1. 10 3月, 2012 1 次提交
  2. 06 3月, 2012 1 次提交
    • H
      x32: Add ptrace for x32 · 55283e25
      H.J. Lu 提交于
      X32 ptrace is a hybrid of 64bit ptrace and compat ptrace with 32bit
      address and longs.  It use 64bit ptrace to access the full 64bit
      registers.  PTRACE_PEEKUSR and PTRACE_POKEUSR are only allowed to access
      segment and debug registers.  PTRACE_PEEKUSR returns the lower 32bits
      and PTRACE_POKEUSR zero-extends 32bit value to 64bit.   It works since
      the upper 32bits of segment and debug registers of x32 process are always
      zero.  GDB only uses PTRACE_PEEKUSR and PTRACE_POKEUSR to access
      segment and debug registers.
      
      [ hpa: changed TIF_X32 test to use !is_ia32_task() instead, and moved
        the system call number to the now-unused 521 slot. ]
      Signed-off-by: N"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com>
      Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1329696488-16970-1-git-send-email-hpa@zytor.com
      55283e25
  3. 02 3月, 2012 2 次提交
  4. 26 2月, 2012 2 次提交
  5. 22 2月, 2012 1 次提交
  6. 21 2月, 2012 14 次提交
    • L
      i387: export 'fpu_owner_task' per-cpu variable · 27e74da9
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      (And define it properly for x86-32, which had its 'current_task'
      declaration in separate from x86-64)
      
      Bitten by my dislike for modules on the machines I use, and the fact
      that apparently nobody else actually wanted to test the patches I sent
      out.
      
      Snif. Nobody else cares.
      
      Anyway, we probably should uninline the 'kernel_fpu_begin()' function
      that is what modules actually use and that references this, but this is
      the minimal fix for now.
      Reported-by: NJosh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com>
      Reported-and-tested-by: NJongman Heo <jongman.heo@samsung.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      27e74da9
    • S
      x86: Specify a size for the cmp in the NMI handler · a38449ef
      Steven Rostedt 提交于
      Linus noticed that the cmp used to check if the code segment is
      __KERNEL_CS or not did not specify a size. Perhaps it does not matter
      as H. Peter Anvin noted that user space can not set the bottom two
      bits of the %cs register. But it's best not to let the assembly choose
      and change things between different versions of gas, but instead just
      pick the size.
      
      Four bytes are used to compare the saved code segment against
      __KERNEL_CS. Perhaps this might mess up Xen, but we can fix that when
      the time comes.
      
      Also I noticed that there was another non-specified cmp that checks
      the special stack variable if it is 1 or 0. This too probably doesn't
      matter what cmp is used, but this patch uses cmpl just to make it non
      ambiguous.
      
      Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CA+55aFxfAn9MWRgS3O5k2tqN5ys1XrhSFVO5_9ZAoZKDVgNfGA@mail.gmail.comSuggested-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Signed-off-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
      a38449ef
    • H
      x32: If configured, add x32 system calls to system call tables · a06c9bc0
      H. Peter Anvin 提交于
      If CONFIG_X86_X32_ABI is defined, add the x32 system calls to the
      system call tables.
      Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      a06c9bc0
    • H
      x32: Handle process creation · d1a797f3
      H. Peter Anvin 提交于
      Allow an x32 process to be started.
      Originally-by: NH. J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
      d1a797f3
    • H
      x32: Signal-related system calls · c5a37394
      H. Peter Anvin 提交于
      x32 uses the 64-bit signal frame format, obviously, but there are some
      structures which mixes that with pointers or sizeof(long) types, as
      such we have to create a handful of system calls specific to x32.  By
      and large these are a mixture of the 64-bit and the compat system
      calls.
      Originally-by: NH. J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      c5a37394
    • H
      x32: Handle the x32 system call flag · fca460f9
      H. Peter Anvin 提交于
      x32 shares most system calls with x86-64, but unfortunately some
      subsystem (the input subsystem is the chief offender) which require
      is_compat() when operating with a 32-bit userspace.  The input system
      actually has text files in sysfs whose meaning is dependent on
      sizeof(long) in userspace!
      
      We could solve this by having two completely disjoint system call
      tables; requiring that each system call be duplicated.  This patch
      takes a different approach: we add a flag to the system call number;
      this flag doesn't affect the system call dispatch but requests compat
      treatment from affected subsystems for the duration of the system call.
      
