The new free_pcp_prepare() function shares a lot of code with
free_pages_prepare(), which makes this a maintenance risk when some
future patch modifies only one of them.  We should be able to achieve
the same effect (skipping free_pages_check() from !DEBUG_VM configs) by
adding a parameter to free_pages_prepare() and making it inline, so the
checks (and the order != 0 parts) are eliminated from the call from
free_pcp_prepare().

!DEBUG_VM: bloat-o-meter reports no difference, as my gcc was already
inlining free_pages_prepare() and the elimination seems to work as
expected

DEBUG_VM bloat-o-meter:

  add/remove: 0/1 grow/shrink: 2/0 up/down: 1035/-778 (257)
  function                                     old     new   delta
  __free_pages_ok                              297    1060    +763
  free_hot_cold_page                           480     752    +272
  free_pages_prepare                           778       -    -778

Here inlining didn't occur before, and added some code, but it's ok for
a debug option.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix build]
Signed-off-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Every page allocated checks a number of page fields for validity.  This
catches corruption bugs of pages that are already freed but it is
expensive.  This patch weakens the debugging check by checking PCP pages
only when the PCP lists are being refilled.  All compound pages are
checked.  This potentially avoids debugging checks entirely if the PCP
lists are never emptied and refilled so some corruption issues may be
missed.  Full checking requires DEBUG_VM.

With the two deferred debugging patches applied, the impact to a page
allocator microbenchmark is

                                             4.6.0-rc3                  4.6.0-rc3
                                           inline-v3r6            deferalloc-v3r7
  Min      alloc-odr0-1               344.00 (  0.00%)           317.00 (  7.85%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2               248.00 (  0.00%)           231.00 (  6.85%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4               209.00 (  0.00%)           192.00 (  8.13%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8               181.00 (  0.00%)           166.00 (  8.29%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16              168.00 (  0.00%)           154.00 (  8.33%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-32              161.00 (  0.00%)           148.00 (  8.07%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-64              158.00 (  0.00%)           145.00 (  8.23%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-128             156.00 (  0.00%)           143.00 (  8.33%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-256             168.00 (  0.00%)           154.00 (  8.33%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-512             178.00 (  0.00%)           167.00 (  6.18%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-1024            186.00 (  0.00%)           174.00 (  6.45%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2048            192.00 (  0.00%)           180.00 (  6.25%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4096            198.00 (  0.00%)           184.00 (  7.07%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8192            200.00 (  0.00%)           188.00 (  6.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16384           201.00 (  0.00%)           188.00 (  6.47%)
  Min      free-odr0-1                189.00 (  0.00%)           180.00 (  4.76%)
  Min      free-odr0-2                132.00 (  0.00%)           126.00 (  4.55%)
  Min      free-odr0-4                104.00 (  0.00%)            99.00 (  4.81%)
  Min      free-odr0-8                 90.00 (  0.00%)            85.00 (  5.56%)
  Min      free-odr0-16                84.00 (  0.00%)            80.00 (  4.76%)
  Min      free-odr0-32                80.00 (  0.00%)            76.00 (  5.00%)
  Min      free-odr0-64                78.00 (  0.00%)            74.00 (  5.13%)
  Min      free-odr0-128               77.00 (  0.00%)            73.00 (  5.19%)
  Min      free-odr0-256               94.00 (  0.00%)            91.00 (  3.19%)
  Min      free-odr0-512              108.00 (  0.00%)           112.00 ( -3.70%)
  Min      free-odr0-1024             115.00 (  0.00%)           118.00 ( -2.61%)
  Min      free-odr0-2048             120.00 (  0.00%)           125.00 ( -4.17%)
  Min      free-odr0-4096             123.00 (  0.00%)           129.00 ( -4.88%)
  Min      free-odr0-8192             126.00 (  0.00%)           130.00 ( -3.17%)
  Min      free-odr0-16384            126.00 (  0.00%)           131.00 ( -3.97%)

Note that the free paths for large numbers of pages is impacted as the
debugging cost gets shifted into that path when the page data is no
longer necessarily cache-hot.
Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Every page free checks a number of page fields for validity.  This
catches premature frees and corruptions but it is also expensive.  This
patch weakens the debugging check by checking PCP pages at the time they
are drained from the PCP list.  This will trigger the bug but the site
that freed the corrupt page will be lost.  To get the full context, a
kernel rebuild with DEBUG_VM is necessary.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix build]
Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

An important function for cpusets is cpuset_node_allowed(), which
optimizes on the fact if there's a single root CPU set, it must be
trivially allowed.  But the check "nr_cpusets() <= 1" doesn't use the
cpusets_enabled_key static key the right way where static keys eliminate
branching overhead with jump labels.

This patch converts it so that static key is used properly.  It's also
switched to the new static key API and the checking functions are
converted to return bool instead of int.  We also provide a new variant
__cpuset_zone_allowed() which expects that the static key check was
already done and they key was enabled.  This is needed for
get_page_from_freelist() where we want to also avoid the relatively
slower check when ALLOC_CPUSET is not set in alloc_flags.

The impact on the page allocator microbenchmark is less than expected
but the cleanup in itself is worthwhile.

                                             4.6.0-rc2                  4.6.0-rc2
                                       multcheck-v1r20               cpuset-v1r20
  Min      alloc-odr0-1               348.00 (  0.00%)           348.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2               254.00 (  0.00%)           254.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4               213.00 (  0.00%)           213.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8               186.00 (  0.00%)           183.00 (  1.61%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16              173.00 (  0.00%)           171.00 (  1.16%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-32              166.00 (  0.00%)           163.00 (  1.81%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-64              162.00 (  0.00%)           159.00 (  1.85%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-128             160.00 (  0.00%)           157.00 (  1.88%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-256             169.00 (  0.00%)           166.00 (  1.78%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-512             180.00 (  0.00%)           180.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-1024            188.00 (  0.00%)           187.00 (  0.53%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2048            194.00 (  0.00%)           193.00 (  0.52%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4096            199.00 (  0.00%)           198.00 (  0.50%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8192            202.00 (  0.00%)           201.00 (  0.50%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16384           203.00 (  0.00%)           202.00 (  0.49%)
Signed-off-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: NZefan Li <lizefan@huawei.com>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The function call overhead of get_pfnblock_flags_mask() is measurable in
the page free paths.  This patch uses an inlined version that is faster.
Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The original count is never reused so it can be removed.
Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Check without side-effects should be easier to maintain.  It also
removes the duplicated cpupid and flags reset done in !DEBUG_VM variant
of both free_pcp_prepare() and then bulkfree_pcp_prepare().  Finally, it
enables the next patch.

It shouldn't result in new branches, thanks to inlining of the check.

