Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 08 4月, 2013 12 次提交
  3. 14 3月, 2013 1 次提交
  5. 13 3月, 2013 2 次提交
  7. 12 3月, 2013 5 次提交
    • A
      ARM: spear3xx: Use correct pl080 header file · 27f423fe
      由 Arnd Bergmann 提交于 
      The definitions have move around recently, causing build errors
in spear3xx for all configurations:

spear3xx.c:47:5: error: 'PL080_BSIZE_16' undeclared here (not in a function)
spear3xx.c:47:23: error: 'PL080_CONTROL_SB_SIZE_SHIFT' undeclared here (not in a function)
spear3xx.c:48:22: error: 'PL080_CONTROL_DB_SIZE_SHIFT' undeclared here (not in a function)
Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alessandro Rubini <rubini@gnudd.com>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
      27f423fe
    • A
      mfd: ab8500: Kill "reg" property from binding · d52701d3
      由 Arnd Bergmann 提交于 
      The ab8500 device is a child of the prcmu device, which is a memory mapped
bus device, whose children are addressable using physical memory addresses,
not using mailboxes, so a mailbox number in the ab8500 node cannot be
parsed by DT. Nothing uses this number, since it was only introduced
as part of the failed attempt to clean up prcmu mailbox handling, and
we can simply remove it.
Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: NSamuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
      d52701d3
    • P
      Arm: socfpga: pl330: Add #dma-cells for generic dma binding support · 0d8abbfd
      由 Padmavathi Venna 提交于 
      This patch adds #dma-cells property to PL330 DMA controller nodes for
supporting generic dma dt bindings on SOCFPGA platform. #dma-channels
and #dma-requests are not required now but added in advance.
Signed-off-by: NPadmavathi Venna <padma.v@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
      0d8abbfd
    • M
      ARM: multiplatform: Sort the max gpio numbers. · 2a6ad871
      由 Maxime Ripard 提交于 
      When building a multiplatform kernel, we could end up with a smaller
number of GPIOs than the one required by the platform the kernel was
running on.

Sort the max GPIO number by descending order so that we always take the
highest number required.
Signed-off-by: NMaxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
      2a6ad871
    • I
      xen: arm: mandate EABI and use generic atomic operations. · 85323a99
      由 Ian Campbell 提交于 
      Rob Herring has observed that c81611c4 "xen: event channel arrays are
xen_ulong_t and not unsigned long" introduced a compile failure when building
without CONFIG_AEABI:

/tmp/ccJaIZOW.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/ccJaIZOW.s:831: Error: even register required -- `ldrexd r5,r6,[r4]'

Will Deacon pointed out that this is because OABI does not require even base
registers for 64-bit values. We can avoid this by simply using the existing
atomic64_xchg operation and the same containerof trick as used by the cmpxchg
macros. However since this code is used on memory which is shared with the
hypervisor we require proper atomic instructions and cannot use the generic
atomic64 callbacks (which are based on spinlocks), therefore add a dependency
on !GENERIC_ATOMIC64. Since we already depend on !CPU_V6 there isn't much
downside to this.

While thinking about this we also observed that OABI has different struct
alignment requirements to EABI, which is a problem for hypercall argument
structs which are shared with the hypervisor and which must be in EABI layout.
Since I don't expect people to want to run OABI kernels on Xen depend on
CONFIG_AEABI explicitly too (although it also happens to be enforced by the
!GENERIC_ATOMIC64 requirement too).
Signed-off-by: NIan Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NStefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NKonrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
      85323a99
  9. 11 3月, 2013 2 次提交
  11. 09 3月, 2013 11 次提交
  13. 08 3月, 2013 1 次提交
    • I
      ARM: 7668/1: fix memset-related crashes caused by recent GCC (4.7.2) optimizations · 455bd4c4
      由 Ivan Djelic 提交于 
      Recent GCC versions (e.g. GCC-4.7.2) perform optimizations based on
assumptions about the implementation of memset and similar functions.
The current ARM optimized memset code does not return the value of
its first argument, as is usually expected from standard implementations.

For instance in the following function:

void debug_mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, struct mutex_waiter *waiter)
{
	memset(waiter, MUTEX_DEBUG_INIT, sizeof(*waiter));
	waiter->magic = waiter;
	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&waiter->list);
}

compiled as:

800554d0 <debug_mutex_lock_common>:
800554d0:       e92d4008        push    {r3, lr}
800554d4:       e1a00001        mov     r0, r1
800554d8:       e3a02010        mov     r2, #16 ; 0x10
800554dc:       e3a01011        mov     r1, #17 ; 0x11
800554e0:       eb04426e        bl      80165ea0 <memset>
800554e4:       e1a03000        mov     r3, r0
800554e8:       e583000c        str     r0, [r3, #12]
800554ec:       e5830000        str     r0, [r3]
800554f0:       e5830004        str     r0, [r3, #4]
800554f4:       e8bd8008        pop     {r3, pc}

GCC assumes memset returns the value of pointer 'waiter' in register r0; causing
register/memory corruptions.

This patch fixes the return value of the assembly version of memset.
It adds a 'mov' instruction and merges an additional load+store into
existing load/store instructions.
For ease of review, here is a breakdown of the patch into 4 simple steps:

Step 1
======
Perform the following substitutions:
ip -> r8, then
r0 -> ip,
and insert 'mov ip, r0' as the first statement of the function.
At this point, we have a memset() implementation returning the proper result,
but corrupting r8 on some paths (the ones that were using ip).

Step 2
======
Make sure r8 is saved and restored when (! CALGN(1)+0) == 1:

save r8:
-       str     lr, [sp, #-4]!
+       stmfd   sp!, {r8, lr}

and restore r8 on both exit paths:
-       ldmeqfd sp!, {pc}               @ Now <64 bytes to go.
+       ldmeqfd sp!, {r8, pc}           @ Now <64 bytes to go.
(...)
        tst     r2, #16
        stmneia ip!, {r1, r3, r8, lr}
-       ldr     lr, [sp], #4
+       ldmfd   sp!, {r8, lr}

Step 3
======
Make sure r8 is saved and restored when (! CALGN(1)+0) == 0:

save r8:
-       stmfd   sp!, {r4-r7, lr}
+       stmfd   sp!, {r4-r8, lr}

and restore r8 on both exit paths:
        bgt     3b
-       ldmeqfd sp!, {r4-r7, pc}
+       ldmeqfd sp!, {r4-r8, pc}
(...)
        tst     r2, #16
        stmneia ip!, {r4-r7}
-       ldmfd   sp!, {r4-r7, lr}
+       ldmfd   sp!, {r4-r8, lr}

Step 4
======
Rewrite register list "r4-r7, r8" as "r4-r8".
Signed-off-by: NIvan Djelic <ivan.djelic@parrot.com>
Reviewed-by: NNicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NDirk Behme <dirk.behme@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
      455bd4c4
  15. 07 3月, 2013 3 次提交
  17. 06 3月, 2013 2 次提交
  19. 05 3月, 2013 1 次提交