      The change of cmpq to cmpl is safe since it immediately follows the
      and.
      Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      fca460f9
    • H
      x32: Export setup/restore_sigcontext from signal.c · 85139422
      H. Peter Anvin 提交于
      Export setup_sigcontext() and restore_sigcontext() from signal.c, so
      we can use the 64-bit versions verbatim for x32.
      Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      85139422
    • H
      x86: Move some signal-handling definitions to a common header · f28f0c23
      H. Peter Anvin 提交于
      There are some definitions which are duplicated between
      kernel/signal.c and ia32/ia32_signal.c; move them to a common header
      file.
      
      Rather than adding stuff to existing header files which contain data
      structures, create a new header file; hence the slightly odd name
      ("all the good ones were taken.")
      
      Note: nothing relied on signal_fault() being defined in
      <asm/ptrace.h>.
      Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      f28f0c23
    • H
      x32: Add x32 system calls to syscall/syscall_64.tbl · 6630f11b
      H. Peter Anvin 提交于
      Split the 64-bit system calls into "64" (64-bit only) and "common"
      (64-bit or x32) and add the x32 system call numbers.
      Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      6630f11b
    • H
      x32: Add a thread flag for x32 processes · bb212724
      H. Peter Anvin 提交于
      An x32 process is *almost* the same thing as a 64-bit process with a
      32-bit address limit, but there are a few minor differences -- in
      particular core dumps are 32 bits and signal handling is different.
      Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      bb212724
    • H
      x86: Factor out TIF_IA32 from 32-bit address space · 6bd33008
      H. Peter Anvin 提交于
      Factor out IA32 (compatibility instruction set) from 32-bit address
      space in the thread_info flags; this is a precondition patch for x32
      support.
      Originally-by: NH. J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-4pr1xnnksprt7t0h3w5fw4rv@git.kernel.org
      6bd33008
    • L
      i387: support lazy restore of FPU state · 7e16838d
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      This makes us recognize when we try to restore FPU state that matches
      what we already have in the FPU on this CPU, and avoids the restore
      entirely if so.
      
      To do this, we add two new data fields:
      
       - a percpu 'fpu_owner_task' variable that gets written any time we
         update the "has_fpu" field, and thus acts as a kind of back-pointer
         to the task that owns the CPU.  The exception is when we save the FPU
         state as part of a context switch - if the save can keep the FPU
         state around, we leave the 'fpu_owner_task' variable pointing at the
         task whose FP state still remains on the CPU.
      
       - a per-thread 'last_cpu' field, that indicates which CPU that thread
         used its FPU on last.  We update this on every context switch
         (writing an invalid CPU number if the last context switch didn't
         leave the FPU in a lazily usable state), so we know that *that*
         thread has done nothing else with the FPU since.
      
      These two fields together can be used when next switching back to the
      task to see if the CPU still matches: if 'fpu_owner_task' matches the
      task we are switching to, we know that no other task (or kernel FPU
      usage) touched the FPU on this CPU in the meantime, and if the current
      CPU number matches the 'last_cpu' field, we know that this thread did no
      other FP work on any other CPU, so the FPU state on the CPU must match
      what was saved on last context switch.
      
      In that case, we can avoid the 'f[x]rstor' entirely, and just clear the
      CR0.TS bit.
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      7e16838d
    • L
      i387: use 'restore_fpu_checking()' directly in task switching code · 80ab6f1e
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      This inlines what is usually just a couple of instructions, but more
      importantly it also fixes the theoretical error case (can that FPU
      restore really ever fail? Maybe we should remove the checking).
      
      We can't start sending signals from within the scheduler, we're much too
      deep in the kernel and are holding the runqueue lock etc.  So don't
      bother even trying.
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      80ab6f1e
    • L
      i387: fix up some fpu_counter confusion · cea20ca3
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      This makes sure we clear the FPU usage counter for newly created tasks,
      just so that we start off in a known state (for example, don't try to
      preload the FPU state on the first task switch etc).
      
      It also fixes a thinko in when we increment the fpu_counter at task
      switch time, introduced by commit 34ddc81a ("i387: re-introduce FPU
      state preloading at context switch time").  We should increment the
      *new* task fpu_counter, not the old task, and only if we decide to use
      that state (whether lazily or preloaded).
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      cea20ca3
  7. 20 2月, 2012 1 次提交
    • S
      x86/nmi: Test saved %cs in NMI to determine nested NMI case · 45d5a168
      Steven Rostedt 提交于
      Currently, the NMI handler tests if it is nested by checking the
      special variable saved on the stack (set during NMI handling)
      and whether the saved stack is the NMI stack as well (to prevent
      the race when the variable is set to zero).
      
