- 21 12月, 2011 5 次提交
-
-
由 Christian König 提交于
That naming seems to make more sense, since we not only want to run PM4 rings with it. Signed-off-by: NChristian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de> Reviewed-by: NJerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
-
由 Christian König 提交于
Emitting fences, semaphores and ib works differently on different ring, so its is easier to maintain separate functions for each ring. Signed-off-by: NChristian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de> Reviewed-by: NJerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
-
由 Christian König 提交于
Replace cp, cp1 and cp2 members with just an array of radeon_cp structs. Signed-off-by: NChristian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de> Reviewed-by: NJerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
-
由 Christian König 提交于
Give all asic and radeon_ring_* functions a radeon_cp parameter, so they know the ring to work with. Signed-off-by: NChristian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de> Reviewed-by: NJerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
-
由 Christian König 提交于
They are used to sync between rings, while fences sync between a ring and the cpu. v2 Fix radeon_semaphore_driver_fini when no semaphore were allocated. v3 Initialize list early on to avoid issue in case or early error Signed-off-by: NChristian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de> Signed-off-by: NJerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
-