!DEBUG_VM bloat-o-meter:

  add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/2 up/down: 0/-27 (-27)
  function                                     old     new   delta
  __free_pages_ok                              748     739      -9
  free_pcppages_bulk                          1403    1385     -18

DEBUG_VM:

  add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/1 up/down: 0/-28 (-28)
  function                                     old     new   delta
  free_pages_prepare                           806     778     -28

This is also slightly faster because cpupid information is not set on
tail pages so we can avoid resets there.
Signed-off-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>

!DEBUG_VM size and bloat-o-meter:

  add/remove: 1/0 grow/shrink: 0/2 up/down: 124/-370 (-246)
  function                                     old     new   delta
  free_pages_check_bad                           -     124    +124
  free_pcppages_bulk                          1288    1171    -117
  __free_pages_ok                              948     695    -253

DEBUG_VM:

  add/remove: 1/0 grow/shrink: 0/1 up/down: 124/-214 (-90)
  function                                     old     new   delta
  free_pages_check_bad                           -     124    +124
  free_pages_prepare                          1112     898    -214

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix whitespace]
Signed-off-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Every page allocated or freed is checked for sanity to avoid corruptions
that are difficult to detect later.  A bad page could be due to a number
of fields.  Instead of using multiple branches, this patch combines
multiple fields into a single branch.  A detailed check is only
necessary if that check fails.

                                             4.6.0-rc2                  4.6.0-rc2
                                        initonce-v1r20            multcheck-v1r20
  Min      alloc-odr0-1               359.00 (  0.00%)           348.00 (  3.06%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2               260.00 (  0.00%)           254.00 (  2.31%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4               214.00 (  0.00%)           213.00 (  0.47%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8               186.00 (  0.00%)           186.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16              173.00 (  0.00%)           173.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-32              165.00 (  0.00%)           166.00 ( -0.61%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-64              162.00 (  0.00%)           162.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-128             161.00 (  0.00%)           160.00 (  0.62%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-256             170.00 (  0.00%)           169.00 (  0.59%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-512             181.00 (  0.00%)           180.00 (  0.55%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-1024            190.00 (  0.00%)           188.00 (  1.05%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2048            196.00 (  0.00%)           194.00 (  1.02%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4096            202.00 (  0.00%)           199.00 (  1.49%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8192            205.00 (  0.00%)           202.00 (  1.46%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16384           205.00 (  0.00%)           203.00 (  0.98%)

Again, the benefit is marginal but avoiding excessive branches is
important.  Ideally the paths would not have to check these conditions
at all but regrettably abandoning the tests would make use-after-free
bugs much harder to detect.
Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The classzone_idx can be inferred from preferred_zoneref so remove the
unnecessary field and save stack space.
Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The allocator fast path looks up the first usable zone in a zonelist and
then get_page_from_freelist does the same job in the zonelist iterator.
This patch preserves the necessary information.

                                             4.6.0-rc2                  4.6.0-rc2
                                        fastmark-v1r20             initonce-v1r20
  Min      alloc-odr0-1               364.00 (  0.00%)           359.00 (  1.37%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2               262.00 (  0.00%)           260.00 (  0.76%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4               214.00 (  0.00%)           214.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8               186.00 (  0.00%)           186.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16              173.00 (  0.00%)           173.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-32              165.00 (  0.00%)           165.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-64              161.00 (  0.00%)           162.00 ( -0.62%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-128             159.00 (  0.00%)           161.00 ( -1.26%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-256             168.00 (  0.00%)           170.00 ( -1.19%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-512             180.00 (  0.00%)           181.00 ( -0.56%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-1024            190.00 (  0.00%)           190.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2048            196.00 (  0.00%)           196.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4096            202.00 (  0.00%)           202.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8192            206.00 (  0.00%)           205.00 (  0.49%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16384           206.00 (  0.00%)           205.00 (  0.49%)

The benefit is negligible and the results are within the noise but each
cycle counts.
Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Watermarks have to be checked on every allocation including the number
of pages being allocated and whether reserves can be accessed.  The
reserves only matter if memory is limited and the free_pages adjustment
only applies to high-order pages.  This patch adds a shortcut for
order-0 pages that avoids numerous calculations if there is plenty of
free memory yielding the following performance difference in a page
allocator microbenchmark;

                                             4.6.0-rc2                  4.6.0-rc2
                                         optfair-v1r20             fastmark-v1r20
  Min      alloc-odr0-1               380.00 (  0.00%)           364.00 (  4.21%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2               273.00 (  0.00%)           262.00 (  4.03%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4               227.00 (  0.00%)           214.00 (  5.73%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8               196.00 (  0.00%)           186.00 (  5.10%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16              183.00 (  0.00%)           173.00 (  5.46%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-32              173.00 (  0.00%)           165.00 (  4.62%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-64              169.00 (  0.00%)           161.00 (  4.73%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-128             169.00 (  0.00%)           159.00 (  5.92%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-256             180.00 (  0.00%)           168.00 (  6.67%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-512             190.00 (  0.00%)           180.00 (  5.26%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-1024            198.00 (  0.00%)           190.00 (  4.04%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2048            204.00 (  0.00%)           196.00 (  3.92%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4096            209.00 (  0.00%)           202.00 (  3.35%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8192            213.00 (  0.00%)           206.00 (  3.29%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16384           214.00 (  0.00%)           206.00 (  3.74%)
Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The fair zone allocation policy is not without cost but it can be
reduced slightly.  This patch removes an unnecessary local variable,
checks the likely conditions of the fair zone policy first, uses a bool
instead of a flags check and falls through when a remote node is
encountered instead of doing a full restart.  The benefit is marginal
but it's there

                                             4.6.0-rc2                  4.6.0-rc2
                                         decstat-v1r20              optfair-v1r20
  Min      alloc-odr0-1               377.00 (  0.00%)           380.00 ( -0.80%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2               273.00 (  0.00%)           273.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4               226.00 (  0.00%)           227.00 ( -0.44%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8               196.00 (  0.00%)           196.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16              183.00 (  0.00%)           183.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-32              175.00 (  0.00%)           173.00 (  1.14%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-64              172.00 (  0.00%)           169.00 (  1.74%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-128             170.00 (  0.00%)           169.00 (  0.59%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-256             183.00 (  0.00%)           180.00 (  1.64%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-512             191.00 (  0.00%)           190.00 (  0.52%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-1024            199.00 (  0.00%)           198.00 (  0.50%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2048            204.00 (  0.00%)           204.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4096            210.00 (  0.00%)           209.00 (  0.48%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8192            213.00 (  0.00%)           213.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16384           214.00 (  0.00%)           214.00 (  0.00%)

The benefit is marginal at best but one of the most important benefits,
avoiding a second search when falling back to another node is not
triggered by this particular test so the benefit for some corner cases
is understated.
Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The page allocator fast path checks page multiple times unnecessarily.
This patch avoids all the slowpath checks if the first allocation
attempt succeeds.
Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

When bulk freeing pages from the per-cpu lists the zone is checked for
isolated pageblocks on every release.  This patch checks it once per
drain.

[mgorman@techsingularity.net: fix locking radce, per Vlastimil]
Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Signed-off-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

__GFP_HARDWALL only has meaning in the context of cpusets but the fast
path always applies the flag on the first attempt.  Move the
manipulations into the cpuset paths where they will be masked by a
static branch in the common case.

