- 28 3月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Hutchings 提交于
Define some constant offsets for CALL_REQUEST based on the description at <http://www.techfest.com/networking/wan/x25plp.htm> and the definition of ROSE as using 10-digit (5-byte) addresses. Use them consistently. Validate all implicit and explicit facilities lengths. Validate the address length byte rather than either trusting or assuming its value. Signed-off-by: NBen Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 27 7月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ralf Baechle 提交于
The use of a static buffer in rose2asc() to return its result is not threadproof and can result in corruption if multiple threads are trying to use one of the procfs files based on rose2asc(). Signed-off-by: NRalf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 18 6月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bernard Pidoux 提交于
ROSE network is organized through nodes connected via hamradio or Internet. AX25 packet radio frames sent to a remote ROSE address destination are routed through these nodes. Without the present patch, automatic routing mechanism did not work optimally due to an improper parameter checking. rose_get_neigh() function is called either by rose_connect() or by rose_route_frame(). In the case of a call from rose_connect(), f0 timer is checked to find if a connection is already pending. In that case it returns the address of the neighbour, or returns a NULL otherwise. When called by rose_route_frame() the purpose was to route a packet AX25 frame through an adjacent node given a destination rose address. However, in that case, t0 timer checked does not indicate if the adjacent node is actually connected even if the timer is not null. Thus, for each frame sent, the function often tried to start a new connexion even if the adjacent node was already connected. The patch adds a "new" parameter that is true when the function is called by rose route_frame(). This instructs rose_get_neigh() to check node parameter "restarted". If restarted is true it means that the route to the destination address is opened via a neighbour node already connected. If "restarted" is false the function returns a NULL. In that case the calling function will initiate a new connection as before. This results in a fast routing of frames, from nodes to nodes, until destination is reached, as originaly specified by ROSE protocole. Signed-off-by: NBernard Pidoux <f6bvp@amsat.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 08 10月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexey Dobriyan 提交于
Commit a3d38402 aka "[AX.25]: Fix unchecked rose_add_loopback_neigh uses" transformed rose_loopback_neigh var into statically allocated one. However, on unload it will be kfree's which can't work. Steps to reproduce: modprobe rose rmmod rose BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000008 printing eip: c014c664 *pde = 00000000 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT DEBUG_PAGEALLOC Modules linked in: rose ax25 fan ufs loop usbhid rtc snd_intel8x0 snd_ac97_codec ehci_hcd ac97_bus uhci_hcd thermal usbcore button processor evdev sr_mod cdrom CPU: 0 EIP: 0060:[<c014c664>] Not tainted VLI EFLAGS: 00210086 (2.6.23-rc9 #3) EIP is at kfree+0x48/0xa1 eax: 00000556 ebx: c1734aa0 ecx: f6a5e000 edx: f7082000 esi: 00000000 edi: f9a55d20 ebp: 00200287 esp: f6a5ef28 ds: 007b es: 007b fs: 0000 gs: 0033 ss: 0068 Process rmmod (pid: 1823, ti=f6a5e000 task=f7082000 task.ti=f6a5e000) Stack: f9a55d20 f9a5200c 00000000 00000000 00000000 f6a5e000 f9a5200c f9a55a00 00000000 bf818cf0 f9a51f3f f9a55a00 00000000 c0132c60 65736f72 00000000 f69f9630 f69f9528 c014244a f6a4e900 00200246 f7082000 c01025e6 00000000 Call Trace: [<f9a5200c>] rose_rt_free+0x1d/0x49 [rose] [<f9a5200c>] rose_rt_free+0x1d/0x49 [rose] [<f9a51f3f>] rose_exit+0x4c/0xd5 [rose] [<c0132c60>] sys_delete_module+0x15e/0x186 [<c014244a>] remove_vma+0x40/0x45 [<c01025e6>] sysenter_past_esp+0x8f/0x99 [<c012bacf>] trace_hardirqs_on+0x118/0x13b [<c01025b6>] sysenter_past_esp+0x5f/0x99 ======================= Code: 05 03 1d 80 db 5b c0 8b 03 25 00 40 02 00 3d 00 40 02 00 75 03 8b 5b 0c 8b 73 10 8b 44 24 18 89 44 24 04 9c 5d fa e8 77 df fd ff <8b> 56 08 89 f8 e8 84 f4 fd ff e8 bd 32 06 00 3b 5c 86 60 75 0f EIP: [<c014c664>] kfree+0x48/0xa1 SS:ESP 0068:f6a5ef28 Signed-off-by: NAlexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 13 2月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Arjan van de Ven 提交于
Many struct file_operations in the kernel can be "const". Marking them const moves these to the .rodata section, which avoids false sharing with potential dirty data. In addition it'll catch accidental writes at compile time to these shared resources. Signed-off-by: NArjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 18 12月, 2006 2 次提交
-
-
由 Ralf Baechle 提交于
rose_add_loopback_neigh uses kmalloc and the callers were ignoring the error value. Rewrite to let the caller deal with the allocation. This allows the use of static allocation of kmalloc use entirely. Signed-off-by: NRalf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ralf Baechle 提交于
The recent fix 0506d406 made obvious that error values were not being propagated through the AX.25 stack. To help with that this patch marks all kmalloc users in the AX.25, NETROM and ROSE stacks as __must_check. Signed-off-by: NRalf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 04 5月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ralf Baechle 提交于
Convert all ROSE sysctl time values from jiffies to ms as units. Signed-off-by: NRalf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
-