      But userspace may set their %rsp to any value as long as they do
      not derefence it, and it may make it point to the NMI stack,
      which will prevent NMIs from triggering while the userspace app
      is running. (I tested this, and it is indeed the case)
      
      Add another check to determine nested NMIs by looking at the
      saved %cs (code segment register) and making sure that it is the
      kernel code segment.
      Signed-off-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
      Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1329687817.1561.27.camel@acer.local.homeSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      45d5a168
  8. 19 2月, 2012 2 次提交
    • L
      i387: re-introduce FPU state preloading at context switch time · 34ddc81a
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      After all the FPU state cleanups and finally finding the problem that
      caused all our FPU save/restore problems, this re-introduces the
      preloading of FPU state that was removed in commit b3b0870e ("i387:
      do not preload FPU state at task switch time").
      
      However, instead of simply reverting the removal, this reimplements
      preloading with several fixes, most notably
      
       - properly abstracted as a true FPU state switch, rather than as
         open-coded save and restore with various hacks.
      
         In particular, implementing it as a proper FPU state switch allows us
         to optimize the CR0.TS flag accesses: there is no reason to set the
         TS bit only to then almost immediately clear it again.  CR0 accesses
         are quite slow and expensive, don't flip the bit back and forth for
         no good reason.
      
       - Make sure that the same model works for both x86-32 and x86-64, so
         that there are no gratuitous differences between the two due to the
         way they save and restore segment state differently due to
         architectural differences that really don't matter to the FPU state.
      
       - Avoid exposing the "preload" state to the context switch routines,
         and in particular allow the concept of lazy state restore: if nothing
         else has used the FPU in the meantime, and the process is still on
         the same CPU, we can avoid restoring state from memory entirely, just
         re-expose the state that is still in the FPU unit.
      
         That optimized lazy restore isn't actually implemented here, but the
         infrastructure is set up for it.  Of course, older CPU's that use
         'fnsave' to save the state cannot take advantage of this, since the
         state saving also trashes the state.
      
      In other words, there is now an actual _design_ to the FPU state saving,
      rather than just random historical baggage.  Hopefully it's easier to
      follow as a result.
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      34ddc81a
    • L
      i387: move TS_USEDFPU flag from thread_info to task_struct · f94edacf
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      This moves the bit that indicates whether a thread has ownership of the
      FPU from the TS_USEDFPU bit in thread_info->status to a word of its own
      (called 'has_fpu') in task_struct->thread.has_fpu.
      
      This fixes two independent bugs at the same time:
      
       - changing 'thread_info->status' from the scheduler causes nasty
         problems for the other users of that variable, since it is defined to
         be thread-synchronous (that's what the "TS_" part of the naming was
         supposed to indicate).
      
         So perfectly valid code could (and did) do
      
      	ti->status |= TS_RESTORE_SIGMASK;
      
         and the compiler was free to do that as separate load, or and store
         instructions.  Which can cause problems with preemption, since a task
         switch could happen in between, and change the TS_USEDFPU bit. The
         change to TS_USEDFPU would be overwritten by the final store.
      
         In practice, this seldom happened, though, because the 'status' field
         was seldom used more than once, so gcc would generally tend to
         generate code that used a read-modify-write instruction and thus
         happened to avoid this problem - RMW instructions are naturally low
         fat and preemption-safe.
      
       - On x86-32, the current_thread_info() pointer would, during interrupts
         and softirqs, point to a *copy* of the real thread_info, because
         x86-32 uses %esp to calculate the thread_info address, and thus the
         separate irq (and softirq) stacks would cause these kinds of odd
         thread_info copy aliases.
      
         This is normally not a problem, since interrupts aren't supposed to
         look at thread information anyway (what thread is running at
         interrupt time really isn't very well-defined), but it confused the
         heck out of irq_fpu_usable() and the code that tried to squirrel
         away the FPU state.
      
         (It also caused untold confusion for us poor kernel developers).
      
      It also turns out that using 'task_struct' is actually much more natural
      for most of the call sites that care about the FPU state, since they
      tend to work with the task struct for other reasons anyway (ie
      scheduling).  And the FPU data that we are going to save/restore is
      found there too.
      