With the other micro-optimisations in this series combined, the impact
on a page allocator microbenchmark is

                                             4.6.0-rc2                  4.6.0-rc2
                                         decstat-v1r20                micro-v1r20
  Min      alloc-odr0-1               381.00 (  0.00%)           377.00 (  1.05%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2               275.00 (  0.00%)           273.00 (  0.73%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4               229.00 (  0.00%)           226.00 (  1.31%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8               199.00 (  0.00%)           196.00 (  1.51%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16              186.00 (  0.00%)           183.00 (  1.61%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-32              179.00 (  0.00%)           175.00 (  2.23%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-64              174.00 (  0.00%)           172.00 (  1.15%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-128             172.00 (  0.00%)           170.00 (  1.16%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-256             181.00 (  0.00%)           183.00 ( -1.10%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-512             193.00 (  0.00%)           191.00 (  1.04%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-1024            201.00 (  0.00%)           199.00 (  1.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2048            206.00 (  0.00%)           204.00 (  0.97%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4096            212.00 (  0.00%)           210.00 (  0.94%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8192            215.00 (  0.00%)           213.00 (  0.93%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16384           216.00 (  0.00%)           214.00 (  0.93%)
Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

page is guaranteed to be set before it is read with or without the
initialisation.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix warning]
Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

zonelist here is a copy of a struct field that is used once.  Ditch it.
Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The number of zones skipped to a zone expiring its fair zone allocation
quota is irrelevant.  Convert to bool.
Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

alloc_flags is a bitmask of flags but it is signed which does not
necessarily generate the best code depending on the compiler.  Even
without an impact, it makes more sense that this be unsigned.
Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Pageblocks have an associated bitmap to store migrate types and whether
the pageblock should be skipped during compaction.  The bitmap may be
associated with a memory section or a zone but the zone is looked up
unconditionally.  The compiler should optimise this away automatically
so this is a cosmetic patch only in many cases.
Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

__dec_zone_state is cheaper to use for removing an order-0 page as it
has fewer conditions to check.

The performance difference on a page allocator microbenchmark is;

                                             4.6.0-rc2                  4.6.0-rc2
                                         optiter-v1r20              decstat-v1r20
  Min      alloc-odr0-1               382.00 (  0.00%)           381.00 (  0.26%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2               282.00 (  0.00%)           275.00 (  2.48%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4               233.00 (  0.00%)           229.00 (  1.72%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8               203.00 (  0.00%)           199.00 (  1.97%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16              188.00 (  0.00%)           186.00 (  1.06%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-32              182.00 (  0.00%)           179.00 (  1.65%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-64              177.00 (  0.00%)           174.00 (  1.69%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-128             175.00 (  0.00%)           172.00 (  1.71%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-256             184.00 (  0.00%)           181.00 (  1.63%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-512             197.00 (  0.00%)           193.00 (  2.03%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-1024            203.00 (  0.00%)           201.00 (  0.99%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2048            209.00 (  0.00%)           206.00 (  1.44%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4096            214.00 (  0.00%)           212.00 (  0.93%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8192            218.00 (  0.00%)           215.00 (  1.38%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16384           219.00 (  0.00%)           216.00 (  1.37%)
Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The page allocator iterates through a zonelist for zones that match the
addressing limitations and nodemask of the caller but many allocations
will not be restricted.  Despite this, there is always functional call
overhead which builds up.

This patch inlines the optimistic basic case and only calls the iterator
function for the complex case.  A hindrance was the fact that
cpuset_current_mems_allowed is used in the fastpath as the allowed
nodemask even though all nodes are allowed on most systems.  The patch
handles this by only considering cpuset_current_mems_allowed if a cpuset
exists.  As well as being faster in the fast-path, this removes some
junk in the slowpath.

The performance difference on a page allocator microbenchmark is;

                                             4.6.0-rc2                  4.6.0-rc2
                                      statinline-v1r20              optiter-v1r20
  Min      alloc-odr0-1               412.00 (  0.00%)           382.00 (  7.28%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2               301.00 (  0.00%)           282.00 (  6.31%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4               247.00 (  0.00%)           233.00 (  5.67%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8               215.00 (  0.00%)           203.00 (  5.58%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16              199.00 (  0.00%)           188.00 (  5.53%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-32              191.00 (  0.00%)           182.00 (  4.71%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-64              187.00 (  0.00%)           177.00 (  5.35%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-128             185.00 (  0.00%)           175.00 (  5.41%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-256             193.00 (  0.00%)           184.00 (  4.66%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-512             207.00 (  0.00%)           197.00 (  4.83%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-1024            213.00 (  0.00%)           203.00 (  4.69%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2048            220.00 (  0.00%)           209.00 (  5.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4096            226.00 (  0.00%)           214.00 (  5.31%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8192            229.00 (  0.00%)           218.00 (  4.80%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16384           229.00 (  0.00%)           219.00 (  4.37%)

perf indicated that next_zones_zonelist disappeared in the profile and
__next_zones_zonelist did not appear.  This is expected as the
micro-benchmark would hit the inlined fast-path every time.
Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

zone_statistics has one call-site but it's a public function.  Make it
static and inline.

The performance difference on a page allocator microbenchmark is;

                                             4.6.0-rc2                  4.6.0-rc2
                                      statbranch-v1r20           statinline-v1r20
  Min      alloc-odr0-1               419.00 (  0.00%)           412.00 (  1.67%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2               305.00 (  0.00%)           301.00 (  1.31%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4               250.00 (  0.00%)           247.00 (  1.20%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8               219.00 (  0.00%)           215.00 (  1.83%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16              203.00 (  0.00%)           199.00 (  1.97%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-32              195.00 (  0.00%)           191.00 (  2.05%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-64              191.00 (  0.00%)           187.00 (  2.09%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-128             189.00 (  0.00%)           185.00 (  2.12%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-256             198.00 (  0.00%)           193.00 (  2.53%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-512             210.00 (  0.00%)           207.00 (  1.43%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-1024            216.00 (  0.00%)           213.00 (  1.39%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2048            221.00 (  0.00%)           220.00 (  0.45%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4096            227.00 (  0.00%)           226.00 (  0.44%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8192            232.00 (  0.00%)           229.00 (  1.29%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16384           232.00 (  0.00%)           229.00 (  1.29%)
Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The PageAnon check always checks for compound_head but this is a
relatively expensive check if the caller already knows the page is a
head page.  This patch creates a helper and uses it in the page free
path which only operates on head pages.

