no longer used by any arch specific code but only in the cpuidle framework code. We can move this function into the idle task code to ensure better proximity to the scheduler code. Signed-off-by: NDaniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Acked-by: NNicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net Cc: preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1393832934-11625-2-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
Prevent tracing of preempt_disable/enable() in sched_clock_cpu(). When CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT is enabled, preempt_disable/enable() are traced and this causes trace_clock() users (and probably others) to go into an infinite recursion. Systems with a stable sched_clock() are not affected. This problem is similar to that fixed by upstream commit 95ef1e52 ("KVM guest: prevent tracing recursion with kvmclock"). Signed-off-by: NFernando Luis Vazquez Cao <fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1394083528.4524.3.camel@nexusSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Juri Lelli 提交于
Deny the use of SCHED_DEADLINE policy to unprivileged users. Even if root users can set the policy for normal users, we don't want the latter to be able to change their parameters (safest behavior). Signed-off-by: NJuri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1393844961-18097-1-git-send-email-juri.lelli@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 27 2月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
Michael spotted that the idle_balance() push down created a task priority problem. Previously, when we called idle_balance() before pick_next_task() it wasn't a problem when -- because of the rq->lock droppage -- an rt/dl task slipped in. Similarly for pre_schedule(), rt pre-schedule could have a dl task slip in. But by pulling it into the pick_next_task() loop, we'll not try a higher task priority again. Cure this by creating a re-start condition in pick_next_task(); and triggering this from pick_next_task_{rt,fair}(). It also fixes a live-lock where we get stuck in pick_next_task_fair() due to idle_balance() seeing !0 nr_running but there not actually being any fair tasks about. Reported-by: NMichael Wang <wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Fixes: 38033c37 ("sched: Push down pre_schedule() and idle_balance()") Tested-by: NSasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140224121218.GR15586@twins.programming.kicks-ass.netSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
Commit cf37b6b4 ("sched/idle: Move cpu/idle.c to sched/idle.c") said to simply move a file; somehow it got mangled and created an old version of the file and forgot to remove the old file. Fix this fail; add the lost change and remove the now identical old file. Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net Cc: nicolas.pitre@linaro.org Cc: preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140224172207.GC9987@twins.programming.kicks-ass.netSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-