Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 19 8月, 2008 15 次提交
  3. 17 8月, 2008 5 次提交
  5. 16 8月, 2008 2 次提交
  7. 15 8月, 2008 5 次提交
  9. 12 8月, 2008 2 次提交
  11. 11 8月, 2008 1 次提交
  13. 24 7月, 2008 2 次提交
  15. 21 7月, 2008 1 次提交
  17. 20 7月, 2008 1 次提交
    • S
      x86: APIC: Remove apic_write_around(); use alternatives, merge fix · f586bf7d
      由 Suresh Siddha 提交于 
      On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 02:03:48PM -0700, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > git merge tip/x86/x2apic
> > CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in arch/x86/kernel/Makefile
> > CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c
> > CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> > CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in arch/x86/kernel/vmi_32.c
> > CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> > CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in include/asm-x86/apic.h
> > CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in include/asm-x86/paravirt.h
>
> that's due to the changes in tip/x86/apic and in tip/x86/uv.
>
> ok, i've just merged x86/apic into x86/x2apic and x86/uv as well, and
> pushed out the result.
>
> Note: it's a first raw merge and completely untested. It will now merge
> cleanly into tip/master. There are probably a few details missing.

Ingo, thanks for doing this. While I was testing my merge changes, you posted
yours... anyhow we need this piece, which is missing from your merge.
Signed-off-by: NSuresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      f586bf7d
  19. 19 7月, 2008 1 次提交
  21. 18 7月, 2008 3 次提交
    • M
      x86: APIC: Make apic_verbosity unsigned · baa13188
      由 Maciej W. Rozycki 提交于 
      As a microoptimisation, make apic_verbosity unsigned.  This will make
apic_printk(APIC_QUIET, ...) expand into just printk(...) with the
surrounding condition and a reference to apic_verbosity removed.
Signed-off-by: NMaciej W. Rozycki <macro@linux-mips.org>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      baa13188
    • C
      x86: apic_32 - introduce calibrate_APIC_clock · 836c129d
      由 Cyrill Gorcunov 提交于 
      Introduce calibrate_APIC_clock so it could help in further 32/64bit
apic code merging.
Signed-off-by: NCyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Cc: macro@linux-mips.org
Cc: yhlu.kernel@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      836c129d
    • M
      x86: APIC: remove apic_write_around(); use alternatives · 593f4a78
      由 Maciej W. Rozycki 提交于 
      Use alternatives to select the workaround for the 11AP Pentium erratum
for the affected steppings on the fly rather than build time.  Remove the
X86_GOOD_APIC configuration option and replace all the calls to
apic_write_around() with plain apic_write(), protecting accesses to the
ESR as appropriate due to the 3AP Pentium erratum.  Remove
apic_read_around() and all its invocations altogether as not needed.
Remove apic_write_atomic() and all its implementing backends.  The use of
ASM_OUTPUT2() is not strictly needed for input constraints, but I have
used it for readability's sake.

I had the feeling no one else was brave enough to do it, so I went ahead
and here it is.  Verified by checking the generated assembly and tested
with both a 32-bit and a 64-bit configuration, also with the 11AP
"feature" forced on and verified with gdb on /proc/kcore to work as
expected (as an 11AP machines are quite hard to get hands on these days).
Some script complained about the use of "volatile", but apic_write() needs
it for the same reason and is effectively a replacement for writel(), so I
have disregarded it.

I am not sure what the policy wrt defconfig files is, they are generated
and there is risk of a conflict resulting from an unrelated change, so I
have left changes to them out.  The option will get removed from them at
the next run.

Some testing with machines other than mine will be needed to avoid some
stupid mistake, but despite its volume, the change is not really that
intrusive, so I am fairly confident that because it works for me, it will
everywhere.
Signed-off-by: NMaciej W. Rozycki <macro@linux-mips.org>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      593f4a78
  23. 12 7月, 2008 2 次提交