With this patch and "Only check PageCompound for high-order pages", the
performance difference on a page allocator microbenchmark is;

                                             4.6.0-rc2                  4.6.0-rc2
                                               vanilla           nocompound-v1r20
  Min      alloc-odr0-1               425.00 (  0.00%)           417.00 (  1.88%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2               313.00 (  0.00%)           308.00 (  1.60%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4               257.00 (  0.00%)           253.00 (  1.56%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8               224.00 (  0.00%)           221.00 (  1.34%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16              208.00 (  0.00%)           205.00 (  1.44%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-32              199.00 (  0.00%)           199.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-64              195.00 (  0.00%)           193.00 (  1.03%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-128             192.00 (  0.00%)           191.00 (  0.52%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-256             204.00 (  0.00%)           200.00 (  1.96%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-512             213.00 (  0.00%)           212.00 (  0.47%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-1024            219.00 (  0.00%)           219.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2048            225.00 (  0.00%)           225.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4096            230.00 (  0.00%)           231.00 ( -0.43%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8192            235.00 (  0.00%)           234.00 (  0.43%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16384           235.00 (  0.00%)           234.00 (  0.43%)
  Min      free-odr0-1                215.00 (  0.00%)           191.00 ( 11.16%)
  Min      free-odr0-2                152.00 (  0.00%)           136.00 ( 10.53%)
  Min      free-odr0-4                119.00 (  0.00%)           107.00 ( 10.08%)
  Min      free-odr0-8                106.00 (  0.00%)            96.00 (  9.43%)
  Min      free-odr0-16                97.00 (  0.00%)            87.00 ( 10.31%)
  Min      free-odr0-32                91.00 (  0.00%)            83.00 (  8.79%)
  Min      free-odr0-64                89.00 (  0.00%)            81.00 (  8.99%)
  Min      free-odr0-128               88.00 (  0.00%)            80.00 (  9.09%)
  Min      free-odr0-256              106.00 (  0.00%)            95.00 ( 10.38%)
  Min      free-odr0-512              116.00 (  0.00%)           111.00 (  4.31%)
  Min      free-odr0-1024             125.00 (  0.00%)           118.00 (  5.60%)
  Min      free-odr0-2048             133.00 (  0.00%)           126.00 (  5.26%)
  Min      free-odr0-4096             136.00 (  0.00%)           130.00 (  4.41%)
  Min      free-odr0-8192             138.00 (  0.00%)           130.00 (  5.80%)
  Min      free-odr0-16384            137.00 (  0.00%)           130.00 (  5.11%)

There is a sizable boost to the free allocator performance.  While there
is an apparent boost on the allocation side, it's likely a co-incidence
or due to the patches slightly reducing cache footprint.
Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Another year, another round of page allocator optimisations focusing
this time on the alloc and free fast paths.  This should be of help to
workloads that are allocator-intensive from kernel space where the cost
of zeroing is not nceessraily incurred.

The series is motivated by the observation that page alloc
microbenchmarks on multiple machines regressed between 3.12.44 and 4.4.
Second, there is discussions before LSF/MM considering the possibility
of adding another page allocator which is potentially hazardous but a
patch series improving performance is better than whining.

After the series is applied, there are still hazards.  In the free
paths, the debugging checking and page zone/pageblock lookups dominate
but there was not an obvious solution to that.  In the alloc path, the
major contributers are dealing with zonelists, new page preperation, the
fair zone allocation and numerous statistic updates.  The fair zone
allocator is removed by the per-node LRU series if that gets merged so
it's nor a major concern at the moment.

On normal userspace benchmarks, there is little impact as the zeroing
cost is significant but it's visible

  aim9
                                 4.6.0-rc3             4.6.0-rc3
                                   vanilla         deferalloc-v3
  Min      page_test   828693.33 (  0.00%)   887060.00 (  7.04%)
  Min      brk_test   4847266.67 (  0.00%)  4966266.67 (  2.45%)
  Min      exec_test     1271.00 (  0.00%)     1275.67 (  0.37%)
  Min      fork_test    12371.75 (  0.00%)    12380.00 (  0.07%)

The overall impact on a page allocator microbenchmark for a range of orders
and number of pages allocated in a batch is