      Thanks to Arjan Van De Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> for pointing us to
      the %esp issue.
      
      Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
      Reported-and-tested-by: NRaphael Prevost <raphael@buro.asia>
      Acked-and-tested-by: NSuresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
      Tested-by: NPeter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      f94edacf
  9. 17 2月, 2012 4 次提交
    • L
      i387: move AMD K7/K8 fpu fxsave/fxrstor workaround from save to restore · 4903062b
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      The AMD K7/K8 CPUs don't save/restore FDP/FIP/FOP unless an exception is
      pending.  In order to not leak FIP state from one process to another, we
      need to do a floating point load after the fxsave of the old process,
      and before the fxrstor of the new FPU state.  That resets the state to
      the (uninteresting) kernel load, rather than some potentially sensitive
      user information.
      
      We used to do this directly after the FPU state save, but that is
      actually very inconvenient, since it
      
       (a) corrupts what is potentially perfectly good FPU state that we might
           want to lazy avoid restoring later and
      
       (b) on x86-64 it resulted in a very annoying ordering constraint, where
           "__unlazy_fpu()" in the task switch needs to be delayed until after
           the DS segment has been reloaded just to get the new DS value.
      
      Coupling it to the fxrstor instead of the fxsave automatically avoids
      both of these issues, and also ensures that we only do it when actually
      necessary (the FP state after a save may never actually get used).  It's
      simply a much more natural place for the leaked state cleanup.
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      4903062b
    • L
      i387: do not preload FPU state at task switch time · b3b0870e
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      Yes, taking the trap to re-load the FPU/MMX state is expensive, but so
      is spending several days looking for a bug in the state save/restore
      code.  And the preload code has some rather subtle interactions with
      both paravirtualization support and segment state restore, so it's not
      nearly as simple as it should be.
      
      Also, now that we no longer necessarily depend on a single bit (ie
      TS_USEDFPU) for keeping track of the state of the FPU, we migth be able
      to do better.  If we are really switching between two processes that
      keep touching the FP state, save/restore is inevitable, but in the case
      of having one process that does most of the FPU usage, we may actually
      be able to do much better than the preloading.
      
      In particular, we may be able to keep track of which CPU the process ran
      on last, and also per CPU keep track of which process' FP state that CPU
      has.  For modern CPU's that don't destroy the FPU contents on save time,
      that would allow us to do a lazy restore by just re-enabling the
      existing FPU state - with no restore cost at all!
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      b3b0870e
    • L
      i387: don't ever touch TS_USEDFPU directly, use helper functions · 6d59d7a9
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      This creates three helper functions that do the TS_USEDFPU accesses, and
      makes everybody that used to do it by hand use those helpers instead.
      
      In addition, there's a couple of helper functions for the "change both
      CR0.TS and TS_USEDFPU at the same time" case, and the places that do
      that together have been changed to use those.  That means that we have
      fewer random places that open-code this situation.
      
      The intent is partly to clarify the code without actually changing any
      semantics yet (since we clearly still have some hard to reproduce bug in
      this area), but also to make it much easier to use another approach
      entirely to caching the CR0.TS bit for software accesses.
      
      Right now we use a bit in the thread-info 'status' variable (this patch
      does not change that), but we might want to make it a full field of its
      own or even make it a per-cpu variable.
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      6d59d7a9
    • L
      i387: fix x86-64 preemption-unsafe user stack save/restore · 15d8791c
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      Commit 5b1cbac3 ("i387: make irq_fpu_usable() tests more robust")
      added a sanity check to the #NM handler to verify that we never cause
      the "Device Not Available" exception in kernel mode.
      
      However, that check actually pinpointed a (fundamental) race where we do
      cause that exception as part of the signal stack FPU state save/restore
      code.
      
      Because we use the floating point instructions themselves to save and
      restore state directly from user mode, we cannot do that atomically with
      testing the TS_USEDFPU bit: the user mode access itself may cause a page
      fault, which causes a task switch, which saves and restores the FP/MMX
      state from the kernel buffers.
      
      This kind of "recursive" FP state save is fine per se, but it means that
      when the signal stack save/restore gets restarted, it will now take the
      '#NM' exception we originally tried to avoid.  With preemption this can
      happen even without the page fault - but because of the user access, we
      cannot just disable preemption around the save/restore instruction.
      
