- 08 6月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Mike Christie 提交于
This has ll_rw_block users pass in the operation and flags separately, so ll_rw_block can setup the bio op and bi_rw flags on the bio that is submitted. Signed-off-by: NMike Christie <mchristi@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: NHannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
-
由 Mike Christie 提交于
This has submit_bh users pass in the operation and flags separately, so submit_bh_wbc can setup the bio op and bi_rw flags on the bio that is submitted. Signed-off-by: NMike Christie <mchristi@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: NHannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
-
- 24 4月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Currently when filesystem needs to make sure data is on permanent storage before committing a transaction it adds inode to transaction's inode list. During transaction commit, jbd2 writes back all dirty buffers that have allocated underlying blocks and waits for the IO to finish. However when doing writeback for delayed allocated data, we allocate blocks and immediately submit the data. Thus asking jbd2 to write dirty pages just unnecessarily adds more work to jbd2 possibly writing back other redirtied blocks. Add support to jbd2 to allow filesystem to ask jbd2 to only wait for outstanding data writes before committing a transaction and thus avoid unnecessary writes. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 05 4月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kirill A. Shutemov 提交于
PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 10 3月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 OGAWA Hirofumi 提交于
On umount path, jbd2_journal_destroy() writes latest transaction ID (->j_tail_sequence) to be used at next mount. The bug is that ->j_tail_sequence is not holding latest transaction ID in some cases. So, at next mount, there is chance to conflict with remaining (not overwritten yet) transactions. mount (id=10) write transaction (id=11) write transaction (id=12) umount (id=10) <= the bug doesn't write latest ID mount (id=10) write transaction (id=11) crash mount [recovery process] transaction (id=11) transaction (id=12) <= valid transaction ID, but old commit must not replay Like above, this bug become the cause of recovery failure, or FS corruption. So why ->j_tail_sequence doesn't point latest ID? Because if checkpoint transactions was reclaimed by memory pressure (i.e. bdev_try_to_free_page()), then ->j_tail_sequence is not updated. (And another case is, __jbd2_journal_clean_checkpoint_list() is called with empty transaction.) So in above cases, ->j_tail_sequence is not pointing latest transaction ID at umount path. Plus, REQ_FLUSH for checkpoint is not done too. So, to fix this problem with minimum changes, this patch updates ->j_tail_sequence, and issue REQ_FLUSH. (With more complex changes, some optimizations would be possible to avoid unnecessary REQ_FLUSH for example though.) BTW, journal->j_tail_sequence = ++journal->j_transaction_sequence; Increment of ->j_transaction_sequence seems to be unnecessary, but ext3 does this. Signed-off-by: NOGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
- 23 2月, 2016 3 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Currently we used atomic bit operations to manipulate __JI_COMMIT_RUNNING bit. However this is unnecessary as i_flags are always written and read under j_list_lock. So just change the operations to standard bit operations. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Revoke and tag descriptor blocks are just different kinds of descriptor blocks and thus have checksum in the same place. Unify computation and checking of checksums for these. Reviewed-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Descriptor block header is initialized in several places. Factor out the common code into jbd2_journal_get_descriptor_buffer(). Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 19 10月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Daeho Jeong 提交于
If a EXT4 filesystem utilizes JBD2 journaling and an error occurs, the journaling will be aborted first and the error number will be recorded into JBD2 superblock and, finally, the system will enter into the panic state in "errors=panic" option. But, in the rare case, this sequence is little twisted like the below figure and it will happen that the system enters into panic state, which means the system reset in mobile environment, before completion of recording an error in the journal superblock. In this case, e2fsck cannot recognize that the filesystem failure occurred in the previous run and the corruption wouldn't be fixed. Task A Task B ext4_handle_error() -> jbd2_journal_abort() -> __journal_abort_soft() -> __jbd2_journal_abort_hard() | -> journal->j_flags |= JBD2_ABORT; | | __ext4_abort() | -> jbd2_journal_abort() | | -> __journal_abort_soft() | | -> if (journal->j_flags & JBD2_ABORT) | | return; | -> panic() | -> jbd2_journal_update_sb_errno() Tested-by: NHobin Woo <hobin.woo@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NDaeho Jeong <daeho.jeong@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
- 18 10月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Darrick J. Wong 提交于
Create separate predicate functions to test/set/clear feature flags, thereby replacing the wordy old macros. Furthermore, clean out the places where we open-coded feature tests. Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Darrick J. Wong 提交于
Instead of overloading EIO for CRC errors and corrupt structures, return the same error codes that XFS returns for the same issues. Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 15 10月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Darrick J. Wong 提交于