                                            4.6.0-rc3                  4.6.0-rc3
                                               vanilla            deferalloc-v3r7
  Min      alloc-odr0-1               428.00 (  0.00%)           316.00 ( 26.17%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2               314.00 (  0.00%)           231.00 ( 26.43%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4               256.00 (  0.00%)           192.00 ( 25.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8               222.00 (  0.00%)           166.00 ( 25.23%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16              207.00 (  0.00%)           154.00 ( 25.60%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-32              197.00 (  0.00%)           148.00 ( 24.87%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-64              193.00 (  0.00%)           144.00 ( 25.39%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-128             191.00 (  0.00%)           143.00 ( 25.13%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-256             203.00 (  0.00%)           153.00 ( 24.63%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-512             212.00 (  0.00%)           165.00 ( 22.17%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-1024            221.00 (  0.00%)           172.00 ( 22.17%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2048            225.00 (  0.00%)           179.00 ( 20.44%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4096            232.00 (  0.00%)           185.00 ( 20.26%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8192            235.00 (  0.00%)           187.00 ( 20.43%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16384           236.00 (  0.00%)           188.00 ( 20.34%)
  Min      alloc-odr1-1               519.00 (  0.00%)           450.00 ( 13.29%)
  Min      alloc-odr1-2               391.00 (  0.00%)           336.00 ( 14.07%)
  Min      alloc-odr1-4               313.00 (  0.00%)           268.00 ( 14.38%)
  Min      alloc-odr1-8               277.00 (  0.00%)           235.00 ( 15.16%)
  Min      alloc-odr1-16              256.00 (  0.00%)           218.00 ( 14.84%)
  Min      alloc-odr1-32              252.00 (  0.00%)           212.00 ( 15.87%)
  Min      alloc-odr1-64              244.00 (  0.00%)           206.00 ( 15.57%)
  Min      alloc-odr1-128             244.00 (  0.00%)           207.00 ( 15.16%)
  Min      alloc-odr1-256             243.00 (  0.00%)           207.00 ( 14.81%)
  Min      alloc-odr1-512             245.00 (  0.00%)           209.00 ( 14.69%)
  Min      alloc-odr1-1024            248.00 (  0.00%)           214.00 ( 13.71%)
  Min      alloc-odr1-2048            253.00 (  0.00%)           220.00 ( 13.04%)
  Min      alloc-odr1-4096            258.00 (  0.00%)           224.00 ( 13.18%)
  Min      alloc-odr1-8192            261.00 (  0.00%)           229.00 ( 12.26%)
  Min      alloc-odr2-1               560.00 (  0.00%)           753.00 (-34.46%)
  Min      alloc-odr2-2               424.00 (  0.00%)           351.00 ( 17.22%)
  Min      alloc-odr2-4               339.00 (  0.00%)           393.00 (-15.93%)
  Min      alloc-odr2-8               298.00 (  0.00%)           246.00 ( 17.45%)
  Min      alloc-odr2-16              276.00 (  0.00%)           227.00 ( 17.75%)
  Min      alloc-odr2-32              271.00 (  0.00%)           221.00 ( 18.45%)
  Min      alloc-odr2-64              264.00 (  0.00%)           217.00 ( 17.80%)
  Min      alloc-odr2-128             264.00 (  0.00%)           217.00 ( 17.80%)
  Min      alloc-odr2-256             264.00 (  0.00%)           218.00 ( 17.42%)
  Min      alloc-odr2-512             269.00 (  0.00%)           223.00 ( 17.10%)
  Min      alloc-odr2-1024            279.00 (  0.00%)           230.00 ( 17.56%)
  Min      alloc-odr2-2048            283.00 (  0.00%)           235.00 ( 16.96%)
  Min      alloc-odr2-4096            285.00 (  0.00%)           239.00 ( 16.14%)
  Min      alloc-odr3-1               629.00 (  0.00%)           505.00 ( 19.71%)
  Min      alloc-odr3-2               472.00 (  0.00%)           374.00 ( 20.76%)
  Min      alloc-odr3-4               383.00 (  0.00%)           301.00 ( 21.41%)
  Min      alloc-odr3-8               341.00 (  0.00%)           266.00 ( 21.99%)
  Min      alloc-odr3-16              316.00 (  0.00%)           248.00 ( 21.52%)
  Min      alloc-odr3-32              308.00 (  0.00%)           241.00 ( 21.75%)
  Min      alloc-odr3-64              305.00 (  0.00%)           241.00 ( 20.98%)
  Min      alloc-odr3-128             308.00 (  0.00%)           244.00 ( 20.78%)
  Min      alloc-odr3-256             317.00 (  0.00%)           249.00 ( 21.45%)
  Min      alloc-odr3-512             327.00 (  0.00%)           256.00 ( 21.71%)
  Min      alloc-odr3-1024            331.00 (  0.00%)           261.00 ( 21.15%)
  Min      alloc-odr3-2048            333.00 (  0.00%)           266.00 ( 20.12%)
  Min      alloc-odr4-1               767.00 (  0.00%)           572.00 ( 25.42%)
  Min      alloc-odr4-2               578.00 (  0.00%)           429.00 ( 25.78%)
  Min      alloc-odr4-4               474.00 (  0.00%)           346.00 ( 27.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr4-8               422.00 (  0.00%)           310.00 ( 26.54%)
  Min      alloc-odr4-16              399.00 (  0.00%)           295.00 ( 26.07%)
  Min      alloc-odr4-32              392.00 (  0.00%)           293.00 ( 25.26%)
  Min      alloc-odr4-64              394.00 (  0.00%)           293.00 ( 25.63%)
  Min      alloc-odr4-128             405.00 (  0.00%)           305.00 ( 24.69%)
  Min      alloc-odr4-256             417.00 (  0.00%)           319.00 ( 23.50%)
  Min      alloc-odr4-512             425.00 (  0.00%)           326.00 ( 23.29%)
  Min      alloc-odr4-1024            426.00 (  0.00%)           329.00 ( 22.77%)
  Min      free-odr0-1                216.00 (  0.00%)           178.00 ( 17.59%)
  Min      free-odr0-2                152.00 (  0.00%)           125.00 ( 17.76%)
  Min      free-odr0-4                120.00 (  0.00%)            99.00 ( 17.50%)
  Min      free-odr0-8                106.00 (  0.00%)            85.00 ( 19.81%)
  Min      free-odr0-16                97.00 (  0.00%)            80.00 ( 17.53%)
  Min      free-odr0-32                92.00 (  0.00%)            76.00 ( 17.39%)
  Min      free-odr0-64                89.00 (  0.00%)            74.00 ( 16.85%)
  Min      free-odr0-128               89.00 (  0.00%)            73.00 ( 17.98%)
  Min      free-odr0-256              107.00 (  0.00%)            90.00 ( 15.89%)
  Min      free-odr0-512              117.00 (  0.00%)           108.00 (  7.69%)
  Min      free-odr0-1024             125.00 (  0.00%)           118.00 (  5.60%)
  Min      free-odr0-2048             132.00 (  0.00%)           125.00 (  5.30%)
  Min      free-odr0-4096             135.00 (  0.00%)           130.00 (  3.70%)
  Min      free-odr0-8192             137.00 (  0.00%)           130.00 (  5.11%)
  Min      free-odr0-16384            137.00 (  0.00%)           131.00 (  4.38%)
  Min      free-odr1-1                318.00 (  0.00%)           289.00 (  9.12%)
  Min      free-odr1-2                228.00 (  0.00%)           207.00 (  9.21%)
  Min      free-odr1-4                182.00 (  0.00%)           165.00 (  9.34%)
  Min      free-odr1-8                163.00 (  0.00%)           146.00 ( 10.43%)
  Min      free-odr1-16               151.00 (  0.00%)           135.00 ( 10.60%)
  Min      free-odr1-32               146.00 (  0.00%)           129.00 ( 11.64%)
  Min      free-odr1-64               145.00 (  0.00%)           130.00 ( 10.34%)
  Min      free-odr1-128              148.00 (  0.00%)           134.00 (  9.46%)
  Min      free-odr1-256              148.00 (  0.00%)           137.00 (  7.43%)
  Min      free-odr1-512              151.00 (  0.00%)           140.00 (  7.28%)
  Min      free-odr1-1024             154.00 (  0.00%)           143.00 (  7.14%)
  Min      free-odr1-2048             156.00 (  0.00%)           144.00 (  7.69%)
  Min      free-odr1-4096             156.00 (  0.00%)           142.00 (  8.97%)
  Min      free-odr1-8192             156.00 (  0.00%)           140.00 ( 10.26%)
