- 11 3月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
ext4_releasepage() warns when it is passed a page with PageChecked set. However this can correctly happen when invalidate_inode_pages2_range() invalidates pages - and we should fail the release in that case. Since the page was dirty anyway, it won't be discarded and no harm has happened but it's good to be safe. Also remove bogus page_has_buffers() check - we are guaranteed page has buffers in this function. Reported-by: NZheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com> Tested-by: NZheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
由 Zheng Liu 提交于
When we try to split an extent, this extent could be zeroed out and mark as initialized. But we don't know this in ext4_map_blocks because it only returns a length of allocated extent. Meanwhile we will mark this extent as uninitialized because we only check m_flags. This commit update extent status tree when we try to split an unwritten extent. We don't need to worry about the status of this extent because we always mark it as initialized. Signed-off-by: NZheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
-
由 Dmitry Monakhov 提交于
This commit adds a self-testing infrastructure like extent tree does to do a sanity check for extent status tree. After status tree is as a extent cache, we'd better to make sure that it caches right result. After applied this commit, we will get a lot of messages when we run xfstests as below. ... kernel: ES len assertation failed for inode: 230 retval 1 != map->m_len 3 in ext4_map_blocks (allocation) ... kernel: ES cache assertation failed for inode: 230 es_cached ex [974/2/4781/20] != found ex [974/1/4781/1000] ... kernel: ES insert assertation failed for inode: 635 ex_status [0/45/21388/w] != es_status [44/1/21432/u] ... Signed-off-by: NDmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org> Signed-off-by: NZheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 18 2月, 2013 4 次提交
-
-
由 Zheng Liu 提交于
After tracking all extent status, we already have a extent cache in memory. Every time we want to lookup a block mapping, we can first try to lookup it in extent status tree to avoid a potential disk I/O. A new function called ext4_es_lookup_extent is defined to finish this work. When we try to lookup a block mapping, we always call ext4_map_blocks and/or ext4_da_map_blocks. So in these functions we first try to lookup a block mapping in extent status tree. A new flag EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_NO_PUT_HOLE is used in ext4_da_map_blocks in order not to put a hole into extent status tree because this hole will be converted to delayed extent in the tree immediately. Signed-off-by: NZheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Jan kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
由 Zheng Liu 提交于
By recording the phycisal block and status, extent status tree is able to track the status of every extents. When we call _map_blocks functions to lookup an extent or create a new written/unwritten/delayed extent, this extent will be inserted into extent status tree. We don't load all extents from disk in alloc_inode() because it costs too much memory, and if a file is opened and closed frequently it will takes too much time to load all extent information. So currently when we create/lookup an extent, this extent will be inserted into extent status tree. Hence, the extent status tree may not comprehensively contain all of the extents found in the file. Here a condition we need to take care is that an extent might contains unwritten and delayed status simultaneously because an extent is delayed allocated and could be allocated by fallocate. At this time we need to keep delayed status because later we need to update delayed reservation space using it. Signed-off-by: NZheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Jan kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
由 Zheng Liu 提交于
This commit lets ext4_ext_map_blocks return EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN flag because in later commit ext4_map_blocks needs to use this flag to determine the extent status. Signed-off-by: NZheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
由 Zheng Liu 提交于
This commit adds two members in extent_status structure to let it record physical block and extent status. Here es_pblk is used to record both of them because physical block only has 48 bits. So extent status could be stashed into it so that we can save some memory. Now written, unwritten, delayed and hole are defined as status. Due to new member is added into extent status tree, all interfaces need to be adjusted. Signed-off-by: NZheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
- 15 2月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Use ERR_PTR()/IS_ERR() abstraction instead of passing in a separate pointer to an integer for the error code, as a code cleanup. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Print some additional debugging context to hopefully help to debug a warning which is getting triggered by xfstests #74. Also remove extraneous newlines from when printk's were converted to ext4_warning() and ext4_msg(). Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Some messages printed related to a WARN_ON(1) were printed using KERN_NOTICE. Use KERN_WARNING or ext4_warning() instead so that context related to the WARN_ON() is printed at the same printk warning level (and log files, etc.) Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 09 2月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
The grab_cache_page_write_begin() function can potentially sleep for a long time, since it may need to do memory allocation which can block if the system is under significant memory pressure, and because it may be blocked on page writeback. If it does take a long time to grab the page, it's better that we not hold an active jbd2 handle. So grab a handle on the page first, and _then_ start the transaction handle. This commit fixes the following long transaction handle hold time: postmark-2917 [000] .... 196.435786: jbd2_handle_stats: dev 254,32 tid 570 type 2 line_no 2541 interval 311 sync 0 requested_blocks 1 dirtied_blocks 0 Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