Change the journal's checksum functions to gate on whether or not the crc32c driver is loaded, and gate the loading on the superblock bits. This prevents a journal crash if someone loads a journal in no-csum mode and then randomizes the superblock, thus flipping on the feature bits. Tested-By: NNikolay Borisov <kernel@kyup.com> Reported-by: NNikolay Borisov <kernel@kyup.com> Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 29 7月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Commit 6f6a6fda "jbd2: fix ocfs2 corrupt when updating journal superblock fails" changed jbd2_cleanup_journal_tail() to return EIO when the journal is aborted. That makes logic in jbd2_log_do_checkpoint() bail out which is fine, except that jbd2_journal_destroy() expects jbd2_log_do_checkpoint() to always make a progress in cleaning the journal. Without it jbd2_journal_destroy() just loops in an infinite loop. Fix jbd2_journal_destroy() to cleanup journal checkpoint lists of jbd2_log_do_checkpoint() fails with error. Reported-by: NEryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com> Tested-by: NEryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com> Fixes: 6f6a6fdaSigned-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 23 7月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Daeho Jeong 提交于
When an error condition is detected, an error status should be recorded into superblocks of EXT4 or JBD2. However, the write request is submitted now without REQ_FUA flag, even in "barrier=1" mode, which is followed by panic() function in "errors=panic" mode. On mobile devices which make whole system reset as soon as kernel panic occurs, this write request containing an error flag will disappear just from storage cache without written to the physical cells. Therefore, when next start, even forever, the error flag cannot be shown in both superblocks, and e2fsck cannot fix the filesystem problems automatically, unless e2fsck is executed in force checking mode. [ Changed use test_opt(sb, BARRIER) of checking the journal flags -- TYT ] Signed-off-by: NDaeho Jeong <daeho.jeong@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 26 6月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rasmus Villemoes 提交于
In one case, we eliminate a local variable; in the other a strlen() call and some .text. Signed-off-by: NRasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 16 6月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Michal Hocko 提交于
insert_revoke_hash does an open coded endless allocation loop if journal_oom_retry is true. It doesn't implement any allocation fallback strategy between the retries, though. The memory allocator doesn't know about the never fail requirement so it cannot potentially help to move on with the allocation (e.g. use memory reserves). Get rid of the retry loop and use __GFP_NOFAIL instead. We will lose the debugging message but I am not sure it is anyhow helpful. Do the same for journal_alloc_journal_head which is doing a similar thing. Signed-off-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Joseph Qi 提交于
If updating journal superblock fails after journal data has been flushed, the error is omitted and this will mislead the caller as a normal case. In ocfs2, the checkpoint will be treated successfully and the other node can get the lock to update. Since the sb_start is still pointing to the old log block, it will rewrite the journal data during journal recovery by the other node. Thus the new updates will be overwritten and ocfs2 corrupts. So in above case we have to return the error, and ocfs2_commit_cache will take care of the error and prevent the other node to do update first. And only after recovering journal it can do the new updates. The issue discussion mail can be found at: https://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-devel/2015-June/010856.html http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.ext4/48841 [ Fixed bug in patch which allowed a non-negative error return from jbd2_cleanup_journal_tail() to leak out of jbd2_fjournal_flush(); this was causing xfstests ext4/306 to fail. -- Ted ] Reported-by: NYiwen Jiang <jiangyiwen@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Tested-by: NYiwen Jiang <jiangyiwen@huawei.com> Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
- 09 6月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
jbd2_journal_get_write_access() and jbd2_journal_get_create_access() are frequently called for buffers that are already part of the running transaction - most frequently it is the case for bitmaps, inode table blocks, and superblock. Since in such cases we have nothing to do, it is unfortunate we still grab reference to journal head, lock the bh, lock bh_state only to find out there's nothing to do. Improving this is a bit subtle though since until we find out journal head is attached to the running transaction, it can disappear from under us because checkpointing / commit decided it's no longer needed. We deal with this by protecting journal_head slab with RCU. We still have to be careful about journal head being freed & reallocated within slab and about exposing journal head in consistent state (in particular b_modified and b_frozen_data must be in correct state before we allow user to touch the buffer). Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 08 6月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michal Hocko 提交于
This basically reverts 47def826 (jbd2: Remove __GFP_NOFAIL from jbd2 layer). The deprecation of __GFP_NOFAIL was a bad choice because it led to open coding the endless loop around the allocator rather than removing the dependency on the non failing allocation. So the deprecation was a clear failure and the reality tells us that __GFP_NOFAIL is not even close to go away. It is still true that __GFP_NOFAIL allocations are generally discouraged and new uses should be evaluated and an alternative (pre-allocations or reservations) should be considered but it doesn't make any sense to lie the allocator about the requirements. Allocator can take steps to help making a progress if it knows the requirements. Signed-off-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Acked-by: NDavid Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