  Min      free-odr2-1                361.00 (  0.00%)           457.00 (-26.59%)
  Min      free-odr2-2                258.00 (  0.00%)           224.00 ( 13.18%)
  Min      free-odr2-4                208.00 (  0.00%)           223.00 ( -7.21%)
  Min      free-odr2-8                185.00 (  0.00%)           160.00 ( 13.51%)
  Min      free-odr2-16               173.00 (  0.00%)           149.00 ( 13.87%)
  Min      free-odr2-32               166.00 (  0.00%)           145.00 ( 12.65%)
  Min      free-odr2-64               166.00 (  0.00%)           146.00 ( 12.05%)
  Min      free-odr2-128              169.00 (  0.00%)           148.00 ( 12.43%)
  Min      free-odr2-256              170.00 (  0.00%)           152.00 ( 10.59%)
  Min      free-odr2-512              177.00 (  0.00%)           156.00 ( 11.86%)
  Min      free-odr2-1024             182.00 (  0.00%)           162.00 ( 10.99%)
  Min      free-odr2-2048             181.00 (  0.00%)           160.00 ( 11.60%)
  Min      free-odr2-4096             180.00 (  0.00%)           159.00 ( 11.67%)
  Min      free-odr3-1                431.00 (  0.00%)           367.00 ( 14.85%)
  Min      free-odr3-2                306.00 (  0.00%)           259.00 ( 15.36%)
  Min      free-odr3-4                249.00 (  0.00%)           208.00 ( 16.47%)
  Min      free-odr3-8                224.00 (  0.00%)           186.00 ( 16.96%)
  Min      free-odr3-16               208.00 (  0.00%)           176.00 ( 15.38%)
  Min      free-odr3-32               206.00 (  0.00%)           174.00 ( 15.53%)
  Min      free-odr3-64               210.00 (  0.00%)           178.00 ( 15.24%)
  Min      free-odr3-128              215.00 (  0.00%)           182.00 ( 15.35%)
  Min      free-odr3-256              224.00 (  0.00%)           189.00 ( 15.62%)
  Min      free-odr3-512              232.00 (  0.00%)           195.00 ( 15.95%)
  Min      free-odr3-1024             230.00 (  0.00%)           195.00 ( 15.22%)
  Min      free-odr3-2048             229.00 (  0.00%)           193.00 ( 15.72%)
  Min      free-odr4-1                561.00 (  0.00%)           439.00 ( 21.75%)
  Min      free-odr4-2                418.00 (  0.00%)           318.00 ( 23.92%)
  Min      free-odr4-4                339.00 (  0.00%)           269.00 ( 20.65%)
  Min      free-odr4-8                299.00 (  0.00%)           239.00 ( 20.07%)
  Min      free-odr4-16               289.00 (  0.00%)           234.00 ( 19.03%)
  Min      free-odr4-32               291.00 (  0.00%)           235.00 ( 19.24%)
  Min      free-odr4-64               298.00 (  0.00%)           238.00 ( 20.13%)
  Min      free-odr4-128              308.00 (  0.00%)           251.00 ( 18.51%)
  Min      free-odr4-256              321.00 (  0.00%)           267.00 ( 16.82%)
  Min      free-odr4-512              327.00 (  0.00%)           269.00 ( 17.74%)
  Min      free-odr4-1024             326.00 (  0.00%)           271.00 ( 16.87%)
  Min      total-odr0-1               644.00 (  0.00%)           494.00 ( 23.29%)
  Min      total-odr0-2               466.00 (  0.00%)           356.00 ( 23.61%)
  Min      total-odr0-4               376.00 (  0.00%)           291.00 ( 22.61%)
  Min      total-odr0-8               328.00 (  0.00%)           251.00 ( 23.48%)
  Min      total-odr0-16              304.00 (  0.00%)           234.00 ( 23.03%)
  Min      total-odr0-32              289.00 (  0.00%)           224.00 ( 22.49%)
  Min      total-odr0-64              282.00 (  0.00%)           218.00 ( 22.70%)
  Min      total-odr0-128             280.00 (  0.00%)           216.00 ( 22.86%)
  Min      total-odr0-256             310.00 (  0.00%)           243.00 ( 21.61%)
  Min      total-odr0-512             329.00 (  0.00%)           273.00 ( 17.02%)
  Min      total-odr0-1024            346.00 (  0.00%)           290.00 ( 16.18%)
  Min      total-odr0-2048            357.00 (  0.00%)           304.00 ( 14.85%)
  Min      total-odr0-4096            367.00 (  0.00%)           315.00 ( 14.17%)
  Min      total-odr0-8192            372.00 (  0.00%)           317.00 ( 14.78%)
  Min      total-odr0-16384           373.00 (  0.00%)           319.00 ( 14.48%)
  Min      total-odr1-1               838.00 (  0.00%)           739.00 ( 11.81%)
  Min      total-odr1-2               619.00 (  0.00%)           543.00 ( 12.28%)
  Min      total-odr1-4               495.00 (  0.00%)           433.00 ( 12.53%)
  Min      total-odr1-8               440.00 (  0.00%)           382.00 ( 13.18%)
  Min      total-odr1-16              407.00 (  0.00%)           353.00 ( 13.27%)
  Min      total-odr1-32              398.00 (  0.00%)           341.00 ( 14.32%)
  Min      total-odr1-64              389.00 (  0.00%)           336.00 ( 13.62%)
  Min      total-odr1-128             392.00 (  0.00%)           341.00 ( 13.01%)
  Min      total-odr1-256             391.00 (  0.00%)           344.00 ( 12.02%)
  Min      total-odr1-512             396.00 (  0.00%)           349.00 ( 11.87%)
  Min      total-odr1-1024            402.00 (  0.00%)           357.00 ( 11.19%)
  Min      total-odr1-2048            409.00 (  0.00%)           364.00 ( 11.00%)
  Min      total-odr1-4096            414.00 (  0.00%)           366.00 ( 11.59%)
  Min      total-odr1-8192            417.00 (  0.00%)           369.00 ( 11.51%)
  Min      total-odr2-1               921.00 (  0.00%)          1210.00 (-31.38%)
  Min      total-odr2-2               682.00 (  0.00%)           576.00 ( 15.54%)
  Min      total-odr2-4               547.00 (  0.00%)           616.00 (-12.61%)
  Min      total-odr2-8               483.00 (  0.00%)           406.00 ( 15.94%)
  Min      total-odr2-16              449.00 (  0.00%)           376.00 ( 16.26%)
  Min      total-odr2-32              437.00 (  0.00%)           366.00 ( 16.25%)
  Min      total-odr2-64              431.00 (  0.00%)           363.00 ( 15.78%)
  Min      total-odr2-128             433.00 (  0.00%)           365.00 ( 15.70%)
  Min      total-odr2-256             434.00 (  0.00%)           371.00 ( 14.52%)
  Min      total-odr2-512             446.00 (  0.00%)           379.00 ( 15.02%)
  Min      total-odr2-1024            461.00 (  0.00%)           392.00 ( 14.97%)
  Min      total-odr2-2048            464.00 (  0.00%)           395.00 ( 14.87%)
  Min      total-odr2-4096            465.00 (  0.00%)           398.00 ( 14.41%)
  Min      total-odr3-1              1060.00 (  0.00%)           872.00 ( 17.74%)
  Min      total-odr3-2               778.00 (  0.00%)           633.00 ( 18.64%)
  Min      total-odr3-4               632.00 (  0.00%)           510.00 ( 19.30%)
  Min      total-odr3-8               565.00 (  0.00%)           452.00 ( 20.00%)
  Min      total-odr3-16              524.00 (  0.00%)           424.00 ( 19.08%)
  Min      total-odr3-32              514.00 (  0.00%)           415.00 ( 19.26%)
  Min      total-odr3-64              515.00 (  0.00%)           419.00 ( 18.64%)
  Min      total-odr3-128             523.00 (  0.00%)           426.00 ( 18.55%)
  Min      total-odr3-256             541.00 (  0.00%)           438.00 ( 19.04%)
  Min      total-odr3-512             559.00 (  0.00%)           451.00 ( 19.32%)
  Min      total-odr3-1024            561.00 (  0.00%)           456.00 ( 18.72%)
  Min      total-odr3-2048            562.00 (  0.00%)           459.00 ( 18.33%)
  Min      total-odr4-1              1328.00 (  0.00%)          1011.00 ( 23.87%)
  Min      total-odr4-2               997.00 (  0.00%)           747.00 ( 25.08%)
  Min      total-odr4-4               813.00 (  0.00%)           615.00 ( 24.35%)
  Min      total-odr4-8               721.00 (  0.00%)           550.00 ( 23.72%)
  Min      total-odr4-16              689.00 (  0.00%)           529.00 ( 23.22%)
  Min      total-odr4-32              683.00 (  0.00%)           528.00 ( 22.69%)
  Min      total-odr4-64              692.00 (  0.00%)           531.00 ( 23.27%)
  Min      total-odr4-128             713.00 (  0.00%)           556.00 ( 22.02%)
  Min      total-odr4-256             738.00 (  0.00%)           586.00 ( 20.60%)
  Min      total-odr4-512             753.00 (  0.00%)           595.00 ( 20.98%)
  Min      total-odr4-1024            752.00 (  0.00%)           600.00 ( 20.21%)