      There are various ways to solve this, including using the
      "enable/disable_page_fault()" helpers to not allow page faults at all
      during the sequence, and fall back to copying things by hand without the
      use of the native FP state save/restore instructions.
      
      However, the simplest thing to do is to just allow the #NM from kernel
      space, but fix the race in setting and clearing CR0.TS that this all
      exposed: the TS bit changes and the TS_USEDFPU bit absolutely have to be
      atomic wrt scheduling, so while the actual state save/restore can be
      interrupted and restarted, the act of actually clearing/setting CR0.TS
      and the TS_USEDFPU bit together must not.
      
      Instead of just adding random "preempt_disable/enable()" calls to what
      is already excessively ugly code, this introduces some helper functions
      that mostly mirror the "kernel_fpu_begin/end()" functionality, just for
      the user state instead.
      
      Those helper functions should probably eventually replace the other
      ad-hoc CR0.TS and TS_USEDFPU tests too, but I'll need to think about it
      some more: the task switching functionality in particular needs to
      expose the difference between the 'prev' and 'next' threads, while the
      new helper functions intentionally were written to only work with
      'current'.
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      15d8791c
  10. 14 2月, 2012 2 次提交
    • L
      i387: make irq_fpu_usable() tests more robust · 5b1cbac3
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      Some code - especially the crypto layer - wants to use the x86
      FP/MMX/AVX register set in what may be interrupt (typically softirq)
      context.
      
      That *can* be ok, but the tests for when it was ok were somewhat
      suspect.  We cannot touch the thread-specific status bits either, so
      we'd better check that we're not going to try to save FP state or
      anything like that.
      
      Now, it may be that the TS bit is always cleared *before* we set the
      USEDFPU bit (and only set when we had already cleared the USEDFP
      before), so the TS bit test may actually have been sufficient, but it
      certainly was not obviously so.
      
      So this explicitly verifies that we will not touch the TS_USEDFPU bit,
      and adds a few related sanity-checks.  Because it seems that somehow
      AES-NI is corrupting user FP state.  The cause is not clear, and this
      patch doesn't fix it, but while debugging it I really wanted the code to
      be more obviously correct and robust.
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      5b1cbac3
    • L
      i387: math_state_restore() isn't called from asm · be98c2cd
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      It was marked asmlinkage for some really old and stale legacy reasons.
      Fix that and the equally stale comment.
      
      Noticed when debugging the irq_fpu_usable() bugs.
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      be98c2cd
  11. 09 2月, 2012 1 次提交
  12. 07 2月, 2012 2 次提交
  13. 03 2月, 2012 1 次提交
    • S
      perf: Remove deprecated WARN_ON_ONCE() · 84f2b9b2
      Stephane Eranian 提交于
      With the new throttling/unthrottling code introduced with
      commit:
      
        e050e3f0 ("perf: Fix broken interrupt rate throttling")
      
      we occasionally hit two WARN_ON_ONCE() checks in:
      
        - intel_pmu_pebs_enable()
        - intel_pmu_lbr_enable()
        - x86_pmu_start()
      
      The assertions are no longer problematic. There is a valid
      path where they can trigger but it is harmless.
      
      The assertion can be triggered with:
      
        $ perf record -e instructions:pp ....
      
      Leading to paths:
      
        intel_pmu_pebs_enable
        intel_pmu_enable_event
        x86_perf_event_set_period
        x86_pmu_start
        perf_adjust_freq_unthr_context
        perf_event_task_tick
        scheduler_tick
      
      And:
      
        intel_pmu_lbr_enable
        intel_pmu_enable_event
        x86_perf_event_set_period
        x86_pmu_start
        perf_adjust_freq_unthr_context.
        perf_event_task_tick
        scheduler_tick
      
      cpuc->enabled is always on because when we get to
      perf_adjust_freq_unthr_context() the PMU is not totally
      disabled. Furthermore when we need to adjust a period,
      we only stop the event we need to change and not the
      entire PMU. Thus, when we re-enable, cpuc->enabled is
      already set. Note that when we stop the event, both
      pebs and lbr are stopped if necessary (and possible).
      Signed-off-by: NStephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
      Cc: peterz@infradead.org
      Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20120202110401.GA30911@quadSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      84f2b9b2
  14. 30 1月, 2012 2 次提交
    • M
      x86/reboot: Remove VersaLogic Menlow reboot quirk · e6d36a65
      Michael D Labriola 提交于
      This commit removes the reboot quirk originally added by commit
      e19e074b ("x86: Fix reboot problem on VersaLogic Menlow boards").
      