-
- 02 12月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Darrick J. Wong 提交于
When we're enabling journal features, we cannot use the predicate jbd2_journal_has_csum_v2or3() because we haven't yet set the sb feature flag fields! Moreover, we just finished loading the shash driver, so the test is unnecessary; calculate the seed always. Without this patch, we fail to initialize the checksum seed the first time we turn on journal_checksum, which means that all journal blocks written during that first mount are corrupt. Transactions written after the second mount will be fine, since the feature flag will be set in the journal superblock. xfstests generic/{034,321,322} are the regression tests. (This is important for 3.18.) Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.coM> Reported-by: NEric Whitney <enwlinux@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 26 11月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 11 9月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Darrick J. Wong 提交于
Clear all three journal checksum feature flags before turning on whichever journal checksum options we want. Rearrange the error checking so that newer flags get complained about first. Reported-by: NTR Reardon <thomas_reardon@hotmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 05 9月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Gioh Kim 提交于
Sicne the jbd/jbd2 superblock is not released until the file system is unmounted, allocate the buffer cache from the non-moveable area to allow page migration and CMA allocations to more easily succeed. Signed-off-by: NGioh Kim <gioh.kim@lge.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
- 29 8月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Darrick J. Wong 提交于
It turns out that there are some serious problems with the on-disk format of journal checksum v2. The foremost is that the function to calculate descriptor tag size returns sizes that are too big. This causes alignment issues on some architectures and is compounded by the fact that some parts of jbd2 use the structure size (incorrectly) to determine the presence of a 64bit journal instead of checking the feature flags. Therefore, introduce journal checksum v3, which enlarges the descriptor block tag format to allow for full 32-bit checksums of journal blocks, fix the journal tag function to return the correct sizes, and fix the jbd2 recovery code to use feature flags to determine 64bitness. Add a few function helpers so we don't have to open-code quite so many pieces. Switching to a 16-byte block size was found to increase journal size overhead by a maximum of 0.1%, to convert a 32-bit journal with no checksumming to a 32-bit journal with checksum v3 enabled. Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Reported-by: NTR Reardon <thomas_reardon@hotmail.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
- 09 3月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
The j_state_lock is one of the hottest locks in the jbd2 layer and thus one of its scalability bottlenecks. We don't need to be holding the j_state_lock while we are calling wake_up(&journal->j_wait_commit), so release the lock a little bit earlier. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 18 2月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rashika Kheria 提交于
Mark functions as static in jbd2/journal.c because they are not used outside this file. This eliminates the following warning in jbd2/journal.c: fs/jbd2/journal.c:125:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘jbd2_verify_csum_type’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] fs/jbd2/journal.c:146:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘jbd2_superblock_csum_verify’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] fs/jbd2/journal.c:154:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘jbd2_superblock_csum_set’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] Signed-off-by: NRashika Kheria <rashika.kheria@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> Reviewed-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
-
- 09 12月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Dmitry Monakhov 提交于
Rename performed via: perl -pi -e 's/JBD:/JBD2:/g' fs/jbd2/*.c Signed-off-by: NDmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NCarlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Some of KERN_EMERG printk messages do not really deserve this log level and the one in log_wait_commit() is even rather useless (the journal has been previously aborted and *that* is where we should have been complaining). So make some messages just KERN_ERR and remove the useless message. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 29 8月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Darrick J. Wong 提交于
In the jbd2 checksumming code, explicitly declare separate variables with endianness information so that we don't get confused and screw things up again. Also fixes sparse warnings. Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 01 7月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Some of the functions which modify the jbd2 superblock were not updating the checksum before calling jbd2_write_superblock(). Move the call to jbd2_superblock_csum_set() to jbd2_write_superblock(), so that the checksum is calculated consistently. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
- 13 6月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Paul Gortmaker 提交于