This patch (of 27):

order-0 pages by definition cannot be compound so avoid the check in the
fast path for those pages.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: use unlikely(order) in free_pages_prepare(), per Vlastimil]
Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

__alloc_pages_may_oom is the central place to decide when the
out_of_memory should be invoked.  This is a good approach for most
checks there because they are page allocator specific and the allocation
fails right after for all of them.

The notable exception is GFP_NOFS context which is faking
did_some_progress and keep the page allocator looping even though there
couldn't have been any progress from the OOM killer.  This patch doesn't
change this behavior because we are not ready to allow those allocation
requests to fail yet (and maybe we will face the reality that we will
never manage to safely fail these request).  Instead __GFP_FS check is
moved down to out_of_memory and prevent from OOM victim selection there.
There are two reasons for that

	- OOM notifiers might release some memory even from this context
	  as none of the registered notifier seems to be FS related
	- this might help a dying thread to get an access to memory
          reserves and move on which will make the behavior more
          consistent with the case when the task gets killed from a
          different context.

Keep a comment in __alloc_pages_may_oom to make sure we do not forget
how GFP_NOFS is special and that we really want to do something about
it.

Note to the current oom_notifier users:

The observable difference for you is that oom notifiers cannot depend on
any fs locks because we could deadlock.  Not that this would be allowed
today because that would just lockup machine in most of the cases and
ruling out the OOM killer along the way.  Another difference is that
callbacks might be invoked sooner now because GFP_NOFS is a weaker
reclaim context and so there could be reclaimable memory which is just
not reachable now.  That would require GFP_NOFS only loads which are
really rare and more importantly the observable result would be dropping
of reconstructible object and potential performance drop which is not
such a big deal when we are struggling to fulfill other important
allocation requests.
Signed-off-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Raushaniya Maksudova <rmaksudova@parallels.com>
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

ZONE_MOVABLE could be treated as highmem so we need to consider it for
accurate statistics.  And, in following patches, ZONE_CMA will be
introduced and it can be treated as highmem, too.  So, instead of
manually adding stat of ZONE_MOVABLE, looping all zones and check
whether the zone is highmem or not and add stat of the zone which can be
treated as highmem.
Signed-off-by: NJoonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Reviewed-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

There is a system thats node's pfns are overlapped as follows:

  -----pfn-------->
  N0 N1 N2 N0 N1 N2

Therefore, we need to care this overlapping when iterating pfn range.

mark_free_pages() iterates requested zone's pfn range and unset all
range's bitmap first.  And then it marks freepages in a zone to the
bitmap.  If there is an overlapping zone, above unset could clear
previous marked bit and reference to this bitmap in the future will
cause the problem.  To prevent it, this patch adds a zone check in
mark_free_pages().
Signed-off-by: NJoonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

__offline_isolated_pages() and test_pages_isolated() are used by memory
hotplug.  These functions require that range is in a single zone but
there is no code to do this because memory hotplug checks it before
calling these functions.  To avoid confusing future user of these
functions, this patch adds comments to them.
Signed-off-by: NJoonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

__free_pages_boot_core has parameter pfn which is not used at all.
Remove it.
Signed-off-by: NLi Zhang <zhlcindy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: NPan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Many developers already know that field for reference count of the
struct page is _count and atomic type.  They would try to handle it
directly and this could break the purpose of page reference count
tracepoint.  To prevent direct _count modification, this patch rename it
to _refcount and add warning message on the code.  After that, developer
who need to handle reference count will find that field should not be
accessed directly.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix comments, per Vlastimil]
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: Documentation/vm/transhuge.txt too]
[sfr@canb.auug.org.au: sync ethernet driver changes]
Signed-off-by: NJoonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: NStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Sunil Goutham <sgoutham@cavium.com>
Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com>
Cc: Manish Chopra <manish.chopra@qlogic.com>
Cc: Yuval Mintz <yuval.mintz@qlogic.com>
Cc: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@mellanox.com>
Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Khugepaged attempts to raise min_free_kbytes if its set too low.
However, on boot khugepaged sets min_free_kbytes first from
subsys_initcall(), and then the mm 'core' over-rides min_free_kbytes
after from init_per_zone_wmark_min(), via a module_init() call.

Khugepaged used to use a late_initcall() to set min_free_kbytes (such
that it occurred after the core initialization), however this was
removed when the initialization of min_free_kbytes was integrated into
the starting of the khugepaged thread.

The fix here is simply to invoke the core initialization using a
core_initcall() instead of module_init(), such that the previous
initialization ordering is restored.  I didn't restore the
late_initcall() since start_stop_khugepaged() already sets
min_free_kbytes via set_recommended_min_free_kbytes().

This was noticed when we had a number of page allocation failures when
moving a workload to a kernel with this new initialization ordering.  On
an 8GB system this restores min_free_kbytes back to 67584 from 11365
when CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE=y is set and either
CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_ALWAYS=y or
CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_MADVISE=y.

Fixes: 79553da2 ("thp: cleanup khugepaged startup")
Signed-off-by: NJason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>
Acked-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NDavid Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Hanjun Guo has reported that a CMA stress test causes broken accounting of
CMA and free pages:

> Before the test, I got:
> -bash-4.3# cat /proc/meminfo | grep Cma
> CmaTotal:         204800 kB
> CmaFree:          195044 kB
>
>
> After running the test:
> -bash-4.3# cat /proc/meminfo | grep Cma
> CmaTotal:         204800 kB
> CmaFree:         6602584 kB
>
> So the freed CMA memory is more than total..
>
> Also the the MemFree is more than mem total:
>
> -bash-4.3# cat /proc/meminfo
> MemTotal:       16342016 kB
> MemFree:        22367268 kB
> MemAvailable:   22370528 kB

Laura Abbott has confirmed the issue and suspected the freepage accounting
rewrite around 3.18/4.0 by Joonsoo Kim.  Joonsoo had a theory that this is
caused by unexpected merging between MIGRATE_ISOLATE and MIGRATE_CMA
pageblocks:

> CMA isolates MAX_ORDER aligned blocks, but, during the process,
> partialy isolated block exists. If MAX_ORDER is 11 and
> pageblock_order is 9, two pageblocks make up MAX_ORDER
> aligned block and I can think following scenario because pageblock
> (un)isolation would be done one by one.
>
> (each character means one pageblock. 'C', 'I' means MIGRATE_CMA,
> MIGRATE_ISOLATE, respectively.
>
> CC -> IC -> II (Isolation)
> II -> CI -> CC (Un-isolation)
>
> If some pages are freed at this intermediate state such as IC or CI,
> that page could be merged to the other page that is resident on
> different type of pageblock and it will cause wrong freepage count.

