Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 20 3月, 2012 1 次提交
  3. 19 3月, 2012 1 次提交
  5. 17 3月, 2012 4 次提交
  7. 11 3月, 2012 5 次提交
  9. 10 3月, 2012 2 次提交
    • A
      aio: fix the "too late munmap()" race · c7b28555
      由 Al Viro 提交于 
      Current code has put_ioctx() called asynchronously from aio_fput_routine();
that's done *after* we have killed the request that used to pin ioctx,
so there's nothing to stop io_destroy() waiting in wait_for_all_aios()
from progressing.  As the result, we can end up with async call of
put_ioctx() being the last one and possibly happening during exit_mmap()
or elf_core_dump(), neither of which expects stray munmap() being done
to them...

We do need to prevent _freeing_ ioctx until aio_fput_routine() is done
with that, but that's all we care about - neither io_destroy() nor
exit_aio() will progress past wait_for_all_aios() until aio_fput_routine()
does really_put_req(), so the ioctx teardown won't be done until then
and we don't care about the contents of ioctx past that point.

Since actual freeing of these suckers is RCU-delayed, we don't need to
bump ioctx refcount when request goes into list for async removal.
All we need is rcu_read_lock held just over the ->ctx_lock-protected
area in aio_fput_routine().
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Reviewed-by: NJeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NBenjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      c7b28555
    • A
      aio: fix io_setup/io_destroy race · 86b62a2c
      由 Al Viro 提交于 
      Have ioctx_alloc() return an extra reference, so that caller would drop it
on success and not bother with re-grabbing it on failure exit.  The current
code is obviously broken - io_destroy() from another thread that managed
to guess the address io_setup() would've returned would free ioctx right
under us; gets especially interesting if aio_context_t * we pass to
io_setup() points to PROT_READ mapping, so put_user() fails and we end
up doing io_destroy() on kioctx another thread has just got freed...
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Acked-by: NBenjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>
Reviewed-by: NJeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      86b62a2c
  11. 07 3月, 2012 2 次提交
  13. 06 3月, 2012 4 次提交
  15. 05 3月, 2012 1 次提交
    • L
      vfs: move dentry_cmp from <linux/dcache.h> to fs/dcache.c · 5483f18e
      由 Linus Torvalds 提交于 
      It's only used inside fs/dcache.c, and we're going to play games with it
for the word-at-a-time patches.  This time we really don't even want to
export it, because it really is an internal function to fs/dcache.c, and
has been since it was introduced.

Having it in that extremely hot header file (it's included in pretty
much everything, thanks to <linux/fs.h>) is a disaster for testing
different versions, and is utterly pointless.

We really should have some kind of header file diet thing, where we
figure out which parts of header files are really better off private and
only result in more expensive compiles.
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      5483f18e
  17. 03 3月, 2012 7 次提交
  19. 02 3月, 2012 1 次提交
  21. 29 2月, 2012 1 次提交
    • R
      ecryptfs: fix printk format warning for size_t · 164974a8
      由 Randy Dunlap 提交于 
      Fix printk format warning (from Linus's suggestion):

on i386:
  fs/ecryptfs/miscdev.c:433:38: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'unsigned int'

and on x86_64:
  fs/ecryptfs/miscdev.c:433:38: warning: format '%u' expects type 'unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'long unsigned int'
Signed-off-by: NRandy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Cc:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc:	Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>
Cc:	Dustin Kirkland <dustin.kirkland@gazzang.com>
Cc:	ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      164974a8
  23. 28 2月, 2012 4 次提交
  25. 27 2月, 2012 2 次提交
  27. 26 2月, 2012 1 次提交
    • I
      autofs: work around unhappy compat problem on x86-64 · a32744d4
      由 Ian Kent 提交于 
      When the autofs protocol version 5 packet type was added in commit
5c0a32fc ("autofs4: add new packet type for v5 communications"), it
obvously tried quite hard to be word-size agnostic, and uses explicitly
sized fields that are all correctly aligned.

However, with the final "char name[NAME_MAX+1]" array at the end, the
actual size of the structure ends up being not very well defined:
because the struct isn't marked 'packed', doing a "sizeof()" on it will
align the size of the struct up to the biggest alignment of the members
it has.