Since the jbd_debug() is implemented with two separate printk() calls, it can lead to corrupted and misleading debug output like the following (see lines marked with "*"): [ 290.339362] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 203): kjournald2: kjournald2 wakes [ 290.339365] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 155): kjournald2: commit_sequence=42103, commit_request=42104 [ 290.339369] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 158): kjournald2: OK, requests differ [* 290.339376] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 648): jbd2_log_wait_commit: [* 290.339379] (fs/jbd2/commit.c, 370): jbd2_journal_commit_transaction: JBD2: want 42104, j_commit_sequence=42103 [* 290.339382] JBD2: starting commit of transaction 42104 [ 290.339410] (fs/jbd2/revoke.c, 566): jbd2_journal_write_revoke_records: Wrote 0 revoke records [ 290.376555] (fs/jbd2/commit.c, 1088): jbd2_journal_commit_transaction: JBD2: commit 42104 complete, head 42079 i.e. the debug output from log_wait_commit and journal_commit_transaction have become interleaved. The output should have been: (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 648): jbd2_log_wait_commit: JBD2: want 42104, j_commit_sequence=42103 (fs/jbd2/commit.c, 370): jbd2_journal_commit_transaction: JBD2: starting commit of transaction 42104 It is expected that this is not easy to replicate -- I was only able to cause it on preempt-rt kernels, and even then only under heavy I/O load. Reported-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Suggested-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Dmitry Monakhov 提交于
Current implementation of jbd2_journal_force_commit() is suboptimal because result in empty and useless commits. But callers just want to force and wait any unfinished commits. We already have jbd2_journal_force_commit_nested() which does exactly what we want, except we are guaranteed that we do not hold journal transaction open. Signed-off-by: NDmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 05 6月, 2013 6 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
In some cases we cannot start a transaction because of locking constraints and passing started transaction into those places is not handy either because we could block transaction commit for too long. Transaction reservation is designed to solve these issues. It reserves a handle with given number of credits in the journal and the handle can be later attached to the running transaction without blocking on commit or checkpointing. Reserved handles do not block transaction commit in any way, they only reduce maximum size of the running transaction (because we have to always be prepared to accomodate request for attaching reserved handle). Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
j_wait_logspace and j_wait_checkpoint are unused. Remove them. Reviewed-by: NZheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
__jbd2_log_space_left() and jbd_space_needed() were kind of odd. jbd_space_needed() accounted also credits needed for currently committing transaction while it didn't account for credits needed for control blocks. __jbd2_log_space_left() then accounted for control blocks as a fraction of free space. Since results of these two functions are always only compared against each other, this works correct but is somewhat strange. Move the estimates so that jbd_space_needed() returns number of blocks needed for a transaction including control blocks and __jbd2_log_space_left() returns free space in the journal (with the committing transaction already subtracted). Rename functions to jbd2_log_space_left() and jbd2_space_needed() while we are changing them. Reviewed-by: NZheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Currently when we add a buffer to a transaction, we wait until the buffer is removed from BJ_Shadow list (so that we prevent any changes to the buffer that is just written to the journal). This can take unnecessarily long as a lot happens between the time the buffer is submitted to the journal and the time when we remove the buffer from BJ_Shadow list. (e.g. We wait for all data buffers in the transaction, we issue a cache flush, etc.) Also this creates a dependency of do_get_write_access() on transaction commit (namely waiting for data IO to complete) which we want to avoid when implementing transaction reservation. So we modify commit code to set new BH_Shadow flag when temporary shadowing buffer is created and we clear that flag once IO on that buffer is complete. This allows do_get_write_access() to wait only for BH_Shadow bit and thus removes the dependency on data IO completion. Reviewed-by: NZheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Similarly as for metadata buffers, also log descriptor buffers don't really need the journal head. So strip it and remove BJ_LogCtl list. Reviewed-by: NZheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
When writing metadata to the journal, we create temporary buffer heads for that task. We also attach journal heads to these buffer heads but the only purpose of the journal heads is to keep buffers linked in transaction's BJ_IO list. We remove the need for journal heads by reusing buffer_head's b_assoc_buffers list for that purpose. Also since BJ_IO list is just a temporary list for transaction commit, we use a private list in jbd2_journal_commit_transaction() for that thus removing BJ_IO list from transaction completely. Reviewed-by: NZheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 28 5月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Zheng Liu 提交于
This commit tries to use kmem_cache_zalloc instead of kmem_cache_alloc/ memset when a new journal head is alloctated. Signed-off-by: NZheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 30 4月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 majianpeng 提交于
bh allocation uses kmem_cache_zalloc() so we needn't call 'init_buffer(bh, NULL, NULL)' and perform other set-zero-operations. Signed-off-by: NJianpeng Ma <majianpeng@gmail.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-