Fix these 2.6.19-rc1 build warnings from modpost:

WARNING: vmlinux - Section mismatch: reference to .init.text:__alloc_bootmem from .text between 'srmmu_nocache_init' (at offset 0x1a0f8) and 'srmmu_mmu_info'
WARNING: vmlinux - Section mismatch: reference to .init.text:__alloc_bootmem from .text between 'srmmu_nocache_init' (at offset 0x1a118) and 'srmmu_mmu_info'
WARNING: vmlinux - Section mismatch: reference to .init.text:srmmu_early_allocate_ptable_skeleton from .text between 'srmmu_nocache_init' (at offset 0x1a188) and 'srmmu_mmu_info'
Signed-off-by: NMartin Habets <errandir_news@mph.eclipse.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

One of the changes necessary for shared page tables is to standardize the
pxx_page macros.  pte_page and pmd_page have always returned the struct
page associated with their entry, while pte_page_kernel and pmd_page_kernel
have returned the kernel virtual address.  pud_page and pgd_page, on the
other hand, return the kernel virtual address.

Shared page tables needs pud_page and pgd_page to return the actual page
structures.  There are very few actual users of these functions, so it is
simple to standardize their usage.

Since this is basic cleanup, I am submitting these changes as a standalone
patch.  Per Hugh Dickins' comments about it, I am also changing the
pxx_page_kernel macros to pxx_page_vaddr to clarify their meaning.
Signed-off-by: NDave McCracken <dmccr@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

Signed-off-by: NJörn Engel <joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de>
Signed-off-by: NAdrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>

Todo items:
 - IRQ_INPROGRESS flag - use sparc64 irq buckets, or generic irq_desc?
 - sun4d
 - re-indent large chunks of sun4m_smp.c
 - some places assume sequential cpu numbering (i.e. 0,1 instead of 0,2)

Last I checked (with 2.6.14), random programs segfault with dual
HyperSPARC.  And with SuperSPARC II's, it seems stable but will
eventually die from a write lock error (wrong lock owner or something).

I haven't tried the HyperSPARC + highmem combination recently, so that
may still be a problem.
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Make sure the callers do a pgprot_noncached() on
vma->vm_page_prot.

Pointed out by Hugh Dickens.
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Signed-off-by: NAdrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.

Let it rip!