      Testing with a VersaLogic Ocelot (VL-EPMs-21a rev 1.00 w/ BIOS
      6.5.102) revealed the following regarding the reboot hang
      problem:
      
      - v2.6.37 reboot=bios was needed.
      
      - v2.6.38-rc1: behavior changed, reboot=acpi is needed,
        reboot=kbd and reboot=bios results in system hang.
      
      - v2.6.38: VersaLogic patch (e19e074b "x86: Fix reboot problem on
        VersaLogic Menlow boards") was applied prior to v2.6.38-rc7.  This
        patch sets a quirk for VersaLogic Menlow boards that forces the use
        of reboot=bios, which doesn't work anymore.
      
      - v3.2: It seems that commit 660e34ce ("x86: Reorder reboot method
        preferences") changed the default reboot method to acpi prior to
        v3.0-rc1, which means the default behavior is appropriate for the
        Ocelot.  No VersaLogic quirk is required.
      
      The Ocelot board used for testing can successfully reboot w/out
      having to pass any reboot= arguments for all 3 current versions
      of the BIOS.
      Signed-off-by: NMichael D Labriola <michael.d.labriola@gmail.com>
      Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
      Cc: Michael D Labriola <mlabriol@gdeb.com>
      Cc: Kushal Koolwal <kushalkoolwal@gmail.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/87vcnub9hu.fsf@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      e6d36a65
    • M
      x86/reboot: Skip DMI checks if reboot set by user · 5955633e
      Michael D Labriola 提交于
      Skip DMI checks for vendor specific reboot quirks if the user
      passed in a reboot= arg on the command line - we should never
      override user choices.
      Signed-off-by: NMichael D Labriola <michael.d.labriola@gmail.com>
      Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
      Cc: Michael D Labriola <mlabriol@gdeb.com>
      Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/87wr8ab9od.fsf@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      5955633e
  15. 28 1月, 2012 1 次提交
  16. 27 1月, 2012 1 次提交
    • P
      bugs, x86: Fix printk levels for panic, softlockups and stack dumps · b0f4c4b3
      Prarit Bhargava 提交于
      rsyslog will display KERN_EMERG messages on a connected
      terminal.  However, these messages are useless/undecipherable
      for a general user.
      
      For example, after a softlockup we get:
      
       Message from syslogd@intel-s3e37-04 at Jan 25 14:18:06 ...
       kernel:Stack:
      
       Message from syslogd@intel-s3e37-04 at Jan 25 14:18:06 ...
       kernel:Call Trace:
      
       Message from syslogd@intel-s3e37-04 at Jan 25 14:18:06 ...
       kernel:Code: ff ff a8 08 75 25 31 d2 48 8d 86 38 e0 ff ff 48 89
       d1 0f 01 c8 0f ae f0 48 8b 86 38 e0 ff ff a8 08 75 08 b1 01 4c 89 e0 0f 01 c9 <e8> ea 69 dd ff 4c 29 e8 48 89 c7 e8 0f bc da ff 49 89 c4 49 89
      
      This happens because the printk levels for these messages are
      incorrect. Only an informational message should be displayed on
      a terminal.
      
      I modified the printk levels for various messages in the kernel
      and tested the output by using the drivers/misc/lkdtm.c kernel
      modules (ie, softlockups, panics, hard lockups, etc.) and
      confirmed that the console output was still the same and that
      the output to the terminals was correct.
      
      For example, in the case of a softlockup we now see the much
      more informative:
      
       Message from syslogd@intel-s3e37-04 at Jan 25 10:18:06 ...
       BUG: soft lockup - CPU4 stuck for 60s!
      
      instead of the above confusing messages.
      
      AFAICT, the messages no longer have to be KERN_EMERG.  In the
      most important case of a panic we set console_verbose().  As for
      the other less severe cases the correct data is output to the
      console and /var/log/messages.
      
      Successfully tested by me using the drivers/misc/lkdtm.c module.
      Signed-off-by: NPrarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
      Cc: dzickus@redhat.com
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1327586134-11926-1-git-send-email-prarit@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      b0f4c4b3
  17. 26 1月, 2012 1 次提交
  18. 18 1月, 2012 1 次提交