This was supposed to be prevented by CMA operating on MAX_ORDER blocks,
but since it doesn't hold the zone->lock between pageblocks, a race
window does exist.

It's also likely that unexpected merging can occur between
MIGRATE_ISOLATE and non-CMA pageblocks.  This should be prevented in
__free_one_page() since commit 3c605096 ("mm/page_alloc: restrict
max order of merging on isolated pageblock").  However, we only check
the migratetype of the pageblock where buddy merging has been initiated,
not the migratetype of the buddy pageblock (or group of pageblocks)
which can be MIGRATE_ISOLATE.

Joonsoo has suggested checking for buddy migratetype as part of
page_is_buddy(), but that would add extra checks in allocator hotpath
and bloat-o-meter has shown significant code bloat (the function is
inline).

This patch reduces the bloat at some expense of more complicated code.
The buddy-merging while-loop in __free_one_page() is initially bounded
to pageblock_border and without any migratetype checks.  The checks are
placed outside, bumping the max_order if merging is allowed, and
returning to the while-loop with a statement which can't be possibly
considered harmful.

This fixes the accounting bug and also removes the arguably weird state
in the original commit 3c605096 where buddies could be left
unmerged.

Fixes: 3c605096 ("mm/page_alloc: restrict max order of merging on isolated pageblock")
Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/3/2/280Signed-off-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Reported-by: NHanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Tested-by: NHanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Acked-by: NJoonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Debugged-by: NLaura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
Debugged-by: NJoonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>	[3.18+]
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

After the OOM killer is disabled during suspend operation, any
!__GFP_NOFAIL && __GFP_FS allocations are forced to fail.  Thus, any
!__GFP_NOFAIL && !__GFP_FS allocations should be forced to fail as well.
Signed-off-by: NTetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: NDavid Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Upstream has supported page parallel initialisation for X86 and the boot
time is improved greately.  Some tests have been done for Power.

Here is the result I have done with different memory size.

* 4GB memory:
    boot time is as the following:
    with patch vs without patch: 10.4s vs 24.5s
    boot time is improved 57%
* 200GB memory:
    boot time looks the same with and without patches.
    boot time is about 38s
* 32TB memory:
    boot time looks the same with and without patches
    boot time is about 160s.
    The boot time is much shorter than X86 with 24TB memory.
    From community discussion, it costs about 694s for X86 24T system.

Parallel initialisation improves the performance by deferring memory
initilisation to kswap with N kthreads, it should improve the performance
therotically.

In testing on X86, performance is improved greatly with huge memory.  But
on Power platform, it is improved greatly with less than 100GB memory.
For huge memory, it is not improved greatly.  But it saves the time with
several threads at least, as the following information shows(32TB system
log):

[   22.648169] node 9 initialised, 16607461 pages in 280ms
[   22.783772] node 3 initialised, 23937243 pages in 410ms
[   22.858877] node 6 initialised, 29179347 pages in 490ms
[   22.863252] node 2 initialised, 29179347 pages in 490ms
[   22.907545] node 0 initialised, 32049614 pages in 540ms
[   22.920891] node 15 initialised, 32212280 pages in 550ms
[   22.923236] node 4 initialised, 32306127 pages in 550ms
[   22.923384] node 12 initialised, 32314319 pages in 550ms
[   22.924754] node 8 initialised, 32314319 pages in 550ms
[   22.940780] node 13 initialised, 33353677 pages in 570ms
[   22.940796] node 11 initialised, 33353677 pages in 570ms
[   22.941700] node 5 initialised, 33353677 pages in 570ms
[   22.941721] node 10 initialised, 33353677 pages in 570ms
[   22.941876] node 7 initialised, 33353677 pages in 570ms
[   22.944946] node 14 initialised, 33353677 pages in 570ms
[   22.946063] node 1 initialised, 33345485 pages in 580ms

It saves the time about 550*16 ms at least, although it can be ignore to
compare the boot time about 160 seconds.  What's more, the boot time is
much shorter on Power even without patches than x86 for huge memory
machine.

So this patchset is still necessary to be enabled for Power.

This patch (of 2):

This patch is based on Mel Gorman's old patch in the mailing list,
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/5/5/280 which is discussed but it is fixed with
a completion to wait for all memory initialised in page_alloc_init_late().
It is to fix the OOM problem on X86 with 24TB memory which allocates
memory in late initialisation.  But for Power platform with 32TB memory,
it causes a call trace in vfs_caches_init->inode_init() and inode hash
table needs more memory.  So this patch allocates 1GB for 0.25TB/node for
large system as it is mentioned in https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/5/1/627

This call trace is found on Power with 32TB memory, 1024CPUs, 16nodes.
Currently, it only allocates 2GB*16=32GB for early initialisation.  But
Dentry cache hash table needes 16GB and Inode cache hash table needs 16GB.
So the system have no enough memory for it.  The log from dmesg as the
following:

  Dentry cache hash table entries: 2147483648 (order: 18,17179869184 bytes)
  vmalloc: allocation failure, allocated 16021913600 of 17179934720 bytes
  swapper/0: page allocation failure: order:0,mode:0x2080020
  CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.4.0-0-ppc64
  Call Trace:
    .dump_stack+0xb4/0xb664 (unreliable)
    .warn_alloc_failed+0x114/0x160
    .__vmalloc_area_node+0x1a4/0x2b0
    .__vmalloc_node_range+0xe4/0x110
    .__vmalloc_node+0x40/0x50
    .alloc_large_system_hash+0x134/0x2a4
    .inode_init+0xa4/0xf0
    .vfs_caches_init+0x80/0x144
    .start_kernel+0x40c/0x4e0
    start_here_common+0x20/0x4a4
Signed-off-by: NLi Zhang <zhlcindy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Most of the mm subsystem uses pr_<level> so make it consistent.

Miscellanea:

 - Realign arguments
 - Add missing newline to format
 - kmemleak-test.c has a "kmemleak: " prefix added to the
   "Kmemleak testing" logging message via pr_fmt
Signed-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>	[percpu]
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Kernel style prefers a single string over split strings when the string is
'user-visible'.

Miscellanea:

 - Add a missing newline
 - Realign arguments
Signed-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>	[percpu]
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Commit 64775719 ("mm: clarify __GFP_NOFAIL deprecation status") was
incomplete and didn't remove the comment about __GFP_NOFAIL being
deprecated in buffered_rmqueue.

Let's get rid of this leftover but keep the WARN_ON_ONCE for order > 1
because we should really discourage from using __GFP_NOFAIL with higher
order allocations because those are just too subtle.
Signed-off-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <kernel@kyup.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>