1. 12 8月, 2010 3 次提交
    • A
      mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations · dfe86cba
      Adrian Hunter 提交于
      SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation.  In addition, eMMC v4.4
      cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are
      all variants of the basic erase command.
      
      SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been
      added.
      
      "erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation.  For
      MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card.  Note that
      "erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the
      minimum size is always one 512 byte sector.  For SD, "erase_size" is 512
      if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise.
      
      SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and
      including the whole card.  When erasing a large area it may
      be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons:
      
          1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card
             wait.  This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but
             erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the
             same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a
             several minutes.
      
          2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress.
      
          3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful.
             Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by
             the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several
             minutes for large areas.
      
      "erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD
      where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good
      chunk size for erasing large areas.
      
      For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card
      specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card.
      
      For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by
      the card.
      
      "preferred_erase_size" is in bytes.
      Signed-off-by: NAdrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
      Acked-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
      Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com>
      Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
      Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
      Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      dfe86cba
    • R
      pc8736x_gpio: depends on X86_32 · 7b958090
      Randy Dunlap 提交于
      Fix kconfig dependency warning for PC8736x_GPIO by restricting it to
      X86_32.
      
        warning: (SCx200_GPIO && SCx200 || PC8736x_GPIO && X86) selects NSC_GPIO which has unmet direct dependencies (X86_32)
      
      NSC_GPIO is X86_32 only.  The other driver (SCx200_GPIO) that selects
      NSC_GPIO is X86_32 only (indirectly, since SCx200 depends on X86_32), so
      limit this driver also.
      Signed-off-by: NRandy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
      Cc: Jordan Crouse <jordan.crouse@amd.com>
      Cc: Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      7b958090
    • T
      acpi: fix bogus preemption logic · 0a7992c9
      Thomas Gleixner 提交于
      The ACPI_PREEMPTION_POINT() logic was introduced in commit 8bd108d1
      (ACPICA: add preemption point after each opcode parse).  The follow up
      commits abe1dfab, 138d1569, c084ca70 tried to fix the preemption logic
      back and forth, but nobody noticed that the usage of
      in_atomic_preempt_off() in that context is wrong.
      
      The check which guards the call of cond_resched() is:
      
          if (!in_atomic_preempt_off() && !irqs_disabled())
      
      in_atomic_preempt_off() is not intended for general use as the comment
      above the macro definition clearly says:
      
       * Check whether we were atomic before we did preempt_disable():
       * (used by the scheduler, *after* releasing the kernel lock)
      
      On a CONFIG_PREEMPT=n kernel the usage of in_atomic_preempt_off() works by
      accident, but with CONFIG_PREEMPT=y it's just broken.
      
      The whole purpose of the ACPI_PREEMPTION_POINT() is to reduce the latency
      on a CONFIG_PREEMPT=n kernel, so make ACPI_PREEMPTION_POINT() depend on
      CONFIG_PREEMPT=n and remove the in_atomic_preempt_off() check.
      
      Addresses https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16210
      
      [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix build]
      Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
      Cc: Francois Valenduc <francois.valenduc@tvcablenet.be>
      Cc: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
      Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      0a7992c9
  2. 11 8月, 2010 37 次提交