So we can better understand what bits of ext4 are responsible for long-running jbd2 handles, use jbd2__journal_start() so we can pass context information for logging purposes. The recommended way for finding the longer-running handles is: T=/sys/kernel/debug/tracing EVENT=$T/events/jbd2/jbd2_handle_stats echo "interval > 5" > $EVENT/filter echo 1 > $EVENT/enable ./run-my-fs-benchmark cat $T/trace > /tmp/problem-handles This will list handles that were active for longer than 20ms. Having longer-running handles is bad, because a commit started at the wrong time could stall for those 20+ milliseconds, which could delay an fsync() or an O_SYNC operation. Here is an example line from the trace file describing a handle which lived on for 311 jiffies, or over 1.2 seconds: postmark-2917 [000] .... 196.435786: jbd2_handle_stats: dev 254,32 tid 570 type 2 line_no 2541 interval 311 sync 0 requested_blocks 1 dirtied_blocks 0 Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 30 1月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Running AIO is pinning inode in memory using file reference. Once AIO is completed using aio_complete(), file reference is put and inode can be freed from memory. So we have to be sure that calling aio_complete() is the last thing we do with the inode. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: NCarlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> Acked-by: NJeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 29 1月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
So far ext4_writepage() skipped writing pages that had any delayed or unwritten buffers attached. When blocksize < pagesize this breaks data=ordered mode guarantees as we can have a page with one freshly allocated buffer whose allocation is part of the committing transaction and another buffer in the page which is delayed or unwritten. So fix this problem by calling ext4_bio_writepage() anyway. It will submit mapped buffers and leave others alone. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
The argument b_size of mpage_add_bh_to_extent() was bogus since it was always == blocksize (which we can easily derive from inode->i_blkbits). Also second branch of condition: if (nrblocks >= EXT4_MAX_TRANS_DATA) { } else if ((nrblocks + (b_size >> mpd->inode->i_blkbits)) > EXT4_MAX_TRANS_DATA) { } was never taken because (b_size >> mpd->inode->i_blkbits) == 1. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
ext4_writepage(), write_cache_pages_da(), and mpage_da_submit_io() doesn't have to deal with the case when page doesn't have buffers. We attach buffers to a page in ->write_begin() and ->page_mkwrite() which covers all places where a page can become dirty. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 28 1月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
We don't support delayed allocation in data=journal mode. So checking for it in mpage_da_submit_io() doesn't make really sence. If we ever decide to extend delayed allocation support to data=journal mode, adding __ext4_journalled_writepage() call will be the least of problems we have to solve. Most likely we'd have to implement separate writepages call anyways because we don't have transaction credits for writing more than a single page so mapping of page buffers would have to be done differently. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Currently we sometimes used block_write_full_page() and sometimes ext4_bio_write_page() for writeback (depending on mount options and call path). Let's always use ext4_bio_write_page() to simplify things a bit. Reviewed-by: NZheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Zheng Liu 提交于
This patch add supports for indirect file support punching hole. It is almost the same as ext4_ext_punch_hole. First, we invalidate all pages between this hole, and then we try to deallocate all blocks of this hole. A recursive function is used to handle deallocation of blocks. In this function, it iterates over the entries in inode's i_blocks or indirect blocks, and try to free the block for each one of them. After applying this patch, xfstest #255 will not pass w/o extent because indirect-based file doesn't support unwritten extents. Signed-off-by: NZheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 17 1月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Zheng Liu 提交于
This patch adds a tracepoint in ext4_punch_hole. CC: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NZheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 13 1月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Wang Shilong 提交于
Because the function 'sb_getblk' seldomly fails to return NULL value,it will be better to use 'unlikely' to optimize it. Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
The only reason for sb_getblk() failing is if it can't allocate the buffer_head. So ENOMEM is more appropriate than EIO. In addition, make sure that the file system is marked as being inconsistent if sb_getblk() fails. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
- 26 12月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
We cannot wait for transaction commit in journal_unmap_buffer() because we hold page lock which ranks below transaction start. We solve the issue by bailing out of journal_unmap_buffer() and jbd2_journal_invalidatepage() with -EBUSY. Caller is then responsible for waiting for transaction commit to finish and try invalidation again. Since the issue can happen only for page stradding i_size, it is simple enough to manually call jbd2_journal_invalidatepage() for such page from ext4_setattr(), check the return value and wait if necessary. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
In data=journal mode we don't need delalloc or DIO handling in invalidatepage and similarly in other modes we don't need the journal handling. So split invalidatepage implementations. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 11 12月, 2012 6 次提交
-
-
由 Tao Ma 提交于
Signed-off-by: NRobin Dong <sanbai@taobao.com> Signed-off-by: NTao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Tao Ma 提交于