And despite all the members being the same, the alignment of them is
different: a "__u64" has 4-byte alignment on x86-32, but native 8-byte
alignment on x86-64.  And while 'NAME_MAX+1' ends up being a nice round
number (256), the name[] array starts out a 4-byte aligned.

End result: the "packed" size of the structure is 300 bytes: 4-byte, but
not 8-byte aligned.

As a result, despite all the fields being in the same place on all
architectures, sizeof() will round up that size to 304 bytes on
architectures that have 8-byte alignment for u64.

Note that this is *not* a problem for 32-bit compat mode on POWER, since
there __u64 is 8-byte aligned even in 32-bit mode.  But on x86, 32-bit
and 64-bit alignment is different for 64-bit entities, and as a result
the structure that has exactly the same layout has different sizes.

So on x86-64, but no other architecture, we will just subtract 4 from
the size of the structure when running in a compat task.  That way we
will write the properly sized packet that user mode expects.

Not pretty.  Sadly, this very subtle, and unnecessary, size difference
has been encoded in user space that wants to read packets of *exactly*
the right size, and will refuse to touch anything else.
Reported-and-tested-by: NThomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de>
Signed-off-by: NIan Kent <raven@themaw.net>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      a32744d4
  29. 25 2月, 2012 2 次提交
    • O
      epoll: ep_unregister_pollwait() can use the freed pwq->whead · 971316f0
      由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于 
      signalfd_cleanup() ensures that ->signalfd_wqh is not used, but
this is not enough. eppoll_entry->whead still points to the memory
we are going to free, ep_unregister_pollwait()->remove_wait_queue()
is obviously unsafe.

Change ep_poll_callback(POLLFREE) to set eppoll_entry->whead = NULL,
change ep_unregister_pollwait() to check pwq->whead != NULL under
rcu_read_lock() before remove_wait_queue(). We add the new helper,
ep_remove_wait_queue(), for this.

This works because sighand_cachep is SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU and because
->signalfd_wqh is initialized in sighand_ctor(), not in copy_sighand.
ep_unregister_pollwait()->remove_wait_queue() can play with already
freed and potentially reused ->sighand, but this is fine. This memory
must have the valid ->signalfd_wqh until rcu_read_unlock().
Reported-by: NMaxime Bizon <mbizon@freebox.fr>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      971316f0
    • O
      epoll: introduce POLLFREE to flush ->signalfd_wqh before kfree() · d80e731e
      由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于 
      This patch is intentionally incomplete to simplify the review.
It ignores ep_unregister_pollwait() which plays with the same wqh.
See the next change.

epoll assumes that the EPOLL_CTL_ADD'ed file controls everything
f_op->poll() needs. In particular it assumes that the wait queue
can't go away until eventpoll_release(). This is not true in case
of signalfd, the task which does EPOLL_CTL_ADD uses its ->sighand
which is not connected to the file.

This patch adds the special event, POLLFREE, currently only for
epoll. It expects that init_poll_funcptr()'ed hook should do the
necessary cleanup. Perhaps it should be defined as EPOLLFREE in
eventpoll.

__cleanup_sighand() is changed to do wake_up_poll(POLLFREE) if
->signalfd_wqh is not empty, we add the new signalfd_cleanup()
helper.

ep_poll_callback(POLLFREE) simply does list_del_init(task_list).
This make this poll entry inconsistent, but we don't care. If you
share epoll fd which contains our sigfd with another process you
should blame yourself. signalfd is "really special". I simply do
not know how we can define the "right" semantics if it used with
epoll.

The main problem is, epoll calls signalfd_poll() once to establish
the connection with the wait queue, after that signalfd_poll(NULL)
returns the different/inconsistent results depending on who does
EPOLL_CTL_MOD/signalfd_read/etc. IOW: apart from sigmask, signalfd
has nothing to do with the file, it works with the current thread.

In short: this patch is the hack which tries to fix the symptoms.
It also assumes that nobody can take tasklist_lock under epoll
locks, this seems to be true.

Note:

	- we do not have wake_up_all_poll() but wake_up_poll()
	  is fine, poll/epoll doesn't use WQ_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE.

	- signalfd_cleanup() uses POLLHUP along with POLLFREE,
	  we need a couple of simple changes in eventpoll.c to
	  make sure it can't be "lost".
Reported-by: NMaxime Bizon <mbizon@freebox.fr>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      d80e731e
  31. 24 2月, 2012 2 次提交