For delayed allocation mode, we write to inline data if the file is small enough. And in case of we write to some offset larger than the inline size, the 1st page is dirtied, so that ext4_da_writepages can handle the conversion. When the 1st page is initialized with blocks, the inline part is removed. Signed-off-by: NTao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Tao Ma 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Tao Ma 提交于
For a normal write case (not journalled write, not delayed allocation), we write to the inline if the file is small and convert it to an extent based file when the write is larger than the max inline size. Signed-off-by: NTao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Tao Ma 提交于
Let readpage and readpages handle the case when we want to read an inlined file. Signed-off-by: NTao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Tao Ma 提交于
Implement inline data with xattr. Now we use "system.data" to store xattr, and the xattr will be extended if the i_size is increased while we don't release the space during truncate. Signed-off-by: NTao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 03 12月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tao Ma 提交于
Currently, in ext4_iget we do a simple check to see whether there does exist some information starting from the end of i_extra_size. With inline data added, this procedure is more complicated. So move it to a new function named ext4_iget_extra_inode. Signed-off-by: NTao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 30 11月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Remove a level of indentation by moving the DIO read and extending write case to the beginning of the file. This results in no actual programmatic changes to the file, but makes it easier to read/understand. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 16 11月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
The calls to ext4_jbd2_file_inode() are needed to guarantee that we do not expose stale data in the data=ordered mode. However, they are not necessary because in all of the cases where we have newly allocated blocks in the delayed allocation write path, we immediately submit the dirty pages for I/O. Hence, we can avoid the overhead of adding the inode to the list of inodes whose data pages will be to be flushed out to disk completely during the next commit operation. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 15 11月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Sandeen 提交于
ext4_da_block_invalidatepages is missing a pagevec_init(), which means that pvec->cold contains random garbage. This affects whether the page goes to the front or back of the LRU when ->cold makes it to free_hot_cold_page() Reviewed-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NCarlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
- 09 11月, 2012 3 次提交
-
-
由 Zheng Liu 提交于
Signed-off-by: NYongqiang Yang <xiaoqiangnk@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NAllison Henderson <achender@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NZheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Zheng Liu 提交于
This patch lets ext4 maintain extent status tree. Currently it only tracks delay extent status in extent status tree. When a delay allocation is issued, the related delay extent will be inserted into extent status tree. When a delay extent is written out or invalidated, it will be removed from this tree. Signed-off-by: NYongqiang Yang <xiaoqiangnk@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NAllison Henderson <achender@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NZheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Anatol Pomozov 提交于
729f52c6 introduced function ext4_get_block_write_nolock() that is very similar to _ext4_get_block(). Eliminate code duplication by passing different flags to _ext4_get_block() Tested: xfs tests Reviewed-by: NZheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com> Signed-off-by: NAnatol Pomozov <anatol.pomozov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 01 10月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Commits 5e8830dc and 41c4d25f introduced a regression into v3.6-rc1 for ext4 in nodealloc mode, such that mtime updates would not take place for files modified via mmap if the page was already in the page cache. This would also affect ext3 file systems mounted using the ext4 file system driver. The problem was that ext4_page_mkwrite() had a shortcut which would avoid calling __block_page_mkwrite() under some circumstances, and the above two commit transferred the responsibility of calling file_update_time() to __block_page_mkwrite --- which woudln't get called in some circumstances. Since __block_page_mkwrite() only has three callers, block_page_mkwrite(), ext4_page_mkwrite, and nilfs_page_mkwrite(), the best way to solve this is to move the responsibility for calling file_update_time() to its caller. This problem was found via xfstests #215 with a file system mounted with -o nodelalloc. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: KONISHI Ryusuke <konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
- 29 9月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Dmitry Monakhov 提交于
Jan Kara have spotted interesting issue: There are potential data corruption issue with direct IO overwrites racing with truncate: Like: dio write truncate_task ->ext4_ext_direct_IO ->overwrite == 1 ->down_read(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem); ->mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex); ->ext4_setattr() ->inode_dio_wait() ->truncate_setsize() ->ext4_truncate() ->down_write(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem); ->__blockdev_direct_IO ->ext4_get_block ->submit_io() ->up_read(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem); # truncate data blocks, allocate them to # other inode - bad stuff happens because # dio is still in flight. In order to serialize with truncate dio worker should grab extra i_dio_count reference before drop i_mutex. Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NDmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Dmitry Monakhov 提交于
If we have enough aggressive DIO readers, truncate and other dio waiters will wait forever inside inode_dio_wait(). It is reasonable to disable nonlock DIO read optimization during truncate